Efficacy and Safety of Percutaneous Access Via Large-Bore Sheaths (22-26F Diameter) in Endovascular Therapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the closure success rate's outcomes with suture-mediated vascular closure device Perclose ProGlide in patients undergoing aortic or iliac artery endovascular repair using large delivery systems (>21F). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We screened all the patient records in aortic databases at 2 centers who had undergone vascular interventions via ProGlide for percutaneous femoral access >21F between 2016 and 2020. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the delivery system size: large (L) (22F-23F) and extra-large (XL) (24F-26F). Demographics, anatomical details, and outcome of percutaneous access were evaluated. RESULTS: Included were 239 patients: 121 in the L group and 118 the XL group. Intraprocedural conversion to open surgery because of bleeding was necessary in 2% L and 6% XL patients (p=0.253). Severe femoral artery calcification was the sole risk factor for converting to open surgery (odds ratio=23.44, 95% confidence interval=1.49-368.17, p=0.025). In all, 2% of L and 3% of XL (p=0.631) did require late percutaneous intervention due to stenosis (all treated with balloon angioplasty). Overall, 3% developed pseudoaneurysm treated conservatively in all except one patient requiring surgical repair. Hematoma and groin infection were observed in 9% and 1%, respectively; none required surgical therapy. CONCLUSION: A femoral arterial defect after accessing the artery via a large bore sheath (22F-26F) can be closed successfully with ProGlide in more than 90% of patients. Severe femoral artery calcification is a risk factor for conversion to open surgery caused by bleeding. CLINICAL IMPACT: This study adds evidence on efficacy of accessing the artery via a large bore sheath (22-26F) secured by ProGlide. In more than 200 patients conversion to open surgery was necessary in only 4%. Severe femoral artery calcification was the sole risk factor for converting to open surgery. Our findings encourage physicians to choose the percutaneous access even in patients requiring the use of large bore sheath.

Carotid Revascularization Improves Cognition in Patients With Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis and Cognitive Decline. Greater Improvement in Younger Patients With More Disordered Neuropsychological Performance.

OBJECTIVES: There has been a growing interest in whether carotid revascularization may reverse cognitive decline. In this study the aim was to assess cognitive changes after carotid artery endarterectomy and stenting, using neuropsychological assessment with MoCA and CANTAB test. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis, qualified for CEA (study group A) and CAS (study group B) have been prospectively assessed. 20 patients with lower extremity artery disease (control group C) and 15 patients qualified for inguinal hernia surgery (control group D) have served as a control group. Patients have been evaluated 1 day before surgery and 6 months after, using MoCA and CANTAB test. Logistic regression models were built to determine variables affecting cognitive performance. RESULTS: After the procedure in the study group A the cognitive evaluation showed improvement in 5 cognitive domains tested in MoCA: visuospatial/executive (p=.0496), naming (p=.0831), language (p=.0009), abstraction (p=.0126) and delayed recall (p=.0016). In CANTAB there were improvement in PAL (p=.0290) and SWM (p=.0105). In study group B positive cognitive changes were seen in visuospatial/executive (p=.0827) and delayed recall (p=.0041) tested with MoCA and in PAL (PALFAMS28 p=.0315, PALNPR28 p=.0090, PALTEA28 p=.0058) and SWM (p=.0882) tested with CANTAB. Using a regression model, the only strong predictors of cognitive improvement on the follow-up visit were younger age and lower MoCA score on the first visit. CONCLUSIONS: Carotid revascularization, both open and endovascular, lead to cognitive improvement in patients with severe carotid stenosis and cognitive decline. This effect seems to be stronger in younger patients with worst cognitive performance before surgery.

Laparoscopic treatment of abdominal hernia - 5 years of experience.

UNLABELLED: Laparoscopic surgery has become a well approved method of abdominal hernias treatment in recent years. Due to the advancement of laparoscopy and the use of improved synthetic materials laparoscopic surgery is characterized not only by low complication but also by a short period of recovery after surgery. The aim of the study was a retrospective analysis of the results of laparoscopic abdominal hernia surgeries (IPOM). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between year 2007 and 2012, 65 patients aged between 29 to 76 underwent laproscopic abdominal hernia surgeries due to either primary or postoperative abdominal hernias. All patients were examined in perioperative period, after 12 and 24 months after surgery in search of complications, pain and reccurence. Recovery period was also estimated. RESULTS: In most cases postoperative pain was estimated from 1 to 4 on VAS scale. The most frequent complications were seromas that occured in 3 patients. The other complications were pneumothorax, wound hematoma and wound infection that occured once each. One patient required reoperation due to wound hematoma. Chronic postoperative pain was diagnosed in 3 patients and 4 recurrences were stated. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic therapy of abdominal hernias is a safe operative method characterized by low recurrence and complication rates as well as short hospital stay and quick recovery. This technique is restricted by high material costs and the lack of full refund for the procedure.