The impact of health literacy on adolescent and young adult pediatric liver transplant recipients.

Pediatric liver transplant recipients have increased rates of morbidity and mortality following transfer to adult health care providers. The role of health literacy (HL) has not been adequately assessed in this population and may be an unrecognized barrier to successful health care transition. We sought to determine the impact of HL for patients and their caregivers on measures of transition readiness (TR), adherence, health-related quality of life, and medical outcomes following pediatric liver transplant. This is a single-center study of pediatric liver transplant recipients transplanted between the ages of 12 and 26 from October 2016 through August 2020. Patients and caregivers completed 4 surveys to evaluate TR, health-related quality of life, and HL. Clinical outcomes were stratified based on the presence or absence of adequate HL. Limited HL was identified in 57.0% of recipients and 47.4% of caregivers. Patients with limited HL were more likely to be younger in age ( p = 0.004), Hispanic ( p = 0.003), and less likely to have obtained a high school diploma or equivalent ( p < 0.001). Patients with adequate HL demonstrated significantly higher levels of TR ( p < 0.001). Patient HL did not impact health-related quality of life, adherence, or medical outcomes. Caregiver HL did not impact patient outcomes or adherence, though higher levels of caregiver education were associated with adequate patient HL ( p = 0.049). This study demonstrates that limited HL is associated with decreased measures of TR. Inadequate HL may be an unrecognized barrier to a successful health care transition. Regular assessment of HL may provide an opportunity for intervention prior to transfer of care. Future studies should investigate the impact of these interventions on long-term medical outcomes.

Immunosuppression-Free Life after Pediatric Liver Transplant: A Case-Control Study from the Society of Pediatric Liver Transplant (SPLIT) Registry.

OBJECTIVE: To compare long-term outcomes of pediatric liver transplant (LT) recipients off immunosuppression (IS) with matched controls on IS using data from the Society of Pediatric Liver Transplant (SPLIT) registry. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective case-control study. SPLIT participants <18 years of age, ≥4 years after isolated LT, and off IS for ≥1 year (cases) were age- and sex-matched 1:2 to patients with the same primary diagnosis and post-LT follow-up duration (controls). Primary outcomes included retransplantation, allograft rejection, IS comorbidities, and prevalence of SPLIT-derived composite ideal outcome (c-IO) achieved at the end of the follow-up period. Differences were compared using multiple linear regression for continuous outcomes and logistic regression for dichotomous data. RESULTS: The study cohort was composed of 33 cases (42.4% male, 60.6% biliary atresia, median age at LT of 0.7 [P25, P75, 0.5, 1.6] years, median IS withdrawal time of 9 [P25, P75, 6, 12] years after LT) and 66 age- and sex-matched controls. No cases required retransplantation. Cases and controls had similar growth parameters, laboratory values, calculated glomerular filtration rates, rates of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease, graft rejection, and attainment of c-IO. CONCLUSIONS: No differences in allograft rejection rates, IS complications, or c-IO prevalence were seen between SPLIT patients off IS and age- and sex-matched controls remaining on IS. Discontinuation of IS most commonly occurred in the context of rigorously designed IS withdrawal trials. The available sample size was small, affecting generalizability to the broader pediatric LT population.

The use of once-daily LCP-Tacrolimus with adolescent and young adult solid organ transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Adolescent and young adult (AYA) solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients experience increased rates of rejection and graft loss surrounding the time of health care transition, in part due to poor medication adherence. This study aims to examine the impact of a once-daily formulation of tacrolimus, LCP-tacrolimus (LCPT), on medication adherence for AYA SOT patients. METHODS: A retrospective descriptive analysis was performed for all patients who underwent SOT and were prescribed LCPT after the age of 12 at our single-center pediatric hospital. Medication adherence was assessed via provider documentation and the medication level variability index (MLVI). RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were prescribed LCPT as part of their immunosuppression regimen. Twenty patients were converted to LCPT from immediate-acting (IR) tacrolimus; six patients were initiated immediately following transplant, and three patients were unable to receive LCPT due to insurance denial. There was a numeric improvement in medication adherence for converted patients when measured by provider assessment (45.0% vs. 68.4%, p = .140) and MLVI (40.0% vs. 71.4%, p = .276), though these did not reach statistical significance. There were no differences in episodes of rejection or adverse effects. LCPT prescription was not associated with decreased medication burden, and two patients transitioned back to IR tacrolimus due to increased cost. CONCLUSIONS: LCPT use did not significantly improve patient adherence; however, it resulted in numerically higher perceived and measured adherence rates. LCPT appears to be safe and effective in the management of SOT recipients; however, it may not affect pill burden and may result in a higher financial burden. Use may be considered for a select group of AYA SOT recipients.

Impact of early immunosuppression on pediatric liver transplant outcomes within 1 year.

OBJECTIVES: The Starzl Network for Excellence in Pediatric Transplantation identified optimizing immunosuppression (IS) as a priority practice improvement area for patients, families, and providers. We aimed to evaluate associations between clinical characteristics, early IS, and outcomes. METHODS: We analyzed pediatric liver transplant (LT) data from 2013 to 2018 in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and the Society of Pediatric Liver Transplantation (SPLIT) registries. RESULTS: We included 2542 LT recipients in UNOS and 1590 in SPLIT. IS choice varied between centers with steroid induction and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) use each ranging from 0% to 100% across centers. Clinical characteristics associated with early IS choice were inconsistent between the two data sets. T-cell depleting antibody use was associated with improved 1-year graft (hazard ratio [HR] 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34-0.76) and patient (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.20-0.79) survival in UNOS but decreased 1-year patient survival (HR 4.12, 95% CI 1.31-12.93) and increased acute rejection (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.07-2.34) in SPLIT. Non-T-cell depleting antibody use was not associated with differential risk of survival nor rejection. MMF use was associated with improved 1-year graft survival (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.54-0.99) in UNOS only. CONCLUSIONS: Variation exists in center choice of early IS regimen. UNOS and SPLIT data provide conflicting associations between IS and outcomes in multivariable analysis. These results highlight the need for future multicenter collaborative work to identify evidence-based IS best practices.

Expanded Newborn Screening Using Genome Sequencing for Early Actionable Conditions.

Importance: The feasibility of implementing genome sequencing as an adjunct to traditional newborn screening (NBS) in newborns of different racial and ethnic groups is not well understood. Objective: To report interim results of acceptability, feasibility, and outcomes of an ongoing genomic NBS study in a diverse population in New York City within the context of the New York State Department of Health Newborn Screening Program. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Genomic Uniform-screening Against Rare Disease in All Newborns (GUARDIAN) study was a multisite, single-group, prospective, observational investigation of supplemental newborn genome screening with a planned enrollment of 100 000 participants. Parent-reported race and ethnicity were recorded at the time of recruitment. Results of the first 4000 newborns enrolled in 6 New York City hospitals between September 2022 and July 2023 are reported here as part of a prespecified interim analysis. Exposure: Sequencing of 156 early-onset genetic conditions with established interventions selected by the investigators were screened in all participants and 99 neurodevelopmental disorders associated with seizures were optional. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was screen-positive rate. Additional outcomes included enrollment rate and successful completion of sequencing. Results: Over 11 months, 5555 families were approached and 4000 (72.0%) consented to participate. Enrolled participants reflected a diverse group by parent-reported race (American Indian or Alaska Native, 0.5%; Asian, 16.5%; Black, 25.1%; Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, 0.1%; White, 44.7%; 2 or more races, 13.0%) and ethnicity (Hispanic, 44.0%; not Hispanic, 56.0%). The majority of families consented to screening of both groups of conditions (both groups, 90.6%; disorders with established interventions only, 9.4%). Testing was successfully completed for 99.6% of cases. The screen-positive rate was 3.7%, including treatable conditions that are not currently included in NBS. Conclusions and Relevance: These interim findings demonstrate the feasibility of targeted interpretation of a predefined set of genes from genome sequencing in a population of different racial and ethnic groups. DNA sequencing offers an additional method to improve screening for conditions already included in NBS and to add those that cannot be readily screened because there is no biomarker currently detectable in dried blood spots. Additional studies are required to understand if these findings are generalizable to populations of different racial and ethnic groups and whether introduction of sequencing leads to changes in management and improved health outcomes. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05990179.

Monitoring Practices After Pediatric Liver Transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to understand the current monitoring practices after pediatric liver transplantation (LT), specifically regarding follow-up clinic visits, outpatient laboratory testing, protocol biopsies, and diagnostic imaging, and to identify potential center and provider characteristics associated with such practices. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of pediatric LT providers at centers participating in the Society of Pediatric Liver Transplantation (SPLIT) registry was conducted from February 2020 to April 2021. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 79% (38/48 SPLIT centers), with the majority representing large volume centers (>10 LTs per year). Frequency of clinic visits and laboratory monitoring varied by center, but all centers decreased frequency after the first post-transplant year. The most common practice included an annual clinic visit and laboratory sampling every 2-3 months. Surveillance liver biopsy is seldom done during the first post-transplant year, while being routinely performed by 50% of centers after this time period. Centers forgoing surveillance biopsies assert that the results would likely not change management. Only 39% of centers have a hepatologist perform the liver biopsy while the remaining centers consult interventional radiology. Most diagnostic imaging is obtained only as needed. Routine abdominal ultrasounds were obtained by only 50% of responding centers after the first year post-transplant. CONCLUSIONS: SPLIT centers vary widely in the routine management of LTs after the first year post-transplant. While common themes emerge, future studies will be needed to connect protocols to outcomes to determine best practice.

Feasibility of using a patient-reported outcome measure into clinical practice following pediatric liver transplantation: The Starzl Network experience.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are not routinely used in clinical care by pediatric liver transplant (LT) teams. The Starzl Network for Excellence in Pediatric Transplantation (SNEPT) assessed feasibility of using a disease-specific Quality of Life (QoL) questionnaire in the ambulatory setting at 10 SNEPT sites. METHODS: A mixed methods feasibility project assessing administration processes, barriers, and user experiences with the Pediatric Liver Transplant Quality of Life (PeLTQL) tool. Iterative processes sought stakeholder feedback across four phases (Pilot, Extended Pilot, Development of a Mobile App PeLTQL version, and Pilot App use). RESULTS: A total of 149 patient-parent dyads completed the PeLTQL during LT clinic follow-up. Clinicians, parents, and patients evaluated and reported on feasibility of operationalization. Only two of 10 SNEPT sites continued PeLTQL administration after the initial two pilot phases. Reasons include limited clinical time and available personnel aggravated by the COVID-19 pandemic. In response, a mobile application version of the PeLTQL was initiated. Providing PeLTQL responses electronically was "very easy" or "easy" as reported by 96% (22/23) parents. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of a PROM into post-pediatric LT clinical care was feasible, but ongoing utilization stalled. Use of a mobile app towards facilitating completion of the PeLTQL outside of clinic hours may address the time and work-flow barriers identified.

Predictors of survival following liver transplantation for pediatric hepatoblastoma and hepatocellular carcinoma: Experience from the Society of Pediatric Liver Transplantation (SPLIT).

Management of unresectable pediatric hepatoblastoma (HB) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains challenging. The Society of Pediatric Liver Transplantation (SPLIT) database was used to study survival predictors in pediatric liver transplantation (LT) for HB and HCC. Event-free survival (EFS), associated risk factors, and postoperative complications were studied in children requiring LT for HB/HCC at 16 SPLIT centers. Three-year EFS was 81% for HB (n = 157) and 62% for HCC (n = 18) transplants. Of HB transplants, 6.9% were PRETEXT II and 15.3% were POST-TEXT I/II. Tumor extent did not impact survival (p = NS). Salvage (n = 13) and primary HB transplants had similar 3-year EFS (62% versus 78%, p = NS). Among HCC transplants, 3-year EFS was poorer in older patients (38% in ≥8-year-olds vs 86% <8-year-olds) and those with larger tumors (48% for those beyond versus 83% within Milan criteria, p = NS). Risk of infection (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.2, p = .02) and renal injury (HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.7-3.3, p < .001) were higher in malignant versus nonmalignant LT. Survival is favorable for pediatric HB and HCC LT, including outcomes after salvage transplant. Unexpected numbers of LTs occurred in PRE/POST-TEXT I/II tumors. Judicious patient selection is critical to distinguish tumors that are potentially resectable; simultaneously, we must advocate for patients with unresectable malignancies to receive organs.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Efficacy of Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir in Children With Chronic HCV: Part 2 of the DORA Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) has shown high efficacy and safety in chronic HCV-infected adults and adolescents; data in children were limited. DORA part 2 is a phase 2/3, nonrandomized, open-label study evaluating the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of a pediatric formulation of GLE and PIB in children ages 3 to < 12 years. APPROACH AND RESULTS: Children with chronic HCV infection, genotype 1-6, with or without compensated cirrhosis, were divided into three cohorts by age-cohort 2 (9 to < 12 years), cohort 3 (6 to < 9 years), and cohort 4 (3 to < 6 years)-and given weight-based doses of GLE and PIB for 8, 12, or 16 weeks. Primary endpoints were sustained virologic response at posttreatment week 12 (SVR12) and steady-state exposure; secondary endpoints were rates of persistent viremia, relapse, and reinfection. Safety and laboratory abnormalities were assessed. Final pediatric dosages determined to be efficacious were 250 mg GLE + 100 mg PIB (in children weighing ≥ 30 to < 45 kg), 200 mg GLE + 80 mg PIB (≥ 20 to < 30 kg), and 150 mg GLE + 60 mg PIB (12 to < 20 kg). Of 80 participants enrolled and dosed, 96% (77/80) achieved SVR12. One participant, on the initial dose ratio, relapsed by posttreatment week 4; no participants had virologic failures on the final dose ratio of GLE 50 mg/PIB 20 mg. Two nonresponders prematurely discontinued the study. Most adverse events (AEs) were mild; no drug-related serious AEs occurred. Pharmacokinetic exposures were comparable to those of adults. CONCLUSIONS: A pediatric formulation of GLE/PIB was highly efficacious and well tolerated in chronic HCV-infected children 3 to < 12 years old.

Efficacy and Safety of Immunosuppression Withdrawal in Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipients: Moving Toward Personalized Management.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Tolerance is transplantation's holy grail, as it denotes allograft health without immunosuppression and its toxicities. Our aim was to determine, among stable long-term pediatric liver transplant recipients, the efficacy and safety of immunosuppression withdrawal to identify operational tolerance. APPROACH AND RESULTS: We conducted a multicenter, single-arm trial of immunosuppression withdrawal over 36-48 weeks. Liver tests were monitored biweekly (year 1), monthly (year 2), and bimonthly (years 3-4). For-cause biopsies were done at investigators' discretion but mandated when alanine aminotransferase or gamma glutamyltransferase exceeded 100 U/L. All subjects underwent final liver biopsy at trial end. The primary efficacy endpoint was operational tolerance, defined by strict biochemical and histological criteria 1 year after stopping immunosuppression. Among 88 subjects (median age 11 years; 39 boys; 57 deceased donor grafts), 33 (37.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 27.4%, 48.5%) were operationally tolerant, 16 were nontolerant by histology (met biochemical but failed histological criteria), and 39 were nontolerant by rejection. Rejection, predicted by subtle liver inflammation in trial entry biopsies, typically (n = 32) occurred at ≤32% of the trial-entry immunosuppression dose and was treated with corticosteroids (n = 32) and/or tacrolimus (n = 38) with resolution (liver tests within 1.5 times the baseline) for all but 1 subject. No death, graft loss, or chronic, severe, or refractory rejection occurred. Neither fibrosis stage nor the expression level of a rejection gene set increased over 4 years for either tolerant or nontolerant subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Immunosuppression withdrawal showed that 37.5% of selected pediatric liver-transplant recipients were operationally tolerant. Allograft histology did not deteriorate for either tolerant or nontolerant subjects. The timing and reversibility of failed withdrawal justifies future trials exploring the efficacy, safety, and potential benefits of immunosuppression minimization.

The Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Type 2 on Children With Liver Diseases: A Joint European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition and Society of Pediatric Liver Transplantation Position Paper.

ABSTRACT: Children are seldom affected by severe forms of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV2) infection; however, the impact of comorbidities in the clinical presentation and outcome of SARS-CoV2 in children is poorly characterized including that of chronic liver disease (CLD) and those taking immunosuppressive medications for autoimmune liver disease or following liver transplantation (LT). Although not the main target organ, a spectrum of liver involvement has been described in children infected with SARS-CoV2 and those presenting with Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C). The Hepatology Committee of the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) and the Society of Pediatric Liver Transplantation (SPLIT) present an evidence-based position paper on liver involvement in children with SARS-CoV2 infection and its impact on those with CLD as well as LT recipients. All children may exhibit acute liver injury from SARS-CoV2 infection, and those with CLD and may experience hepatic decompensation. Preventative and therapeutic measures are discussed.

Improvements in Disease-Specific Health-Related Quality of Life of Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipients During Immunosuppression Withdrawal.

Long-term immunosuppression (IS) leads to systemic complications affecting health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in pediatric liver transplantation (LT) recipients. We serially assessed HRQOL using the PedsQL Generic and Multidimensional Fatigue Scales and Family Impact and Transplant Modules as part of a multicenter prospective immunosuppression withdrawal (ISW) trial between 2012 and 2018. Participants received a primary LT ≥4 years before the study and were on stable IS with normal liver tests and without rejection in the prior 2 years. IS was withdrawn in 7 steps over 36 to 48 weeks. HRQOL was assessed at regular intervals. The primary endpoint was change in disease-specific HRQOL measured by the PedsQL Transplant Module. Generic HRQOL was measured by the PedsQL Generic Scale and was compared with an age-matched and sex-matched multicenter cohort. Of the 88 participants, 39 were boys, median age was 11 years (range, 8-13), and time since transplant was 9 years (range, 6-11). For 36 months, disease-specific HRQOL improved for all participants, whereas generic HRQOL was unchanged. Neither generic nor disease-specific HRQOL changed for the 35 participants who developed acute rejection during ISW. In the first use of patient-reported outcome measures during an ISW trial, we found improvements in disease-specific HRQOL in all participants and no lasting detrimental effects in those who experienced rejection.

Concomitant tacrolimus and ketorolac therapy in pediatric liver transplant recipients: Teaching old dogma new tricks.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), such as ketorolac, are effective analgesic medications, but concerns for nephrotoxicity have limited their role for pain control following pediatric liver transplantation (LT). Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) and NSAIDs share a similar mechanism of nephrotoxicity, and concomitant administration is traditionally discouraged. A retrospective review of pediatric LT recipients was conducted between 1/1/2015 and 12/31/2019 at a single center. Patients were stratified based on receipt of ketorolac. The primary outcome was the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI). Secondary outcomes included serum creatinine, urine output, estimated glomerular filtration rate, bleeding incidence, oral morphine milligram equivalents, and hospital length of stay (LOS). The incidence of AKI was similar between the two groups with 25.8% of patients in the ketorolac group versus 29.2% of patients in the nonketorolac group (p = .475) meeting criteria in the first 10 days post-transplant. Opioid requirements were less in the ketorolac group (p < .001), who also demonstrated shorter LOS compared with nonketorolac patients (p = .033). Concurrent CNI and ketorolac use did not result in an increased incidence of AKI in the early post-LT period and resulted in significantly lower opioid requirements along with a decreased hospital LOS.

The current state of pediatric transplant hepatology fellowships: A survey of recent graduates.

BACKGROUND: The number of programs offering a PTH fellowship has grown rapidly over the last 10 years. This study aimed to describe the clinical, didactic, procedural, and research experiences of recent PTH fellowship graduates. In addition, we sought to understand graduates' post-fellowship professional responsibilities and their perception about the utility of the PTH fellowship. METHODS: An anonymous survey was distributed from February to October 2020 through REDCap to all recent graduates (2015-2019) of an ACGME-approved PTH fellowship program. The survey consisted of 49 questions focused on the PTH fellowship experience. Results were summarized using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Thirty-eight of 43 graduates (88%) responded to the survey representing 12 PTH fellowship programs. The didactic experience varied; 97% received pathology lectures, 81% radiology lectures, 54% organ allocation lectures, 54% procedural lectures, 57% immunology lectures, and 43% live donation lectures. During the PTH fellowship, the majority of fellows performed >10 liver biopsies (82%) and >5 variceal bandings (58%); however, 63%, 32%, 8%, and 8% never performed paracentesis, variceal sclerotherapy, variceal banding, and liver biopsies, respectively. The majority of fellows (95%) completed a research project during PTH fellowship. Currently, 84% of graduates are employed at a transplant academic institution. All graduates recommended the fellowship. CONCLUSIONS: There is variability in the didactic, clinical, and procedural training among PTH fellowship programs. Although uniformly viewed as a beneficial fellowship year, there is an opportunity to collaborate to create a more standardized training experience.

Variation in immunosuppression practices among pediatric liver transplant centers-Society of Pediatric Liver Transplantation survey results.

BACKGROUND: Variation in IS exists among pediatric liver transplant centers. While individual centers may publish their practice paradigms, current data on practices as a whole are lacking. This study sought to ascertain the IS protocols of pediatric liver transplant centers within the SPLIT to better understand variability and similarities among peer institutions. METHODS: A 27-item questionnaire was developed within the SPLIT Quality Improvement and Clinical Care Committee. The survey collected data regarding center demographics, IS practices, and treatment of acute cellular rejection. RESULTS: Twenty-eight (64%) SPLIT centers responded with 22 (79%) centers performing more than 10 transplants per year and 17 (61%) following more than 100 post-transplant recipients. All centers use a written protocol, and 25 (89%) have a dedicated transplant pharmacist/PharmD. Twenty-five (89%) centers use steroids for induction alone or in combination with thymoglobulin/interleukin-2 antibodies. All centers use tacrolimus for initial maintenance therapy. Most centers have specialized protocols for ABO-incompatible transplants, recipients with renal dysfunction, autoimmune liver diseases, and liver tumors. Treatment of rejection varied but was associated with escalation in IS. CONCLUSION: IS practices among pediatric liver transplant centers are similar including the use of written protocols, pharmacy involvement, steroids for induction, tacrolimus as initial IS, tacrolimus reduction/delay for renal dysfunction, and escalation of IS with rejection severity. However, other IS practices show wide variability including treatment for ABO-incompatible grafts and presumed rejection. This study serves as a foundation to guide prospective research linking IS practice to outcomes to determine best practice.

A Learning Health System for Pediatric Liver Transplant: The Starzl Network for Excellence in Pediatric Transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: Learning health systems (LHS) integrate research, improvement, management, and patient care, such that every child receives "the right care at the right time...every time," that is, evidence-based, personalized medicine. Here, we report our efforts to establish a sustainable, productive, multicenter LHS focused on pediatric liver transplantation. METHODS: The Starzl Network for Excellence in Pediatric Transplantation (SNEPT) is the first multicenter effort by pediatric liver transplant families and providers to develop shared priorities and a shared agenda for innovation in clinical care. This report outlines SNEPT's structure, accomplishments, and challenges as an LHS. RESULTS: We prioritized 4 initial projects: immunosuppression, perioperative anticoagulation, quality of life, and transition of care. We shared center protocols/management to identify areas of practice variability between centers. We prioritized actionable items that address barriers to providing "the right care at the right time" to every pediatric liver transplant recipient: facilitating transparency of practice variation and the connection of practices to patient outcomes, harnessing existing datasets to reduce the burden of tracking outcomes, incorporating patient-reported outcomes into outcome metrics, and accelerating the implementation of knowledge into clinical practice. This has allowed us to strengthen collaborative relationships, design quality improvement projects, and collect pilot data for each of our priority projects. CONCLUSIONS: The field of pediatric liver transplantation can be advanced through application of LHS principles. Going forward, SNEPT will continue to unite patient advocacy, big data, technology, and transplant thought leaders to deliver the best care, while developing new, scalable solutions to pediatric transplantation's most challenging problems.

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 Infection in Children With Liver Transplant and Native Liver Disease: An International Observational Registry Study.

OBJECTIVE: Increased mortality risk because of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV2) infection in adults with native liver disease (LD) and liver transplant (LT) is associated with advanced age and comorbid conditions. We aim to report outcomes for children with LD and LT enrolled in the NASPGHAN/SPLIT SARS-CoV2 registry. METHODS: In this multicenter observational cohort study, we collected data from 91 patients <21 years (LD 44, LT 47) with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV2 infection between April 21 and September 17, 2020. RESULTS: Patients with LD were more likely to require admission (70% vs 43% LT, P = 0.007) and pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) management (32% vs 4% LT, P = 0.001). Seven LD patients required mechanical ventilation (MV) and 2 patients died; no patients in the LT cohort died or required MV. Four LD patients presented in pediatric acute liver failure (PALF), 2 with concurrent multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C); all recovered without LT. Two LD patients had MIS-C alone and 1 patient died. Bivariable logistic-regression analysis found that patients with nonalcoholic fatty LD (NAFLD) (odds ratio [OR] 5.6, P = 0.02) and LD (OR 6.1, P = 0.01, vs LT) had higher odds of severe disease (PICU, vasopressor support, MV, renal replacement therapy or death). CONCLUSIONS: Although not directly comparable, LT recipients had lower odds of severe SARS-CoV2 infection (vs LD), despite immunosuppression burden. NAFLD patients reported to the registry had higher odds of severe SARS-CoV2 disease. Future controlled studies are needed to evaluate effective treatments and further stratify LD and LT patients with SARS-CoV2 infection.

Bone Fractures in Children With Cholestatic Liver Disease May Mimic Those Seen in Child Abuse.

ABSTRACT: Certain fractures in children are highly specific for child abuse. Metabolic bone disease frequently develops in patients with cholestatic liver disease (CLD); this can result in weakened bones and a predisposition to pathologic fractures. Fractures that occur in patients with rickets and osteopenia may mimic a bone response to inflicted injury, which in children raise the concern of child abuse. Here we report a series of 15 patients with CLD who developed pathologic fractures in the setting of metabolic bone disease. During initial evaluation, the caretakers of 5 of these 15 patients were reported to child protective services and investigated for child abuse. Pediatricians should be aware that children with CLD have an increased incidence of pathologic fractures, even after the cholestasis has resolved.

Role of Budesonide for the Treatment of Rejection in Pediatric Liver Transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Corticosteroids are an integral part of liver transplant (LT) immunosuppression regimens but are often accompanied by many adverse effects. Budesonide is an oral corticosteroid with extensive (80%-90%) hepatic first-pass metabolism and minimal systemic absorption. The aim of this study was to examine the safety and efficacy of budesonide for management of acute cellular rejection (ACR) in pediatric LT recipients. METHODS: A retrospective descriptive analysis was performed for all pediatric patients who underwent LT at our center and were prescribed oral budesonide for the treatment of ACR. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) values and documented adverse effects were reviewed. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were prescribed budesonide for the treatment of ACR; 65.5% with biopsy-proven acute rejection and 34.5% with presumed ACR. There was a significant decrease in ALT noted from the time of rejection when compared to values 1 month (P = 0.0011), 3 months (P = 0.0003), and 6 months (P = 0.0001) after treatment with budesonide. There was no difference noted between patient baseline ALT levels before rejection when compared to 1, 3, and 6 months posttreatment values suggesting resolution of rejection. Three patients required conversion from budesonide to systemic steroids. There were no discontinuations of budesonide secondary to adverse effects. CONCLUSION: Oral budesonide may be a promising alternative to systemic corticosteroids for the management of mild/moderate ACR and for empiric treatment of ACR in select pediatric LT recipients. Data from this study may provide the foundation for larger, prospective, multicenter trials to assess the effectiveness of budesonide in the treatment of ACR.

A community divided: Post-transplant live vaccine practices among Society of Pediatric Liver Transplantation (SPLIT) centers.

BACKGROUND: Historically, the IDSA and the AST have recommended that live vaccines not be administered post-transplant due to concern for induction of vaccine-strain disease in immunocompromised hosts. However, recent prospective studies and revised AST guidelines published in April 2019 suggest that in the current era of immunosuppression minimization, live vaccines may be safely administered to select transplant recipients with resulting immunoprotection. The goal of this study was to assess current post-transplant live vaccine practices at individual pediatric liver transplant centers following the updated AST guidelines. METHODS: A six-item email survey detailing center-specific post-transplant live vaccine practices followed by up to three response-specific questions were distributed between July 2019 and May 2020 to a representative from each center participating in the SPLIT consortium. RESULTS: The overall survey response rate was 93% (41/44 centers). Only 29% (12/41) of centers offer live vaccines post-transplant; each of these 12 centers uses different eligibility criteria for live vaccines. There was no difference between large (ten or more transplants per year) and small (less than ten transplants per year) centers in likelihood to offer live vaccines post-transplant. The main reasons for a center not offering post-transplant live vaccines were safety concerns and inability to reach group consensus. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of pediatric liver transplant centers are reluctant to offer live vaccines post-transplant despite the updated AST guidelines. Prospective multicenter studies are needed to confirm safety and immunogenicity of live vaccines post-transplant.