A Randomized Trial of Combined tDCS Over Right Inferior Frontal Cortex and Cognitive Bias Modification: Null Effects on Drinking and Alcohol Approach Bias.

BACKGROUND: Deriving novel treatments for alcohol use disorders (AUDs) is of critical importance, as existing treatments are only modestly effective for reducing drinking. Two promising strategies for treating AUDs include cognitive bias modification (CBM) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). While each strategy has shown positive results in reducing drinking or alcohol-related constructs (e.g., craving), initial tests of the combination of CBM and tDCS have shown mixed results. The present study investigated the degree to which combining CBM and tDCS (2.0 mA anodal current over F10) could reduce alcohol approach biases and alcohol consumption. METHODS: Seventy-nine at-risk drinkers were randomized to 1 of 4 conditions in a 2 × 2 factorial design: verum CBM/verum tDCS, verum CBM/sham tDCS, sham CBM/verum tDCS, or sham CBM/sham tDCS. Participants completed a baseline assessment of alcohol approach bias and drinking quantity/frequency (i.e., drinks per drinking day [DDD] and percent heavy drinking days [PHDD]), 4 sessions of combined CBM and tDCS, and follow-up assessments of approach bias and alcohol consumption. RESULTS: Results indicated that while participants did demonstrate significant alcohol approach biases at baseline, neither CBM, tDCS, nor the interaction reduced the bias at the follow-up. In addition, there was evidence of a trend toward reducing DDD from baseline to the 1-week/1-month follow-ups, but there was no significant effect of the intervention on either DDD or PHDD. CONCLUSIONS: These results partially replicated null results presented in similar CBM/tDCS trials and suggest that this combination, at least with anodal stimulation over dorsolateral or inferior frontal sites, may have limited utility to reduce drinking.

A randomized pilot trial of brief family-involved treatment for alcohol use disorder: Treatment engagement and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Involving family members in a patient's treatment for alcohol use disorder (AUD) leads to more positive outcomes, but evidence-based family-involved treatments have not been adopted widely in AUD treatment programs. Study aims the following: (a) modify an empirically supported 12-session AUD treatment, alcohol behavioral couple therapy (ABCT) to make it shorter and appropriate for any concerned family member and (b) conduct a small clinical trial to obtain feasibility data and effect size estimates of treatment efficacy. METHOD: ABCT content was adapted to three-sessions following input from clinicians, patients, and family members. Patient and family member dyads were recruited from an inpatient treatment program and randomized to the new treatment, brief family-involved treatment (B-FIT), or treatment-as-usual (TAU). Drinking was assessed using the Form-90; family support and family functioning were assessed using the Family Environment Scale Conflict and Cohesion subscales and the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale-IV, Communication scale. Dyads (n = 35) were assessed at baseline and 4-month follow-up. RESULTS: On average, dyads received one of three B-FIT sessions with 6 dyads receiving no sessions due to scheduling conflicts or patient discharge. At follow-up, there was a large-to-medium effect size estimate favoring B-FIT for proportion drinking days (patient report, n = 22; Hedges' g = 1.01; patient or family report, n = 28; Hedges' g = .48). Results for family support or family functioning measures favored TAU. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of brief family-involved treatment in inpatient AUD treatment was challenging, but preliminary data suggest the potential value of B-FIT in impacting drinking outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).