Long-term trajectory of renal dysfunction and related risk factors in patients with apparently treatment-resistant and non-resistant arterial hypertension.

Objectives: Evidence suggests that renal function increasingly deteriorates in patients with apparently treatment-resistant hypertension (ATRH) in comparison with those who have non-resistant arterial hypertension (NAH). We aimed to assess the long-term decline in renal function between these patient groups and identify specific risk factors contributing to the progression of renal dysfunction. Methods: Data for 265 patients with ATRH and NAH in a hypertension excellence centre were retrospectively evaluated. Demographic characteristics, co-morbidities, laboratory findings, secondary causes of hypertension, medication and exposure to contrast agents were assessed. To address differences between groups, adjustment with linear mixed-effect models was used. Results: Data from the first 4 years of follow-up were evaluated. After adjustment for age and diabetes, which were identified as independent risk factors for renal dysfunction progression in the study cohort, the mean decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate per year was steeper with ATRH than with NAH (-1.49 vs. -0.65 mL/min/1.73 m2 per year; difference in slope, 0.83 mL/min/1.73 m2 per year; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25-1.41, p = 0.005). In subgroup analyses, without Holm-Bonferroni correction, the prescription of MRA indicated a faster decline in renal function in ATRH. Following correction, no specific therapeutic risk factor was associated with faster progression of renal dysfunction. Conclusions: Renal function declines twice as fast with ATRH compared with NAH, independently of age and diabetes. Larger studies are needed to reveal risk factors for renal dysfunction in patients with hypertension.

High blood pressure (arterial hypertension) is a significant risk factor for kidney function decline. Resistant hypertension represents a subtype of hypertension that is difficult to treat and requires multiple antihypertensive agents to achieve effective blood pressure control. Recent research suggests that individuals with resistant hypertension are at greater risk of kidney dysfunction.This study analyses data from adult patients with arterial hypertension and resistant hypertension followed-up for a mean duration of 6.4 years.A faster decline in kidney function was observed in patients with resistant hypertension. This suggests that renal function in these patients should be closely monitored.After statistical evaluation, no medication was found to be associated with an increased risk of kidney failure progression. However, two specific medications, spironolactone and eplerenone, raised suspicion and require further exploration in larger prospective studies.

Post-Kidney Transplantation Results After Circulatory or Brain Death Without Pre-Mortem Heparin Administration.

BACKGROUND Kidney donation after circulatory death (DCD) follows confirmation of death using cardiorespiratory criteria, while donation after brain death (DBD) uses neurological criteria. DBD and DCD donors are the main sources of grafts for transplantation. This retrospective cohort study from a single center in the Czech Republic aimed to compare 5-year post-transplantation outcomes after DCD and DBD transplantation without pre-mortem heparin administration. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 227 recipients with matched donors enrolled in the transplantation program at our institution between 2015 and 2019 were analyzed. Following the application of the inclusion criteria, 99 recipients and 94 matched donors were finally included in the study. RESULTS The duration of cold ischemia (median 961 vs 1100 min, P=0.028) and the perfusion with the preservation solution (median 11 vs 22 min, P<0.001) was statistically significantly shorter in DBD than in DCD grafts. The 1-year survival rates were 97.5% (95% CI 94.1-100.0%) and 90.0% (95% CI: 77.8-100.0%) for DBD and DCD recipients, respectively. The 3-year survival rates were 91.9 (95% CI: 86.0-98.4) and 90.0 (95% CI: 77.8-100.0) for the DBD and DCD groups, respectively. The overall difference in survival between the 2 groups of patients was not statistically significant (P=0.750) nor was disease-free survival (P=0.370). CONCLUSIONS This retrospective study from a single center showed similar 5-year results after kidney transplantation for DCD and DBD donors without pre-mortem heparin administration, including the time to graft failure and patient survival.

Acute infections in kidney transplant recipients.

Immunosuppressed kidney transplant recipients have a high risk of infectious complications. A variety of infections of viral, bacterial, or mycotic etiology, including opportunistic infections, occur in this group of patients, but bacterial infections are primarily responsible for the high infection-related mortality. Of the bacterial infections, urinary tract infections and pneumonia are the most common, often requiring hospitalization and temporary reduction of immunosuppressive therapy after consultation of the transplant center. In addition to symptoms due to the location of the infection, fever is often present. The differential diagnosis of fever and/or high inflammatory activity is specific to patients after kidney transplantation. In addition to infectious causes, we consider drug-related fever, a rejection episode, a relapse of systemic disease or in patients with graft failure in dialysis treatment graft intolerance syndrome (“symptomatic graft”). Saving the patients life, which often requires a significant reduction in immunosuppressive therapy, always takes precedence over preventing a rejection episode. Infection prevention is an integral part of the care of transplant patients, including the recommendation of vaccination where possible.

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in acute hospitalized older patients focused on hydration.

BACKGROUND: Acutely ill older patients frequently suffer not only from their acute disease, but also polymorbidity and frailty. Dehydration is another typical symptom, usually occurring in its both forms: low-intake dehydration and volume depletion. POCUS is goal-directed bedside ultrasound examination and several studies refer to its positive impact on hydration assessment. The aim of our study was to determine whether POCUS might influence (de)hydration diagnostics and/or treatments in older patients with acute illness. METHODS: We randomized 120 acutely ill patients, aged ≥65 years, into POCUS and non-POCUS groups. All participants underwent routine laboratory tests, including haematocrit, serum and urine osmolality, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, BUN/creatinine ratio, and C-reactive protein (CRP). POCUS was performed twice during the first two days to determine chest and abdominal status, with inferior vena cava (IVC) measurements. Length of hospital stay (HL) and consumption of infused fluids (CIF) was evaluated too. Data were analysed with exploratory methods and appropriate statistics. RESULTS: Among all participants, the serum osmolality significantly correlated with age, BUN, creatinine and CIF. HL correlated with CRP and CIF. No significant correlations between IVC and other followed parameters were found. The POCUS group consumed significantly less infused fluids than the non-POCUS group, what could be influenced by POCUS examination of defined body compartments. CONCLUSION: Dehydration is a common feature in older individuals and its diagnostics is rather complicated. The role of POCUS in assessing hydration status remains unclear. However, our study showed, that ultrasound assessment provides next important information for comprehensive understanding of clinical status in older patients and can be beneficial for optimizing the treatment strategy, including fluid management decisions.