Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 20
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Neuromodulation ; 17(7): 670-6; discussion 676-7, 2014 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24512097

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Percutaneous spinal cord stimulation electrodes have a propensity to migrate longitudinally, which is a costly complication that often compromises therapeutic effect. After implementing simple changes to our percutaneous electrode anchoring technique, we no longer encounter this migration. The current retrospective study updates previously reported results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively examined data in a consecutive series of patients in whom we had secured a new percutaneous electrode by injecting < 0.1 cm(3) of adhesive into the silicone elastomer lead anchor. From 1998 through 2006, we used whichever anchor was supplied with each lead until we observed one case of migration through a short anchor; thereafter, we used a long, tapered anchor exclusively. From 2007 through 2013, we further modified our technique by adding a fascial incision to accommodate the tip of the anchor and by increasing the strength of our suture material. RESULTS: In the first series of 291 patients, followed through July 2007 (mean 4.75 years, range 1.1-9.0 years), 4 (1.37%) experienced electrode migration requiring surgical revision. Only one lead had moved with respect to its anchor; the other three anchors remained securely bonded to their leads. No migration (0.00%) occurred in the second series of 142 patients, followed through 2013 (mean follow-up 2.86 years, range 0.10-5.45 years). CONCLUSION: Improvements to our simple, inexpensive technique apparently have eliminated the most common complication of spinal cord stimulation.


Asunto(s)
Electrodos Implantados/efectos adversos , Migración de Cuerpo Extraño/etiología , Migración de Cuerpo Extraño/prevención & control , Piel/inervación , Estimulación de la Médula Espinal/efectos adversos , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
Med Teach ; 32(8): 676-82, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20662580

RESUMEN

Competency-based medical education (CBME), by definition, necessitates a robust and multifaceted assessment system. Assessment and the judgments or evaluations that arise from it are important at the level of the trainee, the program, and the public. When designing an assessment system for CBME, medical education leaders must attend to the context of the multiple settings where clinical training occurs. CBME further requires assessment processes that are more continuous and frequent, criterion-based, developmental, work-based where possible, use assessment methods and tools that meet minimum requirements for quality, use both quantitative and qualitative measures and methods, and involve the wisdom of group process in making judgments about trainee progress. Like all changes in medical education, CBME is a work in progress. Given the importance of assessment and evaluation for CBME, the medical education community will need more collaborative research to address several major challenges in assessment, including "best practices" in the context of systems and institutional culture and how to best to train faculty to be better evaluators. Finally, we must remember that expertise, not competence, is the ultimate goal. CBME does not end with graduation from a training program, but should represent a career that includes ongoing assessment.


Asunto(s)
Educación Basada en Competencias/organización & administración , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina , Evaluación del Rendimiento de Empleados/organización & administración , Competencia Clínica/normas , Humanos
4.
Med Teach ; 32(8): 638-45, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20662574

RESUMEN

Although competency-based medical education (CBME) has attracted renewed interest in recent years among educators and policy-makers in the health care professions, there is little agreement on many aspects of this paradigm. We convened a unique partnership - the International CBME Collaborators - to examine conceptual issues and current debates in CBME. We engaged in a multi-stage group process and held a consensus conference with the aim of reviewing the scholarly literature of competency-based medical education, identifying controversies in need of clarification, proposing definitions and concepts that could be useful to educators across many jurisdictions, and exploring future directions for this approach to preparing health professionals. In this paper, we describe the evolution of CBME from the outcomes movement in the 20th century to a renewed approach that, focused on accountability and curricular outcomes and organized around competencies, promotes greater learner-centredness and de-emphasizes time-based curricular design. In this paradigm, competence and related terms are redefined to emphasize their multi-dimensional, dynamic, developmental, and contextual nature. CBME therefore has significant implications for the planning of medical curricula and will have an important impact in reshaping the enterprise of medical education. We elaborate on this emerging CBME approach and its related concepts, and invite medical educators everywhere to enter into further dialogue about the promise and the potential perils of competency-based medical curricula for the 21st century.


Asunto(s)
Educación Basada en Competencias/historia , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina , Modelos Teóricos , Educación Basada en Competencias/organización & administración , Historia del Siglo XX , Humanos
5.
J Neurosurg Spine ; 8(4): 327-34, 2008 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18377317

RESUMEN

OBJECT: Laminar fixation of the axis with crossing bilateral screws has been shown to provide rigid fixation with a theoretically decreased risk of vertebral artery damage compared with C1-2 transarticular screw fixation and C-2 pedicle screw fixation. Some studies, however, have shown restricted rigidity of such screws compared with C-2 pedicle screws, and others note that anatomical variability exists within the posterior elements of the axis that may have an impact on successful placement. To elucidate the clinical impact of such screws, the authors report their experience in placing C-2 laminar screws in adult patients over a 2-year period, with emphasis on clinical outcome and technical placement. METHODS: Sixteen adult patients with cervical instability underwent posterior cervical and cervicothoracic fusion procedures at our institution with constructs involving C-2 laminar screws. Eleven patients were men and 5 were women, and they ranged in age from 28 to 84 years (mean 57 years). The reasons for fusion were degenerative disease (9 patients) and treatment of trauma (7 patients). In 14 patients (87.5%) standard translaminar screws were placed, and in 2 (12.5%) an ipsilateral trajectory was used. All patients underwent preoperative radiological evaluation of the cervical spine, including computed tomography scanning with multiplanar reconstruction to assess the posterior anatomy of C-2. Anatomical restrictions for placement of standard translaminar screws included a deeply furrowed spinous process and/or an underdeveloped midline posterior ring of the axis. In these cases, screws were placed into the corresponding lamina from the ipsilateral side, allowing bilateral screws to be oriented in a more parallel, as opposed to perpendicular, plane. All patients were followed for >2 years to record rates of fusion, instrumentation failure, and other complications. RESULTS: Thirty-two screws were placed without neurological or vascular complications. The mean follow-up duration was 27.3 months. Complications included 2 revisions, one for pseudarthrosis and the other for screw pullout, and 3 postoperative infections. CONCLUSIONS: Placement of laminar screws into the axis from the standard crossing approach or via an ipsilateral trajectory may allow a safe, effective, and durable means of including the axis in posterior cervical and cervicothoracic fusion procedures.


Asunto(s)
Vértebra Cervical Axis , Tornillos Óseos , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Laminectomía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/etiología , Fusión Vertebral/instrumentación , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
J Neurosurg ; 106(2): 210-6, 2007 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17410701

RESUMEN

OBJECT: Opioid administration after major intracranial surgery is often limited by a presumed lack of need and a concern that opioids will adversely affect the postoperative neurological examination. The authors conducted a prospective study to evaluate the incidence, severity, and treatment of postoperative pain in patients who underwent major intracranial surgery. METHODS: One hundred eighty-seven patients (77 men and 110 women, mean age 52 +/- 15 years, mean weight 78.1 +/- 19.9 kg) underwent either supratentorial (129 patients) or infratentorial (58 patients) procedures. Sixty-nine percent of the patients reported experiencing moderate to severe pain (> or =4 on a 0-10 scale) during the 1st postoperative day. Pain scores greater than or equal to 4 persisted in 48% on the 2nd postoperative day. Approximately 80% of patients were treated with acetaminophen on the 1st postoperative day, whereas opioids (primarily intravenous fentanyl) were administered to 58%. Compared with patients who underwent supratentorial procedures, those who underwent infratentorial procedures reported more severe pain at rest (mean score 4.9 +/- 2.2 compared with 3.8 +/- 2.6; p = 0.015) and with movement (mean score 6.3 +/- 2.6 compared with 4.5 +/- 2.7; p < 0.001) on the 1st postoperative day. On both the 1st and 2nd postoperative days, patients who underwent infratentorial procedures received greater quantities of opioid (p < or = 0.019) and nonopioid (p < or = 0.013) analgesics than those who underwent supratentorial procedures. Patients' dissatisfaction with analgesic therapy was significantly associated with elevated pain levels on the first 2 postoperative days (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to prevailing assumptions, the study findings reveal that most patients undergoing elective major intracranial surgery will experience moderate to severe pain for the first 2 days after surgery and that this pain is often inadequately treated.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Craneotomía/efectos adversos , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Postoperatorio/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Analgésicos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Bloqueo Nervioso , Dimensión del Dolor , Satisfacción del Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
J Neurosurg ; 107(2): 347-51, 2007 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17695389

