Eight weeks of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir is effective for selected patients with genotype 1 hepatitis C virus infection.

Eight weeks duration of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) can be considered in genotype 1 hepatitis C virus-infected patients who are treatment-naive, do not have cirrhosis, and have a pretreatment viral load <6,000,000 IU/mL. The effectiveness of this regimen, however, has not been fully confirmed by real-world experience. Using data from real-world cohorts, we aimed to determine the effectiveness of 8 weeks of LDV/SOF treatment, examine variables associated with relapse after treatment with this regimen, and compare the effectiveness of 8 weeks and 12 weeks of LDV/SOF treatment. To evaluate the effectiveness of 8 weeks of therapy and characteristics associated with relapse, we used individual patient data from the IFI (Institut für Interdisziplinäre Medizin), Burman's Pharmacy, and Kaiser Permanente Southern California. All patients had fibrosis staging assessed with biopsy, transient elastography, or serum biomarkers. We also performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of six additional real-world cohorts, to compare effectiveness of 8 weeks to 12 weeks duration. In our pooled data analysis, 634 patients were treated for 8 weeks with LDV/SOF, of whom all had outcomes of cure or relapse without loss to follow-up. Per protocol rates of sustained virologic response at 12 weeks were 98.1% (622/634) in the full cohort and 97.9% (571/583) among treatment-eligible patients. Exact logistic regression revealed no specific patient characteristics associated with relapse. Our meta-analysis of six additional real-world cohorts, comprised of 5,637 patients, demonstrated similar risk for relapse between 8 weeks and 12 weeks of LDV/SOF (relative risk = 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.98-1.00). CONCLUSION: An 8-week duration of treatment with LDV/SOF is highly effective in properly selected patients; greater use of this regimen is recommended. (Hepatology 2017;65:1094-1103).

Examining the Effects of Whole Crop Wheat Silage on Ewe Performance during Late Gestation Compared to Traditional Grass Silage across Three Prolific Breed Types.

Provision of adequate nutrient intake in late gestation of the ewe is an important determinant of dam and offspring performance. A 2 × 3 factorial design experiment examining two forage types, whole crop wheat silage (WCWS) or grass silage (GS) offered to one of three prolific breed types, (Belclare X, Lleyn X, Mule (Bluefaced Leicester × Blackface Mountain)), was conducted. Forage type had no impact on dry matter (DM) or metabolizable energy (ME) intake, body weight and body condition score change, or colostrum production (p > 0.05). Ewes offered WCWS had lower crude protein (CP) intake (p < 0.0001) and a lower combined litter weight (p < 0.05). Mule ewes consumed less DM, CP, (p < 0.05), and ME (p < 0.01) compared to Belclare X and Lleyn X ewes however, water intake per kg DM consumed did not differ with breed type (p > 0.05). Colostrum yield over the first 18 h postpartum was lower for Mule ewes compared to other breed types (p < 0.05). In conclusion, results from this study suggest nutrient concentration and balance as opposed to forage type is important for late gestation nutrition and breed type can impact feed intake and colostrum yield.

Luteinizing hormone-induced up-regulation of ErbB-2 is insufficient stimulant of growth and invasion in ovarian cancer cells.

The effects of luteinizing hormone (LH), a gonadotropic hormone implicated in the development of ovarian cancer, are mediated by specific binding to its G protein-coupled receptor, the LH receptor (LHR). Activated LHR initiates second messenger responses, including cyclic AMP (cAMP) and inositol phosphate. Because cAMP increases expression of ErbB-2, a receptor tyrosine kinase whose overexpression in cancers correlates with poor survival, we hypothesized that LH may regulate ErbB-2 expression. Cell surface LHR expression in stable transformants of the ErbB-2-overexpressing ovarian cancer cell line SKOV3 was confirmed by PCR and whole-cell ligand binding studies. Second messenger accumulation in the LHR-expressing cells confirmed signaling through Gs and Gq. Western blots of total protein revealed that LHR introduction up-regulated ErbB-2 protein expression 2-fold and this was further up-regulated in a time- and dose-dependent manner in response to LH. Forskolin and 8Br-cAMP also up-regulated ErbB-2 in both LHR-expressing and mock-transfected cells, indicating that regulation of ErbB-2 is a cAMP-mediated event. Kinase inhibitor studies indicated the involvement of protein kinase A-mediated, protein kinase C-mediated, epidermal growth factor receptor-mediated, and ErbB-2-mediated mechanisms. The LH-induced up-regulation of ErbB-2 was insufficient to overcome the negative effects of LH on proliferation, invasion, and migration. A molecular signature for this nonaggressive phenotype was determined by Taqman array to include increased and decreased expression of genes encoding adhesion proteins and metalloproteinases, respectively. These data establish a role for LH and LHR in the regulation of ErbB-2 expression and suggest that, in some systems, ErbB-2 up-regulation alone is insufficient in producing a more aggressive phenotype.

Eight-Week Outcomes of Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir in Noncirrhotic Treatment-Naive Patients with Hepatitis C: Analysis of Pharmacy-Based Data.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials have demonstrated that 8 weeks of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) achieved high rates of sustained virologic response at 12 weeks (SVR12) in patients with hepatitis C viral (HCV) genotype 1 infection. The effectiveness of this combination was noted to be robust in treatment-naive noncirrhotic patients and in patients with an HCV viral load of < 6 million IU/mL before treatment. Generalizability of these results to community clinical practice, however, was advised with caution due to the variability of staging methods, fluctuating nature of viral loads, lack of prospective trials, and real-life confirmation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, defined as SVR12, of LDV/SOF in a real-world setting. METHODS: Patients met inclusion criteria if given 8 weeks of LDV/SOF by a specialty pharmacy from October 2014 to October 2015 and if SVR12 was assessed after therapy completion. Clinical outcomes data were obtained from the pharmacy database. RESULTS: Of the 6,391 prescriptions of LDV/SOF received by the pharmacy, 3,648 (57%) were covered by insurance, and among them, only 511 (14%) were for an 8-week regimen. SVR12 data were available for 380 (74%) patients who completed an 8-week regimen. 230 different prescribers wrote prescriptions, and 57 different insurance plans approved the 8-week regimen. The majority (74%) of patients were followed by gastroenterology clinics. The 380 patients included in the analysis were all treatment-naive HCV genotype 1 patients. Overall, SVR12 was achieved in 97% of patients, while 10 patients relapsed. The SVR12 rates were lower (93%) in patients with stage 3 fibrosis, particularly in African Americans (29 of 35: 83%). CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes were favorable for the 8-week use of LDV/SOF in a noncontrolled real-world setting in treatment-naive noncirrhotic patients with a baseline viral load < 6 million IU/mL. Use of this approach in African Americans with evidence of advanced fibrosis should be avoided. DISCLOSURES: No outside funding supported this study. Lott is an employee of Diplomat Pharmacy. Andres and Qureshi have nothing to disclose. Study concept and design were contributed by Lott and Qureshi, who also collected the data. All authors contributed equally to data interpretation and manuscript preparation. Andres revised the manuscript, along with Lott and Qureshi. This work was presented in part as a poster at the 2016 International Liver Conference; Barcelona, Spain; April 13-17, 2016.

Absolute Insurer Denial of Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy for Hepatitis C: A National Specialty Pharmacy Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Despite the availability of new direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens, changes in DAA reimbursement criteria, and a public health focus on hepatitis C virus (HCV) elimination, it remains unclear if public and private insurers have increased access to these therapies over time. We evaluated changes in the incidence of absolute denial of DAA therapy over time and by insurance type. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study among patients who had a DAA prescription submitted from January 2016 to April 2017 to Diplomat Pharmacy, Inc., which provides HCV pharmacy services across the United States. The main outcome was absolute denial of DAA prescription, defined as lack of fill approval by the insurer. We calculated the incidence of absolute denial, overall and by insurance type (Medicaid, Medicare, commercial), for the 16-month study period and each quarter. RESULTS: Among 9025 patients from 45 states prescribed a DAA regimen (4702 covered by Medicaid, 1821 Medicare, 2502 commercial insurance), 3200 (35.5%; 95% confidence interval, 34.5%-36.5%) were absolutely denied treatment. Absolute denial was more common among patients covered by commercial insurance (52.4%) than Medicaid (34.5%, P < .001) or Medicare (14.7%, P < .001). The incidence of absolute denial increased across each quarter of the study period, overall (27.7% in first quarter to 43.8% in last quarter; test for trend, P < .001) and for each insurance type (test for trend, P < .001 for each type). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the availability of new DAA regimens and changes in restrictions of these therapies, absolute denials of DAA regimens by insurers have remained high and increased over time, regardless of insurance type.