Economic and Chronologic Optimization of Fecal Donors Screening Process.

Background. Fecal microbial transplantation (FMT) is the delivery of fecal microbiome, isolated from healthy donors, into a patient's gastrointestinal tract. FMT is a safe and efficient treatment for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection. Donors undergo strict screening to avoid disease transmission. This consists of several blood and stool tests, which are performed in a multistage, costly process. We performed a cost-minimizing analysis to find the optimal order in which the tests should be performed. Methods. An algorithm to optimize the order of tests in terms of cost was defined. Performance analysis for disqualifying a potential healthy donor was carried out on data sets based on either the published literature or our real-life data. For both data sets, we calculated the total cost to qualify a single donor according to the optimal order of tests, suggested by the algorithm. Results. Applying the algorithm to the published literature revealed potential savings of 94.2% of the cost of screening a potential donor and 7.05% of the cost to qualify a single donor. In our cohort of 87 volunteers, 53 were not eligible for donation. Of 34 potential donors, 10 were disqualified due to abnormal lab tests. Applying our algorithm to optimize the order of tests, the average cost for screening a potential donor resulted in potential savings of 49.9% and a 21.3% savings in the cost to qualify a single donor. Conclusions. Improving the order and timing of the screening tests of potential FMT stool donors can decrease the costs by about 50% per subject. Highlights: What is known:Fecal microbial transplantation (FMT) is the transfer of microbiome from healthy donors to patients.Fecal donors undergo multiple strict screening tests to exclude any transmissible disease.Screening tests of potential fecal donors is expensive and time consuming.FMT is the most efficient treatment for recurrent C difficile infection.What is new here:An algorithm to optimize the order of donors' screening tests in terms of cost was defined.Optimizing the order tests can save nearly 50% in costs of screening a potential donor.

Fecal transplantation for ulcerative colitis from diet conditioned donors followed by dietary intervention results in favorable gut microbial profile compared to fecal transplantation alone.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Several fecal microbial transplantation (FMT) approaches for ulcerative colitis (UC) have been investigated with conflicting results. We have recently published the clinical outcomes from the CRAFT-UC Trial using FMT with the UC Exclusion Diet (UCED), compared with FMT alone. Here we aimed to compare the two FMT strategies in terms of microbial profile and function. METHODS: Subjects recruited to the CRAFT-UC study with available pre- and post-intervention fecal samples were included. Donors received diet conditioning for 14 days based on the UCED principles. Group-1 received single FMT by colonoscopy (Day 1) and enemas (Days 2 and 14) without donors' dietary conditioning (N=11). Group-2 received FMT but with donors' dietary pre-conditioning and UCED for the patients (N=10). Fecal samples were assessed by DNA shotgun metagenomic sequencing. RESULTS: Following diet conditioning, donors had depletion in metabolic pathways involved in sulfur-containing amino acids biosynthesis. Only Group-2 showed significant shifts towards the donors' microbial composition (ADONIS: R2=0.15, p=0.008) and significant increased Eubacterium_sp_AF228LB post-intervention (ß-coefficient 2.66, 95%CI 2.1-3.3, q<0.05) which was inversely correlated with fecal calprotectin (rho=-0.52, p=0.035). Moreover, pathways involved in gut inflammation and barrier function including branched chain amino acids were enriched post intervention in Group-2 and were significantly inversely correlated with fecal calprotectin. CONCLUSION: FMT from diet conditioned donors followed by the UCED led to microbial alterations associated with favorable microbial profile which correlated with decreased fecal calprotectin. Our findings support further exploration of additive benefit of dietary intervention for both donors and patients undergoing FMT as a potential treatment of UC.

Medical Cannabis Increases Appetite but Not Body Weight in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.

We aimed to elucidate the effect of Medical Cannabis (MC) on appetite and nutritional status among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). A case series of patients with IBD were initiating treatment with MC for disease-related symptoms, at the IBD clinic of a tertiary referral medical center. Patients' demographics, anthropometrics, medical history and treatment and MC use were systematically recorded. An appetite and food frequency questionnaire (SNAQ and FFQ) were filled before, and at 3 and 6 months of treatment. Patients with IBD initiating MC were enrolled (n = 149, age 39.0 ± 14.1 years, 42.3% female), and 33.6% (n = 50) were treated for improvement of nutritional status. A modest increase in appetite after 3 months was detected among all patients enrolled (Pv = 0.08), but there were no significant differences in energy or macronutrient intake, and in patients' body mass index (BMI). A significant appetite improvement after 3 months was detected among 34.0% (n = 17) of patients, but this was not associated with increased caloric intake or BMI at 3 or 6 months. Among patients without increased appetite after 3 months of MC therapy, BMI decreased at 6 months (24.1 ± 3.7 vs. 23.4 ± 3.6, Pv = 0.010). MC may be a potential strategy to improve appetite among some patients with IBD, but not caloric intake or BMI.

Early Initiation of Adalimumab Significantly Diminishes Postoperative Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Recurrence and Is Superior to 6-Mercaptopurine Therapy: An Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Study.

Postoperative recurrence (POR) is the rule in patients with Crohn's disease (CD), mitigated with prophylactic therapy. The evidence for therapeutic choice and timing of intervention is lacking. We aimed to compare the rates of POR in patients treated early with prophylactic 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) or adalimumab. We conducted a prospective single-center randomized open-label clinical study in which patients in surgical remission following their first ileocecectomy were randomized to receive early treatment with 6-MP or adalimumab. Patients were followed up clinically every 3 months and underwent endoscopy at weeks 32 and 58 postoperatively. The primary endpoint was endoscopic recurrence (ePOR) at 1 year (week 58), defined as a Rutgeerts score ≥ i2. We enrolled 35 patients (25 males, mean age 35 ± 1.4 years, median disease duration 5 ± 6.1 years) following ileocecectomy. Of these, seven (20%) were current smokers and nine (26%) biologics-experienced. Patients allocated to adalimumab had significantly less ePOR than patients treated with 6MP at week 32 (21% vs. 69%, p = 0.004) and 58 (47% vs. 75%), (p = 0.03, HR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.16-0.93). POR was associated with an increased diameter of the resected small bowel surgical specimen, lower baseline body mass index (BMI), increased week 18 fecal calprotectin, increased week 18 serum alanine aminotransferase and decreased week 18 hemoglobin level. Adalimumab was more effective than 6-MP in preventing ePOR. Increased operative small bowel diameter and lower postoperative BMI were associated with ePOR. At eighteen weeks, serum hemoglobin, ALT and fecal calprotectin levels were predictive of endoscopic disease recurrence. (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01629628).