Parental occupations at birth and risk of adult testicular germ cell tumors in offspring: a French nationwide case-control study.

Background: Testicular germ cell tumors (TGCT) are the most frequent cancer in young men in developed countries. Parental occupational exposures during early-life periods are suspected to increase TGCT risk. The objective was to estimate the association between parental occupations at birth and adult TGCT. Methods: A case-control study was conducted, including 454 TGCT cases aged 18-45 from 20 French university hospitals, matched to 670 controls based on region and year of birth. Data collected from participants included parental jobs at birth coded according to the International Standard Classification of Occupation-1968 and the French nomenclature of activities-1999. Odds ratios (OR) for TGCT and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using conditional logistic regression, adjusting for TGCT risk factors. Results: Paternal jobs at birth as service workers (OR = 1.98, CI 1.18-3.30), protective service workers (OR = 2.40, CI 1.20-4.81), transport equipment operators (OR = 1.96, CI 1.14-3.37), specialized farmers (OR = 2.66, CI 1.03-6.90), and maternal jobs as secondary education teachers (OR = 2.27, CI 1.09-4.76) or in secondary education (OR = 2.35, CI 1.13-4.88) were significantly associated with adult TGCT. The risk of seminoma was increased for the above-mentioned paternal jobs and that of non-seminomas for public administration and defence; compulsory social security (OR = 1.99, CI 1.09-3.65); general, economic, and social administration (OR = 3.21, CI 1.23-8.39) for fathers; and secondary education teacher (OR = 4.67, CI 1.87-11.67) and secondary education (OR = 3.50, CI 1.36-9.01) for mothers. Conclusion: Some paternal jobs, such as service workers, transport equipment operators, or specialized farmers, and maternal jobs in secondary education seem to be associated with an increased risk of TGCT with specific features depending on the histological type. These data allow hypotheses to be put forward for further studies as to the involvement of occupational exposures in the risk of developing TGCT, such as exposure to pesticides, solvents, or heavy metals.

Efficient pathway for men fertility preservation in testicular cancer or lymphoma: a cross-sectional study of national 2018 data.

BACKGROUND: In 15-49 years-old men, the main cancers are testicular cancer (TC) and lymphomas (L): freezing of ejaculated sperm is primarily used for male fertility preservation (FP) before cancer treatment. Our objective was to analyze the French FP rate in 15-49 years-old men diagnosed with TC or L in 2018. We designed a national descriptive cross-sectional study of sperm banking rate in men with a diagnosis of TC, Hodgkin L (HL) or non-Hodgkin L (NHL). From the French National Cancer Institute (INCa) 2018 data, we extracted the estimated incidence of TC and L in metropolitan France. From the 2018 activity report of CECOS network (Centers for Study and Banking of Eggs and Sperm), we extracted the number of men with TC or L who banked ejaculated sperm. We estimated the proportion of 15-49 years-old men diagnosed with TC or L who banked sperm. RESULTS: Among 15-49 years-old men, INCa estimated 38,048 new cancer diagnoses in metropolitan France in 2018: 2,630 TC and 3,913 L (943 HL and 2,970 NHL). The CECOS network provided data from 26/27 metropolitan centers (96% response rate): 1,079 sperm banking for men with TC, 375 for HL and 211 for NHL. We estimated that the 2018 sperm banking rate in France was 41% for TC, 40% for HL, and 7% for NHL. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, our paper is the first cross-sectional study with multicenter and national data analyzing FP rate in cancer men: it suggests an efficient pathway for men to FP before cancer treatment, compared to previously published studies. Although sperm banking rate in 15-49 years-old men could definitely be improved, further studies should evaluate the information given to patients before gonadotoxic treatments, the factors associated with the absence of sperm banking and whether this lack of referral induces a loss of chance for these men.

RéSUMé: CONTEXTE: Chez les hommes de 15 à 49 ans, les principaux cancers sont le cancer du testicule (CT) et les lymhomes (L): la congélation de spermatozoïdes éjaculés est utilisée en première intention pour leur préservation de fertilité (PF) avant traitement du cancer. Notre objectif était d'analyser le taux de PF chez les hommes de 15 à 49 ans diagnostiqués avec un CT ou un L en 2018 en France. Nous avons réalisé une étude nationale transversale descriptive du taux de congelation de spermatozoïdes chez les hommes âgés de 15 à 49 ans diagnostiqués avec un CT, un L de Hodgkin (LH) ou un L non-Hodgkinien (LNH). A partir des données de l'Institut National du Cancer (INCa) de 2018, nous avons extrait l'incidence estimée de CT et de L en France métropolitaine. A partir des données du bilan d'activité 2018 de la Federation Française des CECOS (Centre d'Etude et de Conservation des Oeufs et du Sperme), nous avons extrait le nombre d'hommes avec un CT ou un L qui ont congelé leurs spermatozoïdes. Nous avons enfin estimé la proportion d'hommes de 15 à 49 ans diagnostiqués avec un CT ou un L qui ont congelé leurs spermatozoïdes. RéSULTATS: Chez les hommes de 15 à 49 ans, l'INCa a estimé en 2018 38 048 nouveaux cas de cancers diagnostiqués en France métropolitaine en 2018: 2 630 CT et 3 913 L (943 LH et 2 970 LNH). Le réseau des CECOS a produit les résultats issus de 26/27 centres métropolitains (taux de réponse de 96%): 1 079 congélations de sperme pour des hommes atteints de CT, 375 pour LH et 211 pour LNH. Nous avons estimé que le taux de congelation de spermatozoïdes de 2018 en France était de 41% pour le CT, 40% pour le LH et 7% pour le LNH. CONCLUSIONS: A notre connaissance, notre travail est la première étude transversale multicentrique de données nationales analysant le taux de PF chez les hommes atteints de cancer: il suggère un parcours patient efficace pour la PF des hommes avant traitement d'un cancer, par rapport aux études précédemment publiées. Bien que le taux de PF chez les hommes puisse certainemen être amélioré, des études futures devraient évaluer l'information donnée aux patients avant traitement gonadotoxique, les facteurs associés à l'absence de PF et si le défaut d'adressage au CECOS induit un perte de chance pour ces hommes. MOTS-CLéS: Chimiothérapie, Radiothérapie, Oncofertiité, Azoospermia, Paternité.

Fertility preservation and sperm donation in transgender individuals: The current situation within the French CECOS network.

BACKGROUND: Many studies reported that reproductive desire could be high among transgender individuals. In France, fertility preservation and sperm donation were very little proposed to transgender individuals until recently, mainly because the Bioethics Law allows the use of assisted reproductive technologies only in infertile couples and prohibits surrogacy. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the distribution of care on the French territory concerning fertility preservation and sperm donation in transgender individuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicentric national survey was carried out between January 2019 and October 2020 in 28 assisted reproductive technology centres of the French CECOS (Centres d'Etudes et de Conservation des Oeufs et du Sperme) network. Each centre was questioned to find out how many transgender individuals came, were informed and cared for fertility preservation and sperm donation. RESULTS: Concerning fertility preservation, 71.4% of centres received transgender individuals and performed gamete cryopreservation; 581 transgender individuals consulted for fertility preservation. Transgender women were more likely to desire (p < 0.0001) and achieve (p < 0.0001) fertility preservation than transgender men. Concerning sperm donation in couples including a transgender man, 68% of centres offer the complete course from the first consultation to the completion of the assisted reproductive technology cycles; 122 offsprings have been conceived with sperm donation in couples including a transgender man since 1999. DISCUSSION: Our results showed that even if all centres do not propose fertility preservation or sperm donation in transgender individuals, these assisted reproductive technologies are present throughout the French territory. The major point is that both fertility preservation and sperm donation in transgender individuals have grown significantly and that the care of these patients is improving year after year. CONCLUSION: In France, most of CECOS centres can take care of transgender individuals for fertility preservation and sperm donation. The French Bioethics Law allows these latter, and transgender individuals can benefit from a financial support of the national health care insurance for fertility preservation and sperm donation.

Closed vitrification system and egg donation: Predictive factors of oocyte survival and pregnancy.

Although many studies have demonstrated the superiority of ultra-fast freezing compared with slow freezing, the debate is still ongoing concerning the best type of vitrification method: direct exposure to liquid nitrogen (i.e., open systems), or sterile system without contact with liquid nitrogen (i.e., closed systems). The aims of this study were to share our experience on closed vitrification systems in the framework of our egg donation programme with fully asynchronous cycles, and to identify predictive factors of successful outcome in this context. Logistic regression analysis indicated that the number of vitrified oocytes was the only factor predictive of the oocyte survival rate and of clinical pregnancy. The addition of one vitrified oocyte increased by 15 % the odds of oocyte survival. When the oocyte survival rate was considered as a continuous variable, the following results were obtained: 7 % of clinical pregnancy probability for 50 % survival rate, 15 % for 75 % survival rate, and 32 % for 100 % survival rate. The rates of oocyte survival and fertilization, embryo implantation, and clinical pregnancy were in agreement with the recommended values established by ALPHA Scientists in Reproductive Medicine in 2012. On the basis of these results, and according to the European directives on safety, we validate the routine use of closed oocyte vitrification systems for egg donation programmes. These results must be confirmed in larger samples before extrapolation to all patient types.