Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 19 de 19
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Nord J Psychiatry ; 78(2): 112-119, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37938028

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Antipsychotic polypharmacy is prevalent, however literature on antipsychotic polypharmacy during treatment among patients with dual diagnosis is largely non-existent. This study aims to investigating the extent of antipsychotic polypharmacy dual diagnosis patients during hospitalisations. METHODS: Utilizing cohort data from an integrated dual diagnosis in-patient facility from patients hospitalized between 1 March 2012, to 31 December 2016, we compared the mean antipsychotic medication administered at admission and discharge and examined covariate associations with logistic regressions. RESULTS: The study identified 907 hospital admissions, of which 641 were the first for each patient during the period. At admission, 74.1% received antipsychotics; polypharmacy spanned psychiatric disorders. categories. Patients with affective or personality spectrum disorders were less likely to have antipsychotic polypharmacy upon admission compared to those with psychosis spectrum disorders. 2013-2016 admissions presented less polypharmacy than 2012. Mean antipsychotic numbers remained unchanged for >30-day hospitalizations. Patients admitted without antipsychotic polypharmacy with an affective spectrum disorder or aged 41-50 or over 51 years old were less likely to be discharged with antipsychotic polypharmacy when compared to patients with psychosis spectrum disorder or aged 18-30 years old. CONCLUSION: Approximately three-quarters of admitted patients were treated with antipsychotic medication. Antipsychotic polypharmacy was observed across all psychiatric disorder categories, indicating potential off-label use. Addressing antipsychotic polypharmacy during treatment is challenging, even for specialised facilities. Rational antipsychotic prescribing, deprescribing protocols, and further prescription pattern research are needed.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Polifarmacia , Diagnóstico Dual (Psiquiatría) , Hospitalización , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/tratamiento farmacológico , Dinamarca/epidemiología
2.
Nord J Psychiatry ; 78(4): 281-289, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38380582

RESUMEN

AIM: Based on a large cohort of dual diagnosis patients, the aim of this study was to quantify the patient-perceived problems and advantages of their substance use and relate the quantity of problems to the substance type and psychiatric diagnosis. MATERIAL: Data comes from a naturalistic cohort admitted to an in-patient facility in Denmark specialized in integrated dual diagnosis treatment. We included 1076 patients at their first admission to the facility from 2010 to 2017. Participants completed 607 DrugCheck and 130 DUDIT-E questionnaires. METHOD: we analyzed the questionnaires and included admission diagnosis by use of t-test and ANOVA to depict the patterns in substance use in relation to psychiatric diagnosis. RESULTS: The three most common substance related problems according to the DrugCheck questionnaire were: feeling depressed, financial problems, and losing interest in daily activities. From DUDIT-E, the highest-ranking negative substance related effects were financial ruin, deterioration of health, and problems at work. Effects on social life relationships were also evident with more than 40% of participants. The top three positive substance related effects reported were relaxation, improved sleep, and control over negative emotions. The number of problems listed varied significantly with the type of preferred substance. Patients using pain medication, sedatives, central stimulants, and alcohol reported most problems. Diagnosis did not differentiate the problems experienced. Results partially support the broad self-medication hypothesis for patients with severe mental illness, but also points out that patients are well aware of negative effects.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales , Automedicación , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Humanos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/psicología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/diagnóstico , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Diagnóstico Dual (Psiquiatría) , Dinamarca , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Automedicación/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Comorbilidad
3.
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry ; 32(12): 2503-2512, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36242645

RESUMEN

The study aims to investigate the association of aspiration for future occupation, socioeconomic position, and intellectual abilities with risk of dual diagnosis, psychosis, substance use disorder (SUD) in later life, and to explore if social and intellectual disadvantage modify any effect of childhood aspirations on outcomes. The study included 7177 Danish boys born in 1953. We investigated childhood aspirations (preference regarding future occupation), socioeconomic position (paternal social group), and intellectual abilities (Härnquist intelligence score) on outcomes with dual diagnosis, psychotic disorder, or SUD in Danish registers. Combinations of variables were used for a two-way and three-way analysis (high and low levels of exposure variables). Cox regression with age as the underlying time scale was used for analysis. The separate analysis showed no associations between childhood aspirations and outcomes. Boys with low intelligence scores had an increased risk of developing psychotic disorders (aHR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.1) and SUD (aHR 1.8, 95% CI 1.5-2.1) compared to high intelligence scores. The interaction analyses showed that individuals with a combination of low intelligence score, high aspirations, and/or high paternal social group might have an increased risk of developing dual diagnosis, psychotic disorders, or SUD in later life. This result should be interpreted with caution as interaction variables were not overall significant with the outcome of dual diagnosis or psychotic disorder. The findings suggest that childhood abilities and social position could be associated with the development of psychotic disorders and SUD in later life, however, further studies are needed to address the temporality of the association to gain an understanding of the underlying mechanism of the association.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Psicóticos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Masculino , Humanos , Anciano , Diagnóstico Dual (Psiquiatría) , Cohorte de Nacimiento , Trastornos Psicóticos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Psicóticos/epidemiología , Trastornos Psicóticos/complicaciones , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/complicaciones , Dinamarca/epidemiología
4.
Nord J Psychiatry ; 77(4): 411-419, 2023 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36271867

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This article aims to describe the time trend in number of dual diagnosis patients treated in the psychiatric system in Denmark from 2000 to 2017. METHOD: We calculated the share of patients with dual diagnosis, number of dual diagnosis contacts, number of unique individuals with dual diagnosis as well as number of new patients with dual diagnosis among patients in psychiatric treatment, i.e. among inpatients, outpatients and patients in emergency departments. In order to calculate this, we merged data from the National Patient Register (NPR), the National Registry of Alcohol Treatment, the National treatment registry for substance use, the National Prescription Registry and the Danish National Health Service register in the period from 2000 to 2017. RESULTS: We found an overall increase in patients with dual diagnosis in psychiatric treatment in Denmark from 2000 to 2017. We further detected an increase in the age and sex-standardized number of patients with dual diagnosis in treatment over time, however most markedly for outpatients. Further, inclusion of data from other sources of data than the NPR dramatically increased the number of patients that could be identified as dual diagnosis patients. Using these data, almost half of all male inpatients could be identified as dual diagnosis while the share was more than 40% for patients with schizophrenia, schizotypal and delusional disorders (F2) and patients with personality disorders (F6). CONCLUSIONS: The increase of individual diagnosis patients necessitates action at different levels. This includes improvement of preventive measures as well as improvement of treatment for this underserved group.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Humanos , Masculino , Diagnóstico Dual (Psiquiatría) , Medicina Estatal , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Dinamarca
5.
J Dual Diagn ; 18(2): 111-122, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35363594

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Evidence from real-world integrated dual diagnosis treatment programs is limited. In 2017 we decided to establish the REDD-PAC cohort with the aim to provide more in-depth information regarding the effect of integrated treatment. METHODS: The REDD-PAC cohort includes more than 2,500 patients with dual diagnosis that have been treated at an in-patient department specializing in the integrated treatment of both psychiatric illness and substance use disorder in Denmark in the period from 2002 to 2017. The collected data included information on diagnosis as well as patient-completed questionnaires regarding anxiety, depression, self-worth, and use of substances. Data regarding medications prescribed and administered, weight, height, and blood pressure were also included. RESULTS: The primary diagnosis was psychosis spectrum disorder (37.0%), followed by affective disorders (18.8%). More than two-thirds of the patients were male, and most patients had a weak connection to the labor market and basic schooling. Patients were generally very motivated for treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Further linking the data to Danish national register data makes it possible to follow individual trajectories pre- and post-admission as well as to access complete follow-up data regarding long-term outcomes, e.g., use of health services, mortality, morbidity, crime, and social circumstances. This article describes both the overarching aims of the REDD-PAC cohort and the basic diagnostic and sociodemographic characteristics of the cohort.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Trastornos de Ansiedad/psicología , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales , Diagnóstico Dual (Psiquiatría) , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/complicaciones , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Pronóstico , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/complicaciones , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/diagnóstico , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología
6.
Nord J Psychiatry ; 75(1): 54-62, 2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32720838

RESUMEN

AIM: We investigated the stability of diagnoses during admission over an 11-year period in patients admitted to a highly specialized integrated dual diagnosis treatment facility in Denmark using diagnosis coded in patient charts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Admission and discharge diagnoses from patient files were examined for stability of primary diagnosis and association with year of admission, age, sex, and duration of admission, in 1570 patients from 2007 to 2017. RESULTS: A vast proportion (69.6%) of the patients retained their diagnosis during a 3-month admission. Stability was highest for schizophrenia spectrum diagnoses and lowest for unspecified diagnosis. Type of primary diagnosis, age, and length of admission was associated with lower likelihood of a stable primary diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term admission for psychiatric patients with substance use disorder (SUD) was significantly associated with stability of diagnosis. The finding calls for longer observation of dual diagnosis patients to ensure that relevant diagnosis is given, and consequently that the appropriate clinical treatment such as psychopharmacological as well as non-pharmacological intervention can be applied.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales , Esquizofrenia , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Diagnóstico Dual (Psiquiatría) , Hospitalización , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Admisión del Paciente , Esquizofrenia/diagnóstico , Esquizofrenia/epidemiología , Esquizofrenia/terapia , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/diagnóstico , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapia
7.
Nord J Psychiatry ; 73(3): 169-177, 2019 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30848979

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether patients with dual diagnosis have a higher risk of being mechanical restraint compared to patients with only psychiatric diagnoses. METHODS: Data on all patients admitted to a psychiatric ward from 2010-2014 in the Capital Region of Denmark was linked with information from the register of coercive measures. Patients were based on diagnosis divided into six groups. The three main patient groups were: only psychiatric diagnosis defined as all ICD-10 F-diagnosis except F10-F19, dual diagnosis (co-occurrence of diagnoses of harmful use or dependency and psychiatric diagnoses) and only other substance use diagnosis (i.e. other than harmful use or dependency). The risk of mechanical restraint was investigated by analyzing all first-time admissions in the period using Cox-proportional hazard models. RESULTS: In the crude rates patients with dual diagnosis were more often mechanically restrained compared to patients with only psychiatric diagnoses or only other substance use diagnoses. However, this was attenuated when the characteristics of patients were accounted for. Patients with only other substance related diagnoses had the highest risk of being mechanically restrained. CONCLUSION: When preventing mechanical restraint, the focus should be on actual use of substances or withdrawal effects and not on the dual diagnoses patients in them-self.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales/complicaciones , Restricción Física/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Dinamarca , Diagnóstico Dual (Psiquiatría) , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Servicio de Psiquiatría en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/complicaciones , Adulto Joven
9.
Am J Epidemiol ; 183(3): 218-26, 2016 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26740025

RESUMEN

We examined incidence of depression after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and whether the timing of depression onset influenced survival. All first-time hospitalizations for ACS (n = 97,793) identified in the Danish Patient Registry during 2001-2009 and a reference population were followed for depression and mortality via linkage to patient, prescription, and cause-of-death registries until the end of 2012. Incidence of depression (as defined by hospital discharge or antidepressant medication use) and the relationship between depression and mortality were examined using time-to-event models. In total, 19,520 (20.0%) ACS patients experienced depression within 2 years after the event. The adjusted rate ratio for depression in ACS patients compared with the reference population was 1.28 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.25, 1.30). During 12 years of follow-up, 39,523 (40.4%) ACS patients and 27,931 (28.6%) of the reference population died. ACS patients with recurrent (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.57, 1.67) or new-onset (HR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.60, 1.72) depression had higher mortality rates than patients with no depression. In the reference population, the corresponding relative estimates for recurrent (HR =1.98, 95% CI: 1.92, 2.05) and new-onset (HR = 2.42, 95% CI: 2.31, 2.54) depression were stronger. Depression is common in ACS patients and is associated with increased mortality independently of time of onset, but here the excess mortality associated with depression seemed to be lower in ACS patients than in the reference population.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo/psicología , Depresión/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/epidemiología , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores Socioeconómicos
10.
Eur J Public Health ; 26(1): 146-52, 2016 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26342131

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lower case fatality and increased use of evidence-based invasive management incl. coronary angiography (CAG) have been reported for patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the last 25 years. This article seeks to investigate whether these advances have benefitted patients in all socio-economic groups and how this has impacted on inequality in case fatality. METHODS: Forty three thousand eight hundred and forty three patients admitted with AMI in the period from 2001 to 2009 were included. Socio-economic position was measured using individual information on education. Age-standardized cumulative incidence of CAG within 1, 3 and 30 days along with age-standardized case fatality within 30 and 365 days were estimated. Cox regression models were used to model the relative inequality over time. RESULTS: Use of CAG within 1, 3 and 30 days increased for all educational groups over time and the inequality in CAG within 1 and 3 days seen in the beginning of the time frame was eliminated. Case fatality decreased in all educational groups and the relative inequality in 30 days case fatality decreased for women but not 365 days case fatality. No change was seen for inequality in case fatality for men. CONCLUSION: Increased use of CAG within the evidence based time frame was observed along with a decrease in inequality. However, a reduction in inequality was only observed for short term case fatality, and only for women. These results suggest that inequality in case fatality is not primarily driven by inequality in invasive management of AMI.


Asunto(s)
Angiografía Coronaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Distribución por Sexo , Factores de Tiempo
11.
Nord J Psychiatry ; 70(5): 335-41, 2016 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26750515

RESUMEN

Introduction In the last decade a range of recommendations to increase awareness of depression in acute coronary syndrome patients have been published. To test the impact of those recommendations we examine and compare recent time trends in depression among acute coronary syndrome patients and a reference population. Methods 87 218 patients registered with acute coronary syndrome from 2001-2009 in Denmark and a match reference population were followed through hospital registries and medication prescriptions for early (≤30 days), intermediate (31 days to 6 months) and later (6 months to 2 years) depression in the acute coronary syndrome population and overall depression in the reference population. Cox regression models were used to compare hazard ratios (HRs) for depression over calendar years. Results During the study period, 11.0% and 6.2% were diagnosed with depression in the acute coronary syndrome population and in the reference population, respectively. For the acute coronary syndrome population, the adjusted HRs increased for early (HR (95% CI) 1.04 (1.01-1.06)) and intermediate depression (HR (95% CI) 1.01 (1.00-1.03)), whereas the adjusted HRs did not change for later depression (HR (95% CI) 0.99 (0.98-1.00)). For the reference population the adjusted HRs for depression increased through the study period (HR (95% CI) 1.01 (1.01-1.03)). Conclusion Increase in diagnoses of depressions within 6 months of acute coronary syndrome may be explained by increased focus on depression in this patient group in combination with increased awareness of depression in the general population.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo/epidemiología , Comorbilidad/tendencias , Depresión/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Humanos
12.
Scand J Public Health ; 40(4): 316-24, 2012 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22786915

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The primary purposes of preventive child health care in Denmark are to help ensure a healthy childhood and to create preconditions for a healthy adult life. The aim of this study is to examine whether participation in age-appropriate preventative child health care affects the association between the socioeconomic position of the family and subsequent use of specialised health care outside the hospital system. METHODS: The study population was children born in 1999 and living in Denmark between 1 January 2002 and 31 December 2006 (n=68,366). The study investigated whether the number of contacts with a specialist in 2006 was related to participation in preventive child health care between 2002 and 2005. To control for the potential effect of difference in GP behaviour the data were analysed using a multilevel Poisson model linking each child to the GP with whom he or she was listed. RESULTS: If the children attended any preventive child health care visits, they had the same probability of contact with a specialist regardless of the parents' income. However, children from low-income families not participating in any preventive care had a lower probability of contact with a specialist than children from more affluent families. CONCLUSIONS: Ensuring participation in preventive child health care at the GP may reduce the social gap in utilisation of specialised health care that exists between children from families of different income levels.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud del Niño/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina General/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios Preventivos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Especialización/estadística & datos numéricos , Protección a la Infancia , Preescolar , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Factores de Riesgo , Clase Social
13.
Ann Surg ; 253(4): 733-8, 2011 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21475013

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study examines variation between hospitals in 30-day mortality after surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) in Denmark and explores whether hospital volume and patient characteristics contribute to any variation between hospitals. BACKGROUND: Little is known about the variation between hospitals in 30-day mortality after CRC surgery, and the impact of treatment and patient characteristics that might contribute to such variation. METHODS: Hospital variation was quantified using a multilevel approach on data derived from a nationwide database of all adenocarcinomas of colon and rectum diagnosed in Denmark in 2001 to 2004. These data were linked to several central registers providing information on patient's socioeconomic status, comorbidity, and use of medication. In total 11,287 patients, who underwent surgery at any of the 43 surgical departments were included. RESULTS: Hospitals varied from 3.5% to 44.1% in 30-day mortality after emergency colon cancer surgery, and the multilevel analysis showed that emergency patients were 5 times [odd ratio (OR) = 4.6)] as likely to die within 30 days in hospitals with the worst performance compared to those with the best performance. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score increased the variation between hospitals (OR = 5.8), whereas the other potential explanatory variables had no effect on the variation. For patients who had elective surgery for colon and rectal cancer the variation in 30-day mortality between hospitals was small and nonsignificant. CONCLUSION: Hospital variation in 30-day mortality after CRC surgery are due to differences in hospitals' ability to take care of emergency patients, especially those with high ASA scores.


Asunto(s)
Colectomía/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Colectomía/métodos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Bases de Datos Factuales , Dinamarca , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tratamiento de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Selección de Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/fisiopatología , Medición de Riesgo , Servicio de Cirugía en Hospital/normas , Servicio de Cirugía en Hospital/tendencias , Análisis de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo
14.
EuroIntervention ; 11(13): 1495-502, 2016 Apr 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26348677

RESUMEN

AIMS: Our aim was to investigate whether there is social inequality in access to invasive examination and treatment, and whether access explains social inequality in case fatality in a nationwide sample of patients admitted for the first time with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in Denmark. METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients admitted for the first time with NSTEMI (n=16,625) or unstable angina (n=8,800) from 2001 to 2009 in Denmark were included. We measured time from admission to coronary angiography (CAG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). The outcomes were 30-day and one-year case fatality. We found social inequality in access to CAG and one-year case fatality for both NSTEMI and unstable angina patients, but the time waited for CAG did not explain the social inequality in case fatality. CONCLUSIONS: Despite nominal equal access to health care, social inequality in case fatality after NSTEMI and unstable angina exists in Denmark. The patients with the shortest education waited longer for angio-graphy; however, this did not seem to explain inequality in case fatality. This register-based study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (Approval number 2010-41-5263). Register-based studies do not need approval by a medical ethics committee in Denmark.


Asunto(s)
Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/terapia , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Factores Socioeconómicos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Angina Inestable/terapia , Angiografía Coronaria , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/métodos , Dinamarca , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/economía , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
PLoS One ; 10(10): e0141598, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26513652

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with low socioeconomic position have higher rates of mortality after diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), but little is known about the mechanisms behind this social inequality. The aim of the present study was to examine whether any educational inequality in survival after ACS was influenced by comorbid conditions including depression. METHODS: From 2001 to 2009 all first-time ACS patients were identified in the Danish National Patient Registry. This cohort of 83 062 ACS patients and a matched reference population were followed for incident depression and mortality until December 2012 by linkage to person, patients and prescription registries. Educational status was defined at study entry and the impact of potential confounders and mediators (age, gender, cohabitation status, somatic comorbidity and depression) on the relation between education and mortality were identified by drawing a directed acyclic graph and analysed using multiple Cox regression analyses. FINDINGS: During follow-up, 29 583(35.6%) of ACS patients and 19 105(22.9%) of the reference population died. Cox regression analyses showed an increased mortality in the lowest educated compared to those with high education in both ACS patients and the reference population. Adjustment for previous and incident depression or other covariables only attenuated the relations slightly. This pattern of associations was seen for mortality after 30 days, 1 year and during total follow-up. CONCLUSION: In this study the relative excess mortality rate in lower educated ACS patients was comparable with the excess risk associated with low education in the background population. This educational inequality in survival remained after adjustment for somatic comorbidity and depression.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo/epidemiología , Depresión/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Comorbilidad , Dinamarca , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Factores Socioeconómicos
16.
PLoS One ; 9(1): e86758, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24497976

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Over the last decades survival after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has improved, leading to an increasing number of patients returning to work, but little is known about factors that may influence their labour market affiliation. This study examines the impact of gender, co-morbidity and socio-economic position on subsequent labour market affiliation and transition between various social services in patients admitted for the first time with ACS. METHODS: From 2001 to 2009 all first-time hospitalisations for ACS were identified in the Danish National Patient Registry (n = 79,714). For this population, data on sick leave, unemployment and retirement were obtained from an administrative register covering all citizens. The 21,926 patients, aged 18-63 years, who had survived 30 days and were part of the workforce at the time of diagnosis were included in the analyses where subsequent transition between the above labour market states was examined using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models. FINDINGS: A total of 37% of patients were in work 30 days after first ACS diagnosis, while 55% were on sick leave and 8% were unemployed. Seventy-nine per cent returned to work once during follow-up. This probability was highest among males, those below 50 years, living with a partner, the highest educated, with higher occupations, having specific events (NSTEMI, and percutaneous coronary intervention) and with no co-morbidity. During five years follow-up, 43% retired due to disability or voluntary early pension. Female gender, low education, basic occupation, co-morbidity and having a severer event (invasive procedures) and receiving sickness benefits or being unemployed 30 days after admission were associated with increased probability of early retirement. CONCLUSION: About half of patients with first-time ACS stay in or return to work shortly after the event. Women, the socially disadvantaged, those with presumed severer events and co-morbidity have lower rates of return.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Empleo , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Jubilación/estadística & datos numéricos , Reinserción al Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Distribución por Sexo , Ausencia por Enfermedad , Factores Socioeconómicos , Adulto Joven
17.
BMJ Open ; 4(1): e004052, 2014 Jan 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24413349

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate trends in time to invasive examination and treatment for patient with first time diagnosis of non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and unstable angina during the period from 2001 to 2009 in Denmark. DESIGN: From 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2009 all first time hospitalisations with NSTEMI and unstable angina were identified in the National Patient Registry (n=65 909). Time from admission to initiation of coronary angiography (CAG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) was calculated. We described the development in invasive examination and treatment probability (CAG, PCI and CABG at 3, 7, 10, 30 and 60 days) for the years 2001-2009, taking the competing risk of death into account using Aalen-Johansen estimators and a Fine-Gray model. SETTING: Nationwide Danish cohort. RESULTS: The proportion of patients receiving a CAG and PCI increased substantially over time while the proportion receiving a CABG decreased for both NSTEMI and unstable angina. For both NSTEMI and unstable angina, a significant increase in invasive examination and treatment probability at 3 days for CAG and PCI were seen especially from 2007 through to 2009. For NSTEMI, the CAG examination probability at 3 days leaped from 20% in 2007 to 32% in 2008 and 39% in 2009, and for PCI the same was true with a leap in treatment probability from 19% to 28% from 2008 to 2009. CONCLUSIONS: In Denmark the use of CAG and PCI in treatment of NSTEMI and unstable angina has increased from 2001 to 2009, while the use of CABG has decreased. During the same period, there was a marked increase in invasive examination and treatment probability at 3 days, that is, more patients were treated faster which is in line with the political aim of reducing time to treatment.


Asunto(s)
Angina Inestable/diagnóstico por imagen , Angina Inestable/terapia , Angiografía Coronaria/tendencias , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/tendencias , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/tendencias , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Dinamarca , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Admisión del Paciente , Factores de Tiempo
18.
Qual Manag Health Care ; 21(4): 278-85, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23011075

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Selection biases due to difference in reporting may cause spurious findings. The purpose of this study was to illustrate the effect of case incompleteness on the differences in 180-day survival rate when comparing departments. METHODS: Completeness was estimated as the proportion of patients reported to the Danish Lymphoma Database compared with the National Patient Registry. The effect of differential reporting between departments was investigated using plots were the proportion of patients who survived 180 days in the individual departments were compared with the national average as well as examining the association between the department and 180-day survival. RESULTS: In total, 8015 patients were registered in the National Patient Registry with a lymphoma diagnosis. Of these, 1824 patients were not reported to the Danish Lymphoma database equaling a rate of completion of 77.2%. There were large differences between departments with regard to patient completeness (range, 52.4%-91.6%). The survival of the patients reported to the database was significantly better than those not reported and the differential reporting affected the department ranking. CONCLUSION: Differential case reporting may cause spurious findings. To ensure valid conclusions validation against a gold standard and continuous feedback to data providers is important.


Asunto(s)
Bases de Datos Factuales , Departamentos de Hospitales/normas , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Dinamarca , Femenino , Humanos , Linfoma , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Distribución por Sexo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Adulto Joven
19.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 174(17): 1145-9, 2012 Apr 23.
Artículo en Danés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22533929

RESUMEN

In Denmark, the linkage between national clinical databases and central health administrative and socio-demographic registries provides unique opportunities for describing and analysing disease courses in ways that can be applied for quality improvement purposes, in the evaluation of new organisational initiatives, and for research. This status article presents an overview of the possibilities and discusses the potentials and challenges.


Asunto(s)
Bases de Datos Factuales , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Sistema de Registros , Dinamarca , Humanos , Registro Médico Coordinado , Pronóstico , Factores Socioeconómicos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA