Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 81(2): 213-223, 2023 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36400157

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare different materials' effects on alveolar ridge preservation of postextraction sockets in anterior maxilla. MATERIALS AND METHOD: In this prospective, single center, randomized, controlled clinical trial, healthy patients who needed one single anterior maxillary tooth extraction (including bicuspids) were selected. After a minimally traumatic extraction without complications, 44 patients were randomly allocated into 4 groups: 1) natural socket healing (blood clot), 2) xenograft and gingival free graft, 3) dense polytetrafluoroethylene membrane, and 4) platelet rich fibrin plugs. Alveolar ridge height and width loss were evaluated in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and in dental casts at 3 moments: 1) preoperative (T1), 2) 7 days postoperative (T2), and 3) 120 days postoperative (T3). Height and width alveolar ridge loss detected in CBCT and in dental casts were compared among the groups (two-way analysis of variance [ANOVA]; P < .05). RESULTS: Forty patients (24 women and 16 men) ranging from 25 to 70 years old (mean of 42 years old) participated in this study. Group 2 showed the least alveolar ridge height loss results in CBCT (9.8 ± 1.9% at T3) and dental cast analysis (1.0 ± 0.2 mm). Groups 2 (12.7 ± 4.7% at T3) and 3 (15.4 ± 2.7% at T3) showed the least alveolar ridge width loss measured in CBCT compared with groups 1 and 4, but the difference between groups 2 and 3 were not statistically significant (P = .968). Group 3 (0.9 ± 0.2 mm) and group 2 (1.0 ± 0.2 mm) showed the least width loss compared with groups 1 and 4 in dental cast analysis. Again, the difference between groups 3 and 2 was not statistically significant (P = 1.000). CONCLUSION: In postextraction sockets of the anterior maxilla and bicuspid region, group 2 (xenogenous bone graft with free gingival graft) and group 3 (dense polytetrafluoroethylene) obtained the best results in alveolar preservation, with group 2 being more indicated when the vertical alveolar ridge preservation is mandatory.


Asunto(s)
Pérdida de Hueso Alveolar , Aumento de la Cresta Alveolar , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Alveolo Dental/diagnóstico por imagen , Alveolo Dental/cirugía , Pérdida de Hueso Alveolar/diagnóstico por imagen , Pérdida de Hueso Alveolar/prevención & control , Pérdida de Hueso Alveolar/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Proceso Alveolar/diagnóstico por imagen , Proceso Alveolar/cirugía , Extracción Dental , Politetrafluoroetileno , Aumento de la Cresta Alveolar/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA