Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy before resection to avoid delay for early-stage lung cancer or oligometastases during the COVID-19 pandemic: Pathologic outcomes from the SABR-BRIDGE protocol.

BACKGROUND: During coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related operating room closures, some multidisciplinary thoracic oncology teams adopted a paradigm of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) as a bridge to surgery, an approach called SABR-BRIDGE. This study presents the preliminary surgical and pathological results. METHODS: Eligible participants from four institutions (three in Canada and one in the United States) had early-stage presumed or biopsy-proven lung malignancy that would normally be surgically resected. SABR was delivered using standard institutional guidelines, with surgery >3 months following SABR with standardized pathologic assessment. Pathological complete response (pCR) was defined as absence of viable cancer. Major pathologic response (MPR) was defined as ≤10% viable tissue. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients underwent SABR. Most common SABR regimens were 34 Gy/1 (29%, n = 21), 48 Gy/3-4 (26%, n = 19), and 50/55 Gy/5 (22%, n = 16). SABR was well-tolerated, with one grade 5 toxicity (death 10 days after SABR with COVID-19) and five grade 2-3 toxicities. Following SABR, 26 patients underwent resection thus far (13 pending surgery). Median time-to-surgery was 4.5 months post-SABR (range, 2-17.5 months). Surgery was reported as being more difficult because of SABR in 38% (n = 10) of cases. Thirteen patients (50%) had pCR and 19 (73%) had MPR. Rates of pCR trended higher in patients operated on at earlier time points (75% if within 3 months, 50% if 3-6 months, and 33% if ≥6 months; p = .069). In the exploratory best-case scenario analysis, pCR rate does not exceed 82%. CONCLUSIONS: The SABR-BRIDGE approach allowed for delivery of treatment during a period of operating room closure and was well-tolerated. Even in the best-case scenario, pCR rate does not exceed 82%.

Circulating tumor cells detected in follow-up predict survival outcomes in tri-modality management of advanced non-metastatic esophageal cancer: a secondary analysis of the QUINTETT randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to establish if presence of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) predicted worse outcome in patients with non-metastatic esophageal cancer undergoing tri-modality therapy. METHODS: We prospectively collected CTC data from patients with operable non-metastatic esophageal cancer from April 2009 to November 2016 enrolled in our QUINTETT esophageal cancer randomized trial (NCT00907543). Patients were randomized to receive either neoadjuvant cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus radiotherapy followed by surgical resection (Neoadjuvant) or adjuvant cisplatin, 5-FU, and epirubicin chemotherapy with concurrent extended volume radiotherapy following surgical resection (Adjuvant). CTCs were identified with the CellSearch® system before the initiation of any treatment (surgery or chemoradiotherapy) as well as at 6-, 12-, and 24-months post-treatment. The threshold for CTC positivity was one and the findings were correlated with patient prognosis. RESULTS: CTC data were available for 74 of 96 patients and identified in 27 patients (36.5%) at a median follow-up of 13.1months (interquartile range:6.8-24.1 months). Detection of CTCs at any follow-up visit was significantly predictive of worse disease-free survival (DFS;hazard ratio [HR]: 2.44; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.41-4.24; p=0.002), regional control (HR: 6.18; 95% CI: 1.18-32.35; p=0.031), distant control (HR: 2.93; 95% CI: 1.52-5.65;p=0.001) and overall survival (OS;HR: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.16-3.51; p=0.013). After adjusting for receiving neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, the presence of CTCs at any follow-up visit remained significantly predictive of worse OS ([HR]:2.02;95% [Cl]:1.16-3.51; p=0.013) and DFS (HR: 2.49;95% Cl: 1.43-4.33; p=0.001). Similarly, any observed increase in CTCs was significantly predictive of worse OS (HR: 3.14; 95% CI: 1.56-6.34; p=0.001) and DFS (HR: 3.34; 95% CI: 1.67-6.69; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The presence of CTCs in patients during follow-up after tri-modality therapy was associated with significantly poorer DFS and OS regardless of timing of chemoradiotherapy.

Surgery crisis simulation during the COVID-19 pandemic.

SummaryCOVID-19 puts health care providers at risk for infection with SARS-CoV-2. Personal protective equipment (PPE) can reduce viral transmission if used properly. We used simulation of an intraoperative crisis involving an infectious outbreak to assess PPE adherence and confidence in PPE use. Simulation of an intraoperative crisis with a patient with COVID-19 revealed gaps in PPE adherence; however, simulation training successfully increased confidence in PPE use and received positive feedback.

The Potential Dangers of Recruitment Maneuvers During One Lung Ventilation Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Existing evidence regarding lung-protective ventilation (LPV) during one-lung ventilation (OLV) focuses on surrogate outcomes. Our objective was to assess whether an LPV protocol during OLV surgery is associated with reduced respiratory complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a matched control retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing pulmonary resection at a tertiary Canadian hospital. The experimental group (n = 50) was derived from primary data of two crossover RCTs, which utilized protocolized LPV strategies with varying levels of positive end-expiratory pressure and recruitment maneuvers. The control group was drawn from a prospectively maintained database; these patients received conventional nonprotocolized ventilation (2000-2010). Each experimental group patient was matched 1:1 with a control group patient with respect to clinically relevant variables (age, sex, diagnosis, smoking status, cardiovascular disease status, comorbidity, BMI, preoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 s, surgery type). Major respiratory complications were defined as composite of acute respiratory distress syndrome, need for new positive-pressure ventilation, and atelectasis requiring bronchoscopy. Paired and unpaired statistical tests were used. RESULTS: Patients appeared well matched. Major respiratory complications occurred in 8% (n = 4) and 2% (n = 1) of patients in experimental and control groups, respectively (P = 0.50). There was a trend toward increased mortality (4 versus 0, P = 0.06) with protocolized LPV. The patients who died had respiratory complications; one had acute respiratory distress syndrome and two had profound hypoxemia. CONCLUSIONS: There was a nonsignificant trend toward increased mortality with LPV during OLV. Although limited by a small sample size, our findings identify a potential danger to excessive recruitment maneuvers. Larger studies, with clinically important outcomes are needed to better define the risk/benefit trade-offs for LPV during OLV.

RBC transfusion is associated with increased risk of respiratory failure after pneumonectomy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pneumonectomy is associated with high risk of respiratory complications. Our objective was to determine if transfusions are associated with increased rate of ARDS and respiratory failure in adults undergoing elective pneumonectomy. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of consecutive pneumonectomies undertaken at a tertiary hospital (2003-2013). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to adjust for confounding factors. RESULTS: ARDS and respiratory failure occurred in 12.4% (n = 20) and 19.2% (n = 31) of 161 pneumonectomy patients, respectively, and were more likely to occur in transfused patients (P = 0.03, P < 0.001). pRBCs, FFP and platelets were transfused in 27% (n = 43), 6% (n = 9), and 2% (n = 3), respectively. On multivariable analyses utilizing blood products as continuous and binary variables, pRBC use was the only independent predictor of ARDS with odds ratio (OR) = 1.23 (95%CI:1.08-1.39, P = 0.002) and OR = 2.45 (95%CI:1.10-5.49, P = 0.03), respectively. On multivariable analyses utilizing blood products as continuous and binary variables, pRBCs were the only independent predictor of respiratory failure with OR = 1.37 (95%CI:1.16-1.60, P < 0.001) and OR = 3.17 (95%CI:1.25-8.02, P = 0.02), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Peri-operative pRBC use appears to be an independent risk factor for ARDS and respiratory failure after pneumonectomy. There is a significant dose-response relationship. Platelets and FFP did not appear to increase ARDS risk but this may be due to low utilization.

Association between Prehospital Time and Mortality following Blunt Thoracic Aortic Injuries.

BACKGROUND: Blunt thoracic aortic injuries (BTAIs) can be lethal, but advances in trauma systems and surgical care have helped reduce mortality. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether time from injury to presentation is associated with mortality following BTAI. METHODS: Using the Ontario Trauma Registry, all patients were identified who were hospitalized with BTAI between 1999 and 2009. Variables including age, sex, Injury Severity Score, Charlson comorbidity index, systolic blood pressure on admission, operative intervention, and time from injury to presentation were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression to determine independent predictors of mortality. RESULTS: We identified 264 cases of BTAI that survived until hospital admission. Of these, 220 patients had documented time from injury to presentation to hospital. Most, 68.2% (n = 150), presented within 60 min of injury. On adjusted multivariate analysis, a prehospital time of ≤60 min independently predicted higher mortality (odds ratio 0.27, 95% confidence interval 0.08-0.89, P = 0.03). Tight clustering was seen with prehospital time and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Rather than reducing mortality as hypothesized, a shorter time between BTAI and hospital presentation (<60 min) is associated with increased mortality. This may be the result of selection bias with the quicker transport of more severely injured patients.

Predictors of Discharge Home after Blunt Traumatic Thoracic Aortic Injury.

BACKGROUND: Blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) can be a highly lethal injury but in the last decade major advances have been made in diagnostic accuracy, injury grading, and therapy. Traditionally, emphasis has been on studying survival postinjury with a paucity of studies examining the discharge characteristics of patients that survive a BTAI. The purpose of this study is to define the epidemiology and predictors of disposition in patients with BTAI in a provincial database. METHODS: Using the Ontario Trauma Registry, all patients were identified who were hospitalized with a BTAI between 1999 and 2009. Trends in therapy and discharge disposition were determined. RESULTS: We identified 264 cases of BTAI. Of these, 157 were discharged from hospital with 36% (n = 56) going directly home and 64% (n = 101) going to continuing care facilities. There was no difference in disposition in those with BTAI treated operatively or nonoperatively (P = 0.48). In those that had repair of BTAI, there was no difference in discharge home between open and endovascular repair (P = 1.00). Univariate analyses identified younger age, male sex, lower injury severity score (ISS), and lower Charlson comorbidity indices as being predictors of discharge home. On adjusted multivariate regression analysis, lower ISS (odds ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.95; P < 0.001) was the only independent predictors of discharge home. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the only independent predictor for discharge home for patients who survive is the overall severity of all their injuries irrespective of their condition on admission or management of their BTAI.

Teaching surgery takes time: the impact of surgical education on time in the operating room.

BACKGROUND: It is generally accepted that surgical training is associated with increased surgical duration. The purpose of this study was to determine the magnitude of this increase for common surgical procedures by comparing surgery duration in teaching and nonteaching hospitals. METHODS: This retrospective population-based cohort study included all adult residents of Ontario, Canada, who underwent 1 of 14 surgical procedures between 2002 and 2012. We used several linked administrative databases to identify the study cohort in addition to patient-, surgeon- and procedure-related variables. We determined surgery duration using anesthesiology billing records. Negative binomial regression was used to model the association between teaching versus nonteaching hospital status and surgery duration. RESULTS: Of the 713 573 surgical cases included in this study, 20.8% were performed in a teaching hospital. For each procedure, the mean surgery duration was significantly longer for teaching hospitals, with differences ranging from 5 to 62 minutes across individual procedures in unadjusted analyses (all p < 0.001). In regression analysis, procedures performed in teaching hospitals were associated with an overall 22% (95% confidence interval 20%-24%) increase in surgery duration, adjusting for patient-, surgeon- and procedure-related variables as well as the clustering of patients within surgeons and hospitals. CONCLUSION: Our results show that a wide range of surgical procedures require significantly more time to perform in teaching than nonteaching hospitals. Given the magnitude of this difference, the impact of surgical training on health care costs and clinical outcomes should be a priority for future studies.

CONTEXTE: Il est généralement admis que la formation chirurgicale est associée à des interventions plus longues. L'objectif de la présente étude était de déterminer l'ampleur de cette augmentation pour les chirurgies courantes en comparant la durée des interventions dans les hôpitaux universitaires et les autres hôpitaux. MÉTHODES: Dans le cadre d'une étude de cohorte rétrospective basée sur la population, nous avons recensé tous les résidents adultes de l'Ontario (Canada) qui ont subi une intervention chirurgicale parmi une liste de 14 entre 2002 et 2012. À l'aide de plusieurs bases de données administratives reliées, nous avons constitué la cohorte de l'étude et recueilli des variables associées aux patients, aux chirurgiens et aux interventions. Nous avons déterminé la durée des opérations à partir des dossiers de facturation d'anesthésiologie. Une régression binomiale négative a été utilisée pour modéliser le lien entre le statut des hôpitaux ­ universitaires ou non ­ et la durée. RÉSULTANTS: Des 713 573 chirurgies à l'étude, 20,8 % ont eu lieu dans un hôpital universitaire. Dans tous les cas, la durée moyenne était significativement plus longue dans les hôpitaux universitaires, les écarts variant de 5 à 62 minutes pour chaque intervention dans les analyses non corrigées (p < 0,001 dans tous les cas). Selon l'analyse de régression, les chirurgies effectuées dans les hôpitaux universitaires étaient associées à une augmentation globale de la durée de 22 % (intervalle de confiance à 95 %, 20 %­24 %), après ajustement pour les variables liées aux patients, aux chirurgiens et aux interventions ainsi que pour la densité de patients pris en charge par les chirurgiens et les hôpitaux. CONCLUSION: Nos résultats montrent que de nombreuses interventions chirurgicales durent considérablement plus longtemps dans les hôpitaux universitaires que dans les autres hôpitaux. Étant donné l'ampleur de cet écart, l'étude de l'incidence de la formation chirurgicale sur les coûts des soins de santé et les résultats cliniques devrait être une priorité pour les recherches futures.

Preoperative chemotherapy for resectable thoracic esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Surgery has been the treatment of choice for patients with localized esophageal cancer. Several studies have investigated whether preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery leads to improvement in cure rates, but individual reports have provided conflicting results. An explicit systematic update of the role of preoperative chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with resectable thoracic esophageal cancer is, therefore, warranted. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review is to determine the role of preoperative chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with resectable thoracic esophageal carcinoma. SEARCH METHODS: We identified trials by searching the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (1966 to 2013), EMBASE (1988 to 2013), and CANCERLIT (1993 to 2013). We did not confine our search to English language publications. We updated searches in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE in October 2013. SELECTION CRITERIA: All trials of patients with potentially resectable carcinoma of the esophagus (of any histologic type) who were randomly assigned to chemotherapy or no chemotherapy before surgery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The primary outcome was survival, which was assessed with the use of hazard ratios. This is an amendment to the original review, which used risk ratios to assess survival at yearly intervals. Hazard ratios (HRs) have now been introduced to summarize the complete survival experience in a single analysis. Risk ratios (RRs) were used to compare rates of resection, tumor recurrences, and treatment morbidity and mortality. MAIN RESULTS: We identified a total of 13 randomized trials involving 2362 participants. Ten trials (2122 participants) reported sufficient detail on survival to be included in a meta-analysis for the primary outcome. Preoperative chemotherapy improves overall survival (HR 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80 to 0.96) and is associated with a significantly higher rate of complete (R0) resection (RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.19).No evidence suggests that the overall rate of resection (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.01), tumor recurrence (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.22) or nonfatal complications (RR 0.90; 95% CI 0.76 to 1.06) was different for preoperative chemotherapy compared with surgery alone. Trials reported risks of toxicity with chemotherapy that ranged from 11% to 90%. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: In summary, preoperative chemotherapy plus surgery offers a survival advantage compared with surgery alone for patients with resectable thoracic esophageal cancer, but the evidence is of moderate quality. Some evidence of toxicity and preoperative mortality have been associated with chemotherapy.

Is it safe to wait? The effect of surgical wait time on survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The effect of surgical wait times on survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains largely unknown. Our objective was to determine the effect of surgical wait time on survival and incidence of upstaging in patients with stage I and II NSCLC. METHODS: All patients with clinical stage I and II NSCLC who underwent surgical resection in a single centre between January 2010 and December 2011 were reviewed. Analysis was stratified based on preoperative clinical stage. We assessed the effect of wait time on survival using a Cox proportional hazard model with wait time in months as a categorical variable. Incidence of upstaging at least 1 stage was assessed using logistic regression. RESULTS: We identified 222 patients: 180 were stage I and 42 were stage II. For stage I, wait times up to 4 months had no significant effect on survival or incidence of upstaging. For stage II, patients waiting between 2 and 3 months had significantly decreased survival (hazard ratio 3.6, p = 0.036) and increased incidence of upstaging (odds ratio 2.0, p = 0.020) than those waiting 0 to 1 month. For those waiting between 1 and 2 months, there was no significant difference in survival or upstaging. CONCLUSION: We did not identify an effect of wait time up to 4 months on survival or upstaging for patients with stage I NSCLC. For patients with stage II disease, wait times greater than 2 months adversely affected survival and upstaging.

CONTEXTE: En chirurgie, l'effet des temps d'attente sur la survie des patients atteints d'un cancer du poumon non à petites cellules (CPNPC) demeure pour une bonne part inconnu. Notre objectif était de déterminer l'effet des temps d'attente sur la survie et sur l'incidence de la restadification à un niveau plus élevé chez les patients atteints d'un CPNPC de stade I et II. MÉTHODES: Tous les patients présentant un CPNPC clinique de stade I et II ayant subi une résection chirurgicale dans un seul centre entre janvier 2010 et décembre 2011 ont été passés en revue. L'analyse a été stratifiée selon le stade clinique préopératoire. Nous avons évalué l'effet des temps d'attente sur la survie à l'aide d'un modèle de risques proportionnels de Cox, les temps d'attente en mois ayant servi de variable catégorielle. L'incidence de la restadification à la hausse d'au moins un stade a été évaluée par régression logistique. RÉSULTATS: Nous avons recensé 222 patients : 180 de stade I et 42 de stade II. Pour le stade I, les temps d'attente allant jusqu'à 4 mois n'ont eu aucun effet significatif sur la survie ou sur l'incidence de la restadification. Pour les stades II, les patients ayant attendu de 2 à trois 3 mois ont présenté une réduction significative de la survie (risque relatif 3,6, p = 0,036) et une incidence accrue de restadification (rapport des cotes 2,0, p = 0,02) comparativement à ceux qui avaient attendu 1 mois et moins. Chez les patients ayant attendu 1 ou 2 mois, on n'a noté aucune différence significative sur la survie ou la restadification. CONCLUSION: Nous n'avons observé aucun effet d'une attente allant jusqu'à 4 mois sur la survie ou la restadification chez les patients atteints d'un CPNPC de stade I. Pour les patients atteints d'une maladie de stade II, les temps d'attente de plus de 2 mois ont eu un impact négatif sur la survie et la restadification.

Development of force-based metrics for skills assessment in minimally invasive surgery.

BACKGROUND: The loss of haptic information that results from the reduced-access conditions present in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) may compromise the safety of the procedures. This limitation must be overcome through training. However, current methods for determining the skill level of trainees do not measure critical elements of skill attainment. This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of force information for the assessment of skill during MIS. METHODS: To achieve the study goal, experiments were performed using a set of sensorized instruments capable of measuring instrument position and tissue interaction forces. Several force-based metrics were developed as well as metrics that combine force and position information. RESULTS: The results show that experience level has a strong correlation with the new force-based metrics presented in this article. In particular, the integral and the derivative of the forces or the metrics that combine force and position provide the strongest correlations. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that force-based metrics are better indications of performance than metrics based on task completion time or position information alone. The proposed metrics can be automatically computed, are completely objective, and measure important aspects of performance.

Risk factors contributing to morbidity associated with feeding tubes placed for esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy: a single-center retrospective study.

Background: Perioperative nutritional optimization of patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer is important as this population is prone to malnutrition associated with poor outcomes. Nutritional supplementation has been achieved via enteral nutrition through percutaneous feeding tubes such as gastrostomy (G-tubes) and surgical jejunostomy tubes (J-tubes). While they are often routinely placed for patients undergoing esophagectomy, these are associated with adverse events including infections, dislodgement, increased healthcare visits, among others. The morbidity associated with feeding tubes has not been well characterized. We aim to determine factors associated with adverse outcomes after feeding tube placement to guide appropriate use of feeding tubes in esophageal carcinoma patients. Methods: Patients who underwent esophagectomy for carcinoma and had at least one feeding tube placed from November, 2017 to October, 2021 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Subgroup analyses were performed testing for relevant characteristics. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted evaluating outcomes of interest. The primary outcome was the overall rate of tube-related complications. Results: A total of 144 patients were included with 212 feeding tubes placed (75 G-tubes; 137 J-tubes). The rate of any adverse event related to feeding tubes was 39%. Of these, 11% were wound infections, 16% required procedural intervention, 11% visited the emergency department (ED), and 2.5% required admission due to feeding tube-related complications. Factors independently associated with adverse events included smoking history [odds ratio (OR), 2.80; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.34-6.23], being female (OR, 2.98; 95% CI: 1.36-6.72), induction treatment (OR, 2.65; 95% CI: 1.14-6.55), and J-tubes (OR, 2.07; 95% CI: 1.09-4.03). Laparoscopically placed J-tubes were associated with increased unplanned admissions compared to those placed via laparotomy (9.4% vs. 0%, P=0.01). Though not statistically significant, there was a trend toward more complications in those who were high risk for malnutrition [body mass index (BMI) <18 kg/m2, weight loss >10%] and comorbid (Charlson Comorbidity Index 5-6). Conclusions: There is significant morbidity related to feeding tubes. The risk profile of these tubes for individual patients should be carefully weighed against the nutritional benefits prior to placement. Patients should be carefully counselled on the possible adverse events and care requirements.

Automated Real-Time Detection of Lung Sliding Using Artificial Intelligence: A Prospective Diagnostic Accuracy Study.

BACKGROUND: Rapid evaluation for pneumothorax is a common clinical priority. Although lung ultrasound (LUS) often is used to assess for pneumothorax, its diagnostic accuracy varies based on patient and provider factors. To enhance the performance of LUS for pulmonary pathologic features, artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted imaging has been adopted; however, the diagnostic accuracy of AI-assisted LUS (AI-LUS) deployed in real time to diagnose pneumothorax remains unknown. RESEARCH QUESTION: In patients with suspected pneumothorax, what is the real-time diagnostic accuracy of AI-LUS to recognize the absence of lung sliding? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a prospective AI-assisted diagnostic accuracy study of AI-LUS to recognize the absence of lung sliding in a convenience sample of patients with suspected pneumothorax. After calibrating the model parameters and imaging settings for bedside deployment, we prospectively evaluated its diagnostic accuracy for lung sliding compared with a reference standard of expert consensus. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-one lung sliding evaluations were derived from 62 patients. AI-LUS showed a sensitivity of 0.921 (95% CI, 0.792-0.973), specificity of 0.802 (95% CI, 0.735-0.856), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.885 (95% CI, 0.828-0.956), and accuracy of 0.824 (95% CI, 0.766-0.870) for the diagnosis of absent lung sliding. INTERPRETATION: In this study, real-time AI-LUS showed high sensitivity and moderate specificity to identify the absence of lung sliding. Further research to improve model performance and optimize the integration of AI-LUS into existing diagnostic pathways is warranted.

What is the predictive value of RECIST criteria following stereotactic lung radiation?

PURPOSE: Response EvaluationCriteriain Solid Tumors (RECIST) is commonly used to assess response to anti-cancer therapies. However, its application after lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is complicated by radiation-induced lung changes. This study assesses the frequency of progressive disease (PD) by RECIST following lung SABR and correlates this with actual treatment outcomes as determined by longitudinal follow-up. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We reviewed patients treated with lung SABR for primary lung tumors or oligometastases between 2010 and 2015. Patients were treated with SABR doses of 54-60 Gy in 3-8 fractions. All follow-up scans were assessed and the treated lesion was serially measured over time, with the maximum diameter on axial CT slices used for RECIST calculations. Lesions demonstrating PD by RECIST criteria were identified and subsequently followed for long-term outcomes. The final 'gold-standard' assessment of response was based on size changes after PD and, as available, positron emission tomography scan and/or biopsy. RESULTS: Eighty-eight lesions met inclusion criteria. Seventy-five were lung primaries and thirteen were lung metastases. Median follow-up was 52 months (interquartile range: 33-68). Two-thirds (66 %, 58/88) of treated lesions met RECIST criteria for PD; however, local recurrence was only confirmed in 16 % (9/58) of cases. Most lesions that triggered PD by RECIST (47/58, 81 %) were ultimately found not to represent recurrence, while a minority (2/58, 3 %) had an uncertain response. The positive predictive value [PPV] of a RECIST defined PD event was 0.16. If PD was triggered within 12-months post-treatment, PPV was 0.08, compared to 0.21 for lesions triggering PD after 12-months. CONCLUSION: Using RECIST criteria, two-thirds of patients treated with lung SABR met criteria for PD. However, only a minority had recurrence, leading to a poor PPV of RECIST. This highlights the limitations of RECIST in this setting and provides context for physicians when interpreting post-lung SABR imaging.

Neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy for resectable gastric cancer: a systematic review and practice guideline for North America.

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer is a global health problem accounting for 10% of all new cancer cases and 12% of all cancer deaths worldwide. Many clinical trials and meta-analyses have explored the value of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy in gastric cancer; however, these studies have produced conflicting results. The purpose of this guidance document was to determine whether patients with resectable gastric cancer should receive neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy in addition to surgery. Outcomes of interest were overall survival, disease-free survival, and adverse events. METHODS: A systematic review was undertaken to inform recommendations regarding neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy in resectable gastric cancer in Ontario, Canada. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, as well as American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) annual meeting proceedings and American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) proceedings were systematically searched from 2002 to 2010. Oral fluoropyrimidine trials were excluded owing to the unavailability of these agents in North America. RESULTS: Overall, 22 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 13 meta-analyses, and two secondary analyses were included. The systematic review informed the development of a clinical practice guideline with the following recommendations. Postoperative 5-fluorouracil-based chemoradiotherapy based on the Macdonald approach or perioperative ECF (epirubicin, cisplatin, fluorouracil) chemotherapy based on the Cunningham/MAGIC (Medical Research Council Adjuvant Gastric Infusional Chemotherapy) approach are both acceptable standards of care in North America. Choice of treatment should be made on a case-by-case basis. Adjuvant chemotherapy is a reasonable option for those patients for whom the Macdonald and MAGIC protocols are contraindicated. All patients with resectable gastric cancer should undergo a pretreatment multidisciplinary assessment to determine the best plan of care. CONCLUSIONS: Overall survival in patients with resectable gastric cancer is significantly improved with the use of either postoperative chemoradiation (Macdonald approach) or perioperative ECF (MAGIC protocol).

High-concentration oxygen and surgical site infections in abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: There has been recent interest in using high-concentration oxygen to prevent surgical site infections (SSIs). Previous meta-analyses in this area have produced conflicting results. With the publication of 2 new randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that were not included in previous meta-analyses, an updated review is warranted. Our objective was to perform a meta-analysis on RCTs comparing high- and low- concentration oxygen in adults undergoing open abdominal surgery. METHODS: We completed independent literature reviews using electronic databases, bibliographies and other sources of grey literature to identify relevant studies. We assessed the overall quality of evidence using grade guidelines. Statistical analysis was performed on pooled data from included studies. A priori subgroup analyses were planned to explain statistical and clinical heterogeneity. RESULTS: Overall, 6 studies involving a total of 2585 patients met the inclusion criteria. There was no evidence of a reduction in SSIs with high-concentration oxygen (risk ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.50-1.19, p = 0.24). We observed substantial heterogeneity among studies. CONCLUSION: There is moderate evidence that high-concentration oxygen does not reduce SSIs in adults undergoing open abdominal surgery.

CONTEXTE: On observe depuis peu un intérêt à l'endroit de l'oxygène à concentration élevée pour prévenir les infections de plaies opératoires. Les méta-analyses réalisées dans le passé à ce sujet ont donné des résultats divergents. Compte tenu de la publication de 2 nouveaux essais randomisés et contrôlés (ERC) qui n'ont pas été inclus dans les méta-analyses précédentes, une nouvelle revue de la situation s'imposait. Notre objectif était donc d'effectuer une méta-analyse des ERC, qui ont comparé l'oxygène à concentration élevée et faible chez des adultes soumis à une chirurgie abdominale ouverte. MÉTHODES: Nous avons effectué des analyses indépendantes de la littérature à partir de bases de données électroniques, de bibliographies et autres éléments de la littérature « grise ¼ pour identifier les études pertinentes. Nous avons classé la qualité glo - bale des données probantes selon les lignes directrices de catégorisation. L'analyse statistique a porté sur les données regroupées des études incluses. Des analyses de sous-groupes ont été planifiées a priori pour expliquer l'hétérogénéité statistique et clinique. RÉSULTANTS: En tout, 6 études regroupant 2585 patients répondaient aux critères d'inclusion. On n'a noté aucune preuve de réduction des infections de plaies opératoires associées à l'oxygène à concentration élevée (risque relatif 0,77, intervalle de confiance de 95 % 0,50­1,19, p = 0,24). Nous avons observé une forte hétérogénéité entre les études. CONCLUSIONS: On dispose de données probantes acceptables selon lesquelles l'oxygène à concentration élevée ne réduit pas les infections de plaies opératoires chez les adultes soumis à une chirurgie abdominale ouverte.

Multicentre positive deviance seminar to generate best practice recommendations to reduce anastomotic leak and length of stay for patients undergoing oesophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: We describe a novel process using positive deviance (PD) with the Canadian Association of Thoracic Surgeons members, to identify perioperative best practice to minimise anastomotic leak (AL) and length of stay (LOS) following oesophagectomy. To our knowledge, this is the first National combination of level 1 evidence with expert opinion (ie, PD seminar) aimed at reducing AL and LOS in oesophageal surgery. Our primary hypothesis is that a multicentre National PD seminar is feasible, and could lead to the generation of best practices recommendations aimed at reducing AL and LOS in patients with oesophageal cancer. METHODS: Adverse events, LOS and AL incidence/severity following oesophagectomy were prospectively collected from seven Canadian thoracic institutions using Thoracic Morbidity and Mortality classification system (2017-2020). Anonymised display of centre's data were presented, with identification of centres demonstrating PD. Surgeons from PD sites discussed principles of care, culminating in the consensus recommendations, anonymously rated by all (5-point Likert scale). RESULTS: Data from 795 esophagectomies were included, with 25 surgeons participating. Two centres were identified as having the lowest AL rates 44/395 (11.1%) (vs five centres 71/400 (17.8%) (p<0.01)) and shortest LOS 8 days 45 (IQR: 6-14) (vs 10 days (IQR: 8-18) (p<0.001)). Recommendations included preoperative (prehabilitation, smoking cessation, chemotherapy for patients with dysphagia, minimise stents/feeding tubes), intraoperative (narrow gastric conduit, intrathoracic anastomosis, avoid routine jejunostomy, use small diameter closed-suction drains), postoperative day (POD) (early (POD 2-3) enteral feeding initiation, avoid routine barium swallow studies, early removal of tubes/drains (POD 2-3)). All ranked above 80% (4/5) in agreement to implement recommendations into their practice. CONCLUSION: We report the feasibility of a National multicentre PD seminar with the generation of best practice recommendations aimed at reducing AL and LOS following oesophagectomy. Further research is required to demonstrate whether National PD seminars can be an effective quality improvement tool.

Multicentre positive deviance to reduce adverse events and length of stay after pulmonary resection.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative adverse events (AEs) following pulmonary resection enormously impact patient well-being, length of stay (LOS) and healthcare costs. Standardised AE data collection can be used to identify positive outliers demonstrating positive deviance (PD) who may be helpful to inform the best practice. Here, we describe our initial experience of a novel quality improvement process using PD to reduce LOS and AEs. METHODS: AE rates and LOS were collected from four centres (2014-2020) using a common dictionary. Surgeons repeatedly participated in 60 to 90 min seminars consisting of the following process: identify outcome and procedure targeted, review relevant best evidence literature, view all data anonymised by surgeon or centre (if multicentre), choose and reveal identity of best performance PD outliers, who discuss their management principles while all receive self-evaluation reports, followed by collegial discussion to generate consensus recommendations, voted by all. We assessed overall impact on AEs and LOS using aggregate data in a before/after analysis. RESULTS: A total of 131 surgeons (average 12/seminar) participated in 11 PD seminars (8 local and 3 multicentre), yielding 85 consensus recommendation (average 8/seminar). Median LOS following lobectomy decreased from 4.0 to 3.0 days (p=0.04) following local PD seminars and from 4.0 to 3.5 days (p=0.11) following multicentre seminars. Trends for reductions in multiple AE rates were also observed. CONCLUSION: While limited by the longitudinal design, these findings provide preliminary support for this data-driven, collegial and actionable quality improvement process to help standardise and improve patient care, and merits further more rigorous investigation.

Management of chest tubes after pulmonary resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effect of suction with water seal, compared with water seal alone, applied to intra pleural chest tubes on the duration of air leaks in patients undergoing pulmonary surgery. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to find randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effect of the 2 methods on the duration of air leaks. Trials were systematically assessed for eligibility and validity. Data were extracted in duplicate and pooled across studies using a random-effects model. RESULTS: The search yielded 7 RCTs that met the eligibility criteria. No difference was identified between the 2 methods in duration of air leak (weighted mean difference [WMD] 1.15 days, favours water seal; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.64 to 2.94), time to discharge (WMD 2.19 d, favours water seal; 95% CI -0.63 to 5.01), duration of chest tubes (WMD 0.96 d, favours water seal; 95% CI -0.12 to 2.05) or incidence of prolonged air leaks (absolute risk reduction [ARR] 0.04, favours water seal; 95% CI -0.01 to 0.09). Water seal was associated with a significantly increased incidence of postoperative pneumothorax (ARR -0.14, 95% CI -0.21 to -0.07). CONCLUSION: No differences were identified in terms of duration of air leak, incidence of prolonged air leak, duration of chest tubes and duration of hospital stay when chest tubes were placed to suction rather than water seal. Chest tube suction appears to be superior to water seal in reducing the incidence of pneumothorax; however, the clinical significance of this finding is unclear.

Predicting recurrence risks in lung cancer patients using multimodal radiomics and random survival forests.

Purpose: We developed a model integrating multimodal quantitative imaging features from tumor and nontumor regions, qualitative features, and clinical data to improve the risk stratification of patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Approach: We retrospectively analyzed 135 patients [mean age, 69 years (43 to 87, range); 100 male patients and 35 female patients] with NSCLC who underwent upfront surgical resection between 2008 and 2012. The tumor and peritumoral regions on both preoperative CT and FDG PET-CT and the vertebral bodies L3 to L5 on FDG PET were segmented to assess the tumor and bone marrow uptake, respectively. Radiomic features were extracted and combined with clinical and CT qualitative features. A random survival forest model was developed using the top-performing features to predict the time to recurrence/progression in the training cohort ( n = 101 ), validated in the testing cohort ( n = 34 ) using the concordance, and compared with a stage-only model. Patients were stratified into high- and low-risks of recurrence/progression using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: The model, consisting of stage, three wavelet texture features, and three wavelet first-order features, achieved a concordance of 0.78 and 0.76 in the training and testing cohorts, respectively, significantly outperforming the baseline stage-only model results of 0.67 ( p < 0.005 ) and 0.60 ( p = 0.008 ), respectively. Patients at high- and low-risks of recurrence/progression were significantly stratified in both the training ( p < 0.005 ) and the testing ( p = 0.03 ) cohorts. Conclusions: Our radiomic model, consisting of stage and tumor, peritumoral, and bone marrow features from CT and FDG PET-CT significantly stratified patients into low- and high-risk of recurrence/progression.