An evaluation of cervical cancer in women age sixty and over.

OBJECTIVE: To assess prior cervical cancer screening, stage at time of diagnosis and outcome in women sixty years of age and over with cervical cancer. METHODS: A retrospective review of cervical cancer patients evaluated at the University of Washington identified a cohort of women age sixty and older with cervical cancer diagnosed between January 1, 1993 and December 31, 2003. Electronic medical records and the University of Washington Tumor Registry were reviewed for age, ethnicity, cervical cancer risk factors, pathology, treatment, and outcome. RESULTS: Six hundred forty-five women with cervical cancer were identified. One hundred (15.5%) women were age 60 or older with a median age of 64 years. At time of diagnosis, 41 were early stage (1A1-1B1) and 59 were advanced stage (1B2-4B). Length of time from last Pap smear significantly correlated with stage. Radical hysterectomy was performed on 29 patients, and 15 received adjuvant treatment. Forty-nine women received primary chemo-radiation, and 22 were treated with primary radiation. Lymph node metastases were identified in 65% of women with locally advanced cervical cancer. At conclusion of the study period, 80% were alive. Stage and time since last Pap smear correlated with overall outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Women 60 and older make up a significant proportion of cervical cancer patients, often fail to receive screening, present with locally advanced disease, and tolerate standard treatment protocols. Careful consideration of these findings should be made when establishing Pap smear screening guidelines for this population of women.

Can mentors prevent and reduce burnout in new chairs of departments of obstetrics and gynecology: results from a prospective, randomized pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed burnout in new chairs of obstetrics and gynecology and whether mentoring by experienced chairs would prevent or reduce burnout. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a year-long prospective, randomized trial. Questionnaires were sent to new chairs to obtain demographic information and to identify need for mentoring and level of burnout. Fourteen chairs in the intervention group selected a mentor; 13 chairs served as controls. After 1 year, questionnaires were completed to determine stress and burnout and the impact of mentoring. RESULTS: Financial issues were the major stressors. New chairs identified human resources, finances, and relationships with school leaders as areas of greatest need for mentoring. Few chairs exhibited burnout. No differences were observed in burnout at the start of the study or after 1 year in the study groups. Mentors and new chairs found the mentoring relationship difficult to establish and maintain. CONCLUSION: Long-distance mentoring by experienced chairs did not alter burnout in new chairs of obstetrics and gynecology. Local mentors appear to be more effective.

A curriculum for Burch colposuspension and diagnostic cystoscopy evaluated by an objective structured assessment of technical skills.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop an effective curriculum for teaching colposuspension and diagnostic cystoscopy. STUDY DESIGN: Fifty-five residents underwent an Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills that was composed of a task-specific checklist and validated global assessment. Thirty of the residents had been exposed to a training curriculum, and 25 residents served as untrained control subjects. RESULTS: For the colposuspension and cystoscopy checklists, the reliability coefficient was 0.85 and 0.72, and the interrater reliability was 0.92 and 0.68, respectively. Although residents who were provided the curriculum performed better on both task-specific checklists, the differences did not reach statistical significance. Senior residents performed consistently better than junior residents for both tasks. When a comparison was made of the junior residents separately to account for previous experience, trained residents performed significantly better on the cystoscopy checklist (P = .029). CONCLUSION: This curriculum is an effective way to teach diagnostic cystoscopy to junior residents. The checklist for this Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills has good reliability and construct validity.

Comparison of objective, structured assessment of technical skills with a virtual reality hysteroscopy trainer and standard latex hysteroscopy model.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a virtual reality (VR) hysteroscopy device and a standard latex hysteroscopy model for assessment of residents' surgical skills. STUDY DESIGN: As part of a 7-station, objective, structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS), 13 obstetrics and gynecology residents performed myoma resection with the Immersion Hysteroscopy VR Trainer (Gaithersburg, Maryland) and dissection of a polyp with a model from Limbs and Things, Inc. (LT) (Bristol, England). OSATS were scored by both blinded (to the residents' levels) and unblinded examiners using a task-specific checklist, global rating scale and pass/fail assessment. RESULTS: Reliability indices for the VR model were 0.70 (checklist) and 0.98 (global), with an interrater reliability of 0.87 and 0.92, respectively. Correlation of scores between blinded and unblinded examiners was 0.78 for the checklist and 0.88 for the global (p < 0.001). Examination of construct validity revealed improved scores with-increasing postgraduate year. Comparison of VR scores to LT scores revealed VR scores to be significantly higher than LT scores (p < 0.001). Correlations of VR and LT scores were low for both the global (0.478, p = 0.12) and checklist (0.362, p = 0.24). CONCLUSION: The VR Hysteroscopy Trainer is not superior to standard models for evaluating surgical skills.

A six-year study of surgical teaching and skills evaluation for obstetric/gynecologic residents in porcine and inanimate surgical models.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to evaluate an ongoing teaching and objective surgical skills testing program for obstetric/gynecologic residents in a laboratory setting, and assess the impact on residents of having 4 years of a surgical laboratory curriculum. STUDY DESIGN: From 1997 through 2002, we conducted surgical skills training sessions for all obstetric/gynecologic residents, using both inanimate and animal (porcine) models. Once a year we tested each resident on 12 structured surgical bench tasks. At the end of each year, we conducted formal objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) with all residents attempting multiple surgical procedures. We compared residents who had 4 years of laboratory training with those who started residency earlier and had only 1 or 2 years of the new curriculum. We also compared residents' own performance from year to year and cohort performance by resident year. RESULTS: PGY3 and PGY4s who had 4 years of surgical laboratory training did significantly better on bench laboratory skills than PGY3 and PGY4s with fewer years of training sessions (total scores of 48.8 vs 30.3, P < .001). However, no significant improvement in surgical procedures as measured by global OSATS was found. When comparing residents' own performance between the beginning and the end of 1 year, global OSATS scores improved significantly on laparoscopic salpingotomy (P < .001) and open oophorectomy (P < .001). For the cohort of PGY4s completing 4 years of laboratory training, average global OSATS scores showed statistically significant improvement (PGY1, PGY2 < PGY3 < PGY4, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Residents who completed the 4-year curriculum showed significantly better technical skills on bench tasks but not on OSATS compared with those with less training. Resident surgical skills evaluated by OSATS significantly improve over time both individually and as a cohort by resident year.

Self-assessment of resident surgical skills: is it feasible?

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine obstetrics and gynecology residents' self-assessment of proficiency on a variety of surgical bench procedures and to compare their ratings with those ratings of trained faculty observers who used instruments that have been shown to be reliable and valid. STUDY DESIGN: As part of a 6-station Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills, 74 residents at 5 institutions estimated their overall open and laparoscopic skill level before the testing. After completing each station, residents evaluated their overall and global skills performance. RESULTS: Residents rated their proficiency higher on open skills than on laparoscopic skills. Task-specific, overall, and global assessments were correlated significantly with the faculty ratings (P < .001). Residents tended to rate themselves lower than did faculty on almost all measures; even those residents with poor skills indicated that they were aware of their deficiencies. Overall and global self-assessments increased with each resident level, which indicated good construct validity. CONCLUSION: Residents can rate their overall open and laparoscopic skills, task-specific performance, and global skills with good reliability and validity. Although they tended to score themselves lower than did faculty observers, the correlations are high (ie, residents who give themselves a higher score tended to receive a higher score from faculty, and vice versa). One of the concerns about self-assessment is that residents with poor skills might not be aware of their deficiencies. We did not find that to be the case. Therefore, when residents work on self-directed exercises, task-specific and global checklists can be used for both learning and self-assessment.

A new curriculum for hysteroscopy training as demonstrated by an objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS).

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop an effective curriculum to teach hysteroscopy, as well as to develop an objective assessment instrument (OSATS). STUDY DESIGN: All 24 residents in our training program attended a 3-hour hysteroscopy curriculum in each of 3 years. Each year after the curriculum, an OSATS was administered consisting of an assembly and operative task. Each task was evaluated with a task-specific checklist and a previously validated global assessment form. Twenty-four residents from an outside institution served as controls. All residents were examined by blinded and unblinded examiners. RESULTS: The reliability coefficient was .7857 for the checklist and .9763 for the global scale. Interrater reliability for the checklist was .7478 and ranged from .4222 to .9329 for the global instruments. Evaluation of construct validity revealed that the junior residents at both locations did significantly worse on the checklist and global scale than the senior residents for all 3 years of the study (P < .001). Those residents provided the curriculum did significantly better on both the checklist and the global scale than the resident controls with a mean of 45% versus 63% for the checklist and 18.3 versus 24.9 for the global score. (P = .001 checklist, P = .007 global scale). CONCLUSION: This curriculum is an effective way to impart knowledge and skill in the assembly and use of the operative hysteroscope. The checklist developed for this OSATS has excellent reliability and construct validity.

Obesity and second-trimester abortion by dilation and evacuation.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and dilation and evacuation (D&E) procedure characteristics. STUDY DESIGN: Data were collected on all women seeking elective surgical second-trimester abortion during a six-week period at a free-standing abortion clinic. Information gathered included age, pregnancy history, height, weight, intravenous sedation, time for procedure, estimated blood loss, use of special instruments, amount of manual dilation needed and gestational age by ultrasound and pathology. Difficulty was rated by a single physician immediately following the surgery using a 10-cm line later converted to a visual analog score. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-eight women underwent D&E during the study period. Data were complete for 163 (82%). Subject demographics and procedure outcomes were analyzed with BMI as a variable. A trend was observed for increased procedure difficulty, time for procedure, blood loss and complications as BMI increased. On average, the procedure for a subject with BMI > or = 30 took 20% longer and was rated as 40% more difficult to perform as compared to procedures on women with BMI < 30. CONCLUSION: We identified a trend with BMI score and some D&E procedure characteristics, but the power of the study was limited. Abortion providers should be aware that obesity may necessitate the availability of special instruments and/or an alterations in surgical technique.

Frequency of symptoms of ovarian cancer in women presenting to primary care clinics.

CONTEXT: Women with ovarian cancer frequently report symptoms prior to diagnosis, but distinguishing these symptoms from those that normally occur in women remains problematic. OBJECTIVE: To compare the frequency, severity, and duration of symptoms between women with ovarian cancer and women presenting to primary care clinics. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: A prospective case-control study of women who visited 2 primary care clinics (N = 1709) and completed an anonymous survey of symptoms experienced over the past year (July 2001-January 2002). Severity of symptoms was rated on a 5-point scale, duration was recorded, and frequency was indicated as number of episodes per month. An identical survey was administered preoperatively to 128 women with a pelvic mass (84 benign and 44 malignant). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparison of self-reported symptoms between ovarian cancer patients and women seeking care in primary care clinics. RESULTS: In the clinic population, 72% of women had recurring symptoms with a median number of 2 symptoms. The most common were back pain (45%), fatigue (34%), bloating (27%), constipation (24%), abdominal pain (22%), and urinary symptoms (16%). Comparing ovarian cancer cases to clinic controls resulted in an odds ratio of 7.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.8-14.2) for increased abdominal size; 3.6 (95% CI, 1.8-7.0) for bloating; 2.5 (95% CI, 1.3-4.8) for urinary urgency; and 2.2 (95% CI, 1.2-3.9) for pelvic pain. Women with malignant masses typically experienced symptoms 20 to 30 times per month and had significantly more symptoms of higher severity and more recent onset than women with benign masses or controls. The combination of bloating, increased abdominal size, and urinary symptoms was found in 43% of those with cancer but in only 8% of those presenting to primary care clinics. CONCLUSIONS: Symptoms that are more severe or frequent than expected and of recent onset warrant further diagnostic investigation because they are more likely to be associated with both benign and malignant ovarian masses.

Use of a postpartum hemorrhage simulator for instruction and evaluation of residents.

OBJECTIVE: Postpartum hemorrhage is a common and potentially life-threatening obstetric emergency. We sought to create a realistic simulation and validate a standardized grading form to evaluate competency in the management of postpartum hemorrhage. METHODS: Residents from 3 programs underwent training with a postpartum hemorrhage simulation using a standard obstetric birthing model equipped with an inflatable uterus to simulate uterine atony. All simulations were graded by staff physicians with a standardized grading sheet constructed from the current literature on the topic. Residents were expected to recognize the hemorrhage and take appropriate steps, including asking the assistant to administer medications, to correct the problem. Objective and subjective performance was measured with standardized grading sheets, and results were analyzed for reliability using Cronbach α and intraclass correlation coefficients. This project was conducted in accordance with the hospital Institutional Review Board policies at each institution. RESULTS: Forty residents from 3 institutions underwent simulation training. The majority were unable to correct the hemorrhage within 5 minutes and almost half also made at least 1 error, either the dose or route, in the medications they requested. Reliability was evaluated with Cronbach α and demonstrated the grading sheets were valid and had good interrater reliability. DISCUSSION: A simulated postpartum hemorrhage scenario can identify important deficiencies in resident knowledge and performance, with no risk to patients. The standardized grading form worked well for our purposes and was reliable in our study. Further testing is needed to evaluate whether the training improves performance in real-life hemorrhages.

Development of an ovarian cancer symptom index: possibilities for earlier detection.

BACKGROUND: Currently, screening for ovarian cancer is not recommended for the general population. Targeting women with specific symptoms for screening has been evaluated only recently, because it was believed that symptoms had limited specificity. METHODS: A case-control study of 149 women with ovarian cancer, including 255 women who were in a screening program and 233 women who were referred for pelvic/abdominal ultrasound, was conducted by inviting women to complete a survey of symptoms. Patients were divided randomly into an exploratory group and a confirmatory group. Symptom types, frequency, severity, and duration were compared between cases and controls. Logistic regression analyses were used to determine which factors independently predicted cancer in the exploratory group and then were used to develop a symptom index, which was tested for sensitivity and specificity in the confirmatory group. RESULTS: Symptoms that were associated significantly with ovarian cancer were pelvic/abdominal pain, urinary urgency/frequency, increased abdominal size/bloating, and difficulty eating/feeling full when they were present for <1 year and occurred >12 days per month. In a logistic regression analysis, symptoms that were associated independently with cancer were pelvic/abdominal pain (P < .001), increased abdominal size/bloating (P<.001), and difficulty eating/feeling full (P = .010). A symptom index was considered positive if any of those 6 symptoms occurred >12 times per month but were present for <1 year. In the confirmatory sample, the index had a sensitivity of 56.7 for early-stage disease and 79.5% for advanced-stage disease. Specificity was 90% for women age >50 years and 86.7% for women age <50 years. CONCLUSIONS: Specific symptoms in conjunction with their frequency and duration were useful in identifying women with ovarian cancer. A symptom index may be useful for identifying women who are at risk.

Assessment of resident surgical skills: is testing feasible?

OBJECTIVE: We have previously shown that in a single residency program objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) is a reliable and valid method of assessing surgical competency. Our goal was to establish feasibility of this evaluation instrument when administered at multiple residency programs throughout the US, and assess the impact of a laboratory-based surgical curriculum on results. STUDY DESIGN: An OSATS exam was administered to 116 residents from 5 residency programs. One of the residency programs had participated in a comprehensive surgical curriculum over a 4-year period of time. The exam consisted of 3 open and 3 laparoscopic tasks. Residents were graded by both a blinded and unblinded examiner with task-specific checklist, global rating scale, pass/fail assessment, and tasks were timed. All tasks were performed on life-like models. RESULTS: Examinations were successfully completed at all sites. Each exam required 90 minutes of resident time. Reliability indices calculated with Cronbach's alpha were .97 for overall global rating and .95 for checklists. Interrater reliability between blinded and unblinded examiners ranged from .71 to .97 for individual tasks and was .95 overall. Assessment of construct validity (the ability to distinguish among residency levels) found significant differences among the residents for both blinded and unblinded examiners for all evaluation outcomes except time. For the test overall, the global rating scale showed significant differences among all 4 residency levels. The checklist showed significant differences at three levels (PGY3-4 >PGY2 >PGY1). Approximate cost for replaceable items was 40 US dollars to 150 per resident depending on which tasks were chosen. Comparison of scores between residents who received a laboratory-based curriculum and those who did not revealed significantly higher scores and shorter time to complete tasks for the group who received additional training. CONCLUSION: Large-scale testing has confirmed that OSATS is an objective, reliable, and valid method to assess surgical skills, and can easily be administered in most residency programs. A laboratory-based surgical curriculum improved test results and reduced time to complete tasks.

Burnout in chairs of obstetrics and gynecology: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of burnout in chairs of academic departments of obstetrics and gynecology, identify important stressors, and develop strategies to treat and prevent burnout. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a cross-sectional study of 131 chairs in the United States and Puerto Rico. We used a 6-part questionnaire focusing on demographics, potential stressors, satisfaction with personal and professional life, self-efficacy, burnout as measured by the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS), and support from the spouse/partner and family. Statistical analyses were performed with the chi(2) test for categorical variables and t test or analysis of variance for continuous variables. RESULTS: Questionnaires were returned from 119 chairs, 110 men and 9 women, a response rate of 91%. Chairs had served an average of 7.2 years. They worked an average of 67.4 hours each week, spending 45% of their time in administrative duties, 31% in patient care, 15% in teaching, and 8% in research. Female chairs worked significantly more hours per week than male chairs, 76.9 versus 66.7 hours (P =.005). Chairs who had served >10 years worked significantly fewer hours each week than did those who had been chairs <5 years, 63.2 versus 69.2 hours (P =.04). The most significant stressors were hospital/departmental budget deficits, Medicare/Medicaid billing audits, loss of key faculty, union disputes, and faculty, resident, and staff dismissals. To deal with stress, chairs most often spent time with family and friends. Twenty-two percent of chairs were somewhat-very dissatisfied with their positions. The MBI-HSS revealed a high subscale score for emotional exhaustion, moderate-high for depersonalization, and high for personal accomplishment. High emotional exhaustion was observed in younger chairs, those who worked nearly 70 hours each week, and those with less spouse/partner support. Burnout was more common in new chairs. CONCLUSION: Burnout in chairs of obstetrics and gynecology is characterized by a high level of emotional exhaustion, moderate-high depersonalization, and high personal accomplishment. These findings should be used to develop programs to improve the psychologic well-being of our academic leaders.

Objective structured assessment of technical skills for episiotomy repair.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to estimate the reliability and validity of an objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) for midline episiotomy repair using a lifelike anatomic model. STUDY DESIGN: Eighteen residents were administered an episiotomy OSATS. Two evaluators independently completed an objective score sheet assessing six key components of the repair, seven global surgical skills, and a pass/fail score for each resident. Residents also completed an anonymous self-assessment. RESULTS: Reliability indices were 0.95 for the checklist and global surgical skills rating. Construct validity found significant differences on the checklist, global surgical skills, and pass/fail score sheets by residency level. Residents more often assessed their own global surgical skills performance lower than the independent evaluators. Surprisingly, 61% (11/18) of the residents failed the assessment, including all postgraduate year 1 and postgraduate year 2 residents. CONCLUSION: Episiotomy OSATS that used task-specific and global checklists provide a reliable and valid method of assessing resident skills in this anatomic model, and performance correlates with resident year level of training.

Evaluation of postoperative fever: usefulness and cost-effectiveness of routine workup.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine which investigative tools are of most clinical benefit in a routine postoperative fever workup and to describe which postoperative patients require closer investigation at the time of fever. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective analysis of 676 patients undergoing exploratory laparotomy for a gynecologic condition who had a fever of 38.0 degrees C (100.4 degrees F) or higher. Charts were reviewed for independent variables related to their diagnosis and surgery in addition to any workup for fever. An estimate of the total charge of a routine workup was performed. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS for Windows, version 10.1. RESULTS: We found 194 patients (29%) had a postoperative temperature of 38.0 degrees C or higher. A laboratory/radiographic workup for the fever was performed in 119 women (61%). Only 15% of urinalyses, 14% of urine cultures, 7% of blood cultures, 14% of chest radiographs, and 17% of sputum cultures were positive. There were several significant differences between those with and without serious infections that can guide management of postoperative patients. The total charge for laboratory/radiographic workup was 48,432 US dollars or 2201 US dollars per serious infection diagnosed. CONCLUSION: Approximately 29% of women undergoing laparotomy by gynecologists have a fever of 38.0 degrees C (100.4 degrees F) or higher. We found the majority of fever workups were of low clinical yield and added moderate cost. Significant infection is associated with surgery for malignancy, bowel resection, number of febrile days, higher fever, and moderately increased white blood cell count. Only patients with these characteristics are most likely to benefit from laboratory and/or radiographic workup of fever.

Interleukin-18 in the plasma of women with preeclampsia.

OBJECTIVE: Interleukin-18 (IL-18) is a proinflammatory cytokine capable of stimulating interferon gamma and tumor necrosis factor-alpha production. Our purpose was to determine whether abnormal levels of IL-18 in maternal plasma correlate with the diagnosis of preeclampsia. STUDY DESIGN: A case control study design was used to enroll 61 patients: controls (n = 31) and preeclamptic women (n = 30). A standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay measured plasma IL-18. Statistical methods included Student t tests and chi(2) tests. RESULTS: Mean IL-18 levels were lower in preeclampsia than in controls (185 +/- 74 pg/mL vs 224 +/- 75 pg/mL, P =.053). Administration of betamethasone (BMZ) and/or hydralazine (HYD) was significantly associated with a lower IL-18 compared with controls (159 +/- 50 pg/mL vs 224 +/- 75 pg/mL, P =.002). After women who received BMZ or HYD were excluded, levels of IL-18 in preeclampsia were similar to those of controls (213 +/- 87 pg/mL, P =.69). There was no association between gestational age and IL-18. CONCLUSION: Lower IL-18 was associated with administration of either BMZ or HYD. After patients receiving these medications were excluded, IL-18 levels were similar in controls and preeclamptic women. IL-18 was not associated with gestational age.

Surgical skills assessment: a blinded examination of obstetrics and gynecology residents.

OBJECTIVE: We have previously shown that objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) is an innovative, reliable, and valid method of assessing surgical skills. Our goal was to establish the feasibility, reliability, and validity of our surgical skills assessment instrument when administered in a blinded fashion. STUDY DESIGN: A 7-station OSATS was administered to 16 obstetric and gynecology residents from Madigan Army Medical Center. The test included laparoscopic (salpingostomy, intracorporeal knot, and ligation of vessels with clips) and open abdominal procedures (subcuticular closure, bladder neck suspension, enterotomy repair, and abdominal wall closure). All tasks were performed with lifelike surgical models. Residents were timed and assessed at each station with 3 methods of scoring: task-specific checklist, global rating scale, and pass/fail grade. Each resident was evaluated by one examiner blinded as to the postgraduate year level and one examiner who had previously worked with the resident. RESULTS: Assessment of construct validity (the ability to distinguish between resident levels) found significant differences on the checklist, global rating scale, and pass/fail grade by residency level for both blinded and unblinded examiners. Reliability indices calculated with Cronbach's alpha were.82 for the checklists and.93 for the global rating scale. Overall interrater reliability between blinded and unblinded examiners was 0.95 for global rating scale and ranged from 0.74 to 0.97 for the checklists. The cost to administer the exam for the 16 residents was approximately $1000. CONCLUSIONS: OSATS administered in either a blinded or unblinded fashion can assess residents' surgical skills with a high degree of reliability and validity. This study provides further evidence that OSATS can be used to establish surgical competence.