Clinical and Echocardiographic Outcomes after Aortic Valve Repair in Patients with Bicuspid or Unicuspid Aortic Valve.

BACKGROUND: Unicuspid and bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) are congenital cardiac anomalies associated with valvular dysfunction and aortopathies occurring at a young age. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate our experience with aortic valve repair (AVr) in patients with bicuspid or unicuspid aortic valves. METHODS: Eighty patients with BAV or unicuspid aortic valve (UAV) underwent AVr. Mean patient age was 42 ± 14 years and 94% were male. Surgical technique included: aortic root replacement with or without cusp repair in 43 patients (53%), replacement of the ascending aorta at the height of the sino-tubular junction with or without cusp repair in 15 patients (19%), and isolated cusp repair in 22 patients (28%). RESULTS: The anatomical structure of the aortic valve was bicuspid in 68 (85%) and unicuspid in 12 patients (15%). Survival rate was 100% at 5 years of follow-up. Eleven patients (13.7%) underwent reoperation, 8 of whom presented with recurrent symptomatic aortic insufficiency (AI). Late echocardiography in the remaining 69 patients revealed mild AI in 63 patients, moderate recurrent AI in 4, and severe recurrent AI in 2. Relief from recurrent severe AI or reoperations was significantly lower in patients who underwent cusp repair compared with those who did not (P = 0.05). Furthermore, the use of pericardial patch augmentation for the repair was a predictor for recurrence (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: AVr in patients with BAV or UAV is a safe procedure with low morbidity and mortality rates. The use of a pericardial patch augmentation was associated with higher repair failure.

Sutureless Aortic Valve: Early and Mid-Term Results at a Single Center.

UNLABELLED: Background: Prolonged life expectancy has increased the number of elderly high risk patients referred for surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR). These referred high risk patients may benefit from sutureless bioprosthesis procedures which reduce mortality and morbidity. OBJECTIVES: To present our initial experience with sutureless aortic bioprotheses, including clinical and echocardiographic results, in elderly high risk patients referred for AVR. METHODS: Forty patients (15 males, mean age 78 ± 7 years) with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis underwent AVR with the 3F Enable or Perceval sutureless bioprosthesis during the period December 2012 to May 2014. Mean logistic EuroScore was 10 ± 3%. Echocardiography was performed preoperatively, intraoperatively, at discharge and at follow-up. RESULTS: There was no in-hospital mortality. Nine patients (22%) underwent minimally invasive AVR via a right anterior mini-thoracotomy and one patient via a J-incision. Four patients underwent concomitant coronary aortic bypass graft, two needed intraoperative repositioning of the valve, one underwent valve exchange due to inappropriate sizing, three (7.5%) had a perioperative stroke with complete resolution of neurologic symptoms, and one patient (2.5%) required permanent pacemaker implantation due to complete atrioventricular block. Mean preoperative and postoperative gradients were 44 ± 14 and 13 ± 5 mmHg, respectively. At follow-up, 82% of patients were in New York Heart Association functional class I and II. CONCLUSIONS: Sutureless AVR can be used safely in elderly high risk patients with relatively low morbidity and mortality. The device can be safely implanted via a minimally invasive incision. Mid-term hemodynamic results are satisfactory, demonstrating significant clinical improvement.

Successful Treatment of Near Fatal Cardiogenic Shock Following Toxic Mushroom Ingestion.

Myocardial injury and hemodynamic compromise following toxic mushroom ingestion is rare. Here we present a case of cardiogenic shock after Amanita proxima ingestion, presenting with severe hemodynamic collapse necessitating mechanical circulatory support. Prompt identification, multidisciplinary clinical decision making, and timely treatment resulted in an outstanding complete clinical resolution. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

Effects of the harvesting technique and external stenting on progression of vein graft disease 2 years after coronary artery bypass.

OBJECTIVES: In a post hoc analysis of the VEST III trial, we investigated the effect of the harvesting technique on saphenous vein graft (SVG) patency and disease progression after coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: Angiographic outcomes were assessed in 183 patients undergoing open (126 patients, 252 SVG) or endoscopic harvesting (57 patients, 114 SVG). Overall SVG patency was assessed by computed tomography angiography at 6 months and by coronary angiography at 2 years. Fitzgibbon patency (FP I, II and III) and intimal hyperplasia (IH) in a patient subset were assessed by coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound, respectively, at 2 years. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between patients who underwent open and those who underwent endoscopic harvesting. Open compared with endoscopic harvesting was associated with higher overall SVG patency rates at 6 months (92.9% vs 80.4%, P = 0.04) and 2 years (90.8% vs 73.9%, P = 0.01), improved FP I, II and III rates (65.2% vs 49.2%; 25.3% vs 45.9%, and 9.5% vs 4.9%, respectively; odds ratio 2.81, P = 0.09) and reduced IH area (-31.8%; P = 0.04) and thickness (-28.9%; P = 0.04). External stenting was associated with improved FP I, II and III rates (odds ratio 2.84, P = 0.01), reduced IH area (-19.5%; P < 0.001) and thickness (-25.0%; P < 0.001) in the open-harvest group and reduced IH area (-12.7%; P = 0.01) and thickness (-9.5%; P = 0.21) in the endoscopic-harvest group. CONCLUSIONS: A post-hoc analysis of the VEST III trial showed that open harvesting is associated with improved overall SVG patency and reduced IH. External stenting reduces SVG disease progression, particularly with open harvesting.

Transapical and Transfemoral Combined Mitral Valve Repair With Annular and Leaflet Therapies.

Two high-risk patients were successfully treated with concomitant implantation of a transapical off-pump beating heart semirigid D-shape annuloplasty device combined in 1 case with a transfemoral edge-to-edge device and in another with transapical chordal implantation. The significant anteroposterior diameter reduction offered by the annuloplasty implantation maximized the leaflet coaptation obtained by the prolapse correction performed with the leaflet devices. Combining the transcatheter annuloplasty device and leaflet/chordal repair technologies represents progress toward definitive transcatheter treatment of degenerative mitral valve disease.

Is Axillary Better Than Femoral Artery Cannulation in Repair of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection?

OBJECTIVE: We compared early and late outcomes of patients who underwent femoral versus axillary artery cannulation for repair of acute type A aortic dissection. METHODS: Between 2004 and 2017, we retrospectively evaluated the clinical outcomes of 135 consecutive patients who underwent emergency surgery for acute type A aortic dissection repair. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those who underwent femoral ( n = 84) and those who underwent right axillary ( n = 51) artery cannulation. Mean patient age was 63 ± 13 years and 88 (65%) were male. RESULTS: Overall operative mortality was 12.6% (axillary 15.7%, femoral 10.7%; P = 0.564). Patients who underwent axillary compared to femoral artery cannulation had a statistically nonsignificant higher operative mortality rate among both stable and unstable patients (13% vs. 6.5%, P = 0.405 and 40% vs. 22.7%, P = 0.818, respectively). While there was no difference in major complication rates, such as stroke, low cardiac output, and surgical revision for bleeding/tamponade, there was a higher incidence of renal failure that required dialysis in patients who underwent axillary cannulation (12% vs. 1%, P = 0.022). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that predictors for the composite endpoint of operative mortality or severe organ malperfusion, such as renal failure or cerebrovascular accident, were hemodynamic instability on admission (OR 3.87; 95% CI, 1.23 to 12.63; P = 0.021), lower preoperative creatinine clearance (OR 0.94; 95% CI, 0.90 to 0.97; P < 0.001); and the use of axillary artery cannulation (OR 4.1; 95% CI, 1.43 to 12.78; P = 0.011). Among those discharged from hospital, the 3-year survival rate was 91% in the axillary group and 87% in the femoral group ( P = 0.772). CONCLUSIONS: Based on our experience, emergent surgery for both stable and unstable patients with acute type A aortic dissection demonstrated similar survival rates and significantly less renal impairment when using the femoral cannulation approach.

Pericardial Patch Augmentation Is Associated With a Higher Risk of Recurrent Aortic Insufficiency.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed early and late clinical outcomes in patients who underwent aortic valve repair or an aortic valve-sparing operation and investigated predictors for failure. METHODS: Of 227 consecutive patients who underwent aortic valve repair or a valve-sparing operation in our department between 2004 and 2016, 81 (36%) underwent aortic root replacement with or without cusp repair, 97 (42%) ascending aorta replacement with or without cusp repair, and 49 (22%) isolated aortic valve repair. Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was complete. RESULTS: One patient (0.4%) died in-hospital. Mean clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was 69 ± 40 months (range, 1 to 147 months) and 53 ± 40 months (range, 1 to 147 months), respectively. Fifteen patients (6.6%) died during follow-up, with an overall 5-year survival rate of 94.4%. Recurrent significant (≥3) aortic insufficiency developed in 20 patients (8.8%), 17 of whom underwent reoperation, with a 5-year freedom from reoperation rate of 88%. Predictors for recurrent significant aortic insufficiency or reoperation were greater preoperative aortic insufficiency (grade III to IV vs I to II; relative risk [RR], 1.97; p = 0.023), cusp repair (RR, 2.92; p = 0.001), higher European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation score (RR, 1.16; p = 0.006), and valve repair with pericardial patch augmentation (RR, 2.34; p = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: Aortic valve repair and valve-sparing operations can be performed with good early and late clinical outcomes. In our experience, however, the rate of recurrent aortic insufficiency was significant, especially in patients who underwent cusp augmentation with glutaraldehyde-treated autologous pericardial patch.

Short- and long-term results after prosthetic mitral valve implantation in patients with severe mitral annulus calcification†.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate short- and long-term outcomes of a conservative decalcification approach in mitral valve replacement (MVR) surgery in the presence of mitral annulus calcification (MAC). METHODS: Of the 1038 patients who underwent MVR, 133 (13%) had significant MAC with at least 30% of the annular circumference heavily calcified. In most patients, the surgical approach to MAC included conservative decalcification, supra-annular prosthesis implantation and insertion of a pericardial patch between the MV annulus and the prosthesis. These patients were matched by a propensity score to a group of patients who underwent MVR without MAC ( n = 118 in each group) and served as a control group. RESULTS: There were 6 early deaths in each group with an overall mortality of 5% ( P = 0.90). Early complications included one major stroke in the non-MAC group and acute renal failure needing dialysis in 2 and 3 patients in the MAC and non-MAC groups, respectively. Mean follow-up was 55 ± 37 months and 99.1% complete. There were 38 (33%) and 33 (29%) late deaths with an estimated survival of 61% and 69% at 6 years in the MAC and non-MAC groups, respectively ( P = 0.55). At follow-up, functional class did not differ between groups ( P = 0.096). Mean echo follow-up time was 40 ± 35 months and was 83% complete. Freedom from moderate or severe mitral regurgitation was 95% and 98%, with an estimated freedom of 95% and 96% at 6 years ( P = 0.20), and mean gradient was 4.9 ± 2.3 mmHg and 5.2 ± 2.0 mmHg for MAC and non-MAC groups, respectively ( P = 0.58). CONCLUSIONS: A conservative approach for dealing with MAC is suitable for the majority of patients. Early and late clinical and echocardiographic outcomes did not differ between the MAC and non-MAC patients, including freedom from early and late occurrence of MV prosthesis paravalvular leak.

Sutureless Versus Stented Valve in Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Small Annulus.

BACKGROUND: Aortic valve replacement, particularly in elderly patients with small aortic annulus, could lead to patient-prosthesis mismatch. Sutureless bioprosthesis could be an ideal solution for these patients. We compared results of aortic valve replacement with sutureless versus stented bioprosthetic valves. METHODS: Of the 63 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with sutureless bioprosthesis between 2011 and 2014 in our department, 22 (20 women, 77 ± 6 years) had a small annulus less than 21 mm (sutureless group). They were matched for sex, age, body surface area, and left ventricular ejection fraction with 22 patients (20 women, 79 ± 6 years) undergoing stented bioprosthesis valve replacement (stented group). Body mass index and body surface area were 28 ± 5 kg/m(2) and 28 ± 3 kg/m(2) (p = 0.9), 1.6 ± 0.2 m(2) and 1.6 ± 0.1 m(2) (p = 0.9), in the sutureless and stented groups, respectively. Logistic EuroSCOREs were similar between groups. RESULTS: Postoperative peak transvalvular gradient was lower in the sutureless group (15 ± 7 mm Hg versus 20 ± 11 mm Hg; p = 0.02). The indexed effective orifice area was greater in the sutureless group (1.12 ± 0.2 cm(2)/m(2) versus 0.82 ± 0.1 cm(2)/m(2); p < 0.05). Aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times were 47 ± 21 and 67 ± 15 minutes, respectively (p < 0.05) in the sutureless group versus 70 ± 22 and 85 ± 21 minutes, respectively (p = 0.02) in the stented group. Intensive care unit stay, hospitalization, and major complications were not significantly different between groups. At follow-up, regression of left ventricular hypertrophy was better in the sutureless group (93 ± 21 g/m(2) versus 106 ± 14 g/m(2); p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Sutureless bioprosthetic valves demonstrate improved hemodynamic performance compared with stented valves in elderly patients with small aortic annulus, providing better regression of left ventricular hypertrophy and decreased rates of patient-prosthesis mismatch. Aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times are also decreased.