Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 13 de 13
Filtrar
1.
Eur J Neurol ; : e16450, 2024 Sep 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39285638

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although there is extensive evidence about the safety of monoclonal antibodies against calcitonin gene-related peptide (anti-CGRP mAbs) in combination with traditional drugs, scarce data are available on the safety of their combination with other mAbs. This study aimed to evaluate the 6-month effectiveness and tolerability of anti-CGRP mAbs in combination with other mAbs for different diseases. METHODS: Patients included in the Italian Headache Registry and treated concomitantly with an anti-CGRP mAb and another mAb were included. Effectiveness outcomes for migraine included reduction from baseline of monthly headache days (MHDs), Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score, Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) scores, and Patients' Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were included. In 27 patients (71.1%), the anti-CGRP mAb was added to a previously ongoing mAb. Nine patients (23.7%) discontinued one of the two mAbs before the end of treatment (seven discontinued the anti-CGRP mAb and two the other mAb). One patient discontinued for AEs. Anti-CGRP mAbs were discontinued due to ineffectiveness (n = 5, 55.5%) and one each (11.1%) for clinical remission and lost to follow-up. MHDs significantly decreased from baseline to 3 months (p < 0.0001) and 6 months (p < 0.001), as did the MIDAS and the HIT-6 scores at 3 and 6 months (p < 0.001). For anti-CGRP mAbs, 27.4% of patients reported PGIC ≥ 5 at 3 months and 48.3% at 6 months. Mild AEs associated with introduction of a second mAb were detected in six patients (15.8%). CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world study, anti-CGRP mAbs showed safety and effectiveness when administered concomitantly with other mAbs.

2.
Neurol Sci ; 44(6): 2033-2039, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36753010

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the access to treatments with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and/or mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in acute ischemic stroke patients admitted to stroke units (SUs) of Veneto region (Italy) according to current "hub-and-spoke" model from 2017 to 2021. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data on treatments with IVT and/or MT for stroke patients admitted to the 23 SUs (6 Hubs and 17 Spokes) of the 6 macro-areas including 9 local sanitary units (LSUs) and 2 hospitals. RESULTS: We reported 6093 treatments with IVT alone, 1114 with IVT plus MT, and 921 with MT alone. Number of stroke unit (SU) beds/100,000 inhabitants ranges from 2.3 to 2.8, and no difference was found among different macro-areas. Number of treatments/100,000 inhabitants/year ranges from 19 to 34 for IVT alone, from 2 to 7 for IVT plus MT, and from 2 to 5 for MT alone. Number of IVT alone/SU bed/year ranges from 9 to 21 in the Hub and from 6 to 12 in the Spokes. Rate of IVT plus MT in patients directly arrived in the same LSU's Hub ranges from 50 to 81%, likewise the one of MT alone ranges from 49 to 84%. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment target rates of IVT and MT set by Action Plan for Stroke in Europe 2018-2030 has been globally exceeded in the Veneto region. However, the target rate of MT and access revascularization treatments is heterogeneous among different macro-areas. Further efforts should be made to homogenize the current territorial organization.


Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Fibrinolíticos , Terapia Trombolítica , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/cirugía , Trombectomía , Isquemia Encefálica/epidemiología , Isquemia Encefálica/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/cirugía , Italia/epidemiología
3.
Neurol Sci ; 44(8): 2845-2851, 2023 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36939946

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Cluster Headache Impact Questionnaire (CHIQ) is a specific and easy-to-use questionnaire to assess the current impact of cluster headache (CH). The aim of this study was to validate the Italian version of the CHIQ. METHODS: We included patients diagnosed with episodic CH (eCH) or chronic CH (cCH) according to the ICHD-3 criteria and included in the "Italian Headache Registry" (RICe). The questionnaire was administered to patients through an electronic form in two sessions: at first visit for validation, and after 7 days for test-retest reliability. For internal consistency, Cronbach's alpha was calculated. Convergent validity of the CHIQ with CH features and the results of questionnaires assessing anxiety, depression, stress, and quality of life was evaluated using Spearman's correlation coefficient. RESULTS: We included 181 patients subdivided in 96 patients with active eCH, 14 with cCH, and 71 with eCH in remission. The 110 patients with either active eCH or cCH were included in the validation cohort; only 24 patients with CH were characterized by a stable attack frequency after 7 days, and were included in the test-retest cohort. Internal consistency of the CHIQ was good with a Cronbach alpha value of 0.891. The CHIQ score showed a significant positive correlation with anxiety, depression, and stress scores, while showing a significant negative correlation with quality-of-life scale scores. CONCLUSION: Our data show the validity of the Italian version of the CHIQ, which represents a suitable tool for evaluating the social and psychological impact of CH in clinical practice and research.


Asunto(s)
Cefalalgia Histamínica , Humanos , Cefalalgia Histamínica/diagnóstico , Cefalalgia Histamínica/psicología , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Italia , Psicometría
4.
Cephalalgia ; 40(4): 337-346, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31537108

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In literature, osmophobia is reported as a specific migrainous symptom with a prevalence of up to 95%. Despite the International Classification of Headache Disorders 2nd edition proposal of including osmophobia among accompanying symptoms, it was no longer mentioned in the ICHD 3rd edition. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study on 193 patients suffering from migraine without aura, migraine with aura, episodic tension-type headache or a combination of these. After a retrospective interview, each patient was asked to describe in detail osmophobia, when present, in the following four headache attacks. RESULTS: In all, 45.7% of migraine without aura attacks were associated with osmophobia, 67.2% of migraineurs reported osmophobia in at least a quarter of the attacks. No episodic tension-type headache attack was associated with osmophobia. It was associated with photophobia or phonophobia in 4.3% of migraine without aura attacks, and it was the only accompanying symptom in 4.7% of migraine without aura attacks. The inclusion of osmophobia in the ICHD-3 diagnostic criteria would enable a 9.0% increased diagnostic sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Osmophobia is a specific clinical marker of migraine, easy to ascertain and able to disentangle the sometimes challenging differential diagnosis between migraine without aura and episodic tension-type headache. We recommend its inclusion among the diagnostic criteria for migraine as it increases sensitivity, showing absolute specificity.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Migrañosos/diagnóstico , Trastornos del Olfato/diagnóstico , Trastornos Fóbicos/diagnóstico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Migrañosos/epidemiología , Trastornos del Olfato/epidemiología , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Trastornos Fóbicos/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
5.
Neurol Sci ; 41(3): 583-589, 2020 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31720898

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Nummular headache (NH) is a rare headache disorder characterized by a small, circumscribed painful area of the scalp. The description of many cases in the last years has supported its re-classification as a primary headache from the International Headache Society, moving it from its previous placement in the Appendix of the International Criteria of Headache Disorders. METHODS: Data were collected from a retro-prospective observational study about rare headaches promoted by the RegistRare Network, a collaborative group of seven Italian Headache Centres. According to the gender-biased profile of certain primary headaches, we have looked further NH patients from a gender perspective. RESULTS: Nineteen NH patients (11 men, 8 women) have been enrolled in the study. Headache onset was at 39 years and preceded approximately 8 years the diagnosis. No clinically evident differences between men and women have been found, including treatment prescriptions and headache resolution. Of note, the mean time from the onset of NH to the first visit in a Headache Centre was longer in men, compared with women (13.5 vs. 0.9 years). NH attacks were efficaciously treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in 60% of patients receiving treatment. Headache prophylaxis with pregabalin and amitriptyline has been reported as effective in 40% and 67% of the treated patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: NH is a primary headache clinically heterogeneous in terms of temporal patterns and pain characteristics. Further research is needed to investigate the existence of male and female phenotypes, by clarifying whether it may be relevant for therapeutic purposes.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Cefaleas Primarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Cefaleas Primarias/epidemiología , Cefaleas Primarias/fisiopatología , Sistema de Registros , Adolescente , Adulto , Edad de Inicio , Anciano , Amitriptilina/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Cefaleas Primarias/prevención & control , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pregabalina/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Enfermedades Raras , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Sexuales , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
7.
CNS Drugs ; 37(12): 1069-1080, 2023 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37999868

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Real-world studies on fremanezumab, an anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody for migraine prevention, are few and with limited follow-up. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the long-term (up to 52 weeks) effectiveness and tolerability of fremanezumab in high-frequency episodic migraine and chronic migraine. METHODS: This s an independent, prospective, multicenter cohort study enrolling outpatients in 17 Italian Headache Centers with high-frequency episodic migraine or chronic migraine and multiple preventive treatment failures. Patients were treated with fremanezumab 225 mg monthly. The primary outcomes included changes from baseline (1 month before treatment) in monthly headache days, response rates (reduction in monthly headache days from baseline), and persistence in medication overuse at months 3, 6, and 12 (all outcome timeframes refer to the stated month). Secondary outcomes included changes from baseline in acute medication intake and disability questionnaires scores at the same timepoints. A last observation carried forward analysis was also performed. RESULTS: A total of 90 patients who received at least one dose of fremanezumab and with a potential 12-month follow-up were included. Among them, 15 (18.0%) patients discontinued treatment for the entire population, a reduction in monthly headache days compared with baseline was reported at month 3, with a significant median [interquartile range] reduction in monthly headache days (- 9.0 [11.5], p < 0.001). A statistically different reduction was also reported at month 6 compared with baseline (- 10.0 [12.0]; p < 0.001) and at 12 months of treatment (- 10.0 [14.0]; p < 0.001). The percentage of patients with medication overuse was significantly reduced compared with baseline from 68.7% (57/83) to 29.6% (24/81), 25.3% (19/75), and 14.7% (10/68) at 3, 6, and 12 months of treatment, respectively (p < 0.001). Acute medication use (days and total number) and disability scores were also significantly reduced (p < 0.001). A ≥ 50% response rate was achieved for 51.9, 67.9, and 76.5% of all patients at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Last observation carried forward analyses confirmed these findings. Fremanezumab was well tolerated, with just one patient discontinuing treatment because of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence for the real-world effectiveness of fremanezumab in treating both high-frequency episodic migraine and chronic migraine, with meaningful and sustained improvements in multiple migraine-related variables. No new safety issue was identified.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Migrañosos , Uso Excesivo de Medicamentos Recetados , Humanos , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Método Doble Ciego , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Cefalea/tratamiento farmacológico
8.
Headache ; 50(2): 301-4, 2010 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19751366

RESUMEN

Topiramate is a highly effective drug in migraine prophylaxis and is considered a first-line treatment. The evidence for the efficacy of topiramate is based upon the results of several large, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Adverse events (AEs) are common and require discontinuation of the treatment in about 20-25% of patients, but they are rarely severe. There are reviews regarding topiramate-related AEs representing a large number of patients treated in controlled trials. The most common AEs are weight loss, dizziness, somnolence, abnormal thinking, fatigue, ataxia, confusion, paresthesias, impaired concentration, nervousness, amnesia, and language difficulties. The development of cough has never been reported as an AE during topiramate prophylaxis for migraine. We present 3 cases in which the prophylactic treatment for migraine with topiramate was discontinued due to the onset of primary intractable coughing.


Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Tos/inducido químicamente , Tos/fisiopatología , Fructosa/análogos & derivados , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Encéfalo/efectos de los fármacos , Encéfalo/fisiopatología , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Fructosa/efectos adversos , Humanos , Enfermedad Iatrogénica/prevención & control , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Migrañosos/prevención & control , Topiramato
9.
Headache ; 49(5): 776-9, 2009 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19456886

RESUMEN

We present the case of a 34-year-old man with a 2-year history of pain related to efforts in heavy lifting, beginning in the right ear and radiating to the neck and to the vertex. He underwent multiple negative neuroimaging examinations, until a 3-dimensional computerized tomography scan of the pharyngeal region evidenced an elongated styloid process. A diagnosis of Eagle's syndrome was made. The excision of the elongated styloid process was performed, resulting in complete and lasting pain relief. We focus on Eagle's syndrome and in particular on this atypical presentation.


Asunto(s)
Neuralgia Facial/etiología , Neuralgia Facial/patología , Cefaleas Primarias/etiología , Cefaleas Primarias/patología , Hueso Temporal/anomalías , Adulto , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Dolor de Oído/etiología , Dolor de Oído/patología , Dolor de Oído/fisiopatología , Neuralgia Facial/fisiopatología , Cefaleas Primarias/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Dolor de Cuello/etiología , Dolor de Cuello/patología , Dolor de Cuello/fisiopatología , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/patología , Enfermedades Profesionales/fisiopatología , Dolor Referido/etiología , Dolor Referido/patología , Dolor Referido/fisiopatología , Faringe/patología , Faringe/fisiopatología , Esfuerzo Físico/fisiología , Síndrome , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Tonsilectomía/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
J Headache Pain ; 10(6): 455-60, 2009 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19711000

RESUMEN

The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the relevance of the symptom "headache" in kidney transplanted patients, since few studies have considered headache as a clinically significant complication in this condition. A total of 83 consecutive kidney transplant patients underwent to neurological examination and a detailed headache history was taken. The headache history considered the period before kidney disease, during renal failure, during dialysis treatment and after transplantation. Diagnosis was made according to International Headache Criteria (ICDH-II) (2004). Our results reveal an occurrence of headache after kidney transplantation in 44.5% of the patients, which is higher than rates reported for the general population and in the only specific comparable study on liver transplant patients. These data suggest the need for prospective studies to explore the causal mechanisms by which headache develops with frequency in kidney transplant patients, and in particular to determine the role of immunosuppressive therapy.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Cefalalgia/epidemiología , Trastornos de Cefalalgia/etiología , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/fisiopatología , Adolescente , Adulto , Antihipertensivos/administración & dosificación , Antihipertensivos/efectos adversos , Causalidad , Ciclosporina/administración & dosificación , Ciclosporina/efectos adversos , Diálisis/efectos adversos , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Trastornos de Cefalalgia/fisiopatología , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Prednisona/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia Renal/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
12.
Headache ; 48(7): 1129-32, 2008 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18705028

RESUMEN

The relationship between epilepsy and migraine is complex and remains to be determined. We report 3 cases that address 2 questions on this topic. The first and second cases showed an association between migraine without aura and the onset of epileptic seizures. The third case report describes a patient in whom migraine with aura occurred and was followed by the development of status epilepticus, which occurred 2 or 3 hours after the attack of migraine with aura. We discuss the present definition of migralepsy and reassess its definition by suggesting possible extensions to its current definition.


Asunto(s)
Epilepsia/complicaciones , Epilepsia/diagnóstico , Trastornos Migrañosos/complicaciones , Trastornos Migrañosos/diagnóstico , Adulto , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Epilepsia/clasificación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Migrañosos/clasificación , Adulto Joven
13.
J Headache Pain ; 6(4): 213-5, 2005 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16362667

RESUMEN

This study evaluates osmophobia (defined as an unpleasant perception, during a headache attack, of odours that are non-aversive or even pleasurable outside the attacks) in connection with the diagnosis of primary headaches. We recruited 775 patients from our Headache Centre (566 females, 209 males; age 38+/-12 years), of whom 477 were migraineurs without aura (MO), 92 with aura (MA), 135 had episodic tension-type headache (ETTH), 44 episodic cluster headache (ECH), 2 chronic paroxysmal hemicrania (CPH) and 25 other primary headaches (OPHs: 12 primary stabbing headaches, 2 primary cough headaches, 3 primary exertional headaches, 2 primary headaches associated with sexual activity, 3 hypnic headaches, 2 primary thunderclap headaches and 1 hemicrania continua). Among them, 43% with MO (205/477), 39% with MA (36/92), and 7% with CH (3/44) reported osmophobia during the attacks; none of the 135 ETTH and 25 OPH patients suffered this symptom. We conclude that osmophobia is a very specific marker to discriminate adequately between migraine (MO and MA) and ETTH; moreover, from this limited series it seems to be a good discriminant also for OPHs, and for CH patients not sharing neurovegetative symptoms with migraine. Therefore, osmophobia should be considered a good candidate as a new criterion for the diagnosis of migraine.


Asunto(s)
Cefaleas Primarias/complicaciones , Odorantes , Trastornos del Olfato/etiología , Trastornos Fóbicos/etiología , Adulto , Cefalalgia Histamínica/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Migraña con Aura/complicaciones , Migraña sin Aura/complicaciones , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/complicaciones
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA