RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Significant practice variation exists in the amount of resuscitative IV fluid given to patients with sepsis. Current research suggests equipoise between a tightly restrictive or more liberal strategy but data is lacking on a wider range of resuscitation practices. We sought to examine the relationship between a wide range of fluid resuscitation practices and sepsis mortality and then identify the primary driver of this practice variation. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of the Premier Healthcare Database. SETTING: Six hundred twelve U.S. hospitals. PATIENTS: Patients with sepsis and septic shock admitted from the emergency department to the ICU from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019. INTERVENTIONS: The volume of resuscitative IV fluid administered before the end of hospital day- 1 and mortality. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In total, 190,682 patients with sepsis and septic shock were included in the analysis. Based upon patient characteristics and illness severity, we predicted that physicians should prescribe patients with sepsis a narrow mean range of IV fluid (95% range, 3.6-4.5 L). Instead, we observed wide variation in the mean IV fluids administered (95% range, 1.7-7.4 L). After splitting the patients into five groups based upon attending physician practice, we observed patients in the moderate group (4.0 L; interquartile range [IQR], 2.4-5.1 L) experienced a 2.5% reduction in risk-adjusted mortality compared with either the very low (1.6 L; IQR, 1.0-2.5 L) or very high (6.1 L; IQR, 4.0-9.0 L) fluid groups p < 0.01). An analysis of within- and between-hospital IV fluid resuscitation practices showed that physician variation within hospitals instead of practice differences between hospitals accounts for the observed variation. CONCLUSIONS: Individual physician practice drives excess variation in the amount of IV fluid given to patients with sepsis. A moderate approach to IV fluid resuscitation is associated with decreased sepsis mortality and should be tested in future randomized controlled trials.
Asunto(s)
Fluidoterapia , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Sepsis , Humanos , Fluidoterapia/métodos , Sepsis/mortalidad , Sepsis/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Resucitación/métodos , Choque Séptico/mortalidad , Choque Séptico/terapia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between length of ICU stay and 1-year mortality for elderly patients who survived to hospital discharge in the United States. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of a random sample of Medicare beneficiaries who survived to hospital discharge, with 1- and 3-year follow-up, stratified by the number of days of intensive care and with additional stratification based on receipt of mechanical ventilation. INTERVENTIONS: None. PATIENTS: The cohort included 34,696 Medicare beneficiaries older than 65 years who received intensive care and survived to hospital discharge in 2005. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 34,696 patients who survived to hospital discharge, the mean ICU length of stay was 3.4 days (± 4.5 d). Patients (88.9%) were in the ICU for 1-6 days, representing 58.6% of ICU bed-days. Patients (1.3%) were in the ICU for 21 or more days, but these patients used 11.6% of bed-days. The percentage of mechanically ventilated patients increased with increasing length of stay (6.3% for 1-6 d in the ICU and 71.3% for ≥ 21 d). One-year mortality was 26.6%, ranging from 19.4% for patients in the ICU for 1 day, up to 57.8% for patients in the ICU for 21 or more days. For each day beyond 7 days in the ICU, there was an increased odds of death by 1 year of 1.04 (95% CI, 1.03-1.05) irrespective of the need for mechanical ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing ICU length of stay is associated with higher 1-year mortality for both mechanically ventilated and non-mechanically ventilated patients. No specific cutoff was associated with a clear plateau or sharp increase in long-term risk.
Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Alta del Paciente , Respiración Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and risk factors for readmission to the intensive care unit (ICU) among preterm infants who required mechanical ventilation at birth. STUDY DESIGN: We studied preterm newborns (birth weight 500-1250 g) who required mechanical ventilation at birth and were enrolled in a multicenter trial of inhaled nitric oxide therapy. Patients were assessed up to 4.5 years of age via annual in-person evaluations and structured telephone interviews. Univariate and multivariable analyses of baseline and birth hospitalization predictors of ICU readmission were performed. RESULTS: Of 512 subjects providing follow-up data, 58% were readmitted to the hospital (51% of these had multiple readmissions, averaging 3.9 readmissions per subject), 19% were readmitted to an ICU, and 12% required additional mechanical ventilation support. In univariate analyses, ICU readmission was more common among male subjects (OR 2.01; 95% CI 1.27-3.18), infants with grade 3-4 intracranial hemorrhage (OR 2.13; 95% CI 1.23-3.69), increasing duration of birth hospitalization (OR 1.01 per day; 95% CI 1.00-1.02), and prolonged oxygen therapy (OR 1.01 per day; 95% CI 1.00-1.01). In the first year after birth hospitalization, children readmitted to an ICU incurred greater health care costs (median $69,700 vs $30,200 for subjects admitted to the ward and $9600 for subjects never admitted). CONCLUSIONS: Small preterm infants who were mechanically ventilated at birth have substantial risk for readmission to an ICU and late mechanical ventilation, require extensive health care resources, and incur high treatment costs.
Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Respiración Artificial , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia , Preescolar , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Masculino , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
The objective of the current study was to characterize the epidemiology and resource use of U.S. children hospitalized with ophthalmologic disease secondary to erythema multiforme (EM), Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). We studied children ages 5 to 19 years hospitalized in 2005 in 11 states, encompassing 38% of the U.S. pediatric population. Using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes, we identified admissions of children with EM, SJS, or TEN and the presence of concurrent ophthalmologic disease, analyzed patient and hospitalization characteristics, and generated age- and sex-adjusted national estimates. We identified 460 children admitted with EM, SJS, or TEN, corresponding to 1,229 U.S. hospitalizations in 2005. Of the children with EM, SJS, or TEN, 60 (13.0%) had ophthalmologic disease, primarily (90.0%) disorders of the conjunctiva. Children with the highest proportions of ophthalmologic disease included those with mycoplasma pneumonia (26.7%), herpes simplex virus (15.6%), upper respiratory infection (13.9%), and lower respiratory infection (13.7%). Individuals with EM, SJS, or TEN and ophthalmologic disease were more likely than those without ophthalmologic disease to receive intensive care unit care (28.3% vs 17.0%, p = 0.03) and to be admitted to a children's hospital (63.3% vs 48.8%, p = 0.03). Ophthalmologic disease was also associated with a significantly longer median length of stay (6.0 days, interquartile range [IQR] 3-9 days vs 3.0 days, IQR 2-6 days, p < 0.001) and median hospital cost ($7,868, IQR $3,539-$17,440 vs $2,969, IQR $1,603-$8,656, p < 0.001). In children with EM, SJS, or TEN, ophthalmologic disease was most common in those with concurrent Mycoplasma pneumoniae and herpes simplex virus infections. Ophthalmologic disease was associated with considerably higher inpatient resource use in this population. Children with EM, SJS, or TEN should be screened and treated early for ophthalmologic disease to prevent morbidity and minimize long-term sequellae.
Asunto(s)
Eritema Multiforme/complicaciones , Oftalmopatías/epidemiología , Oftalmopatías/etiología , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/complicaciones , Adolescente , Niño , Niño Hospitalizado/estadística & datos numéricos , Preescolar , Eritema Multiforme/epidemiología , Femenino , Costos de Hospital , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Incidencia , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Factores de Riesgo , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: In the past decade, guidelines have been developed for the early detection and management of severe sepsis in children and neonates. However, severe sepsis continues to be a significant U.S. healthcare problem, accounting for over 720,000 annual hospitalizations. Large-scale epidemiologic studies of severe sepsis continue to be limited, particularly in children. We present data from 1995, 2000, and 2005 in seven U.S. states, examining how case mix, outcome, and resource use for pediatric severe sepsis have changed over time. DESIGN: We constructed a database including all acute-care hospitalizations for children in the seven states. For each case, we extracted data on demographic characteristics; the principal diagnosis, up to six secondary diagnoses, and six procedures as classified by the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes; and in-hospital fatality. We identified patients with severe sepsis using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes for both infection and acute organ failure. SETTING: Retrospective observational cohort dataset from seven U.S. states from 1995, 2000, and 2005. SUBJECTS: Children in the U.S. 0-19 years old. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In 2005, 17,542 children were hospitalized with severe sepsis in the seven states; there was an 81% increase in pediatric severe sepsis cases since 1995 and a 45% increase since 2000. This corresponded to an increase in prevalence from 0.56 to 0.89 cases per 1,000 pediatric population. Between 1995 and 2005, the prevalence of severe sepsis in newborns more than doubled, from 4.5 to 9.7 cases per 1,000 births. The most common infecting organisms in all 3 years were Staphylococcus species. From 1995 to 2005, the case-fatality rate decreased from 10.3% to 8.9%. Case fatality associated with Staphylococcus aureus increased, whereas fatality associated with Streptococcus pneumoniae decreased by 75%. Nationally, there were 75,255 pediatric hospitalizations in 2005 involving severe sepsis, with an associated cost of $4.8 billion. CONCLUSIONS: Between 1995 and 2005, the prevalence of severe sepsis in U.S. children steadily rose, due to a significant increase in the prevalence of severe sepsis in newborns.
Asunto(s)
Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Sepsis/epidemiología , Adolescente , Distribución por Edad , Peso al Nacer , Niño , Preescolar , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Costos de Hospital , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Prevalencia , Grupos Raciales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sepsis/microbiología , Sepsis/mortalidad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Although neurologic disorders are among the most serious acute pediatric illnesses, epidemiologic data are scarce. We sought to determine the scope and outcomes of children with these disorders in the United States. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: All nonfederal hospitals in 11 states encompassing 38% of the U.S. pediatric population. PATIENTS: Children 29 days to 19 years old hospitalized in 2005. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification, codes, we identified admissions with neurologic diagnoses, analyzed patient and hospitalization characteristics, and generated age- and sex-adjusted national estimates. Of 960,020 admissions in the 11 states, 10.7% (103,140) included a neurologic diagnosis, which yields a national estimate of 273,900 admissions of children with neurologic diagnoses. The most common were seizures (53.9%) and traumatic brain injury (17.3%). Children with neurologic diagnoses had nearly three times greater ICU use than other hospitalized children (30.6% vs 10.6%, p < 0.001). Neurologic diagnoses were associated with nearly half of deaths (46.2%, n = 1,790). Among ICU patients, children with neurologic diagnoses had more than three times the mortality of other patients (4.8% vs1.5%, p < 0.001). Children with neurologic diagnoses had a significantly longer median hospital length of stay than other children (3 d [1, 5] vs 2 d [2, 4], p < 0.001) and greater median hospital costs ($4,630 [$2,380, $9,730] vs $2,840 [$1,520, $5,550], p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Children with neurologic diagnoses account for a disproportionate amount of ICU stays and deaths compared with children hospitalized for other reasons.
Asunto(s)
Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Humanos , Lactante , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To estimate federal dollars spent on critical care research, the cost of providing critical care, and to determine whether the percentage of federal research dollars spent on critical care research is commensurate with the financial burden of critical care. DESIGN AND DATA SOURCES: The National Institutes of Health Computer Retrieval of Information on Scientific Projects database was queried to identify funded grants whose title or abstract contained a key word potentially related to critical care. Each grant identified was analyzed by two reviewers (three if the analysis was discordant) to subjectively determine whether it was definitely, possibly, or definitely not related to critical care. Hospital and total costs of critical care were estimated from the Premier Database, state discharge data, and Medicare data. To estimate healthcare expenditures associated with caring for critically ill patients, total costs were calculated as the combination of hospitalization costs that included critical illness as well as additional costs in the year after hospital discharge. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 19,257 grants funded by the National Institutes of Health, 332 (1.7%) were definitely related to critical care and a maximum of 1212 (6.3%) grants were possibly related to critical care. Between 17.4% and 39.0% of total hospital costs were spent on critical care, and a total of between $121 and $263 billion was estimated to be spent on patients who required intensive care. This represents 5.2% to 11.2%, respectively, of total U.S. healthcare spending. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of research dollars spent on critical care is lower than the percentage of healthcare expenditures related to critical illness.
Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Enfermedad Crítica/economía , Apoyo a la Investigación como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Financiación Gubernamental/economía , Financiación Gubernamental/estadística & datos numéricos , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/economía , National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/estadística & datos numéricos , Apoyo a la Investigación como Asunto/economía , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Hospitalization increases the risk of a subsequent diagnosis of dementia. We aimed to identify diagnoses or events during a hospitalization requiring critical care that are associated with a subsequent dementia diagnosis in the elderly. METHODS: A cohort study of a random 5% sample of Medicare beneficiaries who received intensive care in 2005 and survived to hospital discharge, with three years of follow-up (through 2008) was conducted using Medicare claims files. We defined dementia using the International Classification of Diseases, 9th edition, clinical modification (ICD-9-CM) codes and excluded patients with any prior diagnosis of dementia or cognitive impairment in the year prior to admission. We used an extended Cox model to examine the association between diagnoses and events associated with the critical illness and a subsequent diagnosis of dementia, adjusting for known risk factors for dementia. RESULTS: Over the three years of follow-up, dementia was newly diagnosed in 4,519 (17.8%) of 25,368 patients who received intensive care and survived to hospital discharge. After accounting for known risk factors, having an infection (adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) = 1.25; 95% CI, 1.17 to 1.35), or a diagnosis of severe sepsis (AHR = 1.40; 95% CI, 1.28 to 1.53), acute neurologic dysfunction (AHR = 2.06; 95% CI, 1.72 to 2.46), and acute dialysis (AHR = 1.70; 95% CI, 1.30 to 2.23) were all independently associated with a subsequent diagnosis of dementia. No other measured ICU factors, such as need for mechanical ventilation, were independently associated. CONCLUSIONS: Among ICU events, infection or severe sepsis, neurologic dysfunction, and acute dialysis were independently associated with a subsequent diagnosis of dementia. Patient prognostication, as well as future research into post-ICU cognitive decline, should focus on these higher-risk subgroups.
Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Crítica/epidemiología , Demencia/etiología , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Demencia/epidemiología , Diálisis/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Infecciones/complicaciones , Masculino , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/complicaciones , Factores de Riesgo , Sepsis/complicaciones , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
RATIONALE: The United States has seven times as many intensive care unit (ICU) beds per capita as the United Kingdom; the effect on care of critically ill patients is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To compare medical ICU admissions in the United States and United Kingdom. METHODS: Retrospective (2002-2004) cohort study of 172,785 ICU admissions (137 United States ICUs, Project IMPACT database; 160 United Kingdom ICUs, Case Mix Program) with patients followed until initial hospital discharge. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: United Kingdom (vs. United States) admissions were less likely to be admitted directly from the emergency room (ER) (33.4% vs. 58%); had longer hospital stays before ICU admission (mean days 2.6 ± 8.2 vs. 1 ± 3.6); and fewer were greater than or equal to 85 years (3.2% vs. 7.8%). United Kingdom patients were more frequently mechanically ventilated within 24 hours after ICU admission (68% vs. 27.4%); were sicker (mean Acute Physiology Score 16.7 ± 7.6 vs. 10.6 ± 6.8); and had higher primary hospital mortality (38% vs. 15.9%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.73; 95% confidence interval, 1.50-1.99). There was no mortality difference for mechanically ventilated patients admitted from the ER (adjusted odds ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.89-1.33). Comparisons of hospital mortality were confounded by differences in case mix; hospital length of stay (United Kingdom median 10 d [interquartile range {IQR}, 3-24] vs. United States 6 d [IQR, 3-11]; and discharge practices (more United States patients were discharged to skilled care facilities [29% of survivors vs. 6% in the United Kingdom]). CONCLUSIONS: Lower United Kingdom ICU bed availability is associated with fewer direct admissions from the ER, longer hospital stays before ICU admission, and higher severity of illness. Interpretation of between-country hospital outcomes is confounded by differences in case mix, processes of care, and discharge practices.
Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención al Paciente/normas , Respiración Artificial , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Reino Unido , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
AIMS: Our primary objective was to determine whether all-cause rates of mortality and resource utilization were higher during periods of diabetic foot ulceration. In support of this objective, a secondary objective was to develop and validate an episode-of-care model for diabetic foot ulceration. METHODS: We evaluated data from the Medicare Limited Data Set between 2013 and 2019. We defined episodes-of-care by clustering diabetic foot ulcer related claims such that the longest time interval between consecutive claims in any cluster did not exceed a duration which was adjusted to match two aspects of foot ulcer episodes that are well-established in the literature: healing rate at 12 weeks, and reulceration rate following healing. We compared rates of outcomes during periods of ulceration to rates immediately following healing to estimate incidence ratios. RESULTS: The episode-of-care model had a minimum mean relative error of 4.2% in the two validation criteria using a clustering duration of seven weeks. Compared to periods after healing, all-cause inpatient admissions were 2.8 times more likely during foot ulcer episodes and death was 1.5 times more likely. CONCLUSIONS: A newly-validated episode-of-care model for diabetic foot ulcers suggests an underappreciated association between foot ulcer episodes and all-cause resource utilization and mortality.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Pie Diabético , Anciano , Pie Diabético/epidemiología , Pie Diabético/etiología , Hospitalización , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Medicare , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Cicatrización de HeridasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Few contemporary population-based data exist about the incidence, patient characteristics, and outcomes of mechanical ventilation in acute care hospitals. We sought to describe the epidemiology of mechanical ventilation use in the United States. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using year 2005 hospital discharge records from six states. National projections were generated from age-, race-, and sex-specific rates in the cohort. SETTING: Nonfederal acute care hospitals. PATIENTS: All discharges that included invasive mechanical ventilation identified using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification procedure codes (96.7x). INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 6,469,674 hospitalizations in the six states, 180,326 (2.8%) received invasive mechanical ventilation. There was a wide age distribution with 52.2% of patients <65 yrs of age. A total of 44.6% had at least one major comorbid condition. The most common comorbidities included diabetes (13.2%) and pulmonary disease (13.2%). Inhospital mortality was 34.5%, and only 30.8% of patients were discharged home from the hospital. Almost all patients received care in urban (73.5%) or suburban (23.6%) hospitals vs. rural hospitals (2.9%). Patients in urban hospitals experienced a higher number of organ dysfunctions, more dialysis and tracheostomies, and higher mortality compared with patients in rural hospitals. Projecting to national estimates, there were 790,257 hospitalizations involving mechanical ventilation in 2005, representing 2.7 episodes of mechanical ventilation per 1000 population. Estimated national costs were $27 billion representing 12% of all hospital costs. Incidence, mortality, and cumulative population costs rose significantly with age. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical ventilation use is common and accounts for a disproportionate amount of resource use, particularly in urban hospitals and in elderly patients. Mortality for mechanically ventilated patients is high. Quality improvement and cost-reduction strategies targeted at these patients are warranted.
Asunto(s)
Respiración Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Costos y Análisis de Costo/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Capacidad de Camas en Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitales Rurales/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Urbanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Respiración Artificial/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC or "the Campaign") developed guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. A performance improvement initiative targeted changing clinical behavior (process improvement) via bundles based on key SSC guideline recommendations. DESIGN AND SETTING: A multifaceted intervention to facilitate compliance with selected guideline recommendations in the intensive care unit, emergency department, and wards of individual hospitals and regional hospital networks was implemented voluntarily in the United States, Europe, and South America. Elements of the guidelines were "bundled" into two sets of targets to be completed within 6 hrs and within 24 hrs. An analysis was conducted on data submitted from January 2005 through March 2008. SUBJECTS: A total of 15,022 subjects. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data from 15,022 subjects at 165 sites were analyzed to determine the compliance with bundle targets and association with hospital mortality. Compliance with the entire resuscitation bundle increased linearly from 10.9% in the first site quarter to 31.3% by the end of 2 yrs (p < .0001). Compliance with the entire management bundle started at 18.4% in the first quarter and increased to 36.1% by the end of 2 yrs (p = .008). Compliance with all bundle elements increased significantly, except for inspiratory plateau pressure, which was high at baseline. Unadjusted hospital mortality decreased from 37% to 30.8% over 2 yrs (p = .001). The adjusted odds ratio for mortality improved the longer a site was in the Campaign, resulting in an adjusted absolute drop of 0.8% per quarter and 5.4% over 2 yrs (95% confidence interval, 2.5-8.4). CONCLUSIONS: The Campaign was associated with sustained, continuous quality improvement in sepsis care. Although not necessarily cause and effect, a reduction in reported hospital mortality rates was associated with participation. The implications of this study may serve as an impetus for similar improvement efforts.
Asunto(s)
Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Sepsis/terapia , Intervalos de Confianza , Promoción de la Salud , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Auditoría Médica , Oportunidad Relativa , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Sepsis/mortalidad , Choque Séptico/mortalidad , Choque Séptico/terapia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
RATIONALE: Despite broad concern regarding the provision and cost of health care at the end of life, country-specific patterns of care have rarely been compared. OBJECTIVES: To assess the use of hospital and intensive care services during terminal hospitalizations in England and the United States, two populations with similar socioeconomic backgrounds and life expectancies. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study over a 1-year period (2001) using national (England) Hospital Episode Statistics, and regional (seven U.S. states) administrative discharge data as well as English and U.S. census data. We measured hospitalization rates and death rates during hospitalization with and without intensive care. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Age-adjusted acute hospitalization rates were 110.5 per 1,000 population in England versus 105.3 in the seven U.S. states, with the same mortality rate (0.9 per 1,000 population) in both countries. Of all deaths, 50.3% occurred in hospital in England and 36.6% in the United States, yet only 5.1% of all deaths in England involved intensive care, versus 17.2% in the United States, representing 10.1% of hospital deaths in England versus 47.1% in the United States. Greater intensive care use in the U.S. was most notable with older age; among decedents 85+ years, intensive care was used for 31.5% of medical deaths and 61.0% of surgical deaths in the United States versus 1.9 and 8.5% of deaths in England. CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar overall hospitalization rates in England and the United States, there were marked differences in terminal hospitalizations, with far greater use of intensive care services in the United States, especially among medical patients and the elderly population.
Asunto(s)
Comparación Transcultural , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidado Terminal/métodos , Distribución por Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Cuidados Críticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Inglaterra , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/métodos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
CONTEXT: Although hospital mortality has decreased over time in the United States for patients who receive intensive care, little is known about subsequent outcomes for those discharged alive. OBJECTIVE: To assess 3-year outcomes for Medicare beneficiaries who survive intensive care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: A matched, retrospective cohort study was conducted using a 5% sample of Medicare beneficiaries older than 65 years. A random half of all patients were selected who received intensive care and survived to hospital discharge in 2003 with 3-year follow-up through 2006. From the other half of the sample, 2 matched control groups were generated: hospitalized patients who survived to discharge (hospital controls) and the general population (general controls), individually matched on age, sex, race, and whether they had surgery (for hospital controls). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Three-year mortality after hospital discharge. RESULTS: There were 35,308 intensive care unit (ICU) patients who survived to hospital discharge. The ICU survivors had a higher 3-year mortality (39.5%; n = 13,950) than hospital controls (34.5%; n = 12,173) (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.07 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.04-1.10]; P < .001) and general controls (14.9%; n = 5266) (AHR, 2.39 [95% CI, 2.31-2.48]; P < .001). The ICU survivors who did not receive mechanical ventilation had minimal increased risk compared with hospital controls (3-year mortality, 38.3% [n = 12,716] vs 34.6% [n=11,470], respectively; AHR, 1.04 [95% CI, 1.02-1.07]). Those receiving mechanical ventilation had substantially increased mortality (57.6% [1234 ICU survivors] vs 32.8% [703 hospital controls]; AHR, 1.56 [95% CI, 1.40-1.73]), with risk concentrated in the 6 months after the quarter of hospital discharge (6-month mortality, 30.1% (n = 645) for those receiving mechanical ventilation vs 9.6% (n = 206) for hospital controls; AHR, 2.26 [95% CI, 1.90-2.69]). Discharge to a skilled care facility for ICU survivors (33.0%; n = 11,634) and hospital controls (26.4%; n = 9328) also was associated with high 6-month mortality (24.1% for ICU survivors and hospital controls discharged to a skilled care facility vs 7.5% for ICU survivors and hospital controls discharged home; AHR, 2.62 [95% CI, 2.50-2.74]; P < .001 for ICU survivors and hospital controls combined). CONCLUSIONS: There is a large US population of elderly individuals who survived the ICU stay to hospital discharge but who have a high mortality over the subsequent years in excess of that seen in comparable controls. The risk is concentrated early after hospital discharge among those who require mechanical ventilation.
Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad/tendencias , Sobrevivientes , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Alta del Paciente , Readmisión del Paciente , Respiración Artificial , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riesgo , Instituciones de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
CONTEXT: Severe sepsis, defined as infection complicated by acute organ dysfunction, occurs more frequently and leads to more deaths in black than in white individuals. The optimal approach to minimize these disparities is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent to which higher severe sepsis rates in black than in white patients are due to higher infection rates or to a higher risk of acute organ dysfunction. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Analysis of infection-related hospitalizations from the 2005 hospital discharge data of 7 US states and infection-related emergency department visits from the 2003-2007 National Hospital Ambulatory Care Survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Age- and sex-standardized severe sepsis and infection hospitalization rates and the risk of acute organ dysfunction. RESULTS: Of 8,661,227 non-childbirth-related discharges, 2,261,857 were associated with an infection, and of these, 381,787 (16.8%) had severe sepsis. Black patients had a 67% higher age- and sex-standardized severe sepsis rate than did white patients (9.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.3-9.5 vs 5.6; 95% CI, 5.6-5.6 per 1000 population; P < .001) and 80% higher standardized mortality (1.8, 95% CI, 1.8-1.9 vs 1.0, 95% CI, 1.0-1.1 per 1000 population; P < .001). The higher severe sepsis rate was explained by both a higher infection rate in black patients (47.3; 95% CI, 47.1-47.4 vs 34.0; 95% CI, 33.9-34.0 per 1000 population; incidence rate ratio, 1.39; P < .001) and a higher risk of developing acute organ dysfunction (age- and sex-adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.29; 95% CI, 1.27-1.30; P < .001). Differences in infection presented broadly across different sites and etiology of infection and for community- and hospital-acquired infections and occurred despite a lower likelihood of being admitted for infection from the emergency department (adjusted OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.64-0.76; P < .001). The higher risk of organ dysfunction persisted but was attenuated after adjusting for age, sex, comorbid conditions, poverty, and hospital effect (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.13-1.16; P < .001). Racial disparities in infection and severe sepsis incidence and mortality rates were largest among younger adults (eg, the proportion of invasive pneumococcal disease occurring in adults < 65 years was 73.9% among black patients vs 44.5% among white patients, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Racial differences in severe sepsis are explained by both a higher infection rate and a higher risk of acute organ dysfunction in black than in white individuals.
Asunto(s)
Población Negra , Infecciones/epidemiología , Sepsis/etnología , Sepsis/epidemiología , Población Blanca , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Corazón/fisiopatología , Humanos , Incidencia , Infecciones/complicaciones , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Riñón/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Insuficiencia Respiratoria , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Sepsis/etiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate compliance with American College of Surgeons (ACS) guidelines and whether trauma center designation, hospital traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) case volume or spinal surgery volume is associated with paralysis. We hypothesized a priori that trauma center care, by contrast to nontrauma center care, is associated with reduced paralysis at discharge. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Approximately 11,000 persons incur a TSCI in the United States annually. The ACS recommends all TSCI patients be taken to a level I or II trauma center. METHODS: We studied 4121 patients diagnosed with TSCI by ICD-9-CM criteria in the 2001 hospital discharge files of 7 states (Florida, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Texas, Virginia, Washington), who were treated in 100 trauma centers and 601 nontrauma centers. We performed multivariate analyses, including a propensity score quintile approach, adjusting for differences in case mix and clustering by hospital and by state. We also studied 3125 patients using the expanded modified Medicare Provider Analysis and Review records for the years 1996, 2001, and 2006 to assess temporal trends in paralysis by trauma center designation. RESULTS: Mortality was 7.5%, and 16.3% were discharged with paralysis. Only 57.9% (n = 2378) received care at a designated trauma center. Trauma centers had a 16-fold higher admission caseload (20.7 vs. 1.3; P < 0.001) and 30-fold higher surgical volume (9.6 vs. 0.3; P < 0.001). In the multivariate propensity analysis, paralysis was significantly lower at trauma centers (adjusted odds ratio 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.85; P = 0.001). Higher surgical volume, not higher admission volume, was associated with lower risk of paralysis. Indeed, at nontrauma centers, higher admission caseload was associated with worse outcome. There was no significant difference in mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Trauma center care is associated with reduced paralysis after TSCI, possibly because of greater use of spinal surgery. National guidelines to triage all such patients to trauma centers are followed little more than half the time.
Asunto(s)
Adhesión a Directriz , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Parálisis/etiología , Parálisis/prevención & control , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/complicaciones , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/cirugía , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
RATIONALE: Higher rates of sepsis have been reported in minorities. OBJECTIVES: To explore racial differences in the incidence and associated case fatality of severe sepsis, accounting for clinical, social, health care service delivery, and geographic characteristics. METHODS: Retrospective population-based cohort study using hospital discharge and U.S. Census data for all persons (n = 71,102,655) living in 68 hospital referral regions in six states. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Age-, sex- and race-standardized severe sepsis incidence and inpatient case fatality rates, adjusted incidence rate ratios, and adjusted intensive care unit (ICU) admission and case fatality rate differences. Of 8,938,111 nonfederal hospitalizations, 282,292 had severe sepsis. Overall, blacks had the highest age- and sex-standardized population-based incidence (6.08/1,000 vs. 4.06/1,000 for Hispanics and 3.58/1,000 for whites) and ICU case fatality (32.1 vs. 30.4% for Hispanics and 29.3% for whites, P < 0.0001). Adjusting for differences in poverty in their region of residence, blacks still had a higher population-based incidence of severe sepsis (adjusted rate ratio, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.42-1.46]) than whites, but Hispanics had a lower incidence (adjusted rate ratio, 0.91 [0.90-0.92]). Among patients with severe sepsis admitted to the ICU, adjustments for clinical characteristics and the treating hospital fully explained blacks' higher ICU case fatality. CONCLUSIONS: Higher adjusted black incidence and the lower Hispanic incidence may reflect residual confounding, or it could signal biologic differences in susceptibility. Focused interventions to improve processes and outcomes of care at the hospitals that disproportionately treat blacks could narrow disparities in overall mortality from severe sepsis.
Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Sepsis/etnología , Sepsis/mortalidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Negro o Afroamericano , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Cuidados Críticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Hispánicos o Latinos , Capacidad de Camas en Hospitales , Hospitales de Enseñanza/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Urbanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sepsis/terapia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Población BlancaRESUMEN
RATIONALE: Regionalization has been proposed as a method to improve outcomes for medical patients receiving mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit. OBJECTIVES: To determine the number of patients who would be affected by regionalization and the potential mortality reduction under a regionalized system of care. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study with Monte Carlo simulation, using 2001 state discharge data from eight states representing 42% of the U.S. population. Adult medical patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation were identified. Patient location and hospital mortality rates were obtained from the discharge data; estimates of the relative risk reduction in hospital mortality for high-volume hospitals compared with low-volume hospitals were obtained from the published literature and applied to the cohort. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 180,976 adult medical patients who underwent mechanical ventilation at 1,170 nonfederal hospitals, 83,050 (46%) received mechanical ventilation at 887 (76%) hospitals with low annual volumes (fewer than 275 patients per year). Using published risk estimates, approximately 4,720 lives per year (95% range, 2,522-6,744) could potentially be saved in the 8 states by routinely transferring patients from low- to high-volume hospitals, representing a number needed to treat of 15.7. The median distance that patients would need to travel to reach a high-volume hospital was 8.5 miles (interquartile range, 4.0-21.2 mi). CONCLUSIONS: Regionalization of intensive care could potentially improve survival for patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. Transfer distances are modest for most patients.
Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Derivación y Consulta , Respiración Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Cohortes , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Método de Montecarlo , Transferencia de Pacientes , Regionalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Respiración Artificial/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The past 10-15 yrs brought significant changes in the United States healthcare system. Effects on Medicare intensive care unit use and costs are unknown. Intensive care unit costs are estimated using the Russell equation with a ratio of intensive care unit to floor cost per day, or "R value," of 3, which may no longer be valid. We sought to determine contemporary Medicare intensive care unit resource use, costs, and R values; whether these vary by patient and hospital characteristics; and the impact of updated values on estimated intensive care unit costs. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of Medicare Inpatient Prospective Payment System hospitalizations from 1994 to 2004 using Medicare Provider Analysis and Review files. SETTING: All nonfederal acute care US hospitals paid through the Inpatient Prospective Payment System. SUBJECTS: Inpatient prospective payment system hospitalizations from 1994 to 2004 (n = 121,747, 260). INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We examined resource use and costs (adjusted to y2004$), calculating intensive care unit and floor costs directly and using these to generate year-specific R values. By 2004, 33% of Medicare hospitalizations had intensive care unit or coronary care unit care, with more than half of the increase in total hospitalizations because of additional intensive care unit hospitalizations. Adjusted intensive care unit cost per day remained stable ($2,616 vs. $2,575; 1994 vs 2004), yet adjusted floor cost per day rose substantially ($1,027 vs. $1,488) driven by decreased floor length of stay. Annual adjusted Medicare intensive care unit costs increased 36% to $32.3B, largely because of increased utilization. R values decreased progressively from 2.55 to 1.73, were lower for surgical vs. medical admissions and survivors vs. nonsurvivors, but varied little by hospital characteristics. An R value of 3 overestimated Medicare intensive care unit costs by 17.6% ($5.7 billion) in 2004. CONCLUSIONS: Medicare intensive care unit use is rising rapidly and will likely continue to do so. Despite significant healthcare system changes, adjusted daily critical care costs remained stable, yet care outside the intensive care unit became more expensive. To track intensive care unit cost over time, year-specific R values should be used.
Asunto(s)
Administración Hospitalaria/economía , Costos de Hospital/tendencias , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/economía , Medicare/economía , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Pago Prospectivo/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Sexuales , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Critical care represents a large percentage of healthcare spending in developed countries. Yet, little is known regarding international variation in critical care services. We sought to understand differences in critical care delivery by comparing data on the distribution of services in eight countries. DESIGN: Retrospective review of existing national administrative data. We identified sources of data in each country to provide information on acute care hospitals and beds, intensive care units and beds, intensive care admissions, and definitions of intensive care beds. Data were all referenced and from as close to 2005 as possible. SETTING: United States, France, United Kingdom, Canada, Belgium, Germany, The Netherlands, and Spain. PATIENTS: Not available. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: No standard definition existed for acute care hospital or intensive care unit beds across countries. Hospital beds varied three-fold from 221/100,000 population in the United States to 593/100,000 in Germany. Adult intensive care unit beds also ranged seven-fold from 3.3/100,000 population in the United Kingdom to 24.0/100,000 in Germany. Volume of intensive care unit admissions per year varied ten-fold from 216/100,000 population in the United Kingdom to 2353/100,000 in Germany. The ratio of intensive care unit beds to hospital beds was highly correlated across all countries except the United States (r = .90). There was minimal correlation between the number of intensive care unit beds per capita and health care spending per capita (r = .45), but high inverse correlation between intensive care unit beds and hospital mortality for intensive care unit patients across countries (r = -.82). CONCLUSIONS: Absolute critical care services vary dramatically between countries with wide differences in both numbers of beds and volume of admissions. The number of intensive care unit beds per capita is not strongly correlated with overall health expenditure, but does correlate strongly with mortality. These findings demonstrate the need for critical care data from all countries, as they are essential for interpretation of studies, and policy decisions regarding critical care services.