Establishment and Characterization of the Novel High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Cell Line OVPA8.

High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) is the most frequent histological type of ovarian cancer and the one with worst prognosis. Unfortunately, the majority of established ovarian cancer cell lines which are used in the research have unclear histological origin and probably do not represent HGSOC. Thus, new and reliable models of HGSOC are needed. Ascitic fluid from a patient with recurrent HGSOC was used to establish a stable cancer cell line. Cells were characterized by cytogenetic karyotyping and short tandem repeat (STR) profiling. New generation sequencing was applied to test for hot-spot mutations in 50 cancer-associated genes and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis was used to check for TP53 status. Cells were analyzed for expression of several marker genes/proteins by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), and immunocytochemistry (ICC). Functional tests were performed to compare OVPA8 cells with five commercially available and frequently used ovarian cancer cell lines: SKOV3, A2780, OVCAR3, ES2, and OAW42. Our newly-established OVPA8 cell line shows morphologic and genetic features consistent with HGSOC, such as epithelial morphology, multiple chromosomal aberrations, TP53 mutation, BRCA1 mutation, and loss of one copy of BRCA2. The OVPA8 line has a stable STR profile. Cells are positive for EpCAM, CK19, and CD44; they have relatively low plating efficiency/ability to form spheroids, a low migration rate, and intermediate invasiveness in matrigel, as compared to other ovarian cancer lines. OVPA8 is sensitive to paclitaxel and resistant to cisplatin. We also tested two FGFR inhibitors; OVPA8 cells were resistant to AZD4547 (AstraZeneca, London, UK), but sensitive to the new inhibitor CPL304-110-01 (Celon Pharma, Lomianki/Kielpin, Poland). We have established and characterized a novel cell line, OVPA8, which can be a valuable preclinical model for studies on high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Advances in ovarian cancer therapy.

Epithelial ovarian cancer is typically diagnosed at an advanced stage. Current state-of-the-art surgery and chemotherapy result in the high incidence of complete remissions; however, the recurrence rate is also high. For most patients, the disease eventually becomes a continuum of symptom-free periods and recurrence episodes. Different targeted treatment approaches and biological drugs, currently under development, bring the promise of turning ovarian cancer into a manageable chronic disease. In this review, we discuss the current standard in the therapy for ovarian cancer, major recent studies on the new variants of conventional therapies, and new therapeutic approaches, recently approved and/or in clinical trials. The latter include anti-angiogenic therapies, polyADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, inhibitors of growth factor signaling, or folate receptor inhibitors, as well as several immunotherapeutic approaches. We also discuss cost-effectiveness of some novel therapies and the issue of better selection of patients for personalized treatment.

Unsupervised analysis reveals two molecular subgroups of serous ovarian cancer with distinct gene expression profiles and survival.

PURPOSE: Ovarian cancer is typically diagnosed at late stages, and thus, patients' prognosis is poor. Improvement in treatment outcomes depends, at least partly, on better understanding of ovarian cancer biology and finding new molecular markers and therapeutic targets. METHODS: An unsupervised method of data analysis, singular value decomposition, was applied to analyze microarray data from 101 ovarian cancer samples; then, selected genes were validated by quantitative PCR. RESULTS: We found that the major factor influencing gene expression in ovarian cancer was tumor histological type. The next major source of variability was traced to a set of genes mainly associated with extracellular matrix, cell motility, adhesion, and immunological response. Hierarchical clustering based on the expression of these genes revealed two clusters of ovarian cancers with different molecular profiles and distinct overall survival (OS). Patients with higher expression of these genes had shorter OS than those with lower expression. The two clusters did not derive from high- versus low-grade serous carcinomas and were unrelated to histological (ovarian vs. fallopian) origin. Interestingly, there was considerable overlap between identified prognostic signature and a recently described invasion-associated signature related to stromal desmoplastic reaction. Several genes from this signature were validated by quantitative PCR; two of them-DSPG3 and LOX-were validated both in the initial and independent sets of samples and were significantly associated with OS and disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: We distinguished two molecular subgroups of serous ovarian cancers characterized by distinct OS. Among differentially expressed genes, some may potentially be used as prognostic markers. In our opinion, unsupervised methods of microarray data analysis are more effective than supervised methods in identifying intrinsic, biologically sound sources of variability. Moreover, as histological type of the tumor is the greatest source of variability in ovarian cancer and may interfere with analyses of other features, it seems reasonable to use histologically homogeneous groups of tumors in microarray experiments.

The putative oncogene, CRNDE, is a negative prognostic factor in ovarian cancer patients.

The CRNDE gene seems to play an oncogenic role in cancers, though its exact function remains unknown. Here, we tried to assess its usefulness as a molecular prognostic marker in ovarian cancer. Based on results of our microarray studies, CRNDE transcripts were further analyzed by Real-Time qPCR-based profiling of their expression. The qPCR study was conducted with the use of personally designed TaqMan assays on 135 frozen tissue sections of ovarian carcinomas from patients treated with platinum compounds and either cyclophosphamide (PC, N = 32) or taxanes (TP, N = 103). Elevated levels of two different CRNDE transcripts were a negative prognostic factor; they increased the risk of death and recurrence in the group of patients treated with TP, but not PC (DNA-damaging agents only). Higher associations were found for overexpression of the short CRNDE splice variant (FJ466686): HR 6.072, 95% CI 1.814-20.32, p = 0.003 (the risk of death); HR 15.53, 95% CI 3.812-63.28, p < 0.001 (the risk of recurrence). Additionally, accumulation of the TP53 protein correlated with decreased expression of both CRNDE transcripts in tumor cells. Our results depict CRNDE as a potential marker of poor prognosis in women with ovarian carcinomas, and suggest that its significance depends on the therapeutic regimen used.