Optimizing management of pancreatic cysts--prospective re-assessment for 157 cases.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Ongoing debate continues regarding the appropriate management of pancreatic cysts (PCs). Disagreement prevails regarding frequency of needed follow-up, if and when to perform any PC needle biopsy and indications for surgical resection. EUS is increasingly used to help determine management of PCs. METHODOLOGY: One hundred and fifty seven consecutive patients with PCs were identified out of 5000 patients who underwent EUS between 1995-2007. In 2008, these patients were then prospectively provided clinical follow-up, and CEA, CA19-9 and CRP. RESULTS: No symptoms could be definitively related to the PCs. Twenty four of 157 patients with suspected malignant cysts, mucinous cysts or IPMN had undergone surgical treatment. Whipple's operation was performed in 14 patients and distal pancreatectomy in 10 patients. Fifty PCs were located in the head of pancreas. In 89 patients prospective blood tests were performed; in 6 of them elevated levels of CA-19-9 were detected, 3 of these also had elevated serum CEA. Twelve patients had increased CRP values. No complication (requiring hospitalization) and no mortality related to EUS had occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Elements identified as important for assessment of PCs included: size, serum and fluid markers, imaging characteristics and clinical follow-up. These factors should be included in the recommended guidelines.

Validation of TIRADS ACR Risk Assessment of Thyroid Nodules in Comparison to the ATA Guidelines.

OBJECTIVES: The prevalence of thyroid nodules in adults, detected by ultrasound (US), is reported as high as 68%. US-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) is the test of choice used to determine the nature of the nodules. However, not more than 15% are found to be malignant. Reducing the number of unnecessary FNAB while identifying clinically significant malignant nodules is imperative. There are several guidelines suggested for risk stratification of thyroid nodules by US. The aim of our study was to validate and compare Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) American College of Radiology (ACR) and American Thyroid Association (ATA) risk stratification, specifically pertaining to reduction of unnecessary biopsies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 281 nodules in 245 patients who underwent FNAB between May 2018 and June 2019. Statistical analysis was performed only on 235 nodules that according to the TIRADS ACR and/ or ATA guidelines were eligible for FNAB. Data collected included nodule characteristics with corresponding TIRADS and ATA grading and cytological results using Bethesda scoring. RESULTS: An agreement was found between the two criteria methods in 58.2% (137/235) of the cases. In 35.3% (83/235), ATA recommended FNAB while TIRADS did not. The specificity for ATA criteria was 7% (15/221) and for TIRADS was 37% (81/221). The sensitivity was 100% (14/14) for ATA and 86% (12/14) for TIRADS. CONCLUSION: Application of ACR TIRADS criteria can reduce the number of US-guided FNAB performed on benign nodules compared to ATA criteria, by 35%, with a cost of only two missed carcinomas that remained on further follow-up.