Derivation and external validation of the SIMPLICITY score as a simple immune-based risk score to predict infection in kidney transplant recipients.

Existing approaches for infection risk stratification in kidney transplant recipients are suboptimal. Here, we aimed to develop and validate a weighted score integrating non-pathogen-specific immune parameters and clinical variables to predict the occurrence of post-transplant infectious complications. To this end, we retrospectively analyzed a single-center derivation cohort of 410 patients undergoing kidney transplantation in 2008-2013 in Madrid. Peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations, serum immunoglobulin and complement levels were measured at one-month post-transplant. The primary and secondary outcomes were overall and bacterial infection through month six. A point score was derived from a logistic regression model and prospectively applied on a validation cohort of 522 patients undergoing kidney transplantation at 16 centers throughout Spain in 2014-2015. The SIMPLICITY score consisted of the following variables measured at month one after transplantation: C3 level, CD4+ T-cell count, CD8+ T-cell count, IgG level, glomerular filtration rate, recipient age, and infection within the first month. The discrimination capacity in the derivation and validation cohorts was good for overall (areas under the receiver operating curve of 0.774 and 0.730) and bacterial infection (0.767 and 0.734, respectively). The cumulative incidence of overall infection significantly increased across risk categories in the derivation (low-risk 13.7%; intermediate-risk, 35.9%; high-risk 77.6%) and validation datasets (10.2%, 28.9% and 50.4%, respectively). Thus, the SIMPLICITY score, based on easily available immune parameters, allows for stratification of kidney transplant recipients at month one according to their expected risk of subsequent infection.

Bone fractures and lumbar mineral density after renal transplantation. A long-term cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this work was to investigate the association of vertebral and peripheral fractures 10 yr after grafting with bone metabolic markers and body mass density (BMD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty-eight recipients with stable graft function were included in a cross-sectional study. Graft function, biochemical mineral metabolism markers and body mass density (DEXA) were measured. Vertebral fractures were assessed by a semiquantitative analysis of lateral spine X-ray exam. RESULTS: At the time of the study, intact parathyroid hormone levels were 127.5 ± 78.4 pg/mL and serum calcidiol 20.4 ± 9.3 ng/mL. DEXA showed osteopenia in 47% and osteoporosis in 23% at lumbar spine, 51% and 14% at femoral neck, and 53% and 8% at trochanter. Eighty-five recipients presented vertebral fractures, 69 mild and 16 moderate/severe fractures. In the multivariate analysis, vertebral fractures were associated with older age (p = 0.010), length of follow-up (p = 0.022) and trochanter T-score (p = 0.038). Twenty-three patients presented peripheral fractures and 19 of them also had vertebral fractures. Patients with peripheral fractures were younger, mostly women and had lower BMD. CONCLUSIONS: Vertebral fractures were associated with lower BMD at trochanter. Most fractures were mild and were several times more frequent than in general population. Their clinical significance needs to be determined.

Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus compared with ciclosporin-A in renal transplantation: 7-year observational results.

The European Tacrolimus versus Ciclosporin-A Microemulsion (CsA-ME) Renal Transplantation Study demonstrated that tacrolimus decreased acute rejection rates at 6 months. Primary endpoints of this investigator-initiated, observational 7-year follow-up study were acute rejection rates, patient and graft survival rates, and a composite endpoint (BPAR, graft loss, and patient death). We analyzed data from the original intent-to-treat population (n = 557; 286 tacrolimus, 271 CsA-ME). A total of 237 tacrolimus and 208 CsA-ME patients provided data. At 7 years, Kaplan-Meier estimated rates of patients free from BPAR were 77.1% in the tacrolimus arm and 59.9% in the CsA-ME arm, graft survival rates amounted to 82.6% and 80.6%, and patient survival rates to 89.9% and 88.1%. Estimated combined endpoint-free survival rates were 60.2% in the tacrolimus arm and 47.0% in the CsA-ME arm (P = <0.0001). A higher number of patients from the CsA-ME arm crossed over to tacrolimus during 7 year follow-up: 19.7% vs. 7.9% (P = <0.002). More patients in the tacrolimus group stopped steroids and received immunosuppressive monotherapy. Significantly, more CsA-ME patients received lipid-lowering medication and experienced cosmetic and cardiovascular adverse events. Tacrolimus-treated renal transplant recipients had significantly higher combined endpoint-free survival rates mainly driven by lower acute rejection rates despite less immunosuppressive medication at 7 years.

Are low levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases or malignancies in renal transplantation?

BACKGROUND: Observational studies in healthy people suggest an inverse relationship between 25-hydroxy-vitamin D (25(OH)D levels) and cardiovascular diseases and malignancies. We performed an observational prospective study in renal transplant recipients to investigate the effects of vitamin D deficiency on cardiovascular and malignancy risks. METHODS: From 389 renal transplant recipients, 331 with a functioning graft at 12 months were included in the study. Mineral metabolism parameters were measured at 1, 3, 4 and 12 months. Information regarding the cardiovascular events and malignancies were collected from an electronic database. RESULTS: According to the 1-year mean of 25(OH)D levels, 75 recipients (22.7%) had a normal vitamin D status, 161 (48.6%) had insufficiency and 95 (28.7%) had deficiency in vitamin D levels. During the follow-up, 80 recipients presented at least one cardiovascular event. The total cardiovascular diseases included: 27 patients with coronary diseases, 25 with cardiac failure, 18 with arrhythmia, 11 with acute cerebrovascular events and 19 with peripheral vascular disease. Cardiovascular events were not associated with 25(OH)D levels or vitamin D status, and the 10-year cumulative incidence was 29.3% for normal vitamin D status and 31.6% for insufficiency and 51.9% for deficiency (P = 0.216). Furthermore, Cox univariate analysis showed no association between cardiovascular events and vitamin D levels or vitamin D status. In addition, 53 recipients presented at least one malignancy: 33 non-melanoma skin malignancies and 20 non-skin malignancies (5 prostate, 3 kidney and urinary tract, 2 colon, 2 lung, 2 lymphoma, 2 breast and 4 from other locations). The cumulative incidence of malignancies was 21.3% for normal vitamin D status, 22.7% for insufficiency and 16.7% for deficiency (P = 0.818). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggested that low vitamin D levels were not associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases or malignancies. However, due to the small number of patients and events, the results should not be considered as definitive. Additional studies with a higher number of patients are required to elucidate the true impact of vitamin D status on cardiovascular and malignancy risks.

Risk factors for graft loss and mortality after renal transplantation according to recipient age: a prospective multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: To describe the causes of graft loss, patient death and survival figures in kidney transplant patients in Spain based on the recipient's age. METHODS: The results at 5 years of post-transplant cardiovascular disease (CVD) patients, taken from a database on CVD, were prospectively analysed, i.e. a total of 2600 transplanted patients during 2000-2002 in 14 Spanish renal transplant units, most of them receiving their organ from cadaver donors. Patients were grouped according to the recipient's age: Group A: <40 years, Group B: 40-60 years and Group C: >60 years. The most frequent immunosuppressive regimen included tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids. RESULTS: Patients were distributed as follows: 25.85% in Group A (>40 years), 50.9% in Group B (40-60 years) and 23.19% in Group C (>60). The 5-year survival for the different age groups was 97.4, 90.8 and 77.7%, respectively. Death-censored graft survival was 88, 84.2 and 79.1%, respectively, and non death-censored graft survival was 82.1, 80.3 and 64.7%, respectively. Across all age groups, CVD and infections were the most frequent cause of death. The main causes of graft loss were chronic allograft dysfunction in patients <40 years old and death with functioning graft in the two remaining groups. In the multivariate analysis for graft survival, only elevated creatinine levels and proteinuria >1 g at 6 months post-transplantation were statistically significant in the three age groups. The patient survival multivariate analysis did not achieve a statistically significant common factor in the three age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Five-year results show an excellent recipient survival and graft survival, especially in the youngest age group. Death with functioning graft is the leading cause of graft loss in patients >40 years. Early improvement of renal function and proteinuria together with strict control of cardiovascular risk factors are mandatory.

Improvement in late renal allograft survival between 1990 and 2002 in Spain: results from a multicentre case-control study.

Epidemiological studies have failed to show an improvement in graft survival beyond 1 year after kidney transplantation possibly because of an increased number of expanded donors and older recipients. Thus, we performed a case-control study matching patients transplanted in different eras by donor and recipient characteristics. We considered renal transplant recipients included in the database of the Spanish Chronic Allograft Dysfunction Study Group in 1990, 1994, 1998 and 2002 (n = 4842). We matched patients from these cohorts considering the following variables: donor and recipient age, cause of donor death, hepatitis C virus, panel reactive antibodies and re-transplantation. We identified a total of 896 patients distributed in four cohorts of 224 matched patients. Between 1990 and 2002, the use of cyclosporin decreased (96%, 94%, 80% and 23% respectively, P = 0.001), while the use of tacrolimus increased (0%, 1%, 15% and 63% respectively, P = 0.001) and the prevalence of acute rejection decreased (46%, 37.9%, 20.6% and 15.8% respectively, P < 0.001). One-year serum creatinine was 1.63 +/- 0.66, 1.64 +/- 0.70, 1.44 +/- 0.52 and 1.38 +/- 0.75 respectively, P = 0.001. Graft survival beyond the first year between 1990 and 2002 significantly improved while patient survival did not. Transplant outcome has improved between 1990 and 2002 when donors and recipients of similar characteristics are compared.

A randomized trial of basiliximab with three different patterns of cyclosporin A initiation in renal transplant from expanded criteria donors and at high risk of delayed graft function.

This study assays therapy with basiliximab and different patterns of cyclosporin A (CsA) initiation in renal transplant (RT) recipients from expanded criteria donors (ECD) and at high risk of delayed graft function (DGF). A multicentre six-month open-label randomized trial with three parallel groups treated with basiliximab plus steroids, mycophenolate mofetil and different patterns of CsA initiation: early within 24 h post-RT at 3 mg/kg/d (Group 1; n = 38), and at 5 mg/kg/d (Group 2; n = 40), or delayed after 7-10 d at 5 mg/kg/d (Group 3; n = 36). There were no differences among groups in six months GFR (43.1 +/- 12, 48.0 +/- 14 and 47.2 +/- 17 mL/min, respectively), DGF (Group 1: 31%, Group 2: 37%, Group 3: 42%), nor biopsy-proven acute rejection, although clinically treated and biopsy-proven acute rejection was significantly higher in Group 3 (25%) vs. Group 1 (5.3%, p < 0.05). At six months no differences were observed in death-censored graft survival or patient survival. Induction therapy with basiliximab and three CsA-ME initiation patterns in RT recipients from ECD and at high risk of DGF presented good renal function and graft survival at six months. Late onset group did not achieve improvement in DGF rate and showed a higher incidence of clinically treated and biopsy-proven acute rejection.

Low toxicity regimens in renal transplantation: a country subset analysis of the Symphony study.

Regional transplant practices may affect clinical outcomes within multinational studies. This study evaluated whether the overall results from the Symphony study can be generalized to the participating countries. De novo adult renal transplant recipients (n = 1645) were randomized to receive standard-dose cyclosporine, or daclizumab induction plus low-dose cyclosporine, low-dose tacrolimus,or low-dose sirolimus, all in addition to mycophenolate mofetil and steroids. Data for the highest patient-recruiting countries, Spain (n = 275),Germany (n = 316) and Turkey (n = 258), were compared. Patient transplant characteristics were different among the country subsets; only deceased donors in Spain, more expanded criteria donors in Germany, and mainly living donors in Turkey. Efficacy results for the three countries were consistent with that of the overall study - renal function and biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR)rates were superior with low-dose tacrolimus. Turkey had higher mean calculated glomerular filtration rate across all treatment groups (60.6-72.2 ml/min)compared with that of Spain (51.1-57.5 ml/min) and Germany (51.3-62.9 ml/min). Spain and Turkey had lower BPAR rates across the four treatment groups compared with the overall study; Germany had much higher rates(21.0-54.2%). These findings confirm the general applicability of the Symphony study results and highlight the importance of inclusion of patients from different geographic origins in randomized clinical trials.

Salvage of accidentally sectioned peritoneal catheter: report of three cases.

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) accounts for 6% of patients on maintenance dialysis. There are several factors responsible for this low prevalence. Transfer of patients to hemodialysis when any problem in the technique is present is probably one of the most frequent reasons. Thus, when a problem in the PD catheter appears they are routinely removed instead of subjecting to salvage procedures. We report three cases of accidental cutting of the peritoneal catheter and present the steps taken to salvage the catheter without discontinuing the technique and avoiding withdrawal of the catheter.

Very early serum creatinine as a surrogate marker for graft survival beyond 10 years.

BACKGROUND: Available studies of early serum creatinine (SCr) as a surrogate marker for long-term graft loss are multicenter, registry-based or limited to 5- to 7-year survival. METHODS: This was a single-center observational retrospective study. SCr during the first year post-kidney transplant as an independent variable in determining long-term (>10-year) graft survival in 754 first cadaver kidney transplants was assessed with univariate and multivariate models. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier survival estimates showed that recipient female sex, a transplant procedure performed after 1997, donor age under 55 years, immunosuppression including tacrolimus and/or mycophenolate mofetil and absence of acute rejection, were significantly related to better long-term graft survival. SCr at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months stratified into 2 mg/dL groups was also strongly related to long-term graft survival. Multivariate Cox models showed that increased SCr at any point during the first year had a higher relative risk for ultimate graft loss. CONCLUSIONS: Early graft function is strongly correlated with long-term graft survival (>or=10 years). Mild differences in SCr (1.5 vs. 1.6-2 mg/dL) are associated with highly significant impact on long-term survival, longer than previously described. However, the "hard" predictive value of SCr as an isolated tool is not strong enough. Other early surrogate end points for graft loss are needed.

[Evaluating renal function and indications for starting dialysis]. / Valoración de la función renal e indicaciones para el inicio de diálisis.

EVALUATION OF THE RENAL FUNCTION: For the follow-up of the graft renal function it must be measured the glomerular filtration rate by means of formulae that use the serum creatinine. The most used equation is the brief formula MDRD. - All patients transplanted must be included in the group of Renal Chronic Disease though the glomerular filtration rate is normal and there is no evidence of renal damage. - The measures of intervention proposed in the classification of the Renal Chronic Disease for its progressive establishment in the stage 1 to 3, must be applied to all the transplanted THE BEGINNING OF DIALYSIS: In spite of receiving attention of Nephrologists along the whole evolution, the patients with chronic dysfunction of the graft that need treatment with dialysis start later and with more uremic complications that the patients who start dialysis for the first time. - To change this trend, it is necessary to consider the treatment with dialysis when the glomerular filtration rate is lower than 15 ml/min/1,73 m2. If there appears any complication related to the uremia that cannot be handled by conservative treatment, the beginning of the dialysis is necessary. THE BEGINNING OF THE DIALYSIS OF PROGRAMMED FORM: The beginning of the dialysis of not programmed form in transplanted patients is difficult to justify if we take into account that such patients, have received nephrological attention along all their evolution. - To get a new vascular access in these patients can be difficult depending on the previous trombosis of arteriovenous fistulas. Therefore, it must be realized a prompt evaluation for de department of vascular surgery to guarantee a suitable vascular access. - As general norm, one must follow the same criterion advised for the not transplanted patient: the vascular access must be considered when the glomerular filtration rate is lower than 20 m/min/1,73 m2. - The patient who is going to be treated by dialysis peritoneal precise a very narrow follow-up to be able to programme the placement of the catheter peritoneal with a minimum of 15 days before beginning the training.

[Choosing the dialysis method for kidney transplant patients with advanced kidney disease]. / Elección de la modalidad de diálisis en la insuficiencia renal avanzada del paciente trasplantado renal.

The choice of the most of dialysis modality after renal graft loss is an unanswered question. Most patients start hemodialysis (HD) in this situation, because of several reasons: 1. In most dialysis programs HD predominates clearly over Peritoneal Dialysis (PD). 2. The star of dialysis in emergency situations makes the physician use HD 3. The fear of infections in case of maintenance of immunosupression to avoid immune response and to keep residual renal function in case of PD. A lot of patients could undergo PD in order to maintain the previous style of life, as an alternative in case of absence of vascular access and to avoid vascular accesses in children. Mortality seems to be greater in patients with graft loss than in those who start dialysis for the first time, although the comparison between both groups is methodologically difficult. However, there is no difference in mortality between patients who start HD and those who start PD. Studies comparing the rate of peritonitis in PD patients in both groups find controversial results. The analysis of the few, retrospective and biased studies which look for differences in patient survival in HD and DP suggests that prognosis of both groups is similar. The choice of dialysis modality must be similar to those patients which begin dialysis for the first time.

[Managing a failed kidney graft. Nephrectomy versus embolisation]. / Manejo del injerto renal fallido. Nefrectomía versus embolización.

The early diagnosis of the graft intolerance syndrome or a subclinical state of chronic inflammation due to a failed kidney allograft, is one of the goals that the nephrologists must fulfill to take a series of measures directed to solve this situation. Fever, haematuria, local pain and/or tenderness are the main clinical criteria to make a diagnosis. However, oftenly there are not any clinical symptoms and only the presence of parameters of chronic inflammation (elevated C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, hypoalbuminemia and anemia resistant to erythropoietin therapy) are signs of this entity. Maintenance of immunosuppressive treatment is not advisable due to the risk of infections as well as the increase in cardiovascular risk (level evidence A). Transplantectomy is the best treatment if there are some associated complications such as allograft infection, neoplasia or high risk of graft rupture. However, surgical treatment is not exempt from risks and it is associated to a considerable rate of complications, with the consequent prolongation of the hospitalization stay. Therefore it is desirable to use less invasive procedures, such as embolization. This could be the first step unless the conditions enumerated in point 3 come up (Level evidence B). It is desirable to use prophylactic antibiotic before the embolization to avoid infectious complications (Level evidence B).

[Retransplant]. / Retrasplante.

Despite the advances in immunosuppressive therapy and in patient care, about 20-30% of patients will have lost their grafts after 3 years and this loss will continue by 3-4% per year. These patients are included in maintenance dialysis programmes and account for 4 to 10% of those admitted every year for maintenance dialysis therapy. Among those patients who loss their grafts 40-60% are included in transplant waiting lists. This increases the number of patients waiting for a graft and raises the dilemma about the rights to be included in deceased donor programmes. A common characteristic of these patients waiting for a second or even third transplant is the presence in the blood of antibodies to HLA antigens. A new transplant is the best therapeutic option for these patients, and the results are quite close to those achieved for the first graft. Moreover, a new transplant improves patient outcome when compared with those remaining in the waiting list. The best results are obtained in diabetic patients and in those between 18 to 50 years old (Evidence C). However, the percentage of patients retransplanted has not varied in the last years, possibly due to the wider criteria adopted on candidate selection that increases the waiting lists (Evidence B). In the second transplant, mismatched HLA-A,B antigens could be repeated if the recipient has not developed specific antibodies to these antigens. Recent cross-match has to be negative. Immunosuppressive therapy is similar to that used with first transplants. Lymphoproliferative diseases, BK virus nephropathy and primary glomerulonephritis do not preclude a second transplant (Evidence C).

Renal transplantation in the modern immunosuppressive era in Spain: four-year results from a multicenter database focus on post-transplant cardiovascular disease.

To evaluate cardiovascular disease (CVD) after renal transplantation we established a CVD database (no-intervention) including all patients transplanted among 2000-2002 in 14 hospitals from Spain (Renal Forum Group) (n=2600). They were prospective followed annually thereafter and we present herein the most important results concerning survival figures and CVD at four years. Mean recipient age was 49.7+/-13.7 years: 16% retransplanted and 12.5% hyperimmunized. Tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids was used in 63%. Acute rejection (AR) rate at 1 year was 14.8%. Graft and patient survival at 48 months were 85.6% (death censored) and 91.7% respectively. The first cause of graft loss was vascular in the first year, death with function during the 2-3 years, and chronic allograft nephropathy at the 4th year. Donor age, time on dialysis, acute tubular necrosis (ATN), AR, SCr at 6 months, the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers in the first year, and systolic blood pressure at 24 months were independent risk factors for graft loss at 4th year. The first cause of death was CVD (predominantly ischemic heart disease (IHD) in the first year). Recipient age, ATN, and SCr at 6 months were independent predictors of mortality. Despite worsening of donor age, comorbidity, and advanced age of recipients, survival figures at four years are considered good in our Spanish non-selected population. Cardiovascular mortality is the most important cause of death and graft loss particularly, IHD in the first year. Therefore, to decrease post-transplant mortality a careful cardiovascular evaluation and treatment in the waiting list and a close follow-up of patients after transplantation is mandatory.

Pretransplant IgA-Anti-Beta 2 Glycoprotein I Antibodies As a Predictor of Early Graft Thrombosis after Renal Transplantation in the Clinical Practice: A Multicenter and Prospective Study.

Background: Graft thrombosis is a devastating complication after renal transplantation. We recently described the association of anti-beta-2-glycoprotein-I (IgA-ab2GP1) antibodies with early graft loss mainly caused by thrombosis in a monocenter study. Methods: Multicenter prospective observational cohort study. Setting and participants: Seven hundred forty patients from five hospitals of the Spanish Forum Renal Group transplanted from 2000 to 2002 were prospectively followed-up for 10 years. Outcomes: Early graft loss and graft loss by thrombosis. Measurements: The presence of IgA anti-B2GP1 antibodies in pretransplant serum was examined using the same methodology in all the patients. Results: At transplantation, 288 patients were positive for IgA-B2GP1 (39%, Group-1) and the remaining were negative (Group-2). Graft loss at 6 months was higher in Group-1 (12.5 vs. 4.2% p < 0.001), vessel thrombosis being the most frequent cause of early graft loss, especially in Group-1 (6.9 vs. 0.4% p < 0.001). IgA-aB2GP1 was the most important independent risk factor for graft thrombosis (hazard ratio: 13.83; 95% CI: 3.17-60.27, p < 0.001). Furthermore, the, presence of IgA-aB2GP1 was associated with early graft loss and delayed graft function. At 10 years, survival figures were also lower in Group-1: graft survival was lower compared with Group-2 (60.4 vs. 76.8%, p < 0.001). Mortality was significantly higher in Group-1 (19.8 vs. 12.2%, p = 0.005). Limitations: Patients were obtained during a 3-year period (1 January 2000-31 December 2002) and kidneys were only transplanted from brain-dead donors. Nowadays, the patients are older and the percentage of sensitized and retransplants is high. Conclusion: In a prospective observational multicenter study, we were able to corroborate that pretransplant presence of IgA-aB2GP1 was the main risk factor for graft thrombosis and early graft loss. Therefore, a prospective study is needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of prophylactic anticoagulation to avoid this severe complication.

Paricalcitol Versus Calcifediol for Treating Hyperparathyroidism in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

INTRODUCTION: Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) and vitamin D deficiency are common at kidney transplantation and are associated with some early and late complications. This study was designed to evaluate whether paricalcitol was more effective than nutritional vitamin D for controlling SHPT in de novo kidney allograft recipients. METHODS: This was a 6-month, investigator-initiated, multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical trial. Patients with pretransplantation iPTH between 250 and 600 pg/ml and calcium <10 mg/dl were randomized to paricalcitol (PAR) or calcifediol (CAL). The intention-to-treat population (PAR: n = 46; CAL: n = 47) was used for the analysis. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with serum iPTH >110 pg/ml at 6 months. Secondary endpoints were bone mineral metabolism, renal function, and allograft protocol biopsies. RESULTS: The primary outcome occurred in 19.6% of patients in the PAR group and 36.2% of patients in the CAL group (P = 0.07). However, there was a higher percentage of patients with iPTH <70 pg/ml in the PAR group than in the CAL group (63.4% vs. 37.2%; P = 0.03). No differences were observed in bone turnover biomarkers and bone mineral density. The estimated glomerular filtration rate was significantly higher in the CAL group than in the PAR group without differences in albuminuria. In protocol biopsies, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy tended to be higher in the PAR group than in the CAL group (48% vs. 23.8%; P = 0.09). Both medications were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Both PAR and CAL reduced iPTH, but PAR was associated with a higher proportion of patients with iPTH <70 pg/ml. These results do not support the use of PAR to treat posttransplantation hyperparathyroidism.

Outcomes of Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Left In Place after Kidney Transplantation.

No clear consensus has been reached regarding the optimal time to remove the peritoneal dialysis catheter (PDC) after kidney transplantation (KT). This retrospective observational study, conducted in a single peritoneal dialysis (PD) unit including all PD patients who received a KT between 1995 - 2015, was undertaken to evaluate the clinical outcomes and potential complications associated with a PDC left in place after KT. Of the 132 PD patients who received a KT, 20 were excluded from the study. Of the remaining, 112 (85%) patients with functioning KT were discharged with their PDC left in place and had it removed in a mean interval of 5 ± 3 months after KT, after achieving optimal graft function. During this follow-up period, 7 patients (6%) developed exit-site infection and there were 2 cases (2%) of peritonitis; all of them were successfully treated. Delayed PDC removal after KT is associated with low complication rates, although regular examination is needed so that mild infections can be detected early and therapy promptly instituted.

Lumbar bone mineral density in renal transplant patients on neoral and tacrolimus: a four-year prospective study.

BACKGROUND: This prospective study was designed to investigate the long-term evolution of bone mineral density (BMD) in kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: In 86 patients with functioning grafts, 65 on tacrolimus-based immunosuppression and 21 on cyclosporine-based immunosuppression, laboratory parameters and BMD measurements in lumbar spine (L2-L4) and femoral neck (FN) were performed by DEXA in the first month after transplantation (baseline) and yearly thereafter up to the fourth year. RESULTS: BMD did not change at 12 months in lumbar spine nor in the FN. Detailed analysis identified three patterns of BMD in lumbar spine at 12 months: BMD remained stable in 27 patients (31.4%), decreased >2% in 31 (36.0%) and increased >2% in 28 (32.6%). Patients with no change or gain presented a parallel increase of BMD in FN (P<0.001 in both groups). On multivariate analysis, the variables associated with no change or lumbar BMD loss were total prednisone dose in grams at 12 months (OR 1.402; 95% CI 1.038-1.893; P=0.028), calcitriol levels at 12 months (OR 0.936; 95% CI 0.892-0.982; P=0.007) and lumbar BMD at baseline (OR 1.006; 95% CI 1.002-1.010; P=0.002). Late treatment with calcium supplements and calcitriol did not improve osteopenia. CONCLUSIONS: One third of patients had bone loss mainly during the first year of follow-up. Bone loss was associated to higher baseline BMD, high steroid dose, and lower calcitriol levels at 1 year. Late administration of calcitriol and calcium supplements did not improve posttransplant osteopenia. More than 50% of patients were osteopenic 4 years after transplantation.

Preserved Renal Function in Kidney Transplantation over a Thrombosed Aortobifemoral Bypass Graft: The Role of Retrograde Flow and Early Thrombolysis.

Aortobifemoral bypass (ABFB) thrombosis is not uncommon, and when the artery of a renal graft is implanted on a bypass the risk of graft loss is high. We report the case of a 48-year-old woman with a previous history of ABFB under antiplatelet therapy and a kidney allograft implanted on the vascular prosthesis, who presented with acute limb ischemia and severe renal impairment. Imaging techniques revealed a complete thrombosis of the proximal left arm of the ABFB. However, a faint retrograde flow over the graft was observed thanks to the recanalization of distal left bypass by collateral native arteries. This unusual situation not previously reported in a kidney transplant setting, together with an early diagnosis, allowed graft survival until an early local thrombolysis resolved the problem. Two years later, renal function remains normal.