Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 40
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
AAPS PharmSciTech ; 22(7): 225, 2021 Aug 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34410557

RESUMEN

Batch-to-batch pharmacokinetic (PK) variability of orally inhaled drug products has been documented and can render single-batch PK bioequivalence (BE) studies unreliable; results from one batch may not be consistent with a repeated study using a different batch, yet the goal of PK BE is to deliver a product comparison that is interpretable beyond the specific batches used in the study. We characterized four multiple-batch PK BE approaches to improve outcome reliability without increasing the number of clinical study participants. Three approaches include multiple batches directly in the PK BE study with batch identity either excluded from the statistical model ("Superbatch") or included as a fixed or random effect ("Fixed Batch Effect," "Random Batch Effect"). A fourth approach uses a bio-predictive in vitro test to screen candidate batches, bringing the median batch of each product into the PK BE study ("Targeted Batch"). Three of these approaches (Fixed Batch Effect, Superbatch, Targeted Batch) continue the single-batch PK BE convention in which uncertainty in the Test/Reference ratio estimate due to batch sampling is omitted from the Test/Reference confidence interval. All three of these approaches provided higher power to correctly identify true bioequivalence than the standard single-batch approach with no increase in clinical burden. False equivalence (type I) error was inflated above the expected 5% level, but multiple batches controlled type I error better than a single batch. The Random Batch Effect approach restored 5% type I error, but had low power for small (e.g., <8) batch sample sizes using standard [0.8000, 1.2500] bioequivalence limits.


Asunto(s)
Modelos Estadísticos , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas , Equivalencia Terapéutica , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
2.
Phys Chem Chem Phys ; 22(6): 3273-3280, 2020 Feb 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32003384

RESUMEN

We have prepared the hydrogen sulfide trimer and tetramer anions, (H2S)3- and (H2S)4-, measured their anion photoelectron spectra, and applied high-level quantum chemical calculations to interpret the results. The sharp peaks at low electron binding energies in their photoelectron spectra and their diffuse Dyson orbitals are evidence for them both being dipole-bound anions. While the dipole moments of the neutral (H2S)3 and (H2S)4 clusters are small, the excess electron induces structural distortions that enhance the charge-dipolar attraction and facilitate the binding of diffuse electrons.

3.
AAPS PharmSciTech ; 21(5): 147, 2020 May 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32435854

RESUMEN

The objective of this work was to study the performance of the modified chi-square ratio statistic (mCSRS test) proposed for cascade impactor (CI) profile equivalence testing. The test (T) and reference (R) CI profile datasets were generated from different typical CI profile patterns either with or without inter-site correlation (ISC) through Monte Carlo simulations. The mCSRS test pass rate outcome employing previously published critical values was compared with that of critical values derived from different types of datasets. The influence of number of bootstrap iterations (B) on the consistency of the outcome was assessed within the range of 10-10,000 iterations. Power curves were constructed to study the effect of differences in T and R mean stage deposition, T/R variance ratios, differences between T and R profiles in high/low deposition sites, and sample size on the performance of the mCSRS test. The derived critical values exhibited trends based on R product variability: M1 rank-ordered without ISC (at low variability) and the previously published M8 critical values (at high variability) resulted in lowest pass rate outcomes. The precision of the outcome did not increase considerably beyond B = 2000 (default). The probability of showing equivalence between T and R CI profiles increased with (1) a decrease in mean deposition differences, (2) a decrease in T product variability, and (3) an increase in sample size. The mCSRS outcome is less sensitive to low deposition sites that are prone to analytical variability. In conclusion, the mCSRS test is a sensitive and robust method under most conditions.


Asunto(s)
Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Método de Montecarlo , Equivalencia Terapéutica , Humanos , Probabilidad
4.
AAPS PharmSciTech ; 20(7): 296, 2019 Aug 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31444601

RESUMEN

This article extends previous work studying performance characteristics of the population bioequivalence (PBE) statistical test recommended by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for orally inhaled and nasal drug products. Based on analysis of a metered dose inhaler database for impactor sized mass, a simulation study was designed to compare performance of the recommended PBE approach with several modified or alternative approaches. These included an extended PBE that separately modeled within-batch (can) and between-batch (batch) variability and average bioequivalence (ABE) tests that modeled with or without between-batch variability and with or without log-transformation. This work showed that separately modeling within- and between-batch variability while increasing the number of sampled batches addressed previously identified issues of the PBE approach when between-batch variability was present, namely, (a) increased risk for falsely concluding equivalence and (b) low probability of correctly concluding equivalence. The same modifications were also required of the ABE to achieve expected performance. However, these modifications did not successfully address the issue of equivalence conclusions that depended on the direction of product mean differences (asymmetric performance). This work highlights the importance of understanding decision-making error rates in developing regulatory recommendations to standardize bioequivalence outcomes across products.


Asunto(s)
Inhaladores de Dosis Medida/estadística & datos numéricos , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/administración & dosificación , Equivalencia Terapéutica , United States Food and Drug Administration/estadística & datos numéricos , Administración por Inhalación , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Nebulizadores y Vaporizadores/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos
5.
AAPS PharmSciTech ; 20(6): 249, 2019 Jul 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31286316

RESUMEN

The performances of three statistical approaches for assessing in vitro equivalence was evaluated with a set of 55 scenarios of realistic test (T) and reference (R) cascade impactor (CI) profiles (originally employed by the Product Quality Research Institute to evaluate the chi-square ratio statistic: CSRS) by comparing the outcomes against experts' opinion (surrogate for the truth). The three methods were (A) a stepwise aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) equivalence test integrating population bioequivalence (PBE) testing of impactor-sized mass (ISM) with the CSRS (PBE-CSRS approach), previously suggested by the USFDA; (B) the combination of PBE testing of single actuation content and ISM with the newly suggested modified CSRS (PBE-mCSRS approach), a method employing reference variance scaling; and (C) EMA's average bioequivalence (ABE approach). Based on Monte-Carlo simulations, both PBE-CSRS and ABE approaches resulted in high misclassification rates, the former with highest false-pass rate and the latter with highest false-fail rate at both ≥ 50% and ≥ 80% classification threshold values (the % of simulations or experts necessary to judge a given scenario as equivalent). Based on DeLong's tests, the PBE-mCSRS approach showed significantly better overall agreement with experts' opinion compared to the other approaches. Comparison of CSRS with mCSRS (both without PBE) suggested that the more discriminatory characteristics of the mCSRS method is based on the integration of variance scaling into the mCSRS method. Contrary to the ABE approach, the application of PBE-mCSRS approach for assessing APSD profiles of three dry powder inhaler (DPI) formulations supported the pharmacokinetic bioequivalence assessment of these formulations.


Asunto(s)
Inhaladores de Polvo Seco , Equivalencia Terapéutica , Administración por Inhalación , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Humanos , Método de Montecarlo , Tamaño de la Partícula , Estados Unidos
6.
AAPS PharmSciTech ; 20(5): 206, 2019 May 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31147791

RESUMEN

The multi-stage cascade impactor (CI) is the mainstay method for the determination of the aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) of aerosols emitted from orally inhaled products (OIPs). CIs are designed to operate at a constant flow rate throughout the measurement process. However, it is necessary to mimic an inhalation maneuver to disperse the powder into an aerosol when testing passive dry powder inhalers (DPIs), which constitute a significant portion of available products in this inhaler class. Methods in the pharmacopeial compendia intended for product quality assurance initiate sampling by applying a vacuum to the measurement apparatus using a timer-operated solenoid valve located downstream of the CI, resulting in a period when the flow rate through the impactor rapidly increases from zero towards the target flow rate. This article provides recommendations for achieving consistent APSD measurements, including selection of the CI, pre-separator, and flow control equipment, as well as reviewing considerations that relate to the shape of the flow rate-sampling time profile. Evidence from comparisons of different DPIs delivering the same active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) is indicative that the compendial method for APSD measurement is insensitive as a predictor of pharmacokinetic outcomes. Although inappropriate for product quality testing, guidance is therefore provided towards adopting a more clinically realistic methodology, including the use of an anatomically appropriate inlet and mimicking patient inhalation at the DPI while operating the CI at constant flow rate. Many of these recommendations are applicable to the testing of other OIP classes.


Asunto(s)
Aerosoles/normas , Inhaladores de Polvo Seco/métodos , Diseño de Equipo/métodos , Tamaño de la Partícula , Control de Calidad , Administración por Inhalación , Aerosoles/administración & dosificación , Aerosoles/química , Inhaladores de Polvo Seco/instrumentación , Diseño de Equipo/instrumentación , Humanos , Polvos , Fármacos del Sistema Respiratorio/administración & dosificación , Fármacos del Sistema Respiratorio/química , Fármacos del Sistema Respiratorio/normas , Tecnología Farmacéutica/métodos
7.
AAPS PharmSciTech ; 19(3): 1410-1425, 2018 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29435904

RESUMEN

This article reports performance characteristics of the population bioequivalence (PBE) statistical test recommended by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for orally inhaled products. A PBE Working Group of the International Pharmaceutical Aerosol Consortium on Regulation and Science (IPAC-RS) assembled and considered a database comprising delivered dose measurements from 856 individual batches across 20 metered dose inhaler products submitted by industry. A review of the industry dataset identified variability between batches and a systematic lifestage effect that was not included in the FDA-prescribed model for PBE. A simulation study was designed to understand PBE performance when factors identified in the industry database were present. Neglecting between-batch variability in the PBE model inflated errors in the equivalence conclusion: (i) The probability of incorrectly concluding equivalence (type I error) often exceeded 15% for non-zero between-batch variability, and (ii) the probability of incorrectly rejecting equivalence (type II error) for identical products approached 20% when product and between-batch variabilities were high. Neglecting a systematic through-life increase in the PBE model did not substantially impact PBE performance for the magnitude of lifestage effect considered. Extreme values were present in 80% of the industry products considered, with low-dose extremes having a larger impact on equivalence conclusions. The dataset did not support the need for log-transformation prior to analysis, as requested by FDA. Log-transformation resulted in equivalence conclusions that depended on the direction of product mean differences. These results highlight a need for further refinement of in vitro equivalence methodology.


Asunto(s)
Inhaladores de Dosis Medida , Modelos Estadísticos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Equivalencia Terapéutica , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
8.
AAPS PharmSciTech ; 18(2): 451-461, 2017 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27068528

RESUMEN

The performance of two quality control (QC) tests for aerodynamic particle size distributions (APSD) of orally inhaled drug products (OIPs) is compared. One of the tests is based on the fine particle dose (FPD) metric currently expected by the European regulators. The other test, called efficient data analysis (EDA), uses the ratio of large particle mass to small particle mass (LPM/SPM), along with impactor sized mass (ISM), to detect changes in APSD for QC purposes. The comparison is based on analysis of APSD data from four products (two different pressurized metered dose inhalers (MDIs) and two dry powder inhalers (DPIs)). It is demonstrated that in each case, EDA is able to detect shifts and abnormalities that FPD misses. The lack of sensitivity on the part of FPD is due to its "aggregate" nature, since FPD is a univariate measure of all particles less than about 5 µm aerodynamic diameter, and shifts or changes within the range encompassed by this metric may go undetected. EDA is thus shown to be superior to FPD for routine control of OIP quality. This finding augments previously reported superiority of EDA compared with impactor stage groupings (favored by US regulators) for incorrect rejections (type I errors) when incorrect acceptances (type II errors) were adjusted to the same probability for both approaches. EDA is therefore proposed as a method of choice for routine quality control of OIPs in both European and US regulatory environments.


Asunto(s)
Aerosoles/química , Inhaladores de Polvo Seco/métodos , Ensayo de Materiales/métodos , Polvos/química , Estadística como Asunto/métodos , Tecnología Farmacéutica/métodos , Administración por Inhalación , Administración Oral , Inhaladores de Dosis Medida , Tamaño de la Partícula , Control de Calidad
9.
AAPS PharmSciTech ; 18(8): 3296-3306, 2017 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28589305

RESUMEN

This article reports on results from a two-lab, multiple impactor experiment evaluating the abbreviated impactor measurement (AIM) concept, conducted by the Cascade Impaction Working Group of the International Pharmaceutical Aerosol Consortium on Regulation and Science (IPAC-RS). The goal of this experiment was to expand understanding of the performance of an AIM-type apparatus based on the Andersen eight-stage non-viable cascade impactor (ACI) for the assessment of inhalation aerosols and sprays, compared with the full-resolution version of that impactor described in the pharmacopeial compendia. The experiment was conducted at two centers with a representative commercially available pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) containing albuterol (salbutamol) as active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). Metrics of interest were total mass (TM) emitted from the inhaler, impactor-sized mass (ISM), as well as the ratio of large particle mass (LPM) to small particle mass (SPM). ISM and the LPM/SPM ratio together comprise the efficient data analysis (EDA) metrics. The results of the comparison demonstrated that in this study, the AIM approach had adequate discrimination to detect changes in the mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) of the ACI-sampled aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD), and therefore could be employed for routine product quality control (QC). As with any test method considered for inclusion in a regulatory filing, the transition from an ACI (used in development) to an appropriate AIM/EDA methodology (used in QC) should be evaluated and supported by data on a product-by-product basis.


Asunto(s)
Albuterol/análisis , Inhaladores de Dosis Medida/normas , Tamaño de la Partícula , Tecnología Farmacéutica/métodos , Tecnología Farmacéutica/normas , Administración por Inhalación , Aerosoles , Albuterol/química , Broncodilatadores/análisis , Broncodilatadores/química , Diseño de Equipo/métodos , Diseño de Equipo/normas , Inhaladores de Dosis Medida/tendencias , Nebulizadores y Vaporizadores/normas , Nebulizadores y Vaporizadores/tendencias , Control de Calidad
10.
Phys Chem Chem Phys ; 18(2): 704-12, 2016 Jan 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26327590

RESUMEN

The prospect that protons from water may be transferred to N-heterocyclic molecules due to the presence of an excess electron is studied in hydrated azabenzene cluster anions using anion photoelectron spectroscopy and computational chemistry. In the case of s-triazine (C3H3N3), which has a positive adiabatic electron affinity, proton transfer is not energetically favored nor observed experimentally. Heterocyclic rings with only 1 or 2 nitrogen atoms have negative electron affinities, but the addition of solvating water molecules can yield stable negative ions. In the case of the diazines (C4H4N2: pyrazine, pyrimidine, and pyridazine) the addition of one water molecule is enough to stabilize the negative ion, with the majority of the excess electron density in a π* orbital of the heterocycle but not significantly extended over the hydrogen bonded water network. Pyridine (C5H5N), with the most negative electron affinity, requires three water molecules to stabilize its negative ion. Although our computations suggest proton transfer to be energetically viable in all five N-heterocyclic systems studied here when three or more water molecules are present, proton transfer is not observed experimentally in the triazine nor in the diazine series. In pyridine, however, proton transfer competes energetically with hydrogen bonding (solvation), when three water molecules are present, i.e., both motifs are observed. Pyridine clusters containing four or more water molecules almost exclusively exhibit proton transfer along with solvated [C(6-x)H(6-x+1)N(x)·OH](-) ions.

11.
AAPS PharmSciTech ; 13(3): 978-89, 2012 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22798037

RESUMEN

The purpose of this article is to review the suitability of the analytical and statistical techniques that have thus far been developed to assess the dissolution behavior of particles in the respirable aerodynamic size range, as generated by orally inhaled products (OIPs) such as metered-dose inhalers and dry powder inhalers. The review encompasses all analytical techniques publicized to date, namely, those using paddle-over-disk USP 2 dissolution apparatus, flow-through cell dissolution apparatus, and diffusion cell apparatus. The available techniques may have research value for both industry and academia, especially when developing modified-release formulations. The choice of a method should be guided by the question(s) that the research strives to answer, as well as by the strengths and weaknesses of the available techniques. There is still insufficient knowledge, however, for translating the dissolution data into statements about quality, performance, safety, or efficacy of OIPs in general. Any attempts to standardize a dissolution method for compendial inclusion or compendial use would therefore be premature. This review reinforces and expands on the 2008 stimulus article of the USP Inhalation Ad Hoc Advisory Panel, which "could not find compelling evidence suggesting that such dissolution testing is kinetically and/or clinically crucial for currently approved inhalation drug products."


Asunto(s)
Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/administración & dosificación , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/metabolismo , Administración por Inhalación , Administración Oral , Aerosoles/administración & dosificación , Aerosoles/metabolismo , Solubilidad
12.
AAPS PharmSciTech ; 13(3): 911-8, 2012 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22729779

RESUMEN

This article proposes new terminology that distinguishes between different concepts involved in the discussion of the shelf life of pharmaceutical products. Such comprehensive and common language is currently lacking from various guidelines, which confuses implementation and impedes comparisons of different methodologies. The five new terms that are necessary for a coherent discussion of shelf life are: true shelf life, estimated shelf life, supported shelf life, maximum shelf life, and labeled shelf life. These concepts are already in use, but not named as such. The article discusses various levels of "product" on which different stakeholders tend to focus (e.g., a single-dosage unit, a batch, a production process, etc.). The article also highlights a key missing element in the discussion of shelf life-a Quality Statement, which defines the quality standard for all key stakeholders. Arguments are presented that for regulatory and statistical reasons the true product shelf life should be defined in terms of a suitably small quantile (e.g., fifth) of the distribution of batch shelf lives. The choice of quantile translates to an upper bound on the probability that a randomly selected batch will be nonconforming when tested at the storage time defined by the labeled shelf life. For this strategy, a random-batch model is required. This approach, unlike a fixed-batch model, allows estimation of both within- and between-batch variability, and allows inferences to be made about the entire production process. This work was conducted by the Stability Shelf Life Working Group of the Product Quality Research Institute.


Asunto(s)
Estabilidad de Medicamentos , Almacenaje de Medicamentos/normas , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/normas , Factores de Tiempo
13.
AAPS PharmSciTech ; 12(3): 965-88, 2011 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21785912

RESUMEN

The purpose of this article is to review non-impactor-based methods for measuring particle size distributions of orally inhaled and nasal pharmaceutical aerosols. The assessment of the size distributions of sprays and aerosols from orally inhaled and nasal drug products by methods not involving multi-stage cascade impaction may offer significant potential advantages in terms of labor savings and reducing the risk for operator-related errors associated with complex-to-undertake impactor-based methods. Indeed, in the case of nasal spray products, cascade impaction is inappropriate and alternative, and preferably non-invasive methods must be sought that minimize size-related bias associated with the measurement process for these relatively large droplets. This review highlights the options that are available to those involved with product quality assessments, providing guidance on relative strengths and weaknesses, as well as highlighting precautions that should be observed to minimize bias. The advent of Raman chemical imaging, which enables an estimate to be made of the proportion of each particle comprising active pharmaceutical ingredient(s) (APIs), necessitates a re-think about the value of classical microscopy image analysis as now being capable of providing API-relevant information from collected aerosols and sprays.


Asunto(s)
Aerosoles/química , Tamaño de la Partícula , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/análisis , Espectroscopía Infrarroja por Transformada de Fourier/instrumentación , Tecnología Farmacéutica/métodos , Administración por Inhalación , Diseño de Equipo , Humanos , Ensayo de Materiales/instrumentación , Nebulizadores y Vaporizadores , Suspensiones , Tecnología Farmacéutica/instrumentación
14.
AAPS PharmSciTech ; 12(1): 312-22, 2011 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21286882

RESUMEN

Over the lifecycle of an orally inhaled product (OIP), multi-stage cascade impactor (CI) measurements are used for different purposes and to address different questions. Full-resolution CIs can provide important information during product development and are widely used but are time- and resource-intensive, highly variable, and suboptimal for OIP quality control (QC) testing. By contrast, Efficient Data Analysis (EDA) combined with Abbreviated Impactor Measurement (AIM) systems pertinent either for QC and-possibly-for adult Human Respiratory Tract (pHRT) has been introduced for OIP performance assessment during and post-development. This article summarizes available evidence and discusses a strategy for using either abbreviated or full-resolution CI systems depending on the purpose of the measurement, such that adequate, accurate, and efficient testing of aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) of OIPs can be achieved throughout the lifecycle of a product. Under these proposals, a comprehensive testing program should initially be conducted by full-resolution CI in OIP development to ascertain the product's APSD. Subsequently, correlations should be established from the selected AIM CIs to the corresponding full-resolution system, ideally developing specifications common to both techniques. In the commercial phase, it should be possible to release product using AIM/EDA, keeping the full-resolution CI for investigations, change control, and trouble-shooting, thus optimizing resources for APSD characterization throughout the product lifecycle. If an in vitro-in vivo relationship is established and clinically relevant sizes are known, an AIM-pHRT could serve as a quick indicator that clinically relevant fractions have not changed and also, in the management of post-approval changes.


Asunto(s)
Ensayo de Materiales/métodos , Nebulizadores y Vaporizadores/normas , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/análisis , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/normas , Fármacos del Sistema Respiratorio/análisis , Fármacos del Sistema Respiratorio/normas , Administración por Inhalación , Adulto , Diseño de Equipo , Humanos , Tamaño de la Partícula , Control de Calidad , Sistema Respiratorio , Fármacos del Sistema Respiratorio/sangre , Tecnología Farmacéutica , Pesos y Medidas
15.
AAPS PharmSciTech ; 12(4): 1144-56, 2011 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21901649

RESUMEN

The goal of this article is to discuss considerations regarding implementation of the parametric tolerance interval two one-sided test (PTI-TOST) for delivered dose uniformity (DDU) of orally inhaled products (OIPs). That test was proposed by FDA in 2005 as an alternative to the counting test described in the 1998 draft FDA guidance for metered dose inhalers and dry powder inhalers. The 2005 PTI-TOST, however, still has not found much use in practice despite the general desirability of parametric approaches in modern pharmaceutical quality control. A key reason for its slow uptake is that it rejects, with high probability, batches whose quality is considered acceptable by all other published regulatory and pharmacopeial standards as well as by the DDU specifications for many approved OIPs. Manufacturers therefore continue using nonparametric counting tests for control of DDU. A simulated case study presented here compares the consequences of the PTI-TOST compared to the counting test. The article discusses three possibilities that would help increase the uptake of the PTI-TOST approach, namely: product-specific quality standards, a different default standard suitable for the majority of OIPs, and integration of the PTI-TOST with a continuous verification control strategy rather than using it as an isolated-batch (transactional) end-product testing. In any of these efforts, if a parametric test is used, it is critical not to set the target quality close to, or at the boundary of the process/product capabilities, because PTI tests are designed to reject with high probability the identified target quality.


Asunto(s)
Aprobación de Drogas , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/administración & dosificación , Tecnología Farmacéutica/métodos , United States Food and Drug Administration , Administración por Inhalación , Aerosoles , Simulación por Computador , Nebulizadores y Vaporizadores , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/normas , Control de Calidad , Tecnología Farmacéutica/normas , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration/normas
16.
Phys Chem Chem Phys ; 12(14): 3535-41, 2010 Apr 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20336252

RESUMEN

We report the photoelectron spectra of homogeneous dimer anions of the nucleobases: uracil, thymine, cytosine, adenine, and guanine, i.e., U(2)(-), T(2)(-), C(2)(-), A(2)(-), and G(2)(-) along with DFT calculations on U(2)(-) and T(2)(-). Based on these calculations the photoelectron spectrum of T(2)(-) was assigned as being due to both a proton transferred and a non-proton transferred isomer, while the photoelectron spectrum of U(2)(-) was assigned in terms of a single dominant barrier-free proton transferred isomer. Photoelectron spectra were also measured with a different source and on a different type of photoelectron spectrometer for U(2)(-), T(2)(-), A(2)(-), (1-MeT)(2)(-) and (1,3-Me(2)U)(2)(-).


Asunto(s)
Ácidos Nucleicos/química , Análisis Espectral/métodos , Aniones , Dimerización , Modelos Moleculares
17.
AAPS PharmSciTech ; 11(2): 843-51, 2010 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20480271

RESUMEN

The purpose of this study was to compare relative precision of two different abbreviated impactor measurement (AIM) systems and a traditional multi-stage cascade impactor (CI). The experimental design was chosen to provide separate estimates of variability for each impactor type. Full-resolution CIs are useful for characterizing the aerosol aerodynamic particle size distribution of orally inhaled products during development but are too cumbersome, time-consuming, and resource-intensive for other applications, such as routine quality control (QC). This article presents a proof-of-concept experiment, where two AIM systems configured to provide metrics pertinent to QC (QC-system) and human respiratory tract (HRT-system) were evaluated using a hydrofluoroalkane-albuterol pressurized metered dose inhaler. The Andersen eight-stage CI (ACI) served as the benchmark apparatus. The statistical design allowed estimation of precision with each CI configuration. Apart from one source of systematic error affecting extra-fine particle fraction from the HRT-system, no other bias was detected with either abbreviated system. The observed bias was shown to be caused by particle bounce following the displacement of surfactant by the shear force of the airflow diverging above the collection plate of the second impaction stage. A procedure was subsequently developed that eliminated this source of error, as described in the second article of this series (submitted to AAPS PharmSciTech). Measurements obtained with both abbreviated impactors were very similar in precision to the ACI for all measures of in vitro performance evaluated. Such abbreviated impactors can therefore be substituted for the ACI in certain situations, such as inhaler QC or add-on device testing.


Asunto(s)
Aerosoles/química , Ensayo de Materiales/instrumentación , Fármacos del Sistema Respiratorio/química , Tecnología Farmacéutica/instrumentación , Administración por Inhalación , Aerosoles/administración & dosificación , Diseño de Equipo , Inhaladores de Dosis Medida , Tamaño de la Partícula , Presión , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Fármacos del Sistema Respiratorio/administración & dosificación
18.
AAPS PharmSciTech ; 11(3): 1115-8, 2010 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20623212

RESUMEN

The purpose of this study was to resolve an anomalously high measure of extra-fine particle fraction (EPF) determined by the abbreviated cascade impactor possibly relevant for human respiratory tract (AIM-HRT) in the experiment described in Part 1 of this two-part series, in which the relative precision of abbreviated impactors was evaluated in comparison with a full resolution Andersen eight-stage cascade impactor (ACI). Evidence that the surface coating used to mitigate particle bounce was laterally displaced by the flow emerging from the jets of the lower stage was apparent upon microscopic examination of the associated collection plate of the AIM-HRT impactor whose cut point size defines EPF. A filter soaked in surfactant was floated on top of this collection plate, and further measurements were made using the same pressurized metered-dose inhaler-based formulation and following the same procedure as in Part 1. Measures of EPF, fine particle, and coarse particle fractions were comparable with those obtained with the ACI, indicating that the cause of the bias had been identified and removed. When working with abbreviated impactors, this precaution is advised whenever there is evidence that surface coating displacement has occurred, a task that can be readily accomplished by microscopic inspection of all collection plates after allowing the impactor to sample ambient air for a few minutes.


Asunto(s)
Aerosoles/química , Composición de Medicamentos/instrumentación , Inhaladores de Polvo Seco , Ensayo de Materiales/instrumentación , Fármacos del Sistema Respiratorio/química , Tecnología Farmacéutica/instrumentación , Administración por Inhalación , Aerosoles/administración & dosificación , Diseño de Equipo , Análisis de Falla de Equipo , Humanos , Tamaño de la Partícula , Fármacos del Sistema Respiratorio/administración & dosificación
19.
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv ; 33(3): 127-132, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32176547

RESUMEN

Background: In May 2019, the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine (ISAM) and the International Pharmaceutical Aerosol Consortium on Regulation and Science (IPAC-RS) held a one-day workshop on digital health tools for respiratory therapies, with speakers representing views of patients, pharmaceutical and technology companies, physicians, and payors. Methods: Workshop presentations, audience discussions, and research of relevant literature form the basis of this article. Results: Conversations and publications to date illustrate the broad, and growing, interest in digital technologies, but also highlight a few gaps. The key messages are: (1) There are many great technologies, from simple to complex, but there is still an imperfect understanding of the problems that digital tools need to solve. The current approach often starts with a technology "solution" and then identifying the problems that it could address. This is a poor design practice: the offered technology may not represent the optimum solution to that problem; and that "problem" itself may not represent issues that patients or the health care system deem to be of high priority. (2) Respiratory medicine currently lacks widely accepted and easily measured biomarkers or hand-held diagnostic technologies that could be commercialized for complex/heterogeneous diseases such as asthma (unlike in other areas, e.g., diabetes). (3) There are no obvious solutions that integrate the perspectives of the many stakeholders-from patients to physicians to payors-to make the new field commercially viable, and the incentives of various parties in the health care system are misaligned. (4) A continued dialog, information sharing, mutual education, and collaborations are important in bringing the promise of digital respiratory medicine to fruition. Conclusions: Digital tools for diagnosis and management of respiratory conditions are an active area of research and development but long-term success in this field will depend on identifying real needs, and integrating the often-diverging interests of the various partners in each country's health care system.


Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Tecnología Digital , Enfermedades Respiratorias/terapia , Administración por Inhalación , Aerosoles , Tecnología Biomédica , Humanos , Enfermedades Respiratorias/diagnóstico
20.
AAPS PharmSciTech ; 10(4): 1276-85, 2009.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19882251

RESUMEN

This study of aerodynamic mass-weighted particle size distribution (APSD) data from orally inhaled products (OIPs) investigated whether a set of simpler (than currently used) metrics may be adequate to detect changes in APSD for quality control (QC) purposes. A range of OIPs was examined, and correlations between mass median aerodynamic diameter and the ratio of large particle mass (LPM) to small particle mass (SPM) were calculated. For an Andersen cascade impactor, the LPM combines the mass associated with particle sizes from impactor stage 1 to a product-specific boundary size; SPM combines the mass of particles from that boundary through to terminal filter. The LPM-SPM boundary should be chosen during development based on the full-resolution impactor results so as to maximize the sensitivity of the LPM/SPM ratio to meaningful changes in quality. The LPM/SPM ratio along with the impactor-sized mass (ISM) are by themselves sufficient to detect changes in central tendency and area under the APSD curve, which are key in vitro quality attributes for OIPs. Compared to stage groupings, this two-metric approach provides better intrinsic precision, in part due to having adequate mass and consequently better ability to detect changes in APSD and ISM, suggesting that this approach should be a preferred QC tool. Another advantage is the possibility to obtain these metrics from the abbreviated impactor measurements (AIM) rather than from full-resolution multistage impactors. Although the boundary is product specific, the testing could be accomplished with a basic AIM system which can meet the needs of most or all OIPs.


Asunto(s)
Aerosoles/normas , Tecnología Farmacéutica/normas , Administración por Inhalación , Nebulizadores y Vaporizadores , Tamaño de la Partícula , Control de Calidad , Análisis de Regresión , Tecnología Farmacéutica/instrumentación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA