RESUMEN
The past decade has seen a surge of reports and investigations into cases of autoimmune-mediated encephalitis. The increasing recognition of these disorders is especially of relevance to the fields of neurology and psychiatry. Autoimmune encephalitis involves antibodies against synaptic receptors, neuronal cell surface proteins and intracellular targets. These disorders feature prominent symptoms of cognitive impairment and behavioural changes, often associated with the presence of seizures. Early in the clinical course, autoimmune encephalitis may manifest as psychiatric symptoms of psychosis and involve psychiatry as an initial point of contact. Although commonly associated with malignancy, these disorders can present in the absence of an inciting neoplasm. The identification of autoimmune encephalitis is of clinical importance as a large proportion of individuals experience a response to immunotherapy. This review focuses on the current state of knowledge on n-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor-associated encephalitis and limbic encephalitis, the latter predominantly involving antibodies against the α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptor, the γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)B receptor and leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 (LGI1) protein. In addition, we briefly describe anti-dopamine D2 receptor encephalitis. A summary of the literature will focus on common clinical presentations and course, diagnostic approaches and response to treatment. Since a substantial proportion of patients with autoimmune encephalitis exhibit symptoms of psychosis, the relevance of this disorder to theories of psychosis and schizophrenia will also be discussed.
Asunto(s)
Síntomas Afectivos/inmunología , Enfermedades Autoinmunes del Sistema Nervioso/inmunología , Encefalitis/inmunología , Trastornos Mentales/inmunología , Neuroinmunomodulación/inmunología , Autoanticuerpos/sangre , Enfermedades Autoinmunes del Sistema Nervioso/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Autoinmunes del Sistema Nervioso/terapia , Encéfalo/inmunología , Encefalitis/diagnóstico , Encefalitis/terapia , Humanos , Pronóstico , Trastornos Psicóticos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Psicóticos/inmunología , Trastornos Psicóticos/terapia , Receptores de Neurotransmisores/inmunología , Esquizofrenia/diagnóstico , Esquizofrenia/inmunología , Esquizofrenia/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Data on biologic drug survival in real-world psoriasis treatment are limited. There is a need to evaluate long-term trends of biologic use outside the realm of clinical trials. METHODS: A multicentre chart review was conducted with patients' data from September 2005 to September 2014. Kaplan-Meier plot analysis was used to determine 5-year drug survival rates. A log-rank test was used to compare the rates of drug survival between the studied biologics. RESULTS: For the 398 patients and 545 treatment series analysed, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5-year survival rates were 0.826, 0.687, 0.563, 0.475 and 0.420 with etanercept; 0.804, 0.648, 0.553, 0.508 and 0.508 with adalimumab; 0.838, 0.664, 0.554, 0.485 and 0.382 with infliximab; and 0.914, 0.856, 0.800, 0.755 and 0.755 with ustekinumab, respectively. A statistically significant difference was seen between ustekinumab and the other three biologics. CONCLUSION: A progressive decrease in treatment adherence was seen with all four biologics, as expected, but the survival rate of ustekinumab was highest.
Asunto(s)
Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéutico , Etanercept/uso terapéutico , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Ustekinumab/uso terapéutico , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Satisfacción del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Safety profiles of biologics for treatment of psoriasis are limited to data from randomized controlled trials. There is a need for comparative safety reports of biologics based on data from clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: We sought to estimate and compare the incidence of adverse events (AEs) leading to withdrawal of biologics (etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, and ustekinumab) in the treatment of psoriasis. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective chart review from September 2005 to September 2014. Incidence proportion and rate of AEs leading to withdrawal by biologic agent and AE were calculated. RESULTS: For 545 treatments administered in 398 patients, 22 (4.04%) AEs were associated with withdrawal, for a rate of 1.97/100 patient-years (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.32-2.94). Common AEs were injection-/infusion-site reactions (0.55%, 0.92%, 0%, and 0% for etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, and ustekinumab, respectively); infections (0%, 0.18%, 0.55%, 0.18%); and malignancies (0.18%, 0.18%, 0%, 0.37%). LIMITATIONS: Possible incompleteness of chart details and small study population limit the conclusiveness of findings. CONCLUSION: Biologic agents for treatment of psoriasis are safe; AEs associated with withdrawal occurred in 4% of all administered biologic therapies. It does not appear that real-world patients encounter more AEs with biologics than patients in clinical trials.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Terapia Biológica/efectos adversos , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Psoriasis/diagnóstico , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Privación de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Adalimumab , Adulto , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Terapia Biológica/métodos , Canadá , Estudios de Cohortes , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/etiología , Etanercept , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G/administración & dosificación , Inmunoglobulina G/efectos adversos , Incidencia , Infecciones/inducido químicamente , Infecciones/epidemiología , Infliximab , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Receptores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/administración & dosificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , UstekinumabAsunto(s)
Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéutico , Sustitución de Medicamentos/métodos , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Centros Médicos Académicos , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Canadá , Estudios de Cohortes , Etanercept/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Psoriasis/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ustekinumab/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The gtring presence of dermatology platforms on Facebook has been acknowledged; however, little is known about the extent to which different types of content influence the level of engagement with online users. OBJECTIVE: To assess the level of public engagement with different types of content posted on Facebook pages devoted to dermatology. METHODS: A search on Facebook identified existing pages for dermatology academic journals, professional societies, and patient-centered groups. Then the engagement rate was calculated for each content type published on the selected pages. RESULTS: The median engagement rates were 63.8% for educational posts, 41.3% for interactive posts, 27.4% for news articles, 11.8% for academic articles, and 9.3% for others. CONCLUSION: Educational posts engaged with online users the most effectively. The level of engagement is a key determinant of knowledge dissemination via online tools, and the type of content may influence the level of engagement.