Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 69(7): 1941-1947, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33769554

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to assess the prevalence of newly prescribed antipsychotic/benzodiazepine medication, as well as 30-day readmissions, among Hospital Elder Life Program (HELP)-enrolled patients. DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. SETTING: HELP intervention took place in eight hospital units. The standard care group was selected from eight additional hospital units. PARTICIPANTS: Hospitalized patients, aged 65 years and older, enrolled in HELP during between January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2018 were included in the HELP cohort. Patients hospitalized in eight additional units during the same time frame were part of the standard care group. MEASUREMENTS: Antipsychotic/benzodiazepine medications were pulled from the electronic health record. History of chronic mental illnesses were classified by ICD10 codes. Basic descriptive statistics were used to analyze patient characteristics and comorbidities. Chi-squared and t-tests were performed to detect statistical differences as appropriate. RESULTS: There were 1411 patients in the HELP group and 10,807 patients in the standard care group. The HELP group was likely to be older, female and to have a shorten length of stay (all p ≤ 0.02). Our study demonstrated that approximately 8.9% (n = 125) of patients enrolled in HELP received an order for antipsychotics during their hospital admission, while 31.5% (n = 3400) from the standard care group (p < 0.001). The difference in benzodiazepine prescription in patients enrolled in HELP was also less when comparing the two groups (22.8% HELP vs 25.6% standard care; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Patients enrolled in the HELP group were less likely to receive a prescription for antipsychotics or benzodiazepines. The majority of patients enrolled in HELP were discharged to a more independent environment (home or assisted living) and there was a relatively low 30-day readmission rate among HELP patients.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Femenino , Humanos , Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades , Masculino , Prevalencia , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 67(8): 1730-1736, 2019 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31220334

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To describe the Bundled Hospital Elder Life Program (HELP and HELP in Home Care), an adaptation of HELP, and examine the association of 30-day all-cause unplanned hospital readmission risk among older adults discharged to home care with and without Bundled HELP. DESIGN: Matched case-control study. SETTING: Two medical-surgical units within two midwestern rural hospitals and patient homes (home health). PARTICIPANTS: Hospitalized patients, aged 65 years and older, discharged to home healthcare with and without Bundled HELP exposure between January 1, 2015, and September 30, 2017. Each case (Bundled HELP, n = 148) was matched to a control (non-Bundled HELP, n = 148) on Charlson Comorbidity Index, primary hospital diagnosis of orthopedic condition or injury, and cardiovascular disease using propensity score matching. MEASUREMENTS: The primary study outcome was 30-day all-cause unplanned hospital readmission. Additional outcomes measured were 30-day emergency department (ED) visit, hospital length of stay (LOS), and total number of skilled home care visits. RESULTS: Fewer cases (16.8%) than controls (28.4%) had a 30-day all-cause unplanned hospital readmission. The fully adjusted model showed significantly lower risk of 30-day hospital readmission for case (Bundled HELP) patients (0.41; 95% confidence interval = 0.22-0.77; P < .01). The difference between case (10.8%) and control (15.5%) 30-day ED visit was not significant (P = .23). A lower LOS for the case group was shown (P < .01), while the number of skilled home care visits was not significantly different between groups (P = .28). CONCLUSION: HELP protocol implementation during a patient's hospital stay and as a continued component of home care among older adults at risk for cognitive and/or functional decline appears to be associated with favorable outcomes. Our initial evaluation supports continued study of the Bundled HELP. Further research is needed to confirm the initial findings and to evaluate the impact of the adapted model on functional outcomes and delirium incidence in the home. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:1730-1736, 2019.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud para Ancianos/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Subaguda/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Delirio/epidemiología , Delirio/prevención & control , Femenino , Implementación de Plan de Salud , Servicios de Salud para Ancianos/normas , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/normas , Hospitales Rurales , Humanos , Incidencia , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Alta del Paciente , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Atención Subaguda/métodos , Atención Subaguda/normas
3.
Clin Geriatr Med ; 34(3): 299-311, 2018 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30031418

RESUMEN

Older patients in the emergency department (ED) present unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. The ED clinicians must simultaneously evaluate and treat older adults along multiple domains: cognitive impairment, atypical presentations, functional impairment, medication management, trauma and falls, and end-of-life care. This article reviews these domains and suggests strategies for a more comprehensive, patient-centered ED approach to older patients. Incorporating assessment of these domains into the ED process improves patient outcomes, provider satisfaction, and ED flow.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Evaluación Geriátrica/métodos , Servicios de Salud para Ancianos/normas , Manejo de Atención al Paciente/métodos , Anciano , Humanos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA