RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Escalation in the global rates of labour interventions, particularly cesarean section and oxytocin augmentation, has renewed interest in a better understanding of natural labour progression. Methodological advancements in statistical and computational techniques addressing the limitations of pioneer studies have led to novel findings and triggered a re-evaluation of current labour practices. As part of the World Health Organization's Better Outcomes in Labour Difficulty (BOLD) project, which aimed to develop a new labour monitoring-to-action tool, we examined the patterns of labour progression as depicted by cervical dilatation over time in a cohort of women in Nigeria and Uganda who gave birth vaginally following a spontaneous labour onset. METHODS AND FINDINGS: This was a prospective, multicentre, cohort study of 5,606 women with singleton, vertex, term gestation who presented at ≤ 6 cm of cervical dilatation following a spontaneous labour onset that resulted in a vaginal birth with no adverse birth outcomes in 13 hospitals across Nigeria and Uganda. We independently applied survival analysis and multistate Markov models to estimate the duration of labour centimetre by centimetre until 10 cm and the cumulative duration of labour from the cervical dilatation at admission through 10 cm. Multistate Markov and nonlinear mixed models were separately used to construct average labour curves. All analyses were conducted according to three parity groups: parity = 0 (n = 2,166), parity = 1 (n = 1,488), and parity = 2+ (n = 1,952). We performed sensitivity analyses to assess the impact of oxytocin augmentation on labour progression by re-examining the progression patterns after excluding women with augmented labours. Labour was augmented with oxytocin in 40% of nulliparous and 28% of multiparous women. The median time to advance by 1 cm exceeded 1 hour until 5 cm was reached in both nulliparous and multiparous women. Based on a 95th percentile threshold, nulliparous women may take up to 7 hours to progress from 4 to 5 cm and over 3 hours to progress from 5 to 6 cm. Median cumulative duration of labour indicates that nulliparous women admitted at 4 cm, 5 cm, and 6 cm reached 10 cm within an expected time frame if the dilatation rate was ≥ 1 cm/hour, but their corresponding 95th percentiles show that labour could last up to 14, 11, and 9 hours, respectively. Substantial differences exist between actual plots of labour progression of individual women and the 'average labour curves' derived from study population-level data. Exclusion of women with augmented labours from the study population resulted in slightly faster labour progression patterns. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical dilatation during labour in the slowest-yet-normal women can progress more slowly than the widely accepted benchmark of 1 cm/hour, irrespective of parity. Interventions to expedite labour to conform to a cervical dilatation threshold of 1 cm/hour may be inappropriate, especially when applied before 5 cm in nulliparous and multiparous women. Averaged labour curves may not truly reflect the variability associated with labour progression, and their use for decision-making in labour management should be de-emphasized.
Asunto(s)
Trabajo de Parto/fisiología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Primer Periodo del Trabajo de Parto/fisiología , Nigeria , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Uganda , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A cost of illness (COI) study aims to evaluate the socioeconomic burden that an illness imposes on society as a whole. This study aimed to describe the resources used, patterns of care, direct cost, and loss of productivity due to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in Brazil. METHODS: This 12-month, cross-sectional, COI study of patients with SLE (ACR 1997 Classification Criteria) collected data using patient interviews (questionnaires) and medical records, covering: SLE profile, resources used, morbidities, quality of life (12-Item Short Form Survey, SF-12), and loss of productivity. Patients were excluded if they were retired or on sick leave for another illness. Direct resources included health-related (consultations, tests, medications, hospitalization) or non-health-related (transportation, home adaptation, expenditure on caregivers) hospital resources.Costs were calculated using the unit value of each resource and the quantity consumed. A gamma regression model explored cost predictors for patients with SLE. RESULTS: Overall, 300 patients with SLE were included (92.3% female,mean [standard deviation (SD)] disease duration 11.8 [7.9] years), of which 100 patients (33.3%) were on SLE-related sick leave and 46 patients (15.3%) had stopped schooling. Mean (SD) travel time from home to a care facility was 4.4 (12.6) hours. Antimalarials were the most commonly used drugs (222 [74.0%]). A negative correlation was observed between SF-12 physical component and SLE Disease Activity Index (- 0.117, p = 0.042), Systemic Lupus International CollaboratingClinics/AmericanCollegeofRheumatology Damage Index (- 0.115, p = 0.046), medications/day for multiple co-morbidities (- 0.272, p < 0.001), SLE-specific drugs/day (- 0.113, p = 0.051), and lost productivity (- 0.570, p < 0.001). For the mental component, a negative correlation was observed with medications/day for multiple co-morbidities (- 0.272, p < 0.001), SLE-specific medications/day (- 0.113, p = 0.051), and missed appointments (- 0.232, p < 0.001). Mean total SLE cost was US$3,123.53/patient/year (median [interquartile range (IQR)] US$1,618.51 [$678.66, $4,601.29]). Main expenditure was medication, with a median (IQR) cost of US$910.62 ($460, $4,033.51). Mycophenolate increased costs by 3.664 times (p < 0.001), and inflammatory monitoring (erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein) reduced expenditure by 0.381 times (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: These results allowed access to care patterns, the median cost for patients with SLE in Brazil, and the differences across regions driven by biological, social, and behavioral factors. The cost of SLE provides an updated setting to support the decision-making process across the country.
Asunto(s)
Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Transversales , Brasil , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Costo de EnfermedadRESUMEN
Emergency department (ED) overcrowding is a global condition that severely worsens attention to patients, increases clinical risks and affects hospital cost management. A correct and early prediction of ED's admission is of high value and a motivation to adopt machine learning models. However, several of these studies do not consider data collected in textual form, which is a feature set that contains detailed information about patients and presents great potential for medical health care improvement. To this end, we propose and compare predictive models for admission that use both structured and unstructured data available at triage time. In total, our dataset comprised 499,853 pediatric ED's presentations (with an admission rate of 5.76%) of patients with age up to 18 years old observed over 3.5 years. Our best model consists of a 2-stage architecture with a deep neural network (DNN) to extract information from textual data followed by a gradient boosting classifier. This combined model achieved a value of 0.892 for the Area Under the Curve (AUC) in the test data. We highlight the importance of DNN-based text processing for better prediction, since the absence of text features resulted in AUC reduction of approximately two percentage points. Also, the feature importance of text was higher than that of the Manchester Triage System (MTS), which is a widely used risk classification protocol. These results suggest that activations from a trained DNN should be used in transfer learning setups in future studies.
Asunto(s)
Aprendizaje Profundo/tendencias , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias , Redes Neurales de la Computación , Admisión del Paciente/tendencias , Pediatría/tendencias , Triaje/tendencias , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Bases de Datos Factuales/tendencias , Femenino , Predicción , Hospitalización/tendencias , Humanos , Lactante , MasculinoRESUMEN
Abstract Background A cost of illness (COI) study aims to evaluate the socioeconomic burden that an illness imposes on society as a whole. This study aimed to describe the resources used, patterns of care, direct cost, and loss of productivity due to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in Brazil. Methods This 12-month, cross-sectional, COI study of patients with SLE (ACR 1997 Classification Criteria) collected data using patient interviews (questionnaires) and medical records, covering: SLE profile, resources used, morbidities, quality of life (12-Item Short Form Survey, SF-12), and loss of productivity. Patients were excluded if they were retired or on sick leave for another illness. Direct resources included health-related (consultations, tests, medications, hospitalization) or non-health-related (transportation, home adaptation, expenditure on caregivers) hospital resources. Costs were calculated using the unit value of each resource and the quantity consumed. A gamma regression model explored cost predictors for patients with SLE. Results Overall, 300 patients with SLE were included (92.3% female, mean [standard deviation (SD)] disease duration 11.8 [7.9] years), of which 100 patients (33.3%) were on SLE-related sick leave and 46 patients (15.3%) had stopped schooling. Mean (SD) travel time from home to a care facility was 4.4 (12.6) hours. Antimalarials were the most commonly used drugs (222 [74.0%]). A negative correlation was observed between SF-12 physical component and SLE Disease Activity Index (- 0.117, p = 0.042), Systemic Lupus International CollaboratingClinics/AmericanCollegeofRheumatology Damage Index (- 0.115, p = 0.046), medications/day for multiple co-morbidities (- 0.272, p < 0.001), SLE-specific drugs/day (- 0.113, p = 0.051), and lost productivity (- 0.570, p < 0.001). For the mental component, a negative correlation was observed with medications/day for multiple co-morbidities (- 0.272, p < 0.001), SLE-specific medications/day (- 0.113, p = 0.051), and missed appointments (- 0.232, p < 0.001). Mean total SLE cost was US$3,123.53/patient/year (median [interquartile range (IQR)] US$1,618.51 [$678.66, $4,601.29]). Main expenditure was medication, with a median (IQR) cost of US$910.62 ($460, $4,033.51). Mycophenolate increased costs by 3.664 times (p < 0.001), and inflammatory monitoring (erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein) reduced expenditure by 0.381 times (p < 0.001). Conclusion These results allowed access to care patterns, the median cost for patients with SLE in Brazil, and the differences across regions driven by biological, social, and behavioral factors. The cost of SLE provides an updated setting to support the decision-making process across the country.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We described the clinical profile and outcomes of patients with SLE and RA diseases reported to the Brazilian Health Information System with primary dengue infection. METHODS: Databases from the Brazilian Public Health Informatics System (SUS) were linked as the source of information. Three databases comprising different longitudinal information of lupus or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients under treatment and care through the Brazilian Health System were linked. Patients who had lupus ICD-9 code or RA ICD-9 code and their treatment approved by SUS were included in the study. In Study 1, we described the clinical characteristics of RA/lupus patients who had dengue infection. In Study 2, we compared RA/lupus patients with or without dengue for hospitalization rates after index dengue diagnosis for dengue-exposed or matching date for dengue-unexposed. RESULTS: We included 69 SLE and 301 RA patients with dengue. In the RA/lupus with dengue case series, hospitalization was found in 24.6% of lupus subjects and of 11.2% of RA subjects. It differed by geographic region (p = 0.03), gender (p = 0.05) and the use of azathioprine (p = 0.02). Dengue was the most frequent reason for hospitalization reported (43.0%). Hospitalization due to dengue was noted in 12 (42.9%) dengue-exposed patients (p = 0.02), while rheumatoid arthritis was reported as the cause of hospitalization in 22.2% of dengue-unexposed (p = 0.005). Five deaths were reported among the dengue-exposed and none among dengue-unexposed. Bacterial infection was the most frequent cause of death. We found that the dengue exposure was associated with an increased risk of hospitalization outcome in RA and lupus patients (RR = 6.2; 95% CI: 2.99-12.94). SUMMARY: We found that when comparing RA/lupus patients with or without dengue, dengue-exposed patients had an increased rates of hospitalization and death.