Narrative-Based Practice.

Narrative-based practice has been developed to bring the health care aspects of illness and treatment closer to the psychosocial and life experiences of a patient. It gives value to the lived experience by using writing tools, spoken words, poetry, drawing, and photography. Nephrology has become one of the first health care fields, likely due to its large patient burden of both critical and chronic disease, to use narrative-based practice. The use of narrative-based practice in renal care explores the lived experience through structured and semistructured interviews with patients, caregivers, and health care providers. The principle topics discussed are the lack of a "disease identity" that would allow patients to identify themselves with a specific state of illness, the "uncertainty" of living with an illness characterized by continuous progression and regression, and the living with the "unspeakable" looming specter of death. This review highlights the powerful significance of qualitative knowledge gained with the narrative method. Increased awareness of these aspects of patients' lived experiences can help nurses improve the quality and effectiveness of the therapeutic relationship between patient and health care professional and may offer a promising approach, within this relationship, to decreasing patient feelings of isolation.

The role of pharmacogenomics in contemporary cardiovascular therapy: a position statement from the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy.

There is a strong and ever-growing body of evidence regarding the use of pharmacogenomics to inform cardiovascular pharmacology. However, there is no common position taken by international cardiovascular societies to unite diverse availability, interpretation, and application of such data, nor is there recognition of the challenges of variation in clinical practice between countries within Europe. Aside from the considerable barriers to implementing pharmacogenomic testing and the complexities of clinically actioning results, there are differences in the availability of resources and expertise internationally within Europe. Diverse legal and ethical approaches to genomic testing and clinical therapeutic application also require serious thought. As direct-to-consumer genomic testing becomes more common, it can be anticipated that data may be brought in by patients themselves, which will require critical assessment by the clinical cardiovascular prescriber. In a modern, pluralistic and multi-ethnic Europe, self-identified race/ethnicity may not be concordant with genetically detected ancestry and thus may not accurately convey polymorphism prevalence. Given the broad relevance of pharmacogenomics to areas, such as thrombosis and coagulation, interventional cardiology, heart failure, arrhythmias, clinical trials, and policy/regulatory activity within cardiovascular medicine, as well as to genomic and pharmacology subspecialists, this position statement attempts to address these issues at a wide-ranging level.