[Practices for hospital discharge of patients with pulmonary embolism in university and central hospital emergency call services]. / Muuttaisiko riskiluokituksen käyttö kotiutuskäytäntöä? Keuhkoemboliapotilaan kotiutuskäytännöt yliopisto- ja keskussairaalapäivystyksessä.

INTRODUCTION: The recommendation to discharge low-risk pulmonary embolism patients from or after a brief monitoring in the emergency department has not been widely adopted in Finland. METHODS: We explored the practices for examination and treatment of patients with pulmonary embolism in a university hospital and a central hospital. An assessment was made on how these practices followed the risk classifications. RESULTS: A very small proportion (3.9%) of the patients were discharged directly from the emergency department. According to the risk classifications, the proportion of patients suited for home care would have been between 30 and 60%. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of patients with pulmonary embolism can be treated on the outpatient basis.

High Bleeding Incidence in Unselected Hospitalized Suspected Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Aged Under 65 Years.

High bleeding risk (HBR) is commonly encountered among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and bleeding complications are associated with worse prognosis. Data on bleeding events of patients with ACS are based almost exclusively on percutaneous coronary intervention registries. Enrolling only patients suitable for invasive procedures might have skewed the observed bleeding incidence. We sought to investigate bleeding incidence in unselected patients with ACS. Patients were retrospectively enrolled between January and June 2019 from the emergency department of a tertiary hospital. All consecutive hospitalized adults with suspected non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were included. Data was gathered by a database search and verified using electronic patient records. Bleeding risk was assessed according to the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) definition. The primary end point was a composite of post- discharge Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2, 3, and 5 bleeding during 1-year follow-up. Of the 209 included patients, 15 (7.2%) suffered a bleeding event. There were more bleeding events among dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) users as compared with those without DAPT (10.7% vs 3.1%, p = 0.033). Among HBR patients, 6.1% and in non-HBR patients 8.1% suffered a bleeding event (p = 0.579). Notably, major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3) incidence was highest in patients <65 years and without DAPT use. In conclusion, unselected suspected non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients aged <65 years had surprisingly high bleeding incidence, regardless of ARC-HBR status or DAPT use.

Prevalence of High Bleeding Risk among Hospitalized Suspected NSTEMI Patients.

In recent years, guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) have placed more emphasis on identifying patients at high bleeding risk (HBR). We set out to investigate the prevalence of HBR patients according to the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) criteria in hospitalized patients with suspected non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Consecutive patients were retrospectively enrolled between January and June 2019 from the emergency department (ED) of a tertiary hospital. The discharge diagnosis and baseline data were manually collected using electronic patient records and database searches. Patients with non-cardiac diagnoses were excluded. Overall, 212 patients were included in the study. A total of 146 (68.9%) patients were diagnosed with NSTEMI (Type 1), 47 (22.2%) with unstable angina pectoris (UAP) and 19 (9.0%) with "other." HBR was detected in 47.6% (n = 101) of all patients. Common criteria for HBR among ACS patients were age (40.4%), chronic kidney disease (33.7%), and the use of oral anticoagulation medicines (20.2%). In conclusion, nearly half of the patients hospitalized for ACS fulfilled HBR criteria. According to contemporary guidelines, the management of HBR patients differs from that of non-HBR patients, and thus, a more comprehensive screening for HBR may be considered in clinical practice.

Incidence of influenza in Finnish children.

BACKGROUND: Influenza is an important cause of respiratory illness in children, but data on virologically confirmed influenza infections in children treated as outpatients are limited. METHODS: We carried out a prospective cohort study of normal children younger than 13 years (n = 1338) in the winter of 2000 to 2001. During the study period of 32 weeks, the children were examined at the study clinic whenever they had fever or signs of respiratory infection. Nasal swabs were obtained during each episode of infection for determination of the viral etiology of the illness. RESULTS: The overall attack rate of influenza in the cohort was 18.8%. Influenza viruses were isolated from the children from the beginning of November 2000 through May 2001. Virtually in each week between mid-November and the end of April (a period of 24 weeks), influenza viruses accounted for at least 5% of all respiratory infections in the children. During the peak of the epidemic, the percentage of influenza-positive children exceeded 20%. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the important role of influenza as a cause of acute respiratory infections in children, even in winters of mild or moderate influenza activity. The study also shows that influenza viruses may circulate in the community at substantial levels much longer than previously thought.