Vitrification does not affect birth weight: lessons from the oocyte donation model.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Is embryo cryopreservation a cause of high birth weight and large for gestational age (LGA) in singletons resulting from vitrified-warmed embryo transfer? DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study evaluating 670 oocyte recipients who underwent fresh (367 cycles) or vitrified-warmed embryo transfer (303 cycles) at Instituto Bernabeu between July 2017 and March 2019. All single blastocyst transfers carried out in an artificial cycle that resulted in a singleton live birth were included. RESULTS: Maternal age (42.21 ± 4.45; 42.79 ± 3.83; P = 0.519), body mass index (23.34 ± 3.69; 23.80 ± 3.78; P = 0.075), gestational age (38.96 ± 1.97; 38.77 ± 2.15; P = 0.207), maternal smoking (10.8%; 13.0%; P = 0.475), gestational diabetes (4.9%; 4.3% P = 0.854), preeclampsia (2.7%; 5.6%; P = 0.074), hypertensive disorders (3.3%; 2.3%; P = 0.494), maternal parity (multiparous 18.5%; 14.5%; P = 0.177) and liveborn gender (female 44.5%; 48.8%; P = 0.276) were not significantly different between fresh or vitrified-warmed groups. Endometrial thickness was significantly higher in the fresh versus vitrified-warmed group (8.83 ± 1.73 versus 8.57 ± 1.59; P = 0.035, respectively). Oocyte donor height was similar between the fresh versus vitrified-warmed group (163.22 ± 5.88 versus 164.27 ± 6.66 cm; P = 0.057, respectively). Mean birth weight was not significantly different (3239.21 ± 550.43; 3224.56 ± 570.83; adjusted P = 0.058). No differences were observed in macrosomia (7.1%; 6.3%; adjusted OR 0.857, 95% CI 0.314 to 2.340, P = 0.764), LGA (6.0%; 6.7%; adjusted OR 0.450, 95% CI 0.176 to 1.149, P = 0.095), pre-term birth (10.9%; 9.0% adjusted P = 0.997), very pre-term birth (0.8%; 1.3%; adjusted P = 1.000), extremely pre-term birth (0%; 1.0%; adjusted P = 0.998); underweight (10.0%; 7.0%; adjusted P = 0.050); very low weight (0.6; 1.1%; adjusted P = 1.000) and small for gestational age (1.9%; 0.7%; adjusted P = 0.974) between fresh or vitrified-warmed groups. CONCLUSION: This study eliminates potential confounders that might influence fetal growth and demonstrates that embryo vitrification and warming procedures do not affect birth weight.

Consistent results of non-invasive PGT-A of human embryos using two different techniques for chromosomal analysis.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Are discordances in non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (niPGT-A) results attributable to the technique used for chromosomal analysis? DESIGN: A prospective blinded study was performed (September 2018 to December 2019). In total 302 chromosomal analyses were performed: 92 trophectoderm PGT-A biopsies and their corresponding spent embryo culture medium (SCM) evaluated by two methods (n = 184), negative controls (n = 8), and trophectoderm and inner cell mass biopsies from trophectoderm-aneuploid embryos (n = 18). Trophectoderm analyses were carried out using Veriseq (Illumina), and SCM was analysed using Veriseq and NICS (Yikon). RESULTS: Genetic results were obtained for 96.8% of trophectoderm samples versus 92.4% for both SCM techniques. The mosaicism rate was higher for SCM regardless of the technique used: 30.4% for SCM-NICS and 28.3% for SCM-Veriseq versus 14.1% for trophectoderm biopsies (P = 0.013, P = 0.031, respectively). No significant differences in diagnostic concordance were seen between the two SCM techniques (74.6% for SCM-NICS versus 72.3% for SCM-Veriseq; P = 0.861). For embryos biopsied on day 6, these rates reached 92.0% and 86.5%, respectively. On reanalysing trophectoderm-aneuploid embryos, the discrepancies were shown to be due to maternal DNA contamination (55.6%; 5/9), embryo mosaicism (22.2%; 2/9) and low resolution in SCM-NICS (11.1%; 1/9) and in both SCM techniques (11.1%; 1/9). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study evaluating the consistency of different chromosomal analysis techniques for niPGT-A. In conclusion, the diagnostic concordance between PGT-A and niPGT-A seems independent of the technique used. Optimization of culture conditions and medium retrieval provides a potential target to improve the reliability of niPGT-A.

Impact of chronic endometritis in infertility: a SWOT analysis.

Chronic endometritis is a pathology often associated with reproductive failure, but there are still no clear recommendations on whether its inclusion in the initial study of infertile couples is necessary. In this discussion paper, based on a SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) analysis, the different aspects of the repercussions of chronic endometritis in fertility are evaluated. To avoid possible subjectivity in the analysis and results of this study, the researchers followed the Oxford criteria for the evaluation of evidence. The results from the evaluation of the reviewed literature seem to indicate that, pending new evidence, it would be advisable not to include chronic endometritis in the initial baseline study before assisted reproduction in order not to delay other assisted reproduction treatments. However, it would be advisable in cases of repetitive implantation failure and pregnancy loss after having undergone IVF with viable embryos and before continuing with costly reproductive processes, since results could be improved. The development of randomized studies assessing the impact of antibiotic treatment as a possible therapeutic option in infertile women with chronic endometritis, as well as the possible impact on endometrial microbiota and receptivity/implantation, would allow for the establishment of more precise clinical guidelines in this regard.

Luteal phase stimulation versus follicular phase stimulation in poor ovarian responders: results of a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: In young women with poor ovarian response, luteal-phase ovarian stimulation (LPOS) is a potential method for collecting competent oocytes. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of LPOS compared with follicular phase ovarian stimulation (FPOS) in young women with poor ovarian response (POR). METHODS: This single-center, prospective, randomized pilot study compared LPOS and FPOS in women with POR fulfilling Bologna criteria who underwent in vitro fertilization at the Instituto Bernabeu. The primary outcome was the number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes obtained by follicular puncture. RESULTS: Sixty women were included in the study, with 27 women completing LPOS and 30 undergoing FPOS. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of MII oocytes obtained between the LPOS group and the FPOS group (2.1 ± 2.0 vs. 2.6 ± 2.2, p = 0.31). Length of stimulation was also similar in both groups (8.35 ± 2.8 vs. 8.15 ± 4.1 days, p = 0.69). Similarly, there was no significant difference in the follicle-stimulating hormone total dose, number of cumulus-oocyte complexes, survival rate, fertilization rate, or cancellation rate between groups. A significantly higher Ovarian Sensitivity Index was observed in the LPOS group versus the FPOS group (0.96 vs. 0.57, p = 0.037). CONCLUSION: LPOS was comparable with FPOS in terms of efficacy and may improve ovarian responsiveness in young women with POR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02625532; EudraCT identifier: 2015-003856-31.

COVID-19 and assisted reproductive technology services: repercussions for patients and proposal for individualized clinical management.

The prolonged lockdown of health services providing high-complexity fertility treatments -as currently recommended by many reproductive medicine entities- is detrimental for society as a whole, and infertility patients in particular. Globally, approximately 0.3% of all infants born every year are conceived using assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments. By contrast, the total number of COVID-19 deaths reported so far represents approximately 1.0% of the total deaths expected to occur worldwide over the first three months of the current year. It seems, therefore, that the number of infants expected to be conceived and born -but who will not be so due to the lockdown of infertility services- might be as significant as the total number of deaths attributed to the COVID-19 pandemic. We herein propose remedies that include a prognostic-stratification of more vulnerable infertility cases in order to plan a progressive restart of worldwide fertility treatments. At a time when preventing complications and limiting burdens for national health systems represent relevant issues, our viewpoint might help competent authorities and health care providers to identify patients who should be prioritized for the continuation of fertility care in a safe environment.

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome following GnRH agonist trigger for final follicular maturation in a patient undergoing random start ovarian stimulation for egg-donation cycle with an inadvertent concomitant early pregnancy.

We report the first case of OHSS following GnRH agonist trigger for final follicular maturation in random start ovarian stimulation for egg-donation cycles during inadvertent concomitant early pregnancy. As an additional note, the sustained activity exerted by the increasing endogenous hCG production seemed to be responsible for the suboptimal performance in terms of oocyte yield in the current case. OHSS can occur in random-start stimulations protocols even after the use of a GnRH agonist for triggering in case of concomitant unnoticed early pregnancy especially if stimulation is commenced in the periovulatory/luteal phase. The present case report introduces a note of extreme caution when proceeding with this protocol in an otherwise fertile population (egg-donors, elective or oncologic oocyte cryopreservation).

The relevance of the individual screening for genetic variants in predicting ovarian response.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate if polymorphisms of some genes involved in folliculogenesis predict ovarian response. METHODS: This prospective randomized study includes 124 egg donors genotyped for six SNPs ESR1 (rs2234693), AMHR2 (rs2002555), GDF-9 (rs10491279 and rs254286), AMH (rs10407022) and LHCBR (rs229327) genes and four STRs in ESR1 rs3138774), SHBG (rs6761), CYP19A1 (rs60271534) and AR genes (CAG repeats in exon 1). All donors followed standard ovarian stimulation protocol using a daily dose of 225 UI. The genotypes obtained were compared with the ovarian stimulation outcome. RESULTS: Regarding the number of retrieved oocytes, we found statistical differences for the ESR1 SNP and STR (19.3 ± 8.9 for TT vs 15.3 ± 6.2 for CC/CT, P = 0.027; 19.1 ± 8.3 for <17repeats vs 14.7 ± 6.2 for >17repeats, P = 0.020). Moreover, women carrying TT in the ESR1 at position c.-397T>C with ESR1 (TA)n=17 retrieved the highest number of oocytes (20.4 ± 9.3) (P = 0.001). Concerning AMHR2, we observed an association with the length of stimulation (9.1 ± 1.4 d for AA vs 9.7 ± 1.3 d for AG/GG, P = 0.021) and gonadotropin received (2050 ± 319 for AA vs 2188 ± 299 for AG/GG, P = 0.017). No significant differences were observed for the other polymorphisms (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The polymorphisms in ESR1 and AMHR2 genes showed a clear association with the number of retrieved oocytes and the stimulation data, respectively. Our results suggest that polymorphisms in the genes for key reproductive hormones receptors could be used to predict the ovarian response and to personalize the stimulation prior the treatment.

Second-generation preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in assisted reproduction: a SWOT analysis.

Second-generation preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A 2.0) in patients with an unfavourable reproductive and IVF prognosis is becoming common practice, with the aim of improving reproductive outcomes. However, there is still no clear evidence on the possible advantages and drawbacks with regard to this procedure. In this discussion paper, based on a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) analysis, the different aspects of this strategy are evaluated. Current evidence suggests that PGT-A 2.0 should not at present have an indiscriminate application, but it might be indicated in cases in which the risk of aneuploidy is increased.

Effect of the vaginal microbiome on the pregnancy rate in women receiving assisted reproductive treatment.

PURPOSE: To investigate if the vaginal microbiome influences the IVF outcome. METHODS: Thirty-one patients undergoing assisted reproductive treatment (ART) with own or donated gametes and with cryotransfer of a single euploid blastocyst were recruited for this cohort study. Two vaginal samples were taken during the embryo transfer procedure, just before transferring the embryo. The V3 V4 region of 16S rRNA was used to analyze the vaginal microbiome, and the bioinformatic analysis was performed using QIIME2, Bioconductor Phyloseq, and MicrobiomeAnalyst packages. Alpha diversity was compared between groups according to the result of the pregnancy test. RESULTS: Fourteen (45.2%) patients did not and seventeen (54.8 %) did achieve pregnancy under ART. A greater index of alpha diversity was found in patients who did not achieve pregnancy comparing to those who did, although this difference was not significant (p = 0.088). In the analysis of beta diversity, no statistically significant differences were observed between groups established as per the pregnancy status. Samples from women who achieved pregnancy showed a greater presence of Lactobacillus spp. The cluster analysis identified two main clusters: the first encompassed the genera Lactobacillus, Gardnerella, Clostridium, Staphylococcus, and Dialister, and the second included all other genera. Women who achieved pregnancy were mainly detected microorganisms from the first cluster. CONCLUSIONS: The vaginal microbiome can influence the results of ART. The profiles dominated by Lactobacillus were associated with the achievement of pregnancy, and there was a relationship between the stability of the vaginal microbiome and the achievement of pregnancy.

Clinical efficacy of recombinant versus highly purified follicle-stimulating hormone according to follicle-stimulating hormone receptor genotype.

OBJECTIVE: Conflicting data have been reported on the comparative doses of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) and urinary highly purified follicle-stimulating hormone (HP-FSH) required for ovarian stimulation. Nothing is known about the clinical efficacy of rFSH or HP-FSH depending on the N680S follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) polymorphism. Our aim was to investigate whether the N680S polymorphism of the FSHR gene affects ovarian response with different forms of FSH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study includes 382 cycles performed at Instituto Bernabeu from 191 oocyte donors. All donors carried out two cycles: one with rFSH and the other one with HP-FSH (group 1, n=63), both with HP-FSH (group 2, n=100) or both with rFSH (group 3, n=28). The results were compared by pairs from each patient. The main outcomes were oocyte yield, metaphase II matured oocytes (MII), days of stimulation, and gonadotropin dosage. RESULTS: No significant differences were found when we compared the cycles for donors in group 1. However, according to the FSHR polymorphism, statistical differences were shown. For the SS genotype, more oocytes (16.9 vs. 18.4) and MII (12.8 vs. 15.5) were yielded in the HP-FSH cycle. For the NS genotype, more oocyte (20.1 vs. 16.9) and MII (17.4 vs. 14.2) were yielded in the rFSH cycle. For the NN genotype, no differences were found. No differences were found when we compared the cycles in groups 2 and 3 irrespective of the FSHR polymorphism. CONCLUSION: For the first time, we have shown in a population of egg donors that the N680S FSHR gene polymorphism affects the efficacy of HP-FSH or rFSH. The FSHR genotype is an important factor to determine the dosage and the nature of the gonadotropin selected for ovarian stimulation.

Androgen receptor CAG repeat length is associated with ovarian reserve but not with ovarian response.

The human androgen receptor (AR) gene contains a highly polymorphic CAG repeat sequence within exon 1. In-vitro studies have shown a relationship between CAG repeats in the AR gene and its transactivation potential. This variation in length may play a role in anovulatory infertility. The objective of this study was to investigate whether CAG polymorphism of the AR gene has a predictive value for ovarian reserve, response and cycle outcome in an egg donor programme. CAG length of the AR gene was determined in 147 oocyte donors. All donors underwent ovarian stimulation with a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol (n = 355). No differences were reported in days of stimulation, gonadotrophin doses, and number of oocytes retrieved. Clinical outcomes were not affected by the CAG repeat length of the AR gene; the primary end-point, antral follicle count, was significantly affected (P < 0.05). In conclusion, in a population of fertile egg donors AR gene CAG polymorphism does not affect ovarian response to gonadotrophins. Antral follicle count was associated with the CAG polymorphism genotype. This suggests that genetic factors may increase susceptibility to poor ovarian reserve, and that AR gene genotype could play a role in the natural ovarian ageing process.

Negative effect of P72 polymorphism on p53 gene in IVF outcome in patients with repeated implantation failure and pregnancy loss.

PURPOSE: Investigate whether R72P on p53 gene polymorphism has a higher prevalence among women with a history of recurrent implantation failure (RIF) and pregnancy loss (RPL) and its influence in their IVF cycle outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: p53 polymorphism R72P has been studied in 181 women. The control group included 83 oocyte donors. In the study group 98 women were included: 44 with RIF and 54 with RPL. From the study group, 76 patients underwent IVF-cycles (55 RPL and 21 RIF). RESULTS: The frequency of PP genotypes on p53 among RIF was 11.4% compared with 18.5% for RPL and 6% in controls (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences with respect to patient characteristics. Significant differences were reported in pregnancy rate (69.4% for RR/RP and 33.3% for PP; p < 0.05), embryo implantation rate (33.3% for RR/RP and 7.3% for PP; p < 0.05) and ongoing pregnancy rate (53.1% for RR/RP and 14.3% for PP; p < 0.05) among RIF and RPL. CONCLUSIONS: This investigation reveals that in RIF and RPL patients R72P on p53 gene is more prevalent than fertile population. Moreover, patients carrying a PP genotype on p53 codon 72 will have less chance to achieve an ongoing pregnancy. This information together with some additional markers will allow development of diagnostic tests for detects risk for RIF and RPL before infertility treatment is initiated.

Association between oocyte donors' or recipients' body mass index and clinical outcomes after first single blastocyst transfers-the uterus is the most affected.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether high body mass index (BMI) in either oocyte donors or recipients is associated with poorer outcomes after the first single blastocyst transfer. DESIGN: Retrospective study including 1,394 first blastocyst single embryo transfers (SETs) conducted by 1,394 recipients during oocyte donation cycles with the gametes retrieved from 1,394 women (January 2019-July 2021). Four BMI clusters were defined for both donors and recipients (underweight: <18.5 kg; normal weight: 18.5-24.9 kg; overweight: 25-29.9 kg; and obese: ≥30 kg). SETTING: Network of private IVF centers. PATIENTS: A total of 1,394 recipients aged 42.4 ± 4.0 and with a BMI of 23.2 ± 3.8 kg/m2, and 1,394 donors aged 26.1 ± 4.2 and with a BMI of 21.9 ± 2.5 kg/m2. INTERVENTION: All oocytes were vitrified at 2 egg banks and warmed at 8 in vitro fertilization clinics that were part of the same network. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection, blastocyst culture, and either fresh or vitrified-warmed SETs were conducted. Putative confounders were investigated, and the data were adjusted through regression analyses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the live birth rate (LBR) per SET according to donors' and/or recipients' BMI. The main secondary outcome was the miscarriage rate (<22 gestational weeks) per clinical pregnancy. RESULTS: The LBR per blastocyst SET showed no significant association with donors' BMI. Regarding recipients' BMI, instead, the multivariate odds ratio was significant in obese vs. normal-weight recipients (0.58, 95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.91). The miscarriage rate per clinical pregnancy was also significantly associated with recipients' obesity, with a multivariate odds ratio of 2.31 (95% confidence interval, 1.18-4.51) vs. normal-weight patients. A generalized additive model method was used to represent the relationship between predicted LBR or miscarriage rates and donors' or recipients' BMI; it pictured a scenario where the former outcome moderately but continuously decreases with increasing recipients' BMI to then sharply decline in the BMI range of 25-35 kg/m2. The miscarriage rate, instead, increases almost linearly with respect to both donors' and recipients' increasing BMI. CONCLUSION: Obesity mostly affects the uterus, especially because of higher miscarriage rates. Yet, poorer outcomes can be appreciated already with a BMI of 25 kg/m2 in both oocyte donors and recipients. Finer markers of nutritional homeostasis are therefore desirable; recipients should be counseled about poorer expected outcomes in cases of overweight and obesity; and oocyte banks should avoid assigning oocytes from overweight donors to overweight and obese recipients.

Effect of follicle-stimulating hormone receptor N680S polymorphism on the efficacy of follicle-stimulating hormone stimulation on donor ovarian response.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether N680S FSHR polymorphism has a predictive value for the ovarian response to stimulation with gonadotropins and cycle outcome in our egg donor program. METHODS: The oocyte donor candidates were selected according to the Instituto Bernabeu egg donation program requirements and ASRM and ESHRE guidelines for oocyte donation. The FSHR polymorphism N680S was studied in 145 oocyte donors. All donors underwent controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) (n=355) using urinary follicle-stimulating hormone in a GnRH antagonist protocol and receiving a GnRH agonist triggering. The main outcome measures were oocyte yield, days of stimulation, gonadotropin doses, biochemical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and miscarriage rates. RESULTS: Significant differences were reported in the antral follicle count (16.5 ± 5.0 for NN, 14.5 ± 4.7 for NS, and 14.1 ± 3.8 for SS), number of eggs retrieved (21.5 ± 9.2 for NN, 18.5 ± 8.2 for NS, and 19.8 ± 8.9 for SS), and gonadotropin doses (2098.5 ± 639.4 IU for NN, 2023 ± 490.1 IU for NS, and 2149.5 ± 552.3 IU for SS) between the genotypes. The clinical outcome was not affected by the N680S polymorphism of the FSHR gene in the egg donors. CONCLUSION: In a population of fertile egg donors, the FSHR gene polymorphism at position 680 is associated with different ovarian responses to COH. The genotype of the FSHR gene is an important factor for determining the prognosis of the COH cycles in normo-ovulatory fertile women.

The role of thrombophilias in reproduction: A swot analysis.

Thrombophilia is a group of inherited or acquired coagulation disorders that have been associated with reproductive failure. However, there are still no clear recommendations on whether its inclusion in the initial study of the infertile couple or patients with recurrent implantation failure is necessary. In this discussion paper, based on a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) analysis, the different aspects of the repercussions of thrombophilia screening and treatment in reproduction are evaluated. To avoid possible subjectivity in the analysis and results of this study, researchers followed Oxford criteria for the evaluation of evidence. The results from the evaluation of the reviewed bibliography seem to indicate that, pending new evidence, it would be advisable not to include thrombophilia screening in the initial baseline study of the infertile couple. There is no evidence to support a clear association between thrombophilia and implantation failure or infertility. Thrombophilia testing in this setting may increase cost, with minimal potential benefit and lead to inappropriate use of anticoagulants with possible deleterious adverse effects. Future well-designed studies are needed to assess the possible benefit of anticoagulant therapy in infertile thrombophilic patients with implantation failure.

Conventional ovarian stimulation vs. delayed single dose corifollitropin alfa ovarian stimulation in oocyte donors: a prospective randomized study. Tail trial.

The present study compares two protocols for ovarian controlled stimulation in terms of number of cumulus-oocyte complexes and metaphase II oocytes. We employed a single injection of 150mcg of corifollitropin alfa after a 7-day oral contraceptive pill-free interval for TAIL group and a conventional administration of corifollitropin alfa after a 5-day OCP-free interval with additional rFSH from 8th of ovarian controlled stimulation. Prospective, randomized, comparative, non-inferiority, opened and controlled trial carried out in 180 oocyte donors 31 were excluded, 81 were randomized to the control group and 68 to the TAIL group. No differences were found in the number of follicles larger than 14 and 17 mm at triggering day. However, a lower number of cumulus-oocyte complexes and metaphase II oocytes were obtained in TAIL group compared to the control group, expressed as median (interquartile range): 10.5 (5.5-19) vs. 14 [11-21] and 9 (4-13) vs. 12 (9-17) respectively. Additionally, the incidence of failed retrieval or metaphase II oocytes = 0 was higher in TAIL group 7(10.3%) vs. 1(1.2%) p = 0.024. The use of a single injection of corifollitropin alfa after a 7-day oral contraceptive pill-free interval in oocyte donors resulted in a lower number of cumulus-oocyte complexes and metaphase II oocytes. No additional rFSH was administered in this group. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2019-001343-44/results.

Endometrial receptivity tests in reproduction: a SWOT analysis.

Endometrial receptivity and its management in assisted reproduction is now a significant focus of research interest. Endometrial receptivity tests, which analyze different panels of gene expression, are usually offered in fertility clinics to determine the women's individual 'window of implantation', providing a personalized timing for embryo transfer. However, there are still no definite indications on whether its inclusion in the study of the infertile couple or the study of patients with repeated implantation failure is essential.

Conventional follicular-phase ovarian stimulation vs. luteal-phase stimulation in suboptimal responders: a randomized controlled trial.

Objective: To compare the oocyte yield between follicular-phase stimulation (FPS) and luteal-phase stimulation (LPS) in suboptimal responders. Design: Prospective, randomized, crossover clinical trial. Patients: Forty-one patients with infertility according to the POSEIDON (Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing IndividualizeD Oocyte Number) criteria (1b/2b). Interventions: Crossover study on 2 assigned ovarian stimulations that started randomly in the follicular or luteal phase. The in vitro fertilization cycles were not consecutive but separated in time (45 days to 6 months). The random crossover design ensured that all subjects received the first treatment by chance. Main Outcome Measures: The primary objective was the number of cumulus-oocyte complexes retrieved in each cycle. Secondary objectives were number of metaphase II and fertilized oocytes, additional doses of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone, and the duration of ovarian stimulation (days). Results: The mean number of cumulus-oocyte complexes retrieved was similar between the FPS and LPS groups (7.5 ± 4.6 vs. 7.0 ± 4.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] for the mean, 5.8-8.7 vs. 5.6-8.3, respectively; the difference between means, -0.5; 95% CI, -1.8 to +1.5). Similarly, the mean number of metaphase II oocytes retrieved was not different between the FPS and LPS groups (5.4 ± 3.6 vs. 5.2 ± 2.8; 95% CI for the mean, 4.2-6.5 vs. 4.3-6.1, respectively; the difference between means, -0.2; 95% CI, -1.2 to +1.1). Moreover, the secondary objectives were similar between FPS and LPS groups. Conclusions: In this study, the oocyte yield in LPS did not increase in suboptimal responders compared with that in FPS when the onset of LPS was separated in time from FPS. Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT039393990 https://beta.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03939390.

Can probiotics enhance fertility outcome? Capacity of probiotics as a single intervention to improve the feminine genital tract microbiota in non-symptomatic reproductive-aged women.

Modifications in vaginal and endometrial microbiome and microbiota have been associated with fewer implantation rates and poorest pregnancy outcomes. Therefore, its study has emerged as a new biomarker in reproductive medicine. Despite the numerous papers published on probiotic use for vaginal dysbiosis and their actual wide empiric use especially for infertile patients, there is still no clear answer to justify their recommendation. The impact of probiotics on the vaginal or endometrial microbiota has often been investigated under a symptomatic altered vaginal microbial ecosystem, such as bacterial vaginosis. However 50% of women with bacterial vaginosis are asymptomatic. Actual clinical practice guidelines clearly recommend the use of specific antimicrobial agents for the management of symptomatic vaginal infections. Assuming this should be the management as well for an infertile population, what should be the treatment for the 50% non-symptomatic women presenting unfavorable vaginal/endometrial microbiota? The aim of this review is to assess the capacity of probiotics as a single intervention to alter the feminine genital tract microbiota in non-symptomatic reproductive-aged women.