Gene expression profiles in circulating tumor cells to predict prognosis in metastatic breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: A circulating tumor cell (CTC) count is an established prognostic factor in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Besides enumeration, CTC characterization promises to improve outcome prediction and treatment guidance. Having shown the feasibility of quantifying clinically relevant mRNA transcripts in CTCs, we determined the prognostic value of CTC gene expression in MBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CTCs were isolated and enumerated from blood of 197 MBC patients who were about to start first-line systemic therapy. Of these, 180 were assessable for quantification of mRNA expression by RT-qPCR in relation to time-to-treatment failure (TTF). A prognostic CTC gene profile was generated by leave-one-out cross validation in a 103 patient discovery set and validated in 77 patients. Additionally, all 180 patients were randomly divided into two equal sets to discover and validate a second prognostic profile. RESULTS: CTC count predicted for TTF at baseline {≥5 versus <5 CTCs/7.5 ml blood, hazard ratio (HR) 2.92 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.71-4.95] P < 0.0001}. A 16-gene CTC profile was generated in the first discovery set, which identified patients with death or TTF <9 months versus those with a better outcome. In multivariate analysis, the 16-gene profile was the only factor associated with TTF [HR 3.15 (95% CI 1.35-7.33) P 0.008]. Validation of this profile in the independent patient set pointed into the same direction, but was not statistically significant. A newly generated 8-gene profile showed similarly favorable test characteristics as the 16-gene profile, but did not significantly pass validation either. CONCLUSION: A 16-gene CTC profile was identified, which provided prognostic value on top of CTC count in MBC patients. However, validation of this profile in an independent cohort, nor of a second profile, reached statistical significance, underscoring the need to further fine-tune the still promising approach of CTC characterization.

High protein expression of EZH2 is related to unfavorable outcome to tamoxifen in metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is a highly heterogeneous disease with great differences in outcome to both chemo- and endocrine therapy. Better insight into the mechanisms underlying resistance is essential to better predict outcome to therapy and to obtain a more tailored treatment approach. We have previously described that increased mRNA expression levels of Enhancer of Zeste homolog (EZH2) are associated with worse outcome to tamoxifen therapy in MBC. Here, we explored whether this is also the case for EZH2 protein expression. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A tissue microarray (TMA) was created using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded estrogen receptor (ER)-positive primary breast tumor tissues of 250 MBC patients treated with first-line tamoxifen. Quantity and intensity of EZH2 expression were determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and both were used to generate and group scores according to a previously described method for scoring EZH2. RESULTS: In total, 116 tumors (46%) were considered to be EZH2 positive. The presence of EZH2 protein expression was significantly associated with progression-free survival (PFS) in both univariate [hazard ratio (HR) 1.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17-1.97, P = 0.002] and multivariate analysis including traditional factors associated with tamoxifen outcome (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.06-1.88, P = 0.017). Considering quantity irrespective of intensity, tumors with >50% EZH2-positive cells had the worst PFS (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.42-3.27, P < 0.001), whereas intensity alone did not show a significant association with PFS. Application of other methods of scoring EZH2 positivity resulted in a similar significant association between the amount of EZH2 positive cells and PFS. CONCLUSION: In addition to EZH2 mRNA levels, these results suggest that protein expression of EZH2 can be used as a marker to predict outcome to tamoxifen therapy. This provides new rationale to explore EZH2 inhibition in the clinical setting and increases the possibilities for a more personalized treatment approach in MBC patients.

BCAR4 induces antioestrogen resistance but sensitises breast cancer to lapatinib.

BACKGROUND: High BCAR4 and ERBB2 mRNA levels in primary breast cancer associate with tamoxifen resistance and poor patient outcome. We determined whether BCAR4 expression sensitises breast cancer cells to lapatinib, and identifies a subgroup of patients who possibly may benefit from ERBB2-targeted therapies despite having tumours with low ERBB2 expression. METHODS: Proliferation assays were applied to determine the effect of BCAR4 expression on lapatinib treatment. Changes in cell signalling were quantified with reverse-phase protein microarrays. Quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) of ERBB2 and BCAR4 was performed in 1418 primary breast cancers. Combined BCAR4 and ERBB2 mRNA levels were evaluated for association with progression-free survival (PFS) in 293 oestrogen receptor-α (ER)-positive patients receiving tamoxifen as first-line monotherapy for recurrent disease. RESULTS: BCAR4 expression strongly sensitised ZR-75-1 and MCF7 breast cancer cells to the combination of lapatinib and antioestrogens. Lapatinib interfered with phosphorylation of ERBB2 and its downstream mediators AKT, FAK, SHC, STAT5, and STAT6. Reverse transcriptase-PCR analysis showed that 27.6% of the breast cancers were positive for BCAR4 and 22% expressed also low levels of ERBB2. The clinical significance of combining BCAR4 and ERBB2 mRNA status was underscored by the finding that the group of patients having BCAR4-positive/ERBB2-low-expressing cancers had a shorter PFS on tamoxifen treatment than the BCAR4-negative group. CONCLUSION: This study shows that BCAR4 expression identifies a subgroup of ER-positive breast cancer patients without overexpression of ERBB2 who have a poor outcome and might benefit from combined ERBB2-targeted and antioestrogen therapy.

High miR-26a and low CDC2 levels associate with decreased EZH2 expression and with favorable outcome on tamoxifen in metastatic breast cancer.

For patients with metastatic breast cancer, we previously described that increased EZH2 expression levels were associated with an adverse outcome to tamoxifen therapy. Main objective of the present study is to investigate miR-26a and miR-101 levels, which both target EZH2, for their association with molecular pathways and with efficacy of tamoxifen as first-line monotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. Expression levels were measured using quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR) in primary breast cancer specimens of 235 estrogen receptor-α (ER)-positive patients. Pathway analysis was performed on microarray data available for 65 of these tumors. Logistic regression and Cox uni- and multivariate analysis were performed to relate expression levels with clinical benefit and time to progression (TTP). Increasing levels of miR-26a were significantly (P < 0.005) associated with both clinical benefit and prolonged TTP, whereas miR-101 was not. Cell cycle regulation and CCNE1 and CDC2 were the only significant overlapping pathway and genes differentially expressed between tumors with high and low levels of miR-26a and EZH2, respectively. In addition, increasing mRNA levels of CCNE1 (P < 0.05) and CDC2 (P < 0.001) were related to poor outcome. Multivariate analysis revealed miR-26a and CDC2 as an optimal set of markers associated with outcome on tamoxifen therapy, independently of traditional predictive factors. To summarize, only miR-26a levels are related with treatment outcome. Cell cycle regulation is the only overlapping pathway linked to miR-26a and EZH2 levels. Low mRNA levels of EZH2, CCNE1, and CDC2, and high levels of miR-26a are associated with favorable outcome on tamoxifen.

Decreased expression of EZH2 is associated with upregulation of ER and favorable outcome to tamoxifen in advanced breast cancer.

The purpose of this study is to investigate EZH2 in a large series of breast cancer patients for its prognostic and predictive value, and to evaluate its functional role in treatment response in vitro. EZH2 levels were measured using quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR) in primary breast cancer specimens and related to clinicopathologic factors and disease outcome. EZH2 expression was downregulated with siRNAs in MCF7, to assess expression alterations of putative EZH2 downstream genes and to determine cell numbers after treatment with the anti-estrogen ICI 164384. In 688 lymph node-negative patients who did not receive adjuvant systemic therapy, EZH2 was not significantly correlated with metastasis-free survival (MFS). In 278 patients with advanced disease treated with first-line tamoxifen monotherapy, the tertile with highest EZH2 levels was associated with the lowest clinical benefit (OR = 0.48; P = 0.02) and with a shorter progression-free survival (PFS) in both univariate (HR = 1.80; P < 0.001) and multivariate analysis, including traditional factors (HR = 1.61; P = 0.004). In vitro, EZH2 silencing in MCF7 caused a 38% decrease in cell numbers (P < 0.001) whereas ICI 164384 treatment resulted in a 25% decrease (P < 0.001) compared to controls. Combining EZH2 silencing with ICI treatment reduced cell numbers with 67% (P < 0.001) compared to control conditions. EZH2 downregulation was associated with an almost two-fold upregulation of the estrogen receptor alpha (ER) (P = 0.001). In conclusion, EZH2 has no prognostic value in breast cancer. High levels of EZH2 are associated with poor outcome to tamoxifen therapy in advanced breast cancer. Downregulated EZH2 leads to upregulation of the ER and better response to anti-estrogens.

Relevance of BCAR4 in tamoxifen resistance and tumour aggressiveness of human breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer anti-oestrogen resistance 4 (BCAR4) was identified in a search for genes involved in anti-oestrogen resistance in breast cancer. We explored whether BCAR4 is predictive for tamoxifen resistance and prognostic for tumour aggressiveness, and studied its function. METHODS: BCAR4 mRNA levels were measured in primary breast tumours, and evaluated for association with progression-free survival (PFS) and clinical benefit in patients with oestrogen receptor (ERα)-positive tumours receiving tamoxifen as first-line monotherapy for advanced disease. In a separate cohort of patients with lymph node-negative, ERα-positive cancer, and not receiving systemic adjuvant therapy, BCAR4 levels were evaluated for association with distant metastasis-free survival (MFS). The function of BCAR4 was studied with immunoblotting and RNA interference in a cell model. RESULTS: Multivariate analyses established high BCAR4 mRNA levels as an independent predictive factor for poor PFS after start of tamoxifen therapy for recurrent disease. High BCAR4 mRNA levels were associated with poor MFS and overall survival, reflecting tumour aggressiveness. In BCAR4-expressing cells, phosphorylation of v-erb-b2 erythroblastic leukaemia viral oncogene homolog (ERBB)2, ERBB3, and their downstream mediators extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 and v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog (AKT) 1/2, was increased. Selective knockdown of ERBB2 or ERBB3 inhibited proliferation, confirming their role in BCAR4-induced tamoxifen resistance. CONCLUSION: BCAR4 may have clinical relevance for tumour aggressiveness and tamoxifen resistance. Our cell model suggests that BCAR4-positive breast tumours are driven by ERBB2/ERBB3 signalling. Patients with such tumours may benefit from ERBB-targeted therapy.

Stem cell-like transcriptional reprogramming mediates metastatic resistance to mTOR inhibition.

Inhibitors of the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) are currently used to treat advanced metastatic breast cancer. However, whether an aggressive phenotype is sustained through adaptation or resistance to mTOR inhibition remains unknown. Here, complementary studies in human tumors, cancer models and cell lines reveal transcriptional reprogramming that supports metastasis in response to mTOR inhibition. This cancer feature is driven by EVI1 and SOX9. EVI1 functionally cooperates with and positively regulates SOX9, and promotes the transcriptional upregulation of key mTOR pathway components (REHB and RAPTOR) and of lung metastasis mediators (FSCN1 and SPARC). The expression of EVI1 and SOX9 is associated with stem cell-like and metastasis signatures, and their depletion impairs the metastatic potential of breast cancer cells. These results establish the mechanistic link between resistance to mTOR inhibition and cancer metastatic potential, thus enhancing our understanding of mTOR targeting failure.

Bcar1/p130Cas protein and primary breast cancer: prognosis and response to tamoxifen treatment.

BACKGROUND: The product of the Bcar1/p130Cas (breast cancer resistance/p130Crk-associated substrate) gene causes resistance to antiestrogen drugs in human breast cancer cells in vitro. To investigate its role in clinical breast cancer, we determined the levels of Bcar1/p130Cas protein in a large series of primary breast carcinomas. METHODS: We measured Bcar1/p130Cas protein in cytosol extracts from 937 primary breast carcinomas by western blot analysis. The levels of Bcar1/p130Cas protein were tested for associations and trends against clinicopathologic and patient characteristics, the lengths of relapse-free survival and overall survival (n = 775), and the efficacy of first-line treatment with tamoxifen for recurrent or metastatic disease (n = 268). RESULTS: Bcar1/p130Cas levels in primary tumors were associated with age/menopausal status and the levels of estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor. In univariate survival analysis, higher Bcar1/p130Cas levels were associated with poor relapse-free survival and overall survival (both two-sided P =.04; log-rank test for trend). In multivariate analysis, a high level of Bcar1/p130Cas was independently associated with poor relapse-free survival and overall survival. The response to tamoxifen therapy in patients with recurrent disease was reduced in patients with primary tumors that expressed high levels of Bcar1/p130Cas. In multivariate analysis for response, Bcar1/p130Cas was independent of classical predictive factors, such as estrogen receptor status, age/menopausal status, disease-free interval, and dominant site of relapse. CONCLUSION: Patients with primary breast tumors expressing a high level of Bcar1/p130Cas protein appear to experience more rapid disease recurrence and have a greater risk of (intrinsic) resistance to tamoxifen therapy. Thus, measurement of Bcar1/p130Cas may provide useful prognostic information for patients with primary or metastatic breast cancer.

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator and its inhibitor PAI-1: predictors of poor response to tamoxifen therapy in recurrent breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) is a proteolytic enzyme thought to be involved in processes leading to tumor cell invasion of surrounding tissues. Its activity during metastasis may be regulated by an inhibitor, PAI-1. Previous work has shown that high levels of uPA and PAI-1 are associated with poor prognosis in primary breast cancers. PURPOSE: In this pilot study, we explored possible associations between the expression levels of uPA or PAI-1 and the efficacy of tamoxifen treatment in breast cancer patients with relapsed disease. METHODS: Levels of uPA, PAI-1, estrogen receptor (ER), and progesterone receptor (PgR) were assayed in cytosolic extracts derived from the primary breast tumors of 235 tamoxifennaive patients who had recurrent disease. The extracts were classified as positive or negative for each assayed factor. In some analyses, ER and PgR levels were evaluated together. In these analyses, three ER/PgR subsets were defined: low, intermediate, and high. All patients in the study received tamoxifen therapy upon relapse (median follow-up, 57 months). Association of the tested factors with the response to tamoxifen treatment was studied by logistic regression analysis. Association of the factors with progression-free and overall survival was further evaluated by Cox univariate and multivariate regression analyses. RESULTS: Patients with uPA-negative tumors exhibited a better response (tumor regression or stable disease, maintained for more than 6 months) to tamoxifen treatment than those with uPA-positive tumors (51% versus 26% response; odds ratio [OR] = 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.18-0.65). The response rate was also better for patients with PAI-1-negative tumors than for those with PAI-1-positive tumors (49% versus 35% response; OR = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.32-1.01). In addition, patients with uPA-positive or PAI-1-positive tumors showed shorter progression-free survival (P = .001 and P < .05, respectively) and total survival after relapse (P = .005 and P < .005, respectively). When patients were stratified by ER/PgR status, the only statistically significant association between uPA levels and reduced tamoxifen response was seen in the subset whose tumors possessed intermediate levels of ER/PgR (16% response in uPA-positive versus 60% response in uPA-negative tumors; OR = 0.13; 95% CI = 0.04-0.41). Overall, uPA status appeared independent of association with ER/PgR status in its ability to predict response to tamoxifen treatment. The association of PAI-1 expression and the response to tamoxifen was less pronounced when patients were stratified by ER/PgR status. CONCLUSION: Measurement of primary breast tumor uPA levels may be useful in predicting the overall response of metastatic disease to tamoxifen therapy.

Thymidine kinase and thymidylate synthase in advanced breast cancer: response to tamoxifen and chemotherapy.

Thymidylate synthase (TS) is a crucial target for 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in the de novo pathway of pyrimidine synthesis, which is necessary for DNA synthesis. Thymidine kinase (TK) plays a key role in the complementary or alternative salvage pathway of pyrimidine synthesis in acute or pathological tissue stress. In the present study, the activity levels of TS and TK were determined in 257 primary breast tumors of patients who received tamoxifen as first-line systemic therapy after diagnosis of advanced disease. In 155 (60%) responding patients, the median response duration was 23 months for tumors with low TK activity, 15 months for tumors with intermediate TK activity, and 13 months for tumors with high TK activity (P = 0.003). In Cox multivariate analysis corrected for classical predictive factors including estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor, patients with intermediate and high levels of TK activity in their tumors showed a rapid disease progression (P = 0.0002) and an early death (P = 0.002) after start of tamoxifen treatment. Tumor TS activity levels were not significantly associated with the efficacy of tamoxifen treatment. In 121 patients who became resistant to tamoxifen or additional endocrine treatments and who received 5-FU-containing polychemotherapy, tumor TK activity was not significantly related to the efficacy of chemotherapy. Of the 13 patients with low tumor TS activity, only 1 (8%) responded favorably, whereas 46% (43 of 93) of those with intermediate and 73% (11 of 15) of those with high TS activity responded (P = 0.001). In Cox multivariate regression analysis in which TS was the only significant variable, intermediate and high TS activities were associated with a slow disease progression (P = 0.005) and prolonged survival (P = 0.016) on chemotherapy. In conclusion, for patients with recurrent breast cancer, high tumor TK activity is a significant marker of poor clinical outcome on tamoxifen therapy. Elevated tumor TS activity predicts a favorable outcome for 5-FU-containing polychemotherapy when applied after tumor progression on endocrine therapy.

Plasminogen activator inhibitor-2: prognostic relevance in 1012 patients with primary breast cancer.

The antigen levels of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its inhibitor plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI) 1, as detected in tumor extracts by ELISA, have been reported to be correlated with a poor prognosis in primary breast cancer. In the present study we have characterized a novel PAI-2-specific ELISA, designed to measure PAI-2 antigen levels in tumor cytosols. We determined PAI-2 antigen levels along with those of uPA and PAI-1 in 1012 routinely prepared tumor cytosols of patients with primary breast cancer (median follow-up, 71 months). In the overall population there was no significant association between the level of PAI-2 and prognosis, while in tumors with high uPA values, PAI-2 (test for trend) was associated with a prolonged relapse-free survival, metastasis-free survival, and overall survival (for all analyses, P < 0.02). In Cox's multivariate analysis for relapse-free survival, metastasis-free survival, and overall survival in tumors with high uPA values (including patient's age, menopausal status, lymph node status, tumor size, estrogen and progesterone receptor status, uPA, and PAI-1), PAI-2 either dichotomized or, as a continuous variable, was independently associated with a favorable relapse-free survival, metastasis-free survival, and overall survival. We conclude that the PAI-2-specific ELISA described herein is well suited for the measurement of PAI-2 levels in cytosols routinely prepared for analysis of steroid hormone receptors. We speculate that PAI-2 may serve as an inhibitor for uPA in human primary breast cancers.

The urokinase system of plasminogen activation and prognosis in 2780 breast cancer patients.

The antigen levels of components of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) system of plasminogen activation are correlated with prognosis in several types of cancers, including breast cancer. In the present study involving 2780 patients with primary invasive breast cancer, we have evaluated the prognostic importance of the four major components of the uPA system [uPA, the receptor uPAR (CD87), and the inhibitors PAI-1 and PAI-2]. The antigen levels were determined by ELISA in cytosols prepared from primary breast tumors. The levels of the four factors significantly correlated with each other; the Spearman rank correlation coefficients (r(s)) ranged from 0.32 (between PAI-2 and PAI-1 or uPAR) to 0.59 (between uPA and PAI-1). The median duration of follow-up of patients still alive was 88 months. In the multivariate analyses for relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), we defined a basic model including age, menopausal status, tumor size and grade, lymph node status, adjuvant therapy, and steroid hormone receptor status. uPA, uPAR, PAI-1, and PAI-2 were considered as categorical variables, each with two cut points that were established by isotonic regression analysis. Compared with tumors with low levels, those with intermediate and high levels showed a relative hazard rate (RHR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of 1.22 (1.02-1.45) and 1.69 (1.39-2.05) for uPA, and 1.32 (1.14-1.54) and 2.17 (1.74-2.70) for PAI-1, respectively, in multivariate analysis for RFS in all patients. Compared with tumors with high PAI-2 levels, those with intermediate and low levels showed a poor RFS with a RHR (95% CI) of 1.30 (1.14-1.48) and 1.76 (1.38-2.24), respectively. Similar results were obtained in the multivariate analysis for OS in all patients. Furthermore, uPA and PAI-1 were independent predictive factors of a poor RFS and OS in node-negative and node-positive patients. PAI-2 also added to the multivariate models for RFS in node-negative and node-positive patients, and in the analysis for OS in node-negative patients. uPAR did not further contribute to any of the multivariate models. A prognostic score was calculated based on the estimates from the final multivariate model for RFS. Using this score, the difference between the highest and lowest 10% risk groups was 66% in the analysis for RFS at 10 years and 61% in the analysis for OS. Moreover, separate prognostic scores were calculated for node-negative and node-positive patients. In the 10% highest risk groups, the proportion of disease-free patients was only 27 +/- 6% and 9 +/- 3% at 10 years for node-negative and node-positive patients, respectively. These proportions were 86 +/- 4% and 61 +/- 6% for the corresponding 10% lowest risk groups of relapse. We conclude that several components of the uPA system are potential predictors of RFS and OS in patients with primary invasive breast cancer. Knowledge of these factors could be helpful to assess the individual risk of patients, to select various types of adjuvant treatment and to identify patients who may benefit from targeted therapies that are currently being developed.

High tumor levels of vascular endothelial growth factor predict poor response to systemic therapy in advanced breast cancer.

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a potent angiogenic factor, has been reported to be associated with a poor prognosis in primary breast cancer and in several other cancer types. In the present study, we have measured with ELISA the levels of VEGF in cytosolic extracts of 845 primary breast tumors of patients who developed a recurrence during follow-up. All of the patients received tamoxifen (n = 618) or cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF) or 5-fluorouracil, Adriamycin, cyclophosphamide (FAC) chemotherapy (n = 227) as first-line systemic therapy after diagnosis of advanced disease. VEGF levels were not related to age or menopausal status but were negatively related to the cytosolic levels of estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor (P < 0.0001). In patients who relapsed within 1 year after primary surgery, tumor VEGF levels were higher than in patients who showed a longer disease-free interval (P = 0.0005). In patients with a first relapse in the viscera, VEGF levels were higher compared with those that relapsed to the bone or soft tissue (P = 0.0004). In univariate analysis for response to first-line tamoxifen therapy, patients with high or intermediate levels showed a poor rate of response, compared with patients with low tumor-VEGF levels (P = 0.0001). Similarly, in multivariate analysis for response to tamoxifen treatment, corrected for age, site of relapse, disease-free interval, and estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status, VEGF status was an independent predictive factor (P = 0.009). In concordance, higher levels of VEGF were associated with a short progression-free survival and postrelapse overall survival (both, P < 0.0001). On first-line chemotherapy, the rate of response decreased with higher tumor levels of VEGF, both in univariate (P = 0.003) and in multivariate analysis (P = 0.004). Furthermore, higher VEGF levels were associated with a short progression-free survival (P = 0.003) and postrelapse overall survival (P = 0.001). In conclusion, the tumor VEGF level is an important independent marker that predicts a poor efficacy of both tamoxifen and chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer. Knowledge of the tumor level of VEGF might be helpful in selecting individual patients who may benefit from treatments with antiangiogenic agents combined with conventionally used drugs.

Complete sequencing of TP53 predicts poor response to systemic therapy of advanced breast cancer.

TP53 has been implicated in regulation of the cell cycle, DNA repair, and apoptosis. We studied, in primary breast tumors through direct cDNA sequencing of exons 2-11, whether TP53 gene mutations can predict response in patients with advanced disease to either first-line tamoxifen therapy (202 patients, of whom 55% responded) or up-front (poly)chemotherapy (41 patients, of whom 46% responded). TP53 mutations were detected in 90 of 243 (37%) tumors, and one-fourth of these mutations resulted in a premature termination of the protein. The mutations were observed in 32% (65 of 202) of the primary tumors of tamoxifen-treated patients and in 61% (25 of 41) of the primary tumors of the chemotherapy patients. TP53 mutation was significantly associated with a poor response to tamoxifen [31% versus 66%; odds ratio (OR), 0.22; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.12-0.42; P < 0.0001]. Patients with TP53 gene mutations in codons that directly contact DNA or with mutations in the zinc-binding domain loop L3 showed the lowest response to tamoxifen (18% and 15% response rates, respectively). TP53 mutations were related, although not significantly, to a poor response to up-front chemotherapy (36% versus 63%; OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.09-1.24). In multivariate analysis for response including the classical parameters age and menopausal status, disease-free interval, dominant site of relapse, and levels of estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor, TP53 mutation was a significant predictor of poor response in the tamoxifen-treated group (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.13-0.63; P = 0.0014). TP53-mutated and estrogen receptor-negative (<10 fmol/mg protein) tumors appeared to be the most resistant phenotype. Interestingly, the response of patients with TP53 mutations to chemotherapy after tamoxifen was not worse than that of patients without these mutations (50% versus 42%; OR, 1.35, nonsignificant). The median progression-free survival after systemic treatment was shorter for patients with a TP53 mutation than for patients with wild-type TP53 (6.6 and 0.6 months less for tamoxifen and up-front chemotherapy, respectively). In conclusion, TP53 gene mutation of the primary tumor is helpful in predicting the response of patients with metastatic breast disease to tamoxifen therapy. The type of mutation and its biological function should be considered in the analyses of the predictive value of TP53.

Breast-conserving therapy: proteases as risk factors in relation to survival after local relapse.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether cathepsin D, urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), its inhibitor, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), or clinical factors can predict which patients are at risk for developing distant metastases after local recurrence (LR). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 1,630 patients treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy of the breast between 1980 and 1992, LR developed in 171 as a first event. From the available primary tumor tissues, we determined the cytosolic levels of cathepsin D, uPA and PAI-1. RESULTS: In patients with LR, a short (< or = 2 years) disease-free interval (DFI) and skin involvement of LR were associated with poor postrelapse distant metastasis-free survival (PR-DMFS, P = .001, both) and postrelapse overall survival (PR-OS; P < .0001 and P < .0002, respectively). The primary tumor levels of uPA and PAI-1 were elevated for patients with a short DFI (P < .01), but such a relation was not observed for patients with skin involvement. In univariate analyses, high levels of uPA and PAI-1 in the primary tumor were associated with poor PR-OS (P = .038 and P = .040, respectively) but not PR-DMFS. In Cox multivariate analyses for PR-DMFS and PR-OS, only a short DFI and skin involvement of the LR were independently associated with a poor clinical outcome. CONCLUSION: In patients treated with breast-conserving therapy who had LR as a first event, a short DFI and skin involvement were strong indicators for poor PR-DMFS and PR-OS. The proteases studied did not contribute significantly to the final multivariate model.

Prognostic significance of cathepsins B and L in primary human breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Evaluation of the clinical significance of cytosolic tumor levels of the lysosomal cysteine proteases cathepsin B (catB) and cathepsin L (catL) in patients with primary breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CatB (n = 1,500) and catL (n = 1,391) levels were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in cytosols routinely prepared from frozen-tissue samples that were submitted to our laboratory for the assessment of steroid-hormone-receptor status. The median duration of follow-up of patients still alive at the time of analysis was 93 months. RESULTS: Relating catB and catL levels with classical prognostic factors, the proteases were positively correlated with the number of positive lymph nodes (P < .01), and negatively with the level of steroid-hormone receptors (P < .01). We did not find a significant relationship between catB or catL levels with age and menopausal status of the patients or with the size of the primary tumor. The levels of catB and catL were positively correlated with each other and with the rates of relapse and death (all, P < .0001). In multivariate regression analysis for relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), corrected for the contribution of age/menopausal status, tumor size, the number of positive lymph nodes, and steroid-hormone-receptor status, catB and catL were significant predictors of the rates of relapse and death (all, P < .01). No statistically significant interactions of catB or catL with any of the classical prognostic factors or with each other were observed in their associations with the rates of relapse and death. CONCLUSION: CatB and catL levels measured in routinely prepared cytosols are strong parameters to predict the rate of relapse and the length of survival after treatment of the primary breast tumor.

p53 protein accumulation predicts poor response to tamoxifen therapy of patients with recurrent breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Mutations of the p53 gene are frequently observed in primary breast cancer and accumulation of p53 protein has been used as a surrogate marker of p53 inactivation. Previous studies have shown that p53 accumulation is related to poor prognosis in primary breast cancer. We studied whether p53 protein accumulation is a predictive factor for response to tamoxifen treatment in patients with recurrent breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Levels of p53, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), and urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) were assayed in cytosolic extracts derived from primary tumors of 401 tamoxifen-naive patients who developed recurrent disease. All patients in the study received tamoxifen therapy upon relapse (median follow-up, 69 months). Association of tested factors with response to tamoxifen treatment was studied by logistic regression analysis, and with survival after the start of treatment by Cox univariate and multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: p53 levels (median, 0.23 ng/mg protein) were not related to ER or PgR levels, but positively correlated with uPA (P < .0001). In a test for trend, we observed an association of p53 protein levels with response to tamoxifen therapy. When dichotomized (at the median value), 42% in the p53-high versus 56% in the p53-low group showed a response. In multivariate analysis, including patient and tumor characteristics, p53 accumulation retained significance with the rate of response (odds ratio [OR], 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31 to 0.74; P < .001). Also in multivariate analysis, reduced survival after the start of tamoxifen therapy was observed in the p53-high group (relative hazards rate [RHR], 1.56, 95% CI, 1.17 to 2.10; P = .002). A statistically significant association between p53 levels and decreased tamoxifen response was seen only in the subset of patients whose tumors expressed low levels of ER or PgR (<75 fmol/mg protein). CONCLUSION: Measurement of primary tumor p53 levels may be effective in predicting response to tamoxifen therapy in recurrent breast disease. However, more confirming studies on the association between p53 protein accumulation and response to antiestrogen therapy are needed before tumor p53 levels can be used in routine clinical practice.

Systemic and cardiac neuroendocrine activation and severity of myocardial ischemia in humans.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of different degrees of ischemia on circulating and cardiac neurohormones and vasotone. BACKGROUND: Neuroendocrine activation and subsequent systemic vasoconstriction may complicate ischemia. Whether this relates to severity of ischemia and subsequent cardiac dysfunction, and whether neurohormonal balance in the ischemic area changes, is unknown. METHODS: Fifty-six normotensive patients with coronary artery disease were evaluated during incremental atrial pacing. On the basis of ST segment changes, patients were classified in a nonischemic (n = 11) or ischemic group (n = 45), the latter patients were subsequently classified as lactate (n = 28) or nonlactate (n = 17) producing, to identify neurohormonal changes in the effluent of the ischemic myocardium. RESULTS: Angina occurred in 55%, 82% and 82% of patients in the nonischemic, lactate- and nonlactate-producing groups, respectively. Baseline hemodynamic variables and neurohormones were comparable in all groups, as were heart rate, rate-pressure product and coronary hemodynamic variables during pacing. In lactate producers, contractility did not improve, relaxation deteriorated, left ventricular filling pressure increased and cardiac output decreased during pacing, indicating more severe ischemia compared with that in nonlactate producers. Neurohormones did not change in the nonischemic group. In contrast, arterial and coronary venous catecholamines increased significantly more in lactate producers than in nonlactate producers (arterial norepinephrine by 68% vs. 36%, respectively). Moreover, arterial angiotensin II increased in lactate producers from a baseline mean +/- SEM of 6.8 +/- 0.9 to 9.7 +/- 1.6 pmol/liter (p < 0.05), accompanied by a sustained 23% increase in systemic resistance and arterial pressures. In lactate producers, baseline net cardiac norepinephrine release changed to net uptake during pacing (-0.05 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.06 +/- 0.05 nmol/min, p < 0.05). Epinephrine uptake increased in all patients with ischemia, albeit more in lactate producers. CONCLUSIONS: Circulating catecholamines and renin-angiotensin levels are activated, and systemic vasotone is increased in relation to the degree of ischemia. Cardiac epinephrine uptake increases, whereas net baseline norepinephrine release from the ischemic myocardium changes to net uptake. Modulation of this neurohormonal activation may provide an alternative mode to limit ischemia.

Prognostic significance of the receptor for urokinase plasminogen activator in breast cancer.

We have recently described the urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its type 1 inhibitor (PAI-1) as strong prognostic variables in breast cancer (J. A. Foekens et al., Cancer Res., 52: 6101-6105, 1992; J. Grondahl-Hansen et al., Cancer Res., 53: 2513-2521, 1993; J. A. Foekens et al., J. Clin. Oncol., 11: 899-908, 1994). A specific cell surface receptor (uPAR) binds uPA and strongly enhances plasmin generation, and the amount of uPAR in the tumor tissue might therefore be a rate-limiting factor in the extracellular proteolysis involved in tumor invasion. Here, we report on the prognostic value of uPAR in cytosolic (uPARc) and Triton (uPARt) extracts prepared from 505 primary breast tumors. The median observation time was 54 (range: 12-125) months. uPAR levels were determined by a sandwich ELISA. Univariate analysis showed that high uPAR levels (above the median value) were significantly associated with a shorter overall survival, showing a stronger discriminatory effect for uPARc [relative hazard rate (RHR): 1.47; P = 0.012)] as compared with uPARt (RHR, 1.33; P = 0.059), while no statistically significant differences were found for relapse-free survival. Multivariate analysis including all patients showed that when including other biochemical variables (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, PS2, cathepsin D, uPA, and PAI-1), the only retained independent variable via backward elimination was PAI-1 for both relapse-free survival and overall survival. When analyzed separately in clinically relevant subgroups, the prognostic value of uPAR was particularly strong in a subgroup of 201 node-positive postmenopausal women, showing considerably shorter overall (RHR: 2.39; P < 0.0001) and relapse free (RHR: 1.91; P = 0.0006) survival for patients with high uPARc content. High uPARt levels were also significantly associated with shorter overall survival in this subgroup of patients (RHR: 1.5; P = 0.047), but not with relapse-free survival (P = 0.64). Multivariate analysis, including the basic model, estrogen and progesterone receptors, PS2, cathepsin D, uPA, PAI-1, uPARc, and uPARt in the subgroup of postmenopausal node-positive patients, showed that only uPARc and PAI-1 were significant independent prognostic parameters, with respect to overall survival, RHRs being 2.72 (P < 0.0001) and 1.81 (P = 0.005), respectively. In multivariate analysis of relapse-free survival, uPARc, PAI-1, and uPA were independent parameters with respective relative relapse rates of 1.91 (P = 0.002) for uPARc, 1.68 (P = 0.02) for PAI-1, and 1.6 (P = 0.03) for uPA. These data lend support to the hypothesis that uPAR is an important molecule in plasmin-mediated extracellular matrix degradation leading to cancer cell dissemination and death of the patient.

The clinical significance of androgen receptors in breast cancer and their relation to histological and cell biological parameters.

To analyse the clinical significance of the presence of androgen receptors (AR) in breast carcinomas, clinical and histological parameters of 153 primary breast carcinomas (median follow-up 46 months) were examined. Oestrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) levels were determined in cytosol preparations using enzyme immunoassay assays and in cryostat sections by immunohistochemistry. AR and Ki-67 levels were only determined immunohistochemically. Data were analysed by uni- and multivariate models. 94/153 (61%) breast carcinomas were ER+ PR+ AR+, while 14 cases were only positive for AR. All grade III tumours (n = 17) were steroid receptor negative and 14 (76%) of these cases demonstrated high Ki-67 values suggestive of more aggressive behaviour. Strikingly, 14 ductal carcinomas negative for ER and PR were positive for AR. In univariate analysis, AR as well as ER, tumour size, lymph node status, grade and Ki-67 proved to be significant prognostic factors for disease-free survival (DFS). Multivariate analysis, however, showed lymph node status, tumour size and ER status to be the only independent prognostic factors for DFS within this model. We conclude that simple histological and cell biological parameters, including AR, can be used to select high- and low-risk patients at the time of primary surgery and can provide valuable information on treatment options.