RESUMEN

OBJECT: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea remains a significant cause of morbidity after resection of vestibular schwannomas (VSs), with rates of rhinorrhea after this procedure reported to range between 0 and 27%. The authors investigated whether reconstruction of the drilled posterior wall of the porus acusticus with hydroxyapatite cement (HAC) would decrease the incidence of postoperative CSF rhinorrhea. METHODS: A prospective observational study of 130 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for reconstruction of the posterior wall of the drilled porus acusticus with HAC was conducted between October 2002 and September 2005. All patients underwent a retrosigmoid transmeatal approach for VS resection and were followed up to document cases of CSF rhinorrhea, incisional CSF leak, meningitis, or rhinorrhea-associated meningitis. A cohort of 150 patients with VSs who were treated with the same surgical approach but without HAC reconstruction served as a control group. RESULTS: The authors found that HAC reconstruction of the porus acusticus wall significantly reduced the rate of postoperative CSF rhinorrhea in their patients. In the patients treated with HAC, rhinorrhea developed in only three patients (2.3%) compared with 18 patients (12%) in the control group. This was a statistically significant finding (p = 0.002, odds ratio = 5.8). CONCLUSIONS: The use of HAC in the reconstruction of the drilled posterior wall of the porus acusticus, occluding exposed air cells, greatly reduces the risk of CSF rhinorrhea.


Asunto(s)
Rinorrea de Líquido Cefalorraquídeo/etiología , Rinorrea de Líquido Cefalorraquídeo/prevención & control , Hidroxiapatitas/uso terapéutico , Neuroma Acústico/cirugía , Hueso Petroso/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Adulto , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neuroma Acústico/patología , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Surg Neurol ; 68(4): 443-8; discussion 448, 2007 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17905071

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Anterior sacral meningocele is a rare congenital malformation, whose open surgical treatment is well accepted. We present a laparoscopic approach as an adjunctive approach. METHODS: Five women who underwent laparoscopic transperitoneal surgery were clinically, radiologically, and surgically evaluated. RESULT: All 5 patients underwent laparoscopic transperitoneal surgery and showed satisfactory results. They had no major complications. Three patients had headaches as minor complications, but it was gone in at most 3 days. Decrease in operative time, blood loss, and length of hospitalization were the advantages of the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic approach to treating anterior sacral meningocele was feasible and safe, with only minor complications.


Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía/métodos , Meningocele/cirugía , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/métodos , Adulto , Anestesia General , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Femenino , Cefalea/epidemiología , Cefalea/etiología , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Síndrome de Marfan/complicaciones , Meninges/anatomía & histología , Meninges/cirugía , Meningocele/diagnóstico por imagen , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
9.
Spine J ; 7(1): 118-32, 2007.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17197345

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND CONTENT: There are currently a number of generic and disease-specific instruments for assessing complaints of low back pain (LBP). None provide the comprehensive coverage of the wide range of factors that are considered essential in evaluating treatment outcomes. PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of a comprehensive, disease-specific questionnaire for characterizing complaints of LBP and evaluating the outcomes of treatments for these complaints. STUDY DESIGN: A clinical-cohort study of a large, convenience sample of LBP patients. METHODS: We have developed a comprehensive, disease-specific questionnaire for characterizing complaints of LBP and evaluating the outcomes of treatments for these complaints. A large group of patients who sought treatment for LBP (n=2539) completed the Lumbar Spine Outcomes Questionnaire (LSOQ) before treatment, and at 12 and 24 months after treatment. For each subject and for each evaluation period, scores on six composite measures were derived from the subjects' responses to the questionnaire: a LBP severity score, a leg pain severity score, a functional disability score, a psychological distress score, a physical symptoms score, and a health-care utilization score. These scores were used to evaluate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the questionnaire. RESULTS: Test-retest reliability of the LSOQ was evaluated by correlating the subject's 12-month scores on each composite measure with the corresponding 24-month scores. Intraclass coefficients of correlation were used. The obtained coefficients of correlation [(a) LBP severity, 0.87; (b) leg pain severity, 0.85; (c) functional disability, 0.87; (d) psychological distress, 0.88; (e) physical symptoms other than pain, 0.82; and (f) health-care utilization, 0.76] indicate good test-retest reliability for the LSOQ. Construct validity was evaluated by correlating scores on the composite measures derived from the LSOQ with scores on measures of the same constructs derived from the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and the Short Form 36-Item Health Survey. The coefficients of correlation were relatively high (mostly between .7 and .9), indicating good construct validity. Construct validity was also evaluated by comparing the scores of groups of subjects who were known to differ or not to differ on the composite measures, using multivariate analyses of variance. Significant multivariate and univariate differences were obtained between groups who were expected to differ (ie, surgically and nonsurgically treated patients). No significant differences were found for groups who were not expected to differ (ie, patients with similar diagnosis, but different surgical treatments). Responsiveness was assessed by evaluating differences in the 24-month change scores between improved and unimproved subjects. Large and significant differences were obtained between improved and unimproved subjects for all composite measures derived from the LSOQ. The observed effect sizes ranged from .68 to 1.17 indicating that the LSOQ is highly responsive. CONCLUSION: The LSOQ appears to be acceptable to patients, easy to administer, highly reliable, valid, and responsive. It provides information on demographics, pain severity, functional disability, psychological distress, physical symptoms, health-care utilization, and satisfaction. It should be considered for use in both clinical and research applications as well as regulatory review involving patients with LBP complaints.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de la Región Lumbar/terapia , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Psicometría/instrumentación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estudios de Cohortes , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Femenino , Humanos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/fisiopatología , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/psicología , Masculino , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Psicometría/métodos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
10.
J Neurosurg Spine ; 24(5): 700-7, 2016 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26745352

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE Tarlov cysts (TCs) occur most commonly on extradural components of the sacral and coccygeal nerve roots. These lesions are often found incidentally, with an estimated prevalence of 4%-9%. Given the low estimated rates of symptomatic TC and the fact that symptoms can overlap with other common causes of low-back pain, optimal management of this entity is a matter of ongoing debate. Here, the authors investigate the effects of surgical intervention on symptomatic TCs and aim to solidify the surgical criteria for this disease process. METHODS The authors performed a retrospective review of data from consecutive patients who were surgically treated for symptomatic TCs from September 2011 to March 2013. Clinical evaluations and results from surveying pain and overall health were used. Univariate statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS Twenty-three adults (4 males, 19 females) who had been symptomatic for a mean of 47.4 months were treated with laminectomy, microsurgical exposure and/or imbrication, and paraspinous muscle flap closure. Eighteen patients (78.3%) had undergone prior interventions without sustained improvement. Thirteen patients (56.5%) underwent lumbar drainage for an average of 8.7 days following surgery. The mean follow-up was 14.4 months. Univariate analyses demonstrated that an advanced age (p = 0.045), the number of noted perineural cysts on preoperative imaging (p = 0.02), and the duration of preoperative symptoms (p = 0.03) were associated with a poor postoperative outcome. Although 47.8% of the patients were able to return to normal activities, 93.8% of those surveyed reported that they would undergo the operation again if given the choice. CONCLUSIONS This is one of the largest published studies on patients with TCs treated microsurgically. The data suggest that patients with symptomatic TCs may benefit from open microsurgical treatment. Although outcomes seem related to patient age, duration of symptoms, and extent of disease demonstrated on imaging, further study is warranted and underway.


Asunto(s)
Laminectomía/métodos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/cirugía , Microcirugia/métodos , Músculos Paraespinales/cirugía , Quistes de Tarlov/cirugía , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/diagnóstico por imagen , Región Lumbosacra/diagnóstico por imagen , Región Lumbosacra/cirugía , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Músculos Paraespinales/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Retrospectivos , Quistes de Tarlov/diagnóstico por imagen , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
Laryngoscope ; 115(1): 93-8, 2005 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15630374

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: As stereotactic radiation has emerged as a treatment option for acoustic neuromas, cases that require surgical salvage after unsuccessful radiation have emerged. We present a comparison of the technical challenges faced by the surgeons in the treatment of irradiated versus nonirradiated acoustic neuromas. STUDY DESIGN: Matched case-control series. METHODS: We identified nine patients with acoustic neuromas that required surgical resection after radiation therapy. Cases were performed with suboccipital and translabyrinthine approaches. Nine nonirradiated case-control subjects matched for age, sex, tumor size, and surgical approach were identified for purposes of general comparison. Operative findings and outcomes were compared for the two groups. RESULTS: Surgical removal was found to be significantly more difficult after radiation therapy because of increased fibrosis and adhesion to adjacent nervous structures, particularly at the porus acousticus. Excessive scarring hindered identification of the facial nerve and added uncertainty as to the completeness of tumor removal. Decompression of the internal auditory canal (IAC) dura and resection of neoplasm in the IAC before cerebellopontine angle dissection was required for facial nerve identification. Operative time was significantly longer for irradiated cases, and facial nerve outcomes tended to be poorer, particularly when facial nerve dysfunction prompted the salvage procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical salvage of acoustic neuromas after radiation therapy is feasible, but it presents technical challenges beyond that associated with primary surgical therapy. Poorer outcomes of postoperative cranial nerve status were caused primarily by anatomic changes at the nerve/tumor interface. As surgical experience with the irradiated acoustic neuroma grows, operative observations should be incorporated into the counsel provided to patients with acoustic neuromas as they weigh different management options.


Asunto(s)
Neuroma Acústico/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neuroma Acústico/patología , Neuroma Acústico/radioterapia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos/métodos , Radiocirugia , Terapia Recuperativa , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento
12.
Pain ; 87(1): 89-97, 2000 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10863049

RESUMEN

We have developed a simple procedure for assigning persistent low back pain patients to one of four mutually exclusive, hierarchically organized classes. The procedure relies on the spatial distribution of a patient's pain and the results of straight leg raise tests to make the assignment. We have applied the procedure to a large group of patients who sought treatment for persistent LBP at several university affiliated tertiary care clinics, and found that the resulting four classes of patients were significantly different from one another in their presentation, and in the way they were evaluated and treated by physicians. We concluded that the procedure may have practical research and clinical applications.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de la Región Lumbar/diagnóstico , Ciática/diagnóstico , Estrés Psicológico/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/complicaciones , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Inventario de Personalidad , Ciática/complicaciones , Ciática/psicología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Estrés Psicológico/complicaciones , Estados Unidos
13.
Pain ; 17(2): 189-195, 1983 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6606154

RESUMEN

We wished to determine if pain relief that resulted from transcutaneous (TNS) or spinal cord electrical stimulation in patients with chronic pain was due to activation of an endogenous opiate-related pain control system. Naloxone (0.4-10 mg) or saline was injected in double-blind fashion intravenously into opiate-naive subjects with chronic pain who achieved 30% or greater pain relief with spinal cord stimulation (4 patients) or TNS (9 patients). Subjects rated their pain during stimulation and 2, 5, 10 and 15 min after the injection. Two days or more later the procedure was repeated using the alternate agent (naloxone or saline). Naloxone did not decrease the pain relief induced by stimulation, and therefore the effects of stimulation are probably not mediated by the endogenous opiates.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica , Naloxona/farmacología , Manejo del Dolor , Enfermedad Crónica , Método Doble Ciego , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/métodos , Endorfinas/fisiología , Espacio Epidural , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Médula Espinal , Estimulación Eléctrica Transcutánea del Nervio
14.
Neurosurgery ; 52(5): 1056-63; discussion 1063-5, 2003 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12699547

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Improved clinical and economic outcomes for high-risk surgical procedures have been previously cited in support of regionalization. The goal of this study was to examine the effects of regionalization by analyzing the cost and outcome of craniotomy for tumors and to compare the findings in academic medical centers versus community-based hospitals. METHODS: Outcomes and charges were analyzed for all adult patients undergoing craniotomy for tumor in 33 nonfederal acute care hospitals in Maryland using the Maryland Health Service Cost Review Commission database for the years 1990 to 1996. A total of 4723 patients who underwent craniotomy for tumor were selected on the basis of Diagnostic Related Group 1 (craniotomy except for trauma, age 18 or older) and International Classification of Diseases-9th Revision diagnosis code for benign tumor, primary malignant neoplasm, or secondary malignant neoplasm (codes 191, 192, 194, 200, 225, 227, 228, 237, and 239). Hospitals were categorized as high-volume hospitals (>50 craniotomies/yr) or low-volume hospitals (

Asunto(s)
Centros Médicos Académicos/economía , Centros Médicos Académicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/economía , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirugía , Craneotomía/economía , Craneotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Precios de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/economía , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación y Consulta/economía , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Programas Médicos Regionales/economía , Programas Médicos Regionales/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidad , Craneotomía/mortalidad , Femenino , Capacidad de Camas en Hospitales/economía , Capacidad de Camas en Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Maryland , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Carga de Trabajo/economía , Carga de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos
15.
Neurosurgery ; 67(4): 885-93; discussion 893, 2010 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20802356

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Parasagittal meningiomas invading the superior sagittal sinus (SSS) pose formidable obstacles to surgical management. Invasion is often considered a contraindication to surgery because of associated morbidity, such as cerebral venous thrombosis. OBJECTIVE: We report our most recent experience with the resection of parasagittal meningiomas invading the SSS. METHODS: Between 1992 and 2004, 110 patients with parasagittal meningiomas underwent surgery at the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions. Clinical charts, radiological studies, pathological features, and operative notes were retrospectively analyzed; only those patients with minimum 24 months follow-up (n = 61) were further studied. RESULTS: Tumor distribution by location along the SSS was: 21% anterior, 62% middle, and 17% posterior. All patients were managed with initial surgical resection with radiosurgery for residual/recurrent disease if indicated (19.6%). Pathological examination revealed 80% grade I meningiomas, 13% grade II meningiomas, and 7% grade III meningiomas. Simpson grade I/II resection was achieved in 81% of patients. Major complications included venous thrombosis/infarction (7%), intraoperative air embolism (1.5%), and death (1.5%); long-term outcomes assessed included recurrence (11%) and improvement in Karnofsky Performance Score (85%). CONCLUSION: On the basis of our study, the incidence of postoperative venous sinus thrombosis is 7% in the setting of a recurrence rate of 11% with a mean follow-up of 41 months. In comparison with the published literature, the data corroborate the rationale for our treatment paradigm; lesions invading the sinus can initially be resected to the greatest extent possible without excessive manipulation of vascular structures, whereas residual/recurrent disease can be observed and managed with radiosurgery.


Asunto(s)
Senos Craneales/patología , Senos Craneales/cirugía , Craneotomía/métodos , Neoplasias Meníngeas/cirugía , Meningioma/cirugía , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Anciano , Angiografía Cerebral/métodos , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos
16.
J Neurosurg Spine ; 12(2): 178-82, 2010 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20121353

RESUMEN

OBJECT: The most common spinal procedure performed in the US is lumbar discectomy for disc herniation. Longterm disc degeneration and height loss occur in many patients after lumbar discectomy. The incidence of mechanical back pain following discectomy varies widely in the literature, and its associated health care costs are unknown. The authors set out to determine the incidence of and the health care costs associated with mechanical back pain attributed to segmental degeneration or instability at the level of a prior discectomy performed at their institution. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the data for 111 patients who underwent primary, single-level lumbar hemilaminotomy and discectomy for radiculopathy. All diagnostic modalities, conservative therapies, and operative treatments used for the management of postdisectomy back pain were recorded. Institutional billing and accounting records were reviewed to determine the billed costs of all diagnostic and therapeutic measures. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 37.3 months after primary discectomy, 75 patients (68%) experienced minimal to no back pain, 26 (23%) had moderate back pain requiring conservative treatment only, and 10 (9%) suffered severe back pain that required a subsequent fusion surgery at the site of the primary discectomy. The mean cost per patient for conservative treatment alone was $4696. The mean cost per patient for operative treatment was $42,554. The estimated cost of treatment for mechanical back pain associated with postoperative same-level degeneration or instability was $493,383 per 100 cases of first-time, single-level lumbar discectomy ($4934 per primary discectomy). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative mechanical back pain associated with same-level degeneration is not uncommon in patients undergoing single-level lumbar discectomy and is associated with substantial health care costs.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de Espalda/economía , Dolor de Espalda/epidemiología , Discectomía/efectos adversos , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Radiculopatía/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Dolor de Espalda/etiología , Dolor de Espalda/terapia , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/cirugía , Laminectomía/efectos adversos , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor Postoperatorio/economía , Dolor Postoperatorio/epidemiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/terapia , Radiografía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
18.
Neurosurgery ; 65(3): 574-8; discussion 578, 2009 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19687703

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Same-level recurrent lumbar disc herniation complicates outcomes after primary discectomy in a subset of patients. The health care costs associated with the management of this complication are currently unknown. We set out to identify the incidence and health care cost of same-level recurrent disc herniation after single-level lumbar discectomy at our institution. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 156 consecutive patients undergoing primary single-level lumbar discectomy at one institution. The incidence of symptomatic same-level recurrent disc herniation either responding to conservative therapy or requiring revision discectomy was assessed. Institutional billing and accounting records were reviewed to determine the billing costs of all diagnostic and therapeutic measures used for patients experiencing recurrent disc herniation. RESULTS: Twelve months after surgery, 141 patients were available for follow-up. Of these patients, 124 (88%) were symptom free or had minimal symptoms not affecting their daily activity. Radiographically proven symptomatic same-level recurrent disc herniation developed in 17 patients (12%) a median of 8 months after primary discectomy. Eleven patients (7%) required revision surgery, whereas 6 (3.9%) responded to conservative therapy alone. Diagnosis and management of recurrent disc herniation were associated with a mean cost of $26,593 per patient, and the mean cost was markedly less for patients responding to conservative treatment ($2315) compared with those requiring revision surgery ($39,836) (P < 0.001). Of 141 primary lumbar discectomies performed at our institution with the patients followed for 1 year, the total cost associated with the management of subsequent recurrent disc herniation was $452,083 ($289,797 per 100 primary discectomies). CONCLUSION: In our experience, recurrent lumbar disc herniation occurred in more than 10% of patients and was associated with substantial health care costs. Development of novel techniques to prevent recurrent lumbar disc herniation is warranted to decrease the health care costs and morbidity associated with this complication. Prolonged conservative management should be attempted when possible to reduce the health care costs of this complication.


Asunto(s)
Discectomía/economía , Discectomía/métodos , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/economía , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/cirugía , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Vértebras Lumbares/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Prevención Secundaria , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
19.
Neurosurgery ; 62(4): 965-7; discussion 967-8, 2008 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18496203

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Since the groundbreaking article from the University of Minnesota in 1961 by Drs. Galicich, French, and Melby describing the use of dexamethasone for peritumoral cerebral edema, the use of corticosteroids in patients with brain tumors has become routine. Unfortunately, little has been reported regarding the environment that fostered arguably the greatest translational research contribution in the history of neurosurgery. METHODS: During a pilot study to assess corticosteroid uptake in brain tumors, Dr. Galicich observed that patients given a large dose of corticosteroids just before craniotomy had a relatively benign postoperative course. This led, in October 1959, to the administration of high-dose corticosteroids to a patient with a large recurrent glioblastoma who was semicomatose and severely hemiparetic. The results were dramatic, with almost complete resolution of neurological deficit during a period of several days and marked reduction of midline shift on repeat angiograms. This finding prompted the studies that confirmed the efficacy of high-dose corticosteroids in reducing peritumoral brain edema in humans reported in the 1961 article. RESULTS: After publication, a revolution in brain tumor management occurred because corticosteroid therapy markedly reduced the morbidity and mortality associated with brain tumors both in the United States and worldwide. CONCLUSION: The combination of astute clinical observation and follow up by rigorous clinical research at the University of Minnesota resulted in one of the greatest contributions in the history of neurosurgery, rivaled only by the operative microscope in its effect on morbidity, and unsurpassed in reduction of mortality.


Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides/historia , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Edema Encefálico/historia , Edema Encefálico/prevención & control , Médicos/historia , Historia del Siglo XX , Minnesota
20.
J Spinal Disord Tech ; 15(1): 2-15, 2002 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11891445

RESUMEN

Patients with persistent low back pain (LBP) appear to be different in several important ways from patients who have traditionally been classified as patients with acute or chronic LBP, and data on the effectiveness of the treatments prescribed for them are lacking. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the short- and long-term effectiveness of the treatments currently prescribed for these patients. The data reported in this article were gathered as part of a multicenter, prospective, cross-sectional study of patients who were treated for persistent LBP by neurologic and orthopedic surgeons who are recognized specialists in spinal disorders. At enrollment, patients completed a baseline evaluation, and their physicians recorded relevant clinical and treatment data on standardized study forms. At 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment, patients completed follow-up evaluations. Patients were divided into five treatment groups, and effectiveness was evaluated separately for each group using five patient-reported measures of outcome: pain severity, functional disability, psychologic distress, physical symptoms, and health care use. The data revealed that at the 2-year follow-up, the typical patient of the no-treatment group had improved slightly in terms of pain severity and health care use, but had experienced little or no improvement in functional disability, physical symptoms, and psychologic distress. The average patient in the conservative care group reported small improvements in pain severity, functional disability, physical symptoms, and health care use, with no change in psychologic distress. These small improvements occurred within the first 3 months after enrollment, with essentially no change thereafter. The average patient in the immediate surgical care group showed substantial improvement on all of the outcome measures. The observed improvements were evident shortly after treatment and were maintained for the duration of the study. Patients in the delayed surgical care group had outcomes that were less dramatic than those observed in the immediate surgery care group, but greater than those observed in the conservative care group. The patients who were treated surgically by physicians outside the study, outside surgical care group, did not improve over time. Patients with persistent LBP who received no treatment showed no spontaneous recovery. Conservative care treatments prescribed by surgeons who specialize in spinal disorders, did not appear to be any more effective than no treatment. The outcome of surgery for persistent LBP varied from dramatic for one subgroup of surgical patients, to poor for another subgroup of patients. Patients who were selected immediately for surgical treatment improved substantially. Those treated surgically later by study physicians or by physicians not associated with the study fared less well.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de la Región Lumbar/terapia , Ciática/terapia , Adulto , Análisis de Varianza , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/epidemiología , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/psicología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Ciática/epidemiología , Ciática/psicología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA