Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
1.
Biosecur Bioterror ; 4(1): 20-40, 2006.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16545022

RESUMEN

Annual influenza epidemics create a significant public health burden each year in the United States. That influenza continues to pose a public health threat despite being largely preventable through vaccination is indicative of continuing weaknesses in the U.S.'s public health system. Moreover, the burden of annual influenza epidemics and the fragility and instability of the capacity to respond to them underscore the U.S.'s ongoing vulnerability to pandemic influenza and highlights gaps in bioterrorism preparedness and response efforts. This article examines the burden of annual influenza epidemics in the U.S., efforts to combat that burden with vaccination, shortcomings of influenza vaccination efforts, and how those shortcomings exemplify weaknesses in pandemic influenza and bioterrorism preparedness efforts. We make the case for establishing an annual universal influenza vaccination program to assure access to influenza vaccination to anyone who can safely receive vaccination and desires it. Such a program could greatly reduce the annual burden of influenza while advancing and maintaining U.S. pandemic influenza and bioterrorism preparedness and response efforts.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la Influenza/provisión & distribución , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Vacunación Masiva/organización & administración , Administración en Salud Pública , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Bioterrorismo/prevención & control , Costo de Enfermedad , Planificación en Desastres/métodos , Guías como Asunto , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la Influenza/economía , Gripe Humana/economía , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Relaciones Interinstitucionales , Vacunación Masiva/economía , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Vacunación/economía
2.
J Law Med Ethics ; 34(4): 765-75, 2006.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17199819

RESUMEN

Firearms were associated with 30, 136 deaths in the United States in 2003. Most guns are initially sold to the public through a network of retail dealers. Licensed firearm dealers are an important source of guns for criminals and gun traffickers. Just one percent of licensed dealers were responsible for more than half of all guns traced to crime. Federal law makes it difficult for ATF to inspect and revoke the licenses of problem gun dealers. State licensing systems, however, are a greatly under-explored opportunity for firearm dealer oversight. We identify and categorize these state systems to identify opportunities for interventions to prevent problem dealers from supplying guns to criminals, juveniles, or gun traffickers. Just seventeen states license gun dealers. Twenty-three states permit routine inspections of dealers but only two mandate that those inspections occur on a regular basis. Twenty-six states impose record-keeping requirements for gun sales. Only thirteen states require some form of store security measures to minimize firearm theft. We conclude with recommendations for a comprehensive system of state licensing and oversight of gun dealers. Our findings can be useful for the coalition of more than fifty U.S. mayors that recently announced it would work together to combat illegal gun trafficking.


Asunto(s)
Comercio/legislación & jurisprudencia , Armas de Fuego/legislación & jurisprudencia , Regulación Gubernamental , Concesión de Licencias/legislación & jurisprudencia , Crimen , Armas de Fuego/economía , Control de Formularios y Registros , Humanos , Medidas de Seguridad , Responsabilidad Social , Gobierno Estatal , Robo/prevención & control , Estados Unidos
9.
Annu Rev Public Health ; 24: 209-25, 2003.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12428032

RESUMEN

Violence traditionally had been considered a problem exclusively within the criminal justice domain, although it is now widely viewed as a public health issue as well. Public health has brought new and complementary tools for understanding and preventing violence. Whereas public health has long recognized the environment as a determinant of disease and injury, it has paid less attention to the environment when considering violence prevention strategies. For several decades though, some criminologists and others have been researching environmental factors in crime prevention. This article aims to discuss the main environmental crime-prevention strategies, provide examples of promising interventions, review public health literature that uses these strategies, discuss what public health can contribute, and suggest public health research to test the hypothesis that violence can be prevented and controlled through environmental modifications.


Asunto(s)
Planificación Ambiental , Práctica de Salud Pública , Terrorismo/prevención & control , Violencia/prevención & control , Humanos , Estados Unidos
10.
JAMA ; 288(5): 622-8, 2002 Aug 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12150674

RESUMEN

The Center for Law and the Public's Health at Georgetown and Johns Hopkins Universities drafted the Model State Emergency Health Powers Act (MSEHPA or Model Act) at the request of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The Model Act provides state actors with the powers they need to detect and contain bioterrorism or a naturally occurring disease outbreak. Legislative bills based on the MSEHPA have been introduced in 34 states. Problems of obsolescence, inconsistency, and inadequacy may render current state laws ineffective or even counterproductive. State laws often date back to the early 20th century and have been built up in layers over the years. They frequently predate the vast changes in the public health sciences and constitutional law. The Model Act is structured to reflect 5 basic public health functions to be facilitated by law: (1) preparedness, comprehensive planning for a public health emergency; (2) surveillance, measures to detect and track public health emergencies; (3) management of property, ensuring adequate availability of vaccines, pharmaceuticals, and hospitals, as well as providing power to abate hazards to the public's health; (4) protection of persons, powers to compel vaccination, testing, treatment, isolation, and quarantine when clearly necessary; and (5) communication, providing clear and authoritative information to the public. The Model Act also contains a modernized, extensive set of principles and requirements to safeguard personal rights. Law can be a tool to improve public health preparedness. A constitutional democracy must balance the common good with respect for personal dignity, toleration of groups, and adherence to principles of justice.


Asunto(s)
Bioterrorismo/legislación & jurisprudencia , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/legislación & jurisprudencia , Planificación en Desastres/legislación & jurisprudencia , Bioterrorismo/prevención & control , Derechos Civiles/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Vigilancia de la Población , Salud Pública/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA