Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Intern Emerg Med ; 18(3): 907-915, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36680737

RESUMEN

The significant impact of COVID-19 worldwide has made it necessary to develop tools to identify patients at high risk of severe disease and death. This work aims to validate the RIM Score-COVID in the SEMI-COVID-19 Registry. The RIM Score-COVID is a simple nomogram with high predictive capacity for in-hospital death due to COVID-19 designed using clinical and analytical parameters of patients diagnosed in the first wave of the pandemic. The nomogram uses five variables measured on arrival to the emergency department (ED): age, sex, oxygen saturation, C-reactive protein level, and neutrophil-to-platelet ratio. Validation was performed in the Spanish SEMI-COVID-19 Registry, which included consecutive patients hospitalized with confirmed COVID-19 in Spain. The cohort was divided into three time periods: T1 from February 1 to June 10, 2020 (first wave), T2 from June 11 to December 31, 2020 (second wave, pre-vaccination period), and T3 from January 1 to December 5, 2021 (vaccination period). The model's accuracy in predicting in-hospital COVID-19 mortality was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC). Clinical and laboratory data from 22,566 patients were analyzed: 15,976 (70.7%) from T1, 4,233 (18.7%) from T2, and 2,357 from T3 (10.4%). AUROC of the RIM Score-COVID in the entire SEMI-COVID-19 Registry was 0.823 (95%CI 0.819-0.827) and was 0.834 (95%CI 0.830-0.839) in T1, 0.792 (95%CI 0.781-0.803) in T2, and 0.799 (95%CI 0.785-0.813) in T3. The RIM Score-COVID is a simple, easy-to-use method for predicting in-hospital COVID-19 mortality that uses parameters measured in most EDs. This tool showed good predictive ability in successive disease waves.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Curva ROC , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
PLoS One ; 17(1): e0261711, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35061713

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe the impact of different doses of corticosteroids on the evolution of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, based on the potential benefit of the non-genomic mechanism of these drugs at higher doses. METHODS: Observational study using data collected from the SEMI-COVID-19 Registry. We evaluated the epidemiological, radiological and analytical scenario between patients treated with megadoses therapy of corticosteroids vs low-dose of corticosteroids and the development of complications. The primary endpoint was all-cause in-hospital mortality according to use of corticosteroids megadoses. RESULTS: Of a total of 14,921 patients, corticosteroids were used in 5,262 (35.3%). Of them, 2,216 (46%) specifically received megadoses. Age was a factor that differed between those who received megadoses therapy versus those who did not in a significant manner (69 years [IQR 59-79] vs 73 years [IQR 61-83]; p < .001). Radiological and analytical findings showed a higher use of megadoses therapy among patients with an interstitial infiltrate and elevated inflammatory markers associated with COVID-19. In the univariate study it appears that steroid use is associated with increased mortality (OR 2.07 95% CI 1.91-2.24 p < .001) and megadose use with increased survival (OR 0.84 95% CI 0.75-0.96, p 0.011), but when adjusting for possible confounding factors, it is observed that the use of megadoses is also associated with higher mortality (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.32-1.80; p < .001). There is no difference between megadoses and low-dose (p .298). Although, there are differences in the use of megadoses versus low-dose in terms of complications, mainly infectious, with fewer pneumonias and sepsis in the megadoses group (OR 0.82 95% CI 0.71-0.95; p < .001 and OR 0.80 95% CI 0.65-0.97; p < .001) respectively. CONCLUSION: There is no difference in mortality with megadoses versus low-dose, but there is a lower incidence of infectious complications with glucocorticoid megadoses.


Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiología , Prednisona/uso terapéutico , Sistema de Registros , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidad , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/virología , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , SARS-CoV-2/crecimiento & desarrollo , Sepsis/epidemiología , Sepsis/mortalidad , Sepsis/virología , España/epidemiología , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Rev. Soc. Peru. Med. Interna ; 29(1): 30-35, ene.-mar.2016. ilus
Artículo en Español | LILACS, LIPECS | ID: lil-786740

RESUMEN

El estatus epiléptico no convulsivo (EENC) es una situación clínica en la cual los pacientes presentan un grado variable de alteración del nivel de conciencia o de su estado mental basal, asociado a descargas o paroxismos electrográficos de forma continua y sin presentar movimientos convulsivos, 0 estos son muy sutiles. Es una entidad de relativamente reciente descripción, que va adquiriendo cada vez una mayor importancia entre las causas de deterioro del nivel de conciencia, siendo en parte, probablemente infradiagnosticada, a lo que contribuye el desconocimiento del clínico, la necesidad de realizar un electroencefalograma (EEG) y la falta de unos criterios diagnósticos consensuados. El objetivo de este artículo es hacer una revisión del EENC haciendo un especial énfasis en aquellas situaciones en las cuales el clínico se pueda enfrentar con dicha patología...


Nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is a situation in which patients have a varying degree of altered level of consciousness or mental condition associated with continuously electrographic discharges or paroxysms, without present convulsive movements or that they are very subtle. It is an entity of relatively recent description, which becomes more important as cause of altered level of consciousness, and it was thought likely being underdiagnosed, contributing the ignorance of clinician, the need for an electroencephalogram and lack of consensus diagnostic criteria. The aim of this article is to review the non-convulsive status epilepticus with special emphasis on those situations in which the clinician may face with this pathology...


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Estado Epiléptico , Estado Epiléptico/diagnóstico , Estado Epiléptico/terapia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA