Role of a Pharmacist in Postdischarge Care for Patients With Kidney Disease: A Scoping Review.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to explore and describe the role of pharmacists in providing postdischarge care to patients with kidney disease. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase (Elsevier), CINAHL (Ebscohost), Web of Science Core Collection, and Scopus were searched on January 30, 2023. Publication date limits were not included. Search terms were identified based on 3 concepts: kidney disease, pharmacy services, and patient discharge. Experimental, quasi-experimental, observational, and qualitative studies, or study protocols, describing the pharmacist's role in providing postdischarge care for patients with kidney disease, excluding kidney transplant recipients, were eligible. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Six unique interventions were described in 10 studies meeting inclusion criteria. DATA SYNTHESIS: Four interventions targeted patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) during hospitalization and 2 evaluated patients with pre-existing chronic kidney disease. Pharmacists were a multidisciplinary care team (MDCT) member in 5 interventions and were the sole provider in 1. Roles commonly identified include medication review, medication reconciliation, medication action plan formation, kidney function assessment, drug dose adjustments, and disease education. Some studies showed improvements in diagnostic coding, laboratory monitoring, medication therapy problem (MTP) resolution, and patient education; prevention of hospital readmission was inconsistent. Limitations include lack of standardized reporting of kidney disease, transitions of care processes, and differences in outcomes evaluated. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: This review identifies potential roles of a pharmacist as part of a postdischarge MDCT for patients with varying degrees of kidney disease. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacist's role in providing postdischarge care to patients with kidney disease is inconsistent. Multidisciplinary care teams including a pharmacist provided consistent identification and resolution of MTPs, improved patient education, and increased self-awareness of diagnosis.

Evaluating the Impact of a Pharmacist-Led Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention at Discharge in a Community, Nonteaching Hospital.

INTRODUCTION: Approximately 30% to 50% of hospital discharge antimicrobials are inappropriate. Limited data exist on approaches to improve antimicrobial prescribing practices at the time of discharge from a community hospital. Objective: To assess the impact of a comprehensive pharmacist-led antimicrobial stewardship intervention at discharge. METHODS: We conducted a quasi-experimental, pre-post study. A biphasic intervention took place on 2 medicine units from November 2019 to May 2020 at a community hospital. Baseline data were collected, followed by prescriber education on antimicrobial stewardship to both units (education phase). Next, a pharmacist-led intervention took place on one unit (intervention phase). The primary outcome was composite appropriateness of an oral antimicrobial prescribed to an adult at the time of discharge, defined by narrow spectrum of activity, dosing, and duration of therapy. The primary outcome was assessed using Fisher exact test. RESULTS: Baseline composite appropriateness was 30% (n = 12) on the control unit and 30.8% (n = 20) on the intervention unit. From baseline to posteducation, no significant change in composite appropriateness was found on the control (30% to 26.7%, P = 0.256) or intervention (30.8% to 19.4%, P = 0.09) unit. There was no significant difference between the education to intervention phase (26.7% vs 35%, P = 0.254) on the control unit. On the intervention unit, a significant difference in composite appropriateness was found from the education to intervention phase (19.4% vs 47.8%, P = 0.017). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: A pharmacist-led intervention improved appropriateness of oral antimicrobials prescribed at discharge. One-time education was insufficient for improving antimicrobial stewardship.

Managing the Drug-Drug Interaction With Apixaban and Primidone: A Case Report.

The management of the drug-drug interaction (DDI) between primidone, a moderate to strong cytochrome P-450 (CYP) 3A4 inducer, and apixaban, a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) and CYP3A4 substrate is complex and limited evidence exists to guide management. This case report describes a 65-year-old male, receiving primidone for essential tremor who developed an acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) requiring oral anticoagulation. DOACs are preferred over vitamin K antagonists for acute VTE treatment. Based on patient-specific variables, provider preference, and the avoidance of other DDIs, apixaban was selected. Apixaban's package insert recommends avoiding use with concomitant strong P-gp and CYP3A4 inducers due to the decreased exposure to apixaban; however, no recommendations are available for drugs that are moderate to strong CYP3A4 inducers and lack P-gp effects. Given that phenobarbital is an active metabolite of primidone, extrapolation of evidence from such literature is theoretical but provides insight into the management of this multi-faceted DDI. In the absence of the ability to monitor plasma apixaban levels, a management strategy of avoidance with a washout period of primidone based on pharmacokinetic parameters was used in this case. Additional evidence is needed to clearly understand the degree of impact and clinical significance of the DDI between apixaban and primidone.

Evaluating the Safety of Trough Versus Area Under the Curve (AUC)-Based Dosing Method of Vancomycin With Concomitant Piperacillin-Tazobactam.

Background: Vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam (VPT) is a common antibiotic combination used in hospitals, and there has been increasing data indicating that the combination is associated with increased rates of acute kidney injury (AKI). It is unclear if the dosing method of vancomycin would mitigate the risk of AKI seen with VPT. Objective: To observe and compare incidence of AKI in patients on VPT when using the trough-based dosing method versus the area-under-the-curve (AUC)-based dosing method. Methods: This was a multi-center, retrospective, observational study at 3 community hospitals. Adults receiving at least 48 hours of VPT were included. Patients with severe renal dysfunction, pregnant patients, prisoners, and patients with central nervous system infections, or malignancy were excluded. The primary outcome was incidence of AKI as defined by the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) criteria. Results: A total of 300 patients were included in the study; 150 patients in both the trough and AUC groups. A total of 23 patients (15%) in the trough group and 17 patients (11%) in the AUC group met the primary outcome (odds ratio [OR]: 0.7058, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.3603, 1.3826], P = .3098). Conclusion and Relevance: The incidence of AKI was lower in the AUC group compared with the trough group; however, this was not significant. The results of our study suggest that there is no difference between incidence of AKI when using trough- or AUC-based dosing in those receiving VPT. Because of the small sample size and retrospective nature of the study, more data are needed.

Oral Vancomycin for Secondary Prophylaxis of Clostridium difficile Infection.

OBJECTIVE: To summarize and critically appraise the evidence regarding oral vancomycin prophylaxis (OVP) to prevent recurrent Clostridium difficile infections (RCDIs), identify potential consequences of this emerging practice, and highlight future directions of study. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE literature search of English-language publications from 1947 through September 2018 was performed using the search terms vancomycin and C difficile and prophylaxis. Clinical trials were identified on the National Library of Medicine clinical trials registry. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All clinical studies (n = 3) assessing oral vancomycin for secondary prophylaxis of C difficile infection (CDI) were evaluated by all authors. Other search results and references in selected publications were used for background and discussion. DATA SYNTHESIS: OVP reduced the risk of RCDI in high-risk patients taking systemic antibiotics. Variable dosing regimens and lack of safety data are limitations. OVP may have an adverse impact on the gastrointestinal microbiome, but this was not examined in the clinical studies. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: Although current studies are limited by methodological concerns, clinicians can consider vancomycin 125 mg orally once or twice daily in high-risk patients receiving broad-spectrum antibacterial agents. Results of ongoing trials will define the most appropriate regimen and its impact on outcomes, including collateral damage. CONCLUSIONS: OVP reduces the risk of RCDIs and should be considered on a case-by-case basis. Caution is warranted before routine use is implemented because the impact on long-term outcomes has not been assessed and the optimal regimen has not been defined.

Signals of Muscle Relaxant Drug Interactions Associated with Unintentional Traumatic Injury: A Population-Based Screening Study.

BACKGROUND: Use of muscle relaxants is rapidly increasing in the USA. Little is understood about the role of drug interactions in the known association between muscle relaxants and unintentional traumatic injury, a clinically important endpoint causing substantial morbidity, disability, and death. OBJECTIVE: We examined potential associations between concomitant drugs (i.e., precipitants) taken with muscle relaxants (affected drugs, i.e., objects) and hospital presentation for unintentional traumatic injury. METHODS: In a series of self-controlled case series studies, we screened to identify drug interaction signals for muscle relaxant + precipitant pairs and unintentional traumatic injury. We used Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database, 2000-2019. We included new users of a muscle relaxant, aged 16-90 years, who were dispensed at least one precipitant drug and experienced an unintentional traumatic injury during the observation period. We classified each observation day as precipitant exposed or precipitant unexposed. The outcome was an emergency department or inpatient discharge diagnosis for unintentional traumatic injury. We used conditional Poisson regression to estimate rate ratios adjusting for time-varying confounders and then accounted for multiple estimation via semi-Bayes shrinkage. RESULTS: We identified 74,657 people who initiated muscle relaxants and experienced an unintentional traumatic injury, in whom we studied concomitant use of 2543 muscle relaxant + precipitant pairs. After adjusting for time-varying confounders, 16 (0.6%) pairs were statistically significantly and positively associated with injury, and therefore deemed signals of a potential drug interaction. Among signals, semi-Bayes shrunk, confounder-adjusted rate ratios ranged from 1.29 (95% confidence interval 1.04-1.62) for baclofen + sertraline to 2.28 (95% confidence interval 1.14-4.55) for methocarbamol + lamotrigine. CONCLUSIONS: Using real-world data, we identified several new signals of potential muscle relaxant drug interactions associated with unintentional traumatic injury. Only one among 16 signals is currently reported in a major drug interaction knowledge base. Future studies should seek to confirm or refute these signals.

Successful Use of Apixaban for Paget-Schroetter Syndrome in a Pediatric Patient.

Paget-Schroetter syndrome (PSS) is a rare syndrome that typically develops in young, healthy males subjected to repetitive overhead motions resulting in compression and thrombosis of the subclavian vein. This "effort thrombosis" typically occurs acutely in patients with specific anatomic variations within the thoracic outlet and is treated by a combination of surgical and pharmacologic interventions. There is a paucity of literature regarding this syndrome, particularly surrounding pharmacotherapy, and in the treatment of pediatric patients. This case report documents the pharmacologic treatment of a 17-year-old, male, baseball player with confirmed PSS. Apixaban was selected as the anticoagulant therapy of choice following the determination of its safety and anticipated efficacy for this pediatric patient. Upon admission, anticoagulation was initiated with intravenous heparin and transitioned to warfarin for 1 dose. On day 2, the patient was discharged with apixaban 10 mg twice daily for 7 days, followed by 5 mg twice daily. One week later, he underwent catheter-directed thrombectomy, followed by thoracic outlet decompression with resection of the first rib. Apixaban therapy was continued for 10 weeks after the procedure to diminish the risk of any further thrombotic events. This pediatric patient with PSS was successfully treated with apixaban in conjunction with surgical management. Treatment with apixaban resulted in continued resolution of thrombus after follow-up, with no complications reported thereafter. Further research is needed to definitively determine the safety and efficacy of apixaban for the use of pediatric anticoagulation, particularly in upper extremity deep vein thrombosis.

Population-Based Signals of Antidepressant Drug Interactions Associated With Unintentional Traumatic Injury.

Antidepressants are very widely used and associated with traumatic injury, yet little is known about their potential for harmful drug interactions. We aimed to identify potential drug interaction signals by assessing concomitant medications (precipitant drugs) taken with individual antidepressants (object drugs) that were associated with unintentional traumatic injury. We conducted pharmacoepidemiologic screening of 2000-2015 Optum Clinformatics data, identifying drug interaction signals by performing self-controlled case series studies for antidepressant + precipitant pairs and injury. We included persons aged 16-90 years codispensed an antidepressant and ≥ 1 precipitant drug(s), with an injury during antidepressant therapy. We classified antidepressant person-days as either precipitant-exposed or precipitant-unexposed. The outcome was an emergency department or inpatient discharge diagnosis for unintentional traumatic injury. We used conditional Poisson regression to calculate confounder adjusted rate ratios (RRs) and accounted for multiple estimation via semi-Bayes shrinkage. We identified 330,884 new users of antidepressants who experienced an injury. Among such persons, we studied concomitant use of 7,953 antidepressant + precipitant pairs. Two hundred fifty-six (3.2%) pairs were positively associated with injury and deemed potential drug interaction signals; 22 of these signals had adjusted RRs > 2.00. Adjusted RRs ranged from 1.06 (95% confidence interval: 1.00-1.12, P = 0.04) for citalopram + gabapentin to 3.06 (1.42-6.60) for nefazodone + levonorgestrel. Sixty-five (25.4%) signals are currently reported in a seminal drug interaction knowledgebase. We identified numerous new population-based signals of antidepressant drug interactions associated with unintentional traumatic injury. Future studies, intended to test hypotheses, should confirm or refute these potential interactions.

Dexmedetomidine Use in a Case of Severe Cancer Pain.

A 58-year-old male with chronic pancreatitis was seen by the palliative care service for pain and agitation related to a recent diagnosis of disseminated abdominal cancer. Increasing symptom burden, including pain and nausea, in the face of escalating doses of multiple opioid and sedative medications resulted in the addition of dexmedetomidine to successfully control his symptoms. Visceral sensitization related to his chronic pancreatitis likely increased his pain perception and required a multimodal approach to control his symptoms.