Efficacy and safety results of depatuxizumab mafodotin (ABT-414) in patients with advanced solid tumors likely to overexpress epidermal growth factor receptor.

BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) alterations are associated with multiple cancers. Current EGFR-directed therapies have led to increased efficacy but are associated with specific side effects. The antibody-drug conjugate depatuxizumab mafodotin (depatux-m) targets EGFR with a monoclonal antibody linked to a cytotoxin, and is highly tumor-specific. METHODS: This phase 1/2 study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of depatux-m in patients who had advanced solid tumors with known wild-type EGFR overexpression, amplification, or mutated EGFR variant III. A 3 + 3 dose escalation was used, and 2 dosing schedules were evaluated. Depatux-m also was manufactured under an alternate process to reduce the drug load and improve the safety profile, and it was tested at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). In another cohort, prolonged infusion time of depatux-m was evaluated; and a cohort with confirmed EGFR amplification also was evaluated at the MTD. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were treated. The MTD and the recommended phase 2 dose for depatux-m was 3.0 mg/kg. Common adverse events (AEs) were blurred vision (48%) and fatigue (41%). A majority of patients (66%) experienced 1 or more ocular AEs. Grade 3 or 4 AEs were observed in 43% of patients. One patient with EGFR-amplified, triple-negative breast cancer had a partial response. Stable disease was observed in 23% of patients. Pharmacokinetics revealed that depatux-m exposures were approximately dose-proportional. CONCLUSIONS: Depatux-m resulted in infrequent nonocular AEs but increased ocular AEs. Patient follow-up confirmed that ocular AEs were reversible. Lowering the drug-antibody ratio did not decrease the number of ocular AEs. A partial response in 1 patient with EGFR-amplified disease provides the opportunity to study depatux-m in diseases with a high incidence of EGFR amplification. Cancer 2018;124:2174-83. © 2018 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Cancer Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

Current strategies in the non-clinical safety assessment of biologics: New targets, new molecules, new challenges.

Nonclinical safety testing of biopharmaceuticals can present significant challenges to human risk assessment with these innovative and often complex drugs. Emerging topics in this field were discussed recently at the 2016 Annual US BioSafe General Membership meeting. The presentations and subsequent discussions from the main sessions are summarized. The topics covered included: (i) specialty biologics (oncolytic virus, gene therapy, and gene editing-based technologies), (ii) the value of non-human primates (NHPs) for safety assessment, (iii) challenges in the safety assessment of immuno-oncology drugs (T cell-dependent bispecifics, checkpoint inhibitors, and costimulatory agonists), (iv) emerging therapeutic approaches and modalities focused on microbiome, oligonucleotide, messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) therapeutics, (v) first in human (FIH) dose selection and the minimum anticipated biological effect level (MABEL), (vi) an update on current regulatory guidelines, International Council for Harmonization (ICH) S1, S3a, S5, S9 and S11 and (vii) breakout sessions that focused on bioanalytical and PK/PD challenges with bispecific antibodies, cytokine release in nonclinical studies, determining adversity and NOAEL for biologics, the value of second species for toxicology assessment and what to do if there is no relevant toxicology species.

Bone Marrow Findings Secondary to Antineoplastic Compounds: Hematopoietic, Bone, and Cytokine Cross Talk.

New medullary bone formation has been observed in rats administered a variety of antineoplastic compounds. Similar effects reported in rats administered granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) were attributed to exaggerated pharmacology of G-CSF as a cytokine and growth factor, resulting in stromal proliferation in addition to the intended hematopoietic effects. Similar phenomena of marrow stromal change are reported among other species in association with various growth factors. Case study summaries of test item-related histopathologic changes in bone marrow, reflecting trabecular and/or endosteal new bone formation, are presented. In each of these cases, it was concluded that the new medullary bone and stromal proliferation did not reflect a primary target-related toxicity; rather, the mesenchymal changes were attributed to nonspecific, secondary effects of cytokines elaborated in response to primary cytotoxic effects on hematopoietic cells with subsequent impact on circulating blood cells. The common features associated with marrow stromal changes in the case studies, as well as with a variety of pharmacologic compounds across several species described in the literature, are hematologic effects and/or changes in growth factor levels and cytokine expression.

Industry perspective on the nonclinical safety assessment of heterobifunctional degraders.

Targeted protein degraders (TPDs), which act through the ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS), are one of the newest small-molecule drug modalities. Since the initiation of the first clinical trial in 2019, investigating the use of ARV-110 in patients with cancer, the field has rapidly expanded. Recently, some theoretical absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) and safety challenges have been posed for the modality. Using these theoretical concerns as a framework, the International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development (IQ Consortium) Protein Degrader Working Group (WG) conducted two surveys to benchmark current preclinical practices for TPDs. Conceptually, the safety assessment of TPDs is the same as for standard small molecules; however, the techniques used, assay conditions/study endpoints, and timing of assessments might need to be modified to address differences in mode of action of the class.

Characterization and Potential Mitigation of Corneal Effects in Nonclinical Toxicology Studies in Animals Administered Depatuxizumab Mafodotin.

Purpose: To characterize the ocular toxicity of an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), depatuxizumab mafodotin (Depatux-m), in nonclinical species and to evaluate the effects of drug-antibody ratios (DARs), variations of the ADC construct, and potential methods for mitigation of the corneal toxicity. Depatux-m contains the potent cytotoxic agent monomethyl auristatin F as the ADC payload. Methods: Depatux-m was administered intravenously to cynomolgus monkeys at doses up to 30 mg/kg and to mice up to 100 mg/kg. Ocular toxicity was evaluated by clinical ophthalmic examinations and histopathology. Potential mitigation was tested through agents to block target engagement and multiple topical ophthalmic treatments (antioxidant, vasoconstrictor, tear stimulant). Results: Effects primarily involved corneal epithelium and were dose-dependent with respect to onset, severity, and time to reversal in both monkeys and mice. On slit lamp biomicroscopy, the initial effect in monkeys was superficial multifocal punctate opacities (granularity), which migrated axially and were followed by pigmentation and multifocal punctate fluorescein staining. Microscopically, findings were characterized by single-cell necrosis, pigmentation, disordered basilar layer, and thinning of the corneal epithelium. Increased toxicity was associated with a higher DAR or more stably attached linker. Treatment with agents to block target engagement did not affect toxicity, and none of the topical treatments was successful. Conclusions: The corneal findings observed were similar to the effects described in clinical trials with Depatux-m and other ADCs. Collectively, these studies and available literature support the hypothesis that ADC-mediated toxicity is driven primarily by mechanism of action of the payload.

Off-target binding of an anti-amyloid beta monoclonal antibody to platelet factor 4 causes acute and chronic toxicity in cynomolgus monkeys.

ABT-736 is a humanized monoclonal antibody generated to target a specific conformation of the amyloid-beta (Aß) protein oligomer. Development of ABT-736 for Alzheimer's disease was discontinued due to severe adverse effects (AEs) observed in cynomolgus monkey toxicity studies. The acute nature of AEs observed only at the highest doses suggested potential binding of ABT-736 to an abundant plasma protein. Follow-up investigations indicated polyspecificity of ABT-736, including unintended high-affinity binding to monkey and human plasma protein platelet factor 4 (PF-4), known to be involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in humans. The chronic AEs observed at the lower doses after repeat administration in monkeys were consistent with HIT pathology. Screening for a backup antibody revealed that ABT-736 possessed additional unintended binding characteristics to other, unknown factors. A subsequently implemented screening funnel focused on nonspecific binding led to the identification of h4D10, a high-affinity Aß oligomer binding antibody that did not bind PF-4 or other unintended targets and had no AEs in vivo. This strengthened the hypothesis that ABT-736 toxicity was not Aß target-related, but instead was the consequence of polyspecificity including PF-4 binding, which likely mediated the acute and chronic AEs and the HIT-like pathology. In conclusion, thorough screening of antibody candidates for nonspecific interactions with unrelated molecules at early stages of discovery can eliminate candidates with polyspecificity and reduce potential for toxicity caused by off-target binding.

Strategies and Recommendations for Using a Data-Driven and Risk-Based Approach in the Selection of First-in-Human Starting Dose: An International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development (IQ) Assessment.

Various approaches to first-in-human (FIH) starting dose selection for new molecular entities (NMEs) are designed to minimize risk to trial subjects. One approach uses the minimum anticipated biological effect level (MABEL), which is a conservative method intended to maximize subject safety and designed primarily for NMEs having high perceived safety risks. However, there is concern that the MABEL approach is being inappropriately used for lower risk molecules with negative impacts on drug development and time to patient access. In addition, ambiguity exists in how MABEL is defined and the methods used to determine it. The International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development convened a working group to understand current use of MABEL and its impact on FIH starting dose selection, and to make recommendations for FIH dose selection going forward. An industry-wide survey suggested the achieved or estimated maximum tolerated dose, efficacious dose, or recommended phase II dose was > 100-fold higher than the MABEL-based starting dose for approximately one third of NMEs, including trials in patients. A decision tree and key risk factor table were developed to provide a consistent, data driven-based, and risk-based approach for selecting FIH starting doses.

Characterization of ABBV-221, a Tumor-Selective EGFR-Targeting Antibody Drug Conjugate.

Depatuxizumab mafodotin (depatux-m, ABT-414) is a tumor-selective antibody drug conjugate (ADC) comprised of the anti-EGFR antibody ABT-806 and the monomethyl auristatin F (MMAF) warhead. Depatux-m has demonstrated promising clinical activity in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients and is currently being evaluated in clinical trials in first-line and recurrent GBM disease settings. Depatux-m responses have been restricted to patients with amplified EGFR, highlighting the need for therapies with activity against tumors with nonamplified EGFR overexpression. In addition, depatux-m dosing has been limited by corneal side effects common to MMAF conjugates. We hypothesized that a monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) ADC utilizing an EGFR-targeting antibody with increased affinity may have broader utility against tumors with more modest EGFR overexpression while mitigating the risk of corneal side effects. We describe here preclinical characterization of ABBV-221, an EGFR-targeting ADC comprised of an affinity-matured ABT-806 conjugated to MMAE. ABBV-221 binds to a similar EGFR epitope as depatux-m and retains tumor selectivity with increased binding to EGFR-positive tumor cells and greater in vitro potency. ABBV-221 displays increased tumor uptake and antitumor activity against wild-type EGFR-positive xenografts with a greatly reduced incidence of corneal side effects relative to depatux-m. ABBV-221 has similar activity as depatux-m against an EGFR-amplified GBM patient derived xenograft (PDX) model and is highly effective alone and in combination with standard-of-care temozolomide in an EGFRvIII-positive GBM xenograft model. Based on these results, ABBV-221 has advanced to a phase I clinical trial in patients with advanced solid tumors associated with elevated levels of EGFR. Mol Cancer Ther; 17(4); 795-805. ©2018 AACR.

Challenges and opportunities for the future of monoclonal antibody development: Improving safety assessment and reducing animal use.

The market for biotherapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) is large and is growing rapidly. However, attrition poses a significant challenge for the development of mAbs, and for biopharmaceuticals in general, with large associated costs in resource and animal use. Termination of candidate mAbs may occur due to poor translation from preclinical models to human safety. It is critical that the industry addresses this problem to maintain productivity. Though attrition poses a significant challenge for pharmaceuticals in general, there are specific challenges related to the development of antibody-based products. Due to species specificity, non-human primates (NHP) are frequently the only pharmacologically relevant species for nonclinical safety and toxicology testing for the majority of antibody-based products, and therefore, as more mAbs are developed, increased NHP use is anticipated. The integration of new and emerging in vitro and in silico technologies, e.g., cell- and tissue-based approaches, systems pharmacology and modeling, have the potential to improve the human safety prediction and the therapeutic mAb development process, while reducing and refining animal use simultaneously. In 2014, to engage in open discussion about the challenges and opportunities for the future of mAb development, a workshop was held with over 60 regulators and experts in drug development, mechanistic toxicology and emerging technologies to discuss this issue. The workshop used industry case-studies to discuss the value of the in vivo studies and identify opportunities for in vitro technologies in human safety assessment. From these and continuing discussions it is clear that there are opportunities to improve safety assessment in mAb development using non-animal technologies, potentially reducing future attrition, and there is a shared desire to reduce animal use through minimised study design and reduced numbers of studies.

Assessment of the abuse liability of ABT-288, a novel histamine H3 receptor antagonist.

RATIONALE: Histamine H3 receptor antagonists, such as ABT-288, have been shown to possess cognitive-enhancing and wakefulness-promoting effects. On the surface, this might suggest that H3 antagonists possess psychomotor stimulant-like effects and, as such, may have the potential for abuse. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to further characterize whether ABT-288 possesses stimulant-like properties and whether its pharmacology gives rise to abuse liability. METHODS: The locomotor-stimulant effects of ABT-288 were measured in mice and rats, and potential development of sensitization was addressed. Drug discrimination was used to assess amphetamine-like stimulus properties, and drug self-administration was used to evaluate reinforcing effects of ABT-288. The potential development of physical dependence was also studied. RESULTS: ABT-288 lacked locomotor-stimulant effects in both rats and mice. Repeated administration of ABT-288 did not result in cross-sensitization to the stimulant effects of d-amphetamine in mice, suggesting that there is little overlap in circuitries upon which the two drugs interact for motor activity. ABT-288 did not produce amphetamine-like discriminative stimulus effects in drug discrimination studies nor was it self-administered by rats trained to self-administer cocaine. There were no signs of physical dependence upon termination of repeated administration of ABT-288 for 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: The sum of these preclinical data, the first of their kind applied to H3 antagonists, indicates that ABT-288 is unlikely to possess a high potential for abuse in the human population and suggests that H3 antagonists, as a class, are similar in this regard.