RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the prescription of drugs to aid smoking cessation and to detect whether there are differences by age or sex. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SITE: Zamora Health Area. PARTICIPANTS: Persons with smoking cessation attempts employing drugs funded in the period from 2020 to 2023. INTERVENTIONS: Request of pharmaceutical consumption of varenicline, bupropion and cytisine to the Pharmacy Information System of the Regional Health Management of Castilla y León. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Number of quit attempts per person, treatment drug, number of medication containers per attempt, year, age and sex. Descriptive and statistical analysis using SPSS© v. 20. RESULTS: 2581 people tried to quit smoking with drugs, 2206 made one attempt and 375 made several attempts. Mean age was 50.7 years (95% CI: 50.2-51.1). No significant differences were found for age (P=.71) or sex (P=.74). There was a preference for prescribing varenicline over bupropion and low drug compliance, with only one container of medication being collected in about 50% of cases. A total of 1680 attempts were made to quit using cytisine in 2023, equivalent to 55.4% of the total number of treatment drugs used in the four years. The estimated cumulative incidence rate of drug withdrawal attempts in smokers between 18 and 65 years of age was 11.9%. CONCLUSIONS: The drug intervention had a low reach and poor compliance with the recommended treatment. It is essential to emphasize patient follow-up and drug adherence.
Asunto(s)
Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Humanos , Atención a la Salud , Fumar , Atención Primaria de SaludRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the agreement between two rapid detection tests (RDT) for antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study that used a random sample of non-hospitalized patients from the primary care management division of the Healthcare Area of Leon (58 RT-PCR-positive cases and 52 RT-PCR-negative cases). Information regarding symptoms was collected and all patients were simultaneously tested using two RDTs (Combined - cRDT and Differentiated - dRDT). The results of both tests were evaluated using the chi-square test and, for degree of agreement, the kappa coefficient. RESULTS: About 52% of the participants were women (mean age: 48.2±11.0 years). A total of 58.2% were positive for d-RDT and 41.2% were positive for c-RDT. In the subjects who were RT-PCR-positive, d-RDT was positive in 72.4% and c-RDT in 55.2%; in those who were RT-PCR-negative, the percentages were 42.3% and 26.9%, respectively. The kappa coefficient observed between the two RDTs was 0.644, and was higher in patients without a fever or anosmia (0.725) and lower in those with a fever or anosmia (0.524). CONCLUSIONS: There is good agreement between the tests used in this study. Given the sensitivity observed, they can be very useful as a complement to RT-PCR.