Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Hematol Oncol ; 33(1): 15-22, 2015 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24733536

RESUMEN

Various treatment options exist for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). Clinical registries provide insight into routine treatment and identify changes in treatment over time. The Tumour Registry Lymphatic Neoplasms prospectively collects data on the treatment of patients with lymphoid B-cell neoplasm as administered by office-based haematologists in Germany. Data on patient and tumour characteristics, co-morbidities, systemic treatments, and outcome parameters are recorded. Eight hundred and six patients with CLL were recruited between May 2009 and August 2013. At the start of first-line treatment, median age was 71 years, 64% were male, and 44% had a Binet stage C disease. The most frequently used first-line/second-line regimens were bendamustine + rituximab (BR, 56%/55%), fludarabine + cyclophosphamide + rituximab (FCR, 22%/11%), and bendamustine (B, 5%/9%). Chlorambucil was used in only 7% (first-line) and 6% (second-line) of patients. Patients treated with FCR were younger and healthier than patients treated with BR. Overall, 91% of first-line treatments were successful (40% complete response). Real-life patient populations differ considerably from patients treated in randomized controlled trials. BR and FCR dominate the first-line and second-line treatments of CLL by office-based haematologists in Germany. Future analysis will investigate progression-free and overall survival times.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/tratamiento farmacológico , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales de Origen Murino/administración & dosificación , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina , Clorambucilo/administración & dosificación , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Alemania , Hematología/métodos , Hematología/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Compuestos de Mostaza Nitrogenada/administración & dosificación , Visita a Consultorio Médico/estadística & datos numéricos , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Estudios Prospectivos , Rituximab , Vidarabina/administración & dosificación , Vidarabina/análogos & derivados
2.
Oncol Res Treat ; 37(11): 635-6, 638-44, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25486127

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Various treatment options exist for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Clinical registries provide insight into routine treatment and identify changes in treatment over time. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Tumour Registry Lymphatic Neoplasms (TLN) prospectively collects data on the treatment of patients with lymphoid B cell neoplasms as administered by office-based haematologists in Germany. Data on patient and tumour characteristics, comorbidities, systemic treatments and outcome parameters are recorded. RESULTS: 371 non-transplant patients with MM were recruited between 2009 and 2011. At the start of first-line (second-line) treatment, the median age was 73 (75) years; 67% (74%) of the patients had stage III MM (classification of Durie and Salmon) and 19% (28%) had renal insufficiency. In the first line, 40% of the patients received bortezomib+melphalan+prednisone (VMP), 25% received bortezomib±dexamethasone (V±D) and 8% were treated with melphalan+prednisone+thalidomide (MPT). While use of bortezomib-based regimens increased from 67% (2009) to 85% (2011), use of melphalan-based regimens decreased from 68% to 48%. The overall objective response rate of treatment was 82%. In the second line, 34% of the patients received V±D and 16% lenalidomide+dexamethasone (LD). CONCLUSION: Bortezomib-based regimens dominate the first- and second-line treatment of MM. Future analyses will investigate outcome data, e.g. effectiveness of bortezomib retherapy compared to other second-line treatments.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Atención Ambulatoria , Ácidos Borónicos/administración & dosificación , Bortezomib , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Alemania/epidemiología , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Hematología/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Melfalán/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/epidemiología , Mieloma Múltiple/patología , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Estudios Prospectivos , Pirazinas/administración & dosificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA