Reassessment of the clinical impact of preformed donor-specific anti-HLA-Cw antibodies in kidney transplantation.

Anti-denatured HLA-Cw antibodies are highly prevalent, whereas anti-native HLA-Cw antibodies seem to lead to random flow cytometry crossmatch results. We aimed to reassess crossmatch prediction for anti-HLA-Cw using 2 types of single antigen flow beads (classical beads and beads with diminished expression of denatured HLA), and to compare the pathogenicity of preformed anti-denatured and anti-native HLA-Cw antibodies in kidney transplantation. We performed 135 crossmatches with sera reacting against donor HLA-Cw (classical beads fluorescence ≥500); only 20.6% were positive. Forty-three (31.6%) were anti-denatured HLA antibodies (beads with diminished expression of denatured HLA fluorescence <300); all were crossmatch negative. The correlation between classical beads fluorescence and the crossmatch ratio was low (ρ = 0.178), and slightly higher with beads with diminished expression of denatured HLA (ρ = 0.289). We studied 52 kidney recipients with preformed anti-HLA-Cw donor-specific antibodies. Those with anti-native HLA antibodies experienced more acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejections (P = .006 and .03, respectively), and displayed a lower graft survival (P = .04). Patients with anti-native HLA-Cw antibodies more frequently had previous sensitizing events (P < .000001) or plausibility of their antibody profile according to known anti-native HLA-Cw eplets (P = .0001). Anti-native but not anti-denatured HLA-Cw antibodies are deleterious, which underscores the need for reagents with diminished expression of denatured HLA.

Humoral response after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in dialysis patients: Integrating anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike-Protein-RBD antibody monitoring to manage dialysis centers in pandemic times.

Dialysis patients are both the most likely to benefit from vaccine protection against SARS-CoV-2 and at the highest risk of not developing an immune response. Data from the medical field are thus mandatory. We report our experience with a BNT162b2-mRNA vaccine in a retrospective analysis of 241 dialysis patients including 193 who underwent anti-Spike-Protein-Receptor-Binding-Domain (RBD) IgG analysis. We show that a pro-active vaccine campaign is effective in convincing most patients to be vaccinated (95%) and frequently elicits a specific antibody response (94.3% after two doses and 98.4% after three doses). Only immunocompromised Status is associated with lack of seroconversion (OR 7.6 [1.5-38.2], p = 0.02). We also identify factors associated with low response (last quartile; IgG<500AU/mL): immunocompromised status, age, absence of RAAS inhibitors, low lymphocytes count, high C Reactive Protein; and with high response (high quartile; IgG>7000AU/mL): age; previous SARS-CoV-2 infection and active Cancer. From this experience, we propose a strategy integrating anti-spike IgG monitoring to guide revaccination and dialysis center management in pandemic times.

Deleterious Impact of Donor-Specific Anti-HLA Antibodies Toward HLA-Cw and HLA-DP in Kidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: It is widely accepted that HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSA) are associated with antibody-mediated rejection and graft loss. However, in many transplant programs, preformed anti-HLA-Cw and anti-HLA-DP DSA are not considered in organ allocation policies because their clinical relevance is still uncertain. METHODS: We analyzed the clinical impact of Cw/DP DSA through a retrospective study, comparing 48 patients transplanted with isolated preformed Cw/DP DSA (Cw/DP DSA group) with (i) 104 matched HLA-sensitized kidney transplant recipients with No DSA at D0 (No DSA group) and (ii) 47 kidney transplant recipients with preformed A, -B, -DR, -DQ DSA (A/B/DR/DQ DSA group). RESULTS: A positive flow cytometry crossmatch in the Cw/DP DSA group was more frequent than in the No DSA group and as frequent as in the A/B/DR/DQDSA group. Two years after transplantation, the biopsy-proven acute rejection-free survival was worse in the Cw/DP and A/B/DR/DQ DSA groups than in the No DSA group (65%, 84%, 93%, P = 0.001 and P = 0.05, respectively). Accordingly, graft survival was lower in the Cw/DP and the A/B/DR/DQ DSA groups than in the No DSA group (87%, 89%, 95%, P = 0.02 and P = 0.1, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that preformed anti-HLA-Cw and anti-HLA-DP DSA are as deleterious as anti-HLA A/B/DR/DQ DSA. It justifies their inclusion in kidney allocation programs and in immunological risk stratification algorithms.