RESUMEN
Immediate initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) for all people living with HIV has important health benefits but implications for the economic aspects of patients' lives are still largely unknown. This stepped-wedge cluster-randomized controlled trial aimed to determine the causal impact of immediate ART initiation on patients' healthcare expenditures in Eswatini. Fourteen healthcare facilities were randomly assigned to transition at one of seven time points from the standard of care (ART eligibility below a CD4 count threshold) to the immediate ART for all intervention (EAAA). 2261 patients living with HIV were interviewed over the study period to capture their past-year out-of-pocket healthcare expenditures. In mixed-effects regression models, we found a 49% decrease (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.36, 0.72, p < 0.001) in past-year total healthcare expenditures in the EAAA group compared to the standard of care, and a 98% (RR 0.02, 95% CI 0.00, 0.02, p < 0.001) decrease in spending on private and traditional healthcare. Despite a higher frequency of HIV care visits for newly initiated ART patients, immediate ART initiation appears to have lowered patients' healthcare expenditures because they sought less care from alternative healthcare providers. This study adds an important economic argument to the World Health Organization's recommendation to abolish CD4-count-based eligibility thresholds for ART.
RESUMEN: El inicio inmediato de la terapia antirretroviral (TAR) para todas las personas que viven con VIH tiene importantes beneficios para la salud, pero aún se desconocen las implicaciones en el aspecto económico. Este ensayo controlado aleatorizado por clústers (CRT por sus siglas en inglés) por grupos en distintas etapas pretende determinar el impacto del inicio inmediato de la TAR en los gastos sanitarios de los pacientes en Eswatini. Catorce centros sanitarios fueron asignados aleatoriamente a la transición en uno de los siete periodos de la asistencia estándar (elegibilidad para la TAR en niveles definidos de recuento de CD4) a la intervención de TAR inmediato para todos (EAAA). Se entrevistó a 2.261 pacientes con VIH a lo largo del estudio para conocer sus gastos sanitarios del año anterior. Según los modelos de regresión de efectos mixtos, se observó un descenso del 49% (RR: 0,51; IC del 95%: 0,36, 0,72; p<0,001) en el gasto sanitario total del año anterior en el grupo de la EAAA, y un descenso del 98% (RR 0,02; IC del 95%: 0,00, 0,02; p<0,001) en el gasto en asistencia sanitaria privada y tradicional. A pesar de una mayor frecuencia de visitas deatención de VIH para los pacientes que recién comenzaron laTAR, la aplicación inmediata de laTAR redujo los gastos sanitarios de los pacientes dado que buscaron menos atención de proveedores de asistencia sanitaria alternativos. Este estudio añade un importante argumento económico a la recomendación de la Organización Mundial de la Salud de abolir las restricciones de elegibilidad para la terapia antirretroviral basados en el recuento de CD4.
Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH , Infecciones por VIH , Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Recuento de Linfocito CD4 , Esuatini , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Gastos en Salud , HumanosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Immediate ART (or early access to ART for all, EAAA) is becoming a national policy in many countries in sub-Saharan Africa. It is plausible that the switch from delayed to immediate ART could either increase or decrease patient satisfaction with treatment. A decrease in patient satisfaction would likely have detrimental consequences for long-term retention and adherence, in addition to the value lost because of the worsening patient experience itself. We conducted a pragmatic stepped-wedge cluster-randomized controlled trial (SW-cRCT) to determine the causal impact of immediate treatment for HIV on patient satisfaction. DESIGN: This seven-step SW-cRCT took place in 14 public-sector health facilities in Eswatini's Hhohho region, from September 2014 to August 2017. METHODS: During each step of the trial, we randomly selected days for data collection at each study facility. During these days, a random sample of HIV patients were selected for outcome assessment. In total, 2629 patients provided data on their overall patient satisfaction and satisfaction with the following four domains of the patient experience using a five-point Likert scale: wait time, consultation time, involvement in treatment decisions, and respectful treatment. Higher values on the Likert scale indicated lower patient satisfaction. We analyzed the data using a multilevel ordered logistic regression model with individuals at the first level and health facilities at the second (cluster) level. RESULTS: The proportional odds ratio (OR) comparing EAAA to control was 0.91 (95% CI 0.66-1.25) for overall patient satisfaction. For the specific domains of the patient experience, the ORs describing the impact of EAAA on satisfaction were 1.04 (95% CI 0.61-1.78) for wait time, 0.90 (95% CI 0.62-1.31) for involvement in treatment decisions, 0.86 (95% CI 0.61-1.20) for consultation time, and 1.35 (95% CI 0.93-1.96) for respectful treatment. These results were robust across a wide range of sensitivity analyses. Over time - and independent of EAAA - we observed a worsening trend for both overall patient satisfaction and satisfaction in the four domains of the patient experience we measured. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the policy change from delayed to immediate ART in sub-Saharan Africa. Immediate (versus delayed) ART in public-sector health facilities in Eswatini had no effect on either overall patient satisfaction or satisfaction with four specific domains of the patient experience. At the same time, we observed a strong secular trend of decreasing patient satisfaction in both the intervention and the control arm of the trial. Further implementation research should identify approaches to ensure high patient satisfaction as ART programs grow and mature.
Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH/administración & dosificación , Intervención Médica Temprana/economía , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Sector Público , Adulto , Fármacos Anti-VIH/efectos adversos , Fármacos Anti-VIH/economía , Esuatini , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/economía , Infecciones por VIH/virología , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Tiempo , Carga ViralRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The WHO recommends antiretroviral treatment (ART) for all HIV-positive patients regardless of CD4 count or disease stage, referred to as "Early Access to ART for All" (EAAA). The health systems effects of EAAA implementation are unknown. This trial was implemented in a government-managed public health system with the aim to examine the "real world" impact of EAAA on care retention and viral suppression. METHODS: In this stepped-wedge randomized controlled trial, 14 public sector health facilities in Eswatini were paired and randomly assigned to stepwise transition from standard of care (SoC) to EAAA. ART-naïve participants ≥18 years who were not pregnant or breastfeeding were eligible for enrolment. We used Cox proportional hazard models with censoring at clinic transition to estimate the effects of EAAA on retention in care and retention and viral suppression combined. RESULTS: Between September 2014 and August 2017, 3405 participants were enrolled. In SoC and EAAA respectively, 12-month HIV care retention rates were 80% (95% CI: 77 to 83) and 86% (95% CI: 83 to 88). The 12-month combined retention and viral suppression endpoint rates were 44% (95% CI: 40 to 48) under SoC compared to 80% (95% CI: 77 to 83) under EAAA. EAAA increased both retention (HR: 1·60, 95% CI: 1·15 to 2·21, p = 0.005) and retention and viral suppression combined (HR: 4.88, 95% CI: 2.96 to 8.05, p < 0.001). We also identified significant gaps in current health systems ability to provide viral load (VL) monitoring with 80% participants in SoC and 66% in EAAA having a missing VL at last contact. CONCLUSIONS: The observed improvement in retention in care and on the combined retention and viral suppression provides an important co-benefit of EAAA to HIV-positive adults themselves, at least in the short term. Our results from this "real world" health systems trial strongly support EAAA for Eswatini and countries with similar HIV epidemics and health systems. VL monitoring needs to be scaled up for appropriate care management.
Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Recuento de Linfocito CD4 , Esuatini/epidemiología , Femenino , VIH/efectos de los fármacos , VIH/fisiología , Infecciones por VIH/sangre , Infecciones por VIH/virología , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Salud Pública , Sector Público , Retención en el Cuidado , Nivel de Atención , Carga Viral , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Background: Since 2015, the World Health Organisation (WHO) recommends immediate initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) for all HIV-positive patients. Epidemiological evidence points to important health benefits of immediate ART initiation; however, the policy's impact on the economic aspects of patients' lives remains unknown. Methods: We conducted a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial in Eswatini to determine the causal impact of immediate ART initiation on patients' individual- and household-level economic outcomes. Fourteen healthcare facilities were non-randomly matched into pairs and then randomly allocated to transition from the standard of care (ART eligibility at CD4 counts of <350 cells/mm3 until September 2016 and <500 cells/mm3 thereafter) to the 'Early Initiation of ART for All' (EAAA) intervention at one of seven timepoints. Patients, healthcare personnel, and outcome assessors remained unblinded. Data were collected via standardised paper-based surveys with HIV-positive adults who were neither pregnant nor breastfeeding. Outcomes were patients' time use, employment status, household expenditures, and household living standards. Results: A total sample of 3019 participants were interviewed over the duration of the study. The mean number of participants approached at each facility per time step varied from 4 to 112 participants. Using mixed-effects negative binomial regressions accounting for time trends and clustering at the level of the healthcare facility, we found no significant difference between study arms for any economic outcome. Specifically, the EAAA intervention had no significant effect on non-resting time use (RR = 1.00 [CI: 0.96, 1.05, p=0.93]) or income-generating time use (RR = 0.94, [CI: 0.73,1.20, p=0.61]). Employment and household expenditures decreased slightly but not significantly in the EAAA group, with risk ratios of 0.93 [CI: 0.82, 1.04, p=0.21] and 0.92 [CI: 0.79, 1.06, p=0.26], respectively. We also found no significant treatment effect on households' asset ownership and living standards (RR = 0.96, [CI 0.92, 1.00, p=0.253]). Lastly, there was no evidence of heterogeneity in effect estimates by patients' sex, age, education, timing of HIV diagnosis and ART initiation. Conclusions: Our findings do not provide evidence that should discourage further investments into scaling up immediate ART for all HIV patients. Funding: Funded by the Dutch Postcode Lottery in the Netherlands, Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung (Humboldt-Stiftung), the Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands in South Africa/Mozambique, British Columbia Centre of Excellence in Canada, Doctors Without Borders (MSF USA), National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health and Joachim Herz Foundation. Clinical trial number: NCT02909218 and NCT03789448.
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is an incurable virus that attacks the immune system and affects around 39 million people worldwide. Once diagnosed, HIV can be treated with antiretroviral therapy (ART) to limit its effects and stop it spreading to other people. HIV rates vary across the world, but the African country of Eswatini has the highest prevalence with more than one in four (27%) people classed as HIV-positive. Until 2015, people living with HIV were typically only treated with ART once their immune system weakened. Recent studies found that starting treatment earlier enhances the positive effects of ART. This caused the World Health Organization (WHO) to change their guidelines and advise people living with HIV to begin ART as soon as they are diagnosed. While antiretroviral drugs are usually provided to patients free of charge, accessing care can be expensive for patients because of high transport costs or lost time from income-generating activities. This means starting treatment earlier and, thus, having more frequent healthcare visits, may result in a greater cost to the patient. The economic impact of this change is unclear, and for patients living in poverty, these added costs can affect their decision on whether to continue treatment. Steinert et al. interviewed 3,019 HIV-patients from 14 health facilities in Eswatini who began treatment with ART either immediately after diagnosis or after their immune system became suppressed. Patients were asked about their time spent being active to generate income, employment status, monthly household expenditures, and household living standards. On average, beginning ART earlier appears to have had no large negative effects on the economic wellbeing of patients. The same results were found for patient groups defined by sex, education, age, and time spent taking ART. These findings suggest that starting ART for HIV as soon as possible offers medical benefits and seems to have no large economic consequences for patients in the short term, even for poorer communities. This adds weight to the WHO advice on HIV treatment and supports the need to continue to deliver effective treatments to countries like Eswatini that have a high rate of HIV infection.
Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH , Estatus Económico/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por VIH , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fármacos Anti-VIH/administración & dosificación , Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Empleo/estadística & datos numéricos , Esuatini , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por VIH/economía , Instituciones de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Rapid diagnostic testing has made HIV diagnosis and subsequent treatment more accessible. However, multiple factors, including improper implementation of testing strategies and clerical errors, have been reported to lead to HIV misdiagnosis. The World Health Organization has recommended HIV retesting prior to antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation which has become pertinent with scaling up of Early Access to ART for All (EAAA). In this analysis, misdiagnosed clients are identified from a subgroup of clients enrolled in EAAA implementation study in Swaziland. METHODS: The subgroup to assess misdiagnosis was identified from enrolled EAAA study clients, who had an undetectable viral load prior to ART initiation between September 1, 2014 and May 31, 2016. One hundred and five of 2533 (4%) clients had an undetectable viral load prior to initiation to ART (pre-ART). The HIV status of clients was confirmed using the Determine HIV 1/2 and Uni-Gold HIV 1/2 rapid tests performed serially as recommended by the national testing algorithm. The status of clients on ART was additionally confirmed by fourth-generation HIV Ag/Ab combo tests, Architect and Genscreen Ultra. RESULTS: Fourteen of the 105 (13%) clients were false positive (HIV negative) on confirmation testing, of whom five (36%) were still in pre-ART care, while nine (64%) were in ART care. Overall, proportion of false positive was 0.6% (14/2533). The false-positive clients had a median CD4 of 791 cells/ml (interquartile range (IQR): 628, 967) compared to 549 cells/ml (IQR: 387, 791) for true positives (HIV positive) (p = 0.0081) and were nearly 20 years older (p = 0.0008). CONCLUSIONS: Overall 0.6% of all enrolled EAAA clients were misdiagnosed, and 64% of misdiagnosed clients were initiated on ART. With adoption of EAAA guidelines by national governments, ART initiation regardless of immunological criteria, strengthening of proficiency testing and adoption of retesting prior to ART initiation would allow identification of misdiagnosed clients and further reduce potential of initiating misdiagnosed clients on ART.
Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Errores Diagnósticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Recuento de Linfocito CD4 , Esuatini , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por VIH/inmunología , Infecciones por VIH/virología , VIH-1/genética , VIH-1/inmunología , VIH-1/aislamiento & purificación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Tiempo , Carga Viral , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Mother-to-Mother (M2M) or "Mentor Mother" programmes utilise HIV positive mothers to provide support and advice to HIV positive pregnant women and mothers of HIV exposed babies. Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) supported a Mentor Mother programme in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe from 2009 to 2012; with programme beneficiaries observed to have far higher retention at 6-8 weeks (99% vs 50%, p<0.0005) and to have higher adherence to Prevention of Mother to Child Transmission (PMTCT) guidelines, compared to those not opting in. In this study we explore how the M2M progamme may have contributed to these findings. METHODS: In this qualitative study we used thematic analysis of in-depth interviews (nâ=â79). This study was conducted in 2 urban districts of Bulawayo, Zimbabwe's second largest city. RESULTS: Interviews were completed by 14 mentor mothers, 10 mentor mother family members, 30 beneficiaries (women enrolled both in PMTCT and M2M), 10 beneficiary family members, 5 women enrolled in PMTCT but who had declined to take part in the M2M programme and 10 health care staff members. All beneficiaries and health care staff reported that the programme had improved retention and provided rich information on how this was achieved. Additionally respondents described how the programme had helped bring about beneficial behaviour change. CONCLUSIONS: M2M programmes offer great potential to empower communities affected by HIV to catalyse positive behaviour change. Our results illustrate how M2M involvement may increase retention in PMTCT programmes. Non-disclosure to one's partner, as well as some cultural practices prevalent in Zimbabwe appear to be major barriers to participation in M2M programmes.