RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sepsis can cause immune dysregulation and multiple organ failure in patients and eventually lead to death. The gut microbiota has demonstrated its precise therapeutic potential in the treatment of various diseases. This study aimed to discuss the structural changes of the gut microbiota in patients with sepsis and to analyze the differences in the gut microbiota of patients with different prognoses. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter study in which rectal swab specimens were collected on the first and third days of sepsis diagnosis. A total of 70 specimens were collected, and gut microbiota information was obtained by 16S rRNA analysis. RESULTS: The relative abundance of Enterococcus decreased in rectal swab specimens during the first three days of diagnosis in patients with sepsis, while the relative abundance of inflammation-associated Bacillus species such as Escherichia coli, Enterobacteriaceae, and Bacteroidetes increased. By comparing the differences in the flora of the survival group and the death group, we found that the abundance of Veillonella and Ruminococcus in the death group showed an increasing trend (p < 0.05), while the abundance of Prevotella_6 and Prevotella_sp_S4_BM14 was increased in surviving patients (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio, reflecting overall gut microbial composition, was significantly lower on day three of sepsis diagnosis. Changes in the abundance of specific gut microbiota may serve as prognostic markers in patients with sepsis.
Asunto(s)
Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Sepsis , Humanos , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/genética , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , Heces , Firmicutes/genética , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Bacteroidetes/genéticaRESUMEN
The gut microbiota is closely related to the development of sepsis. The aim of this study was to explore changes in the gut microbiota and gut metabolism, as well as potential relationships between the gut microbiota and environmental factors in the early stages of sepsis. Fecal samples were collected from 10 septic patients on the first and third days following diagnosis in this study. The results showed that in the early stages of sepsis, the gut microbiota is dominated by microorganisms that are tightly associated with inflammation, such as Escherichia-Shigella, Enterococcus, Enterobacteriaceae, and Streptococcus. On sepsis day 3 compared to day 1, there was a significant decrease in Lactobacillus and Bacteroides and a significant increase in Enterobacteriaceae, Streptococcus, and Parabacteroides. Culturomica_massiliensis, Prevotella_7 spp., Prevotellaceae, and Pediococcus showed significant differences in abundance on sepsis day 1, but not on sepsis day 3. Additionally, 2-keto-isovaleric acid 1 and 4-hydroxy-6-methyl-2-pyrone metabolites significantly increased on sepsis day 3 compared to day 1. Prevotella_7 spp. was positively correlated with phosphate and negatively correlated with 2-keto-isovaleric acid 1 and 3-hydroxypropionic acid 1, while Prevotella_9 spp. was positively correlated with sequential organ failure assessment score, procalcitonin and intensive care unit stay time. In conclusion, the gut microbiota and metabolites are altered during sepsis, with some beneficial microorganisms decreasing and some pathogenic microorganisms increasing. Furthermore, Prevotellaceae members may play different roles in the intestinal tract, with Prevotella_7 spp. potentially possessing beneficial health properties and Prevotella_9 spp. potentially playing a promoting role in sepsis.
Asunto(s)
Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Sepsis , Humanos , Heces/microbiología , Enterobacteriaceae , Sepsis/microbiología , ARN Ribosómico 16SRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The translocation of intestinal flora has been linked to the colonization of diverse and heavy lower respiratory flora in patients with septic ARDS, and is considered a critical prognostic factor for patients. METHODS: On the first and third days of ICU admission, BALF, throat swab, and anal swab were collected, resulting in a total of 288 samples. These samples were analyzed using 16S rRNA analysis and the traceability analysis of new generation technology. RESULTS: On the first day, among the top five microbiota species in abundance, four species were found to be identical in BALF and throat samples. Similarly, on the third day, three microbiota species were found to be identical in abundance in both BALF and throat samples. On the first day, 85.16% of microorganisms originated from the throat, 5.79% from the intestines, and 9.05% were unknown. On the third day, 83.52% of microorganisms came from the throat, 4.67% from the intestines, and 11.81% were unknown. Additionally, when regrouping the 46 patients, the results revealed a significant predominance of throat microorganisms in BALF on both the first and third day. Furthermore, as the disease progressed, the proportion of intestinal flora in BALF increased in patients with enterogenic ARDS. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with septic ARDS, the main source of lung microbiota is primarily from the throat. Furthermore, the dynamic trend of the microbiota on the first and third day is essentially consistent.It is important to note that the origin of the intestinal flora does not exclude the possibility of its origin from the throat.
Asunto(s)
Bacterias , Líquido del Lavado Bronquioalveolar , Microbiota , Faringe , ARN Ribosómico 16S , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria , Sepsis , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/microbiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Faringe/microbiología , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , Líquido del Lavado Bronquioalveolar/microbiología , Anciano , Sepsis/microbiología , Bacterias/clasificación , Bacterias/aislamiento & purificación , Bacterias/genética , Alveolos Pulmonares/microbiología , Adulto , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Microbioma GastrointestinalRESUMEN
Introduction: The small intestine, as the main digestion and absorption site of the gastrointestinal tract, is often overlooked in studies, and the overall microbiota does not reflect the makeup of the microbiota in different segments of the intestine. Therefore, we aimed to exclude the influence of routine ICU treatment measures on sepsis patients and observed changes in the diversity and abundance of gut microbiota in different intestinal segments of septic mice. Methods: The mice were randomly divided into the CLP6h group and the sham group. The contents of the colon and small intestine of the experimental group and the control group were collected after 6 h. Results: After CLP, the number and structure of the gut microbiota in the colon changed most obviously, among which Bacteroidetes had the most significant changes. Akkermansia, D.Firmicutes_bacterium_M10_2, Blautia, Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, Candidatus_Arthromitus, and Muribaculaceae were changed in the colon. Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Akkermansia, Blautia, Candidatus_Arthromitus, and Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136_group were changed in the small intestine. Discussion: Our experiment found that there were different numbers of unique and common gut microbiota in the small intestine and colon after sepsis, and the gut microbiota of the colon changed more drastically after sepsis than the small intestine. Thus, we should focus on protective gut microbiota and mucin-degrading microbes. We hope that these results will provide help for sepsis treatment in the future.