Development and validation of a predictive tool for adverse drug reactions in neonates under intensive care.

AIMS: Neonates hospitalized in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) commonly experience adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Thus, we aimed to develop and validate a tool for predicting ADRs in neonates hospitalized in NICUs. METHODS: A nested case-control study in an open cohort with neonates admitted to the NICU of a maternity hospital in Natal, Brazil was conducted from January 2019 to January 2022 [Correction added on 4 December 2023, after first online publication: 2023 has been changed to 2019 in the preceding sentence.]. Neonates with ADR were randomly paired with 2 controls. For the development of the tool, a multivariate logistic regression was applied on 2/3 of the sample (cases with respective controls). The model's fit was evaluated using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test for calibration and the Brier score for performance assessment. Validation of the tool was performed by determining the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve with bootstrap adjusted c-statistics. RESULTS: In all, 450 neonates (150 cases and 300 controls) were included in the study. We identified 5 independent risk factors for ADR, 4 related to the neonate (current mechanical ventilation, heart rate ≥178 beats/min, intravenous medications, ≥5 prescription medications) and 1 to the mother (gestational hypertension). The tool had a classification cut-off point of ≥15, and its total score ranged from 0 to 34. In validation, the tool had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.74 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-0.81) with sensitivity of 52.02% (95% CI 47.40-56.64) and specificity of 81.35% (95% CI 77.75-84.95). CONCLUSION: The tool demonstrated adequate discriminative ability and utilized 5 commonly monitored variables in the NICU.

Incidence of Adverse Drug Reactions in High-Risk Pregnancy: A Prospective Cohort Study in Obstetric Intensive Care.

PURPOSE: To estimate the cumulative incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in women with high-risk pregnancy hospitalized in an obstetric intensive care unit, then to describe the medicines involved and to identify major risk factors. METHODS: From June 2016 to December 2017, patients admitted to the ICU with high-risk pregnancy were considered eligible in this observational, longitudinal, prospective study. Patients were investigated daily for the occurrence of ADRs through pharmaceutical anamnesis, active search in medical records and questioning of the health team. Suspected ADRs were classified according to Naranjo's algorithm. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to identify risk factors of ADR. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 607 high-risk pregnancies from 851 women admitted to the ICU, of whom 244 admitted for non-obstetric conditions, with an ICU stay less than 24 h or readmitted to the ICU were excluded. The mean age was 27.0 ± 7.5 years-old, mean gestational age was 33.8 ± 6.3 weeks. ADR were observed in 165 women (27.2%). No severe ADR was observed and 29.7% were of moderate severity. The most often implicated medicine was magnesium sulphate (25.2%) with 44.5% of patients administered that substance experiencing ADRs consisting of somnolence (68.6%), absent patellar reflex (21.6%) and hypotension (9.8%). Risk factors of ADR were blood pressure (adjusted odds-ratio (aOR) 1.02), haemoglobin level (aOR 1.21) and body temperature (aOR 0.71). CONCLUSIONS: ADRs affect about one third of high-risk pregnancies, mainly due to magnesium sulphate administrations. High blood pressure, lower body temperature, and high haemoglobin concentration on admission were associated with an increased risk of ADR.

Prevalence and profile of adverse drug reactions in high-risk pregnancy: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Commonly used drugs in pregnant women include antihypertensives, hypoglycemic agents, analgesics, antimicrobials, antiemetics and antispasmodics but the use of medicines during pregnancy, especially in high-risk pregnancy, may be associated with high risk of adverse drug reactions (ADR). The objective of this study was to determine the risk of an adverse drug reaction in hospitalized high-risk pregnant women and the factors associated with their occurrence. METHODS: The study received IRB approval and all patients gave written informed consent. Observational cohort study conducted from September 2015 to November 2016 in 1070 pregnant women consecutively admitted to the high risk sector of the University Maternity Januário Cicco in Brazil. ADR were detected through daily active search. Risk factors for the occurrence of ADR were determined using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: The mean age of the study population was 26.2 ± 7.2 years and gestational age was 31.2 ± 7.2 weeks. The average number of previous pregnancies was 2.4 ± 1.8 and 46.4% reported cases of previous abortion/miscarriage. ADR were observed in 10.7% of women. The main medicines involved, with the incidence rate of ADR per 100 prescriptions of the drug (IR), were parenteral scopolamine (IR 14.9%), methyldopa (IR 15.9%), insulin (IR 8.46%), oral scopolamine (IR 3.58%), captopril (IR 2.38%) and ceftriaxone (IR 18.4%). Multivariate analysis showed that only gestational age in weeks (odds-ratio 0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.95-0.98) was related to the occurrence of adverse reactions. CONCLUSION: Lower gestational age is a risk factor for high-risk pregnant women, increasing the likelihood of adverse reactions, with parenteral medications being those that have the highest potential risk of harm.

Drug related problems in the neonatal intensive care unit: incidence, characterization and clinical relevance.

BACKGROUND: Any event involving drug therapy that may interfere in a patient's desired clinical outcome is called a drug related problem (DRP). DRP are very common in intensive therapy, however, little is known about DRP in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of DRPs in NICU patients and to characterize DRPs according to type, cause and corresponding pharmaceutical conducts. METHODS: Prospective observational study conducted in the NICU at a teaching hospital in Brazil from January 2014 to November 2016. The data were collected from the records of the clinical pharmacy service, excluding neonates admitted for less than 24 h and those who had no drugs prescribed. DRPs were classified according to the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe system and evaluated for relevance-safety. RESULTS: Six hundred neonates were included in the study, with mean gestational age of 31.9 ± 4.1 weeks and mean birth weight of 1779 ± 885 g. The incidence of DRPs in the NICU was 6.8% patient-days (95%CI 6.2-7.3%) and affected 59.8% of neonates (95% CI 55.8-63.8%). Sub-optimal effect (52.8%) and inappropriate dose selection (39.75%) were the most common problem and cause, respectively. Anti-infectives was the medication class most involved in DRPs. More than one-third of neonates were exposed to DRP of significant or high safety-relevance. Most of the pharmaceutical interventions were related with drug prescription, with over 90% acceptance by attending physicians. CONCLUSION: DRP are common in NICU, predominating problems of sub-optimal treatment, mainly due to inappropriate dose selection.

Assessment of the risk of QT-interval prolongation associated with potential drug-drug interactions in patients admitted to Intensive Care Units.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the relationship between drug interactions and QT-interval prolongation in patients admitted to a general intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. From May 2015 to July 2016, all patients over 18 years-old admitted to the ICU for more than 24 h and in whom the QT-interval on the ECG could be read were prospectively included in this observational, cross-sectional study. All medications administered in the 24 h prior to admission were recorded and the QT-interval was measured upon ICU admission and corrected with Bazzet's formula (QTc). Drug-drug interactions involving drugs potentially associated with QTc prolongation (DDIQT) were searched and QTc increase associated with pharmacokinetic (PK-DDIQT) and pharmacodynamic (PD-DDIQT) interactions was assessed with multiple regression adjusted by patient varibles. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 283 patients, 54.4% males, mean age 57.6 ±â€¯16.7 years-old. Forty five (15.9%) patients presented 65 DDIQT with predominance of pharmacodynamic (66.1%). The risk of DDIQT prescription increased with lower systolic blood pressure, in hypokalemia, in non-diabetics and with the number of medications. PK-DDIQT alone did not affect the QTc interval (7.75 ms, 95%CI: -22.4 to 37.9 ms, p = 0.61), but PD-DDIQT increased QTc by 28.4 ms (95%CI: 9.67 to 47.4 ms, p = 0.003). Most PD-DDIQT involved metoclopramide with ondansetron or amiodarone, and ondansetron with ciprofloxacin. CONCLUSIONS: In patients exposed to drugs associated with prolonged QTc in the 24 h prior to ICU admission, pharmacodynamic DDIQT are associated with increased risk of QTc prolongation.

Factors associated with expression of extrapyramidal symptoms in users of atypical antipsychotics.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate factors associated with the occurrence of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) in users of second-generation antipsychotics (SGA). METHODS: Observational cross-sectional study based on a random sample of subjects from three outpatient clinics. Inclusion criteria were age between 18 and 65 years, of both genders, with a diagnosis of schizophrenia and under the use of a single SGA agent. Subjects who had received i.m. long-acting antipsychotics in the past were excluded. The families of eligible patients were contacted by phone and, if willing to participate in the study, a household visit was scheduled. Informed consent was obtained from all study subjects and their next of kin. The risk of EPS associated with sociodemographic, clinical features and medications used was analyzed by logistic regression. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 213 subjects. EPS were observed in 38.0% of subjects. The more commonly used SGA were olanzapine (76, 35.7%), risperidone (74, 34.3%), quetiapine (26, 12.2%), and ziprasidone (23, 10.8%). Among the drugs used as adjunctive therapy for schizophrenia, benzodiazepines were the most prevalent (31.5%), followed by carbamazepine (24.4%) and antidepressants (20.2%). Multivariate analysis showed that the risk of EPS was associated with the use of carbamazepine (odds ratio 3.677, 95% CI 1.627-8.310). We found no evidence that the type of SGA modified the risk of EPS. CONCLUSION: The occurrence of EPS in SGA users is a common finding, with no difference of antipsychotics studied in relation to the risk of extrapyramidal manifestations. The adjunctive use of carbamazepine may predispose the user of SGA to the occurrence of EPS.

Study protocol for the development and validation of a questionnaire evaluating predisposition to immunosuppressant medication non-adherence of kidney pre-transplant patients. The KATITA project.

Non-adherence to immunosuppressive medication after kidney transplant is an important cause of graft rejection and loss. Approaches to minimization of non-adherence have focused on the identification of episodes of medication non-adherence, but by then irreparable harm to the graft may already have occurred, and a more effective approach would be to adopt preventive measures in patients who may have difficulty in adhering to medication. The aim of this study protocol is to develop and validate a clinical questionnaire for assessing, in kidney transplant candidate patients in the pre-transplant setting, the predisposition to non-adherence to immunosuppressive medication. In this multicenter, prospective study, a pilot questionnaire in Brazilian Portuguese language, composed of Likert-scaled statements expressing patients' beliefs, behaviors and barriers regarding medication taking will be assembled from a literature review, from focus groups, and an expert panel. The pilot questionnaire will be administered to a minimum of 300 patients in kidney transplant waiting lists and exploratory factor analysis will be used for development of the definitive questionnaire. A random subsample of a minimum of 60 patients will have the scale re-administered after one month for evaluation of test-retest reliability. A multicenter, external validation study will include 364 kidney transplant candidates who will be evaluated immediately before surgery and at months 3, 6 and 12 post-transplant for assessment of concurrent validity, by comparison with two scales that assess medication non-adherence, and for determination of predictive validity using a triangulation method for assessment of medication non-adherence. Structural validity will be assessed with confirmatory factor analysis using structural equation modeling. Cross-cultural generalizability and validity will be assessed by a multicenter study, in which a translation of the scale to another language will be administered to kidney transplant candidate patients from a different culture, with a subsample being selected for test-retest. This study will be conducted in Spain with a Spanish translation of the scale.

Correction: Risk factors for drug-related problems in a general hospital: A large prospective cohort.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230215.].

Development and Internal Validation of a Questionnaire Assessing Predisposition to Nonadherence to Immunosuppressive Medication in Kidney Pretransplant Patients.

BACKGROUND: After kidney transplant, nonadherence to immunosuppressive therapy is the main cause of impaired kidney function and graft loss. The objective of this study was the development and internal validation of a clinical questionnaire for assessing the predisposition to adherence to immunosuppressive therapy in kidney pretransplant patients. METHODS: Multicenter prospective study conducted in 7 kidney hemodialysis and 6 kidney transplant centers of 3 Brazilian state capitals. Kidney transplant candidate patients of both sexes and >18-y-old were included. Retransplanted patients were excluded. A 72-item pilot version of the questionnaire, created through literature review complemented with a focus group of 8 kidney pretransplant patients, was administered to 541 kidney transplant candidate patients. Factor analysis with varimax rotation was used for questionnaire development. Internal validity evaluation used Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability. Construct validity was assessed by differentiation by known groups. RESULTS: The final questionnaire, named Kidney AlloTransplant Immunosuppressive Therapy Adherence (KATITA) Questionnaire, consisting of 25 items in 3 dimensions, presented good internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.81). The 3 dimensions and respective Cronbach's alpha were "Carelessness" (14 items, 0.81), "Skepticism" (6 items, 0.57), and "Concern" (5 items, 0.62). The interdimension correlation matrix showed low correlation coefficients (<0.35). Test-retest reliability, evaluated with 154 patients, showed an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.62 (moderate agreement). The scale showed construct validity. CONCLUSIONS: The KATITA-25 questionnaire is the first psychometric instrument for evaluation of predisposition to nonadherence to immunosuppressive medication in candidate patients for kidney transplant in the pretransplant setting.

Nonadherence to Immunosuppressant Therapy of Kidney Transplant Candidate Patients: External Validation of the KATITA-25 Scale.

BACKGROUND: The self-administered Kidney AlloTransplant Immunosuppressive Therapy Adherence (KATITA-25) questionnaire is a multidimensional scale for use in the pretransplant setting that evaluates the predisposition to nonadherence of patients who are candidates to kidney transplant. The scale has shown adequate internal consistency and test-retest reliability. This study presents the results of an external validation study of the KATITA-25 scale. METHODS: Patients >18 y old scheduled for kidney transplant were included in this multicenter study. The KATITA-25 scale was administered before surgery and then at 3-mo posttransplantation for evaluation of scale sensitivity to change. At this time, 2 validated medication adherence scales were applied for assessment of concurrent validity. For evaluation of predictive validity, nonadherence to immunosuppressive medication was assessed at 6 and 12 mo after transplantation by 3 independent methods: patient self-report of nonadherence using the Morisky-Green-Levine Medication Assessment Questionnaire scale, serum trough levels of immunosuppressants, and pharmacy refills. RESULTS: Three twenty-two patients were available for evaluation of concurrent validity and 311 patients of predictive validity. After kidney transplant, the median KATITA-25 score decreased from 20 to 8 ( P  < 0.001), demonstrating scale sensitivity to change, and the KATITA-25 score showed correlation with the Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medication Scale score (Spearman's ρ 0.18, P  = 0.002) and the Cuestionario para la Evaluación de la Adhesión al Tratamiento Antiretroviral scores (ρ -0.17, P  = 0.002), confirming concurrent validity. The nonadherence rate was 57.6%. The scale predictive validity was demonstrated by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (0.68), sensitivity (59.8%), specificity (68.2%), and positive predictive value (71.8%). CONCLUSIONS: This external validation study of KATITA-25 scale provided evidence of sensitivity to change, and structural, criterion, and predictive validity.

Temporal profile of adverse drug reactions and associated clinical factors: a prospective observational study in a neonatal intensive care unit.

OBJECTIVE: Although adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are quite common in hospitalised neonates, pharmacovigilance activities in this public are still incipient. This study aims to characterise ADRs in neonates in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), identifying causative drugs, temporal profile and associated factors. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: NICU of a public maternity hospital in Natal/Brazil. PARTICIPANTS: All neonates admitted to the NICU for more than 24 hours and using at least one medication were followed up during the time of hospitalisation. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence rate and risk factors for ADRs. The ADRs were detected by an active search in electronic medical records and analysis of spontaneous reports in the hospital pharmacovigilance system. RESULTS: Six hundred neonates were included in the study, where 118 neonates had a total of 186 ADRs. The prevalence of ADRs at the NICU was 19.7% (95% CI 16.7% to 23.0%). The most common ADRs were tachycardia (30.6%), polyuria (9.1%) and hypokalaemia (8.6%). Tachycardia (peak incidence rate: 57.1 ADR/1000 neonates) and hyperthermia (19.1 ADR/1000 neonates) predominated during the first 5 days of hospitalisation. The incidence rate of polyuria and hypokalaemia increased markedly after the 20th day, with both reaching a peak of 120.0 ADR/1000 neonates. Longer hospitalisation time (OR 0.018, 95% CI 0.007 to 0.029; p<0.01) and number of prescribed drugs (OR 0.127, 95% CI 0.075 to 0.178; p<0.01) were factors associated with ADRs. CONCLUSION: ADRs are very common in NICU, with tachycardia and hyperthermia predominant in the first week of hospitalisation and polyuria and hypokalaemia from the third week onwards.

Drug-related problems in hypertension and gestational diabetes mellitus: A hospital cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the drug-related problems (DRPs) in high-risk pregnant women with hypertension and gestational diabetes mellitus according to frequency, type, cause, and factors associated with their occurrence in the hospital setting. METHODOLOGY: This is an observational, longitudinal, prospective study that included 571 hospitalized pregnant women with hypertension and gestational diabetes mellitus using at least one medication. DRPs were classified according to the Classification for Drug-Related Problems (PCNE V9.00). In addition to descriptive statistics, a univariate and multivariate logistic regression model was employed to determine the factors associated with the DRPs. RESULTS: A total of 873 DRPs were identified. The most frequent DRPs were related to therapeutic ineffectiveness (72.2%) and occurrence of adverse events (27.0%) and the main drugs involved were insulins and methyldopa. These were followed in the first five days of treatment by: the ineffectiveness of insulin (24.6%), associated with underdosage (12.9%) or insufficient frequency of administration (9.5%) and methyldopa associated with the occurrence of adverse reactions (40.2%) in the first 48h. Lower maternal age (OR 0.966, 95% CI 0.938-0.995, p = 0.022), lower gestational age (OR 0.966, 95% CI 0.938-0.996, p = 0.026), report of drug hypersensitivity (OR 2.295, 95% CI 1.220-4.317, p = 0.010), longer treatment time (OR 1.237, 95% CI: 1.147-1.333, p = 0.001) and number of prescribed medications (OR 1.211, 95% CI: 0.240-5.476, p = 0.001) were risk factors for occurrence of DRPs. CONCLUSION: DRPs are frequent in pregnant women with hypertension and gestational diabetes mellitus, and they are mainly related to therapeutic ineffectiveness and the occurrence of adverse events.

Polypharmacy, physical activity, and sedentary time in older adults: A scoping review.

OBJECTIVE: To map out the studies that have investigated the associations of polypharmacy and/or potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use with physical activity and sedentary time in older adults. METHODS: We conducted a literature search from inception to December 2022 in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus. INCLUSION CRITERIA: observational studies including older adults (≥60 years); English, Portuguese, and Spanish languages; any definition of polypharmacy; implicit and explicit criteria of PIM use; physical activity and/or sedentary time data. RESULTS: Fourteen cross-sectional studies were included; 11 defined polypharmacy as ≥5 medications (prevalence ranging from 9.5 % to 57 %). No study reported information on PIM use. Most studies included participants aged <80 years. Twelve studies included self-reported measures of physical activity, while two studies used accelerometer-measured physical activity. Ten studies included analyses adjusted for confounders, and nine considered polypharmacy as an outcome. All of them demonstrated an inverse association between physical activity and polypharmacy, irrespective of the definition of polypharmacy and the assessment method employed (self-reported or accelerometry). One study reported an inverse association between polypharmacy (as the exposure) and physical activity (as the outcome). None of the studies investigated the association between sedentary time and polypharmacy. CONCLUSIONS: Limited evidence suggests an inverse association between physical activity and polypharmacy in older adults. However, the relationship between PIM use, physical activity, and sedentary time remains unknown. Longitudinal studies utilizing objectively-measured physical activity and sedentary time are needed to better clarify the relationship between these movement behaviors and polypharmacy and/or PIM use in older adults.

Causality assessment of adverse drug reactions in neonates: a comparative study between Naranjo's algorithm and Du's tool.

BACKGROUND: Algorithms for causality assessment of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) are important in the management of adverse events, however, it is inconclusive which tool best suits pharmacovigilance in neonates. AIM: To compare the performance of the algorithms of Du and Naranjo in determining causality in cases of ADRs in neonates in a NICU. METHOD: This observational and prospective study was conducted in a NICU of a Brazilian maternity school between January 2019 and December 2020. Independently, three clinical pharmacists used the algorithms of Naranjo and Du in 79 cases of ADRs in 57 neonates. The algorithms were evaluated for inter-rater and inter-tool agreement using Cohen's kappa coefficient (k). RESULTS: The Du algorithm showed greater ability to identify definite ADRs (≈ 60%), but had low reproducibility (overall k = 0.108; 95% CI 0.064-0.149). In contrast, the Naranjo algorithm showed a lower proportion of definite ADRs (< 4%), but had good reproducibility (overall k = 0.402; 95% CI 0.379-0.429). The tools showed no significant correlation regarding ADR causality classification (overall k = - 0.031; 95% CI - 0.049 to 0.065). CONCLUSION: Although the Du algorithm has a lower reproducibility compared to the Naranjo, this tool showed good sensitivity for classifying ADRs as definite, proving to be a more suitable tool for neonatal clinical routine.

Temporal assessment of entomological surveillance of Trypanosoma cruzi vectors in an endemic area of northeastern Brazil.

Entomological surveillance is essential for the control of triatomines and the prevention of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in humans and domestic animals. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate entomological indicators and triatomine control during the period from 2005 to 2015 in an endemic area in the state of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil. This observational and retrospective study was developed based on data analysis related to active entomological surveillance activities and chemical control of infested housing units (HU) in the Agreste mesoregion of the state of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil, in the period between 2005 to 2015. The quantitative analysis of housing units surveyed for entomological indicators was performed by linear regression of random effects (p < 0.05). The effect of the number of HU surveyed on the entomological indicators was analyzed by fitting a linear random effects regression model and an increasing intradomiciliary colonization rate was significant. In the period evaluated 92,156 housing units were investigated and the presence of triatomines was reported in 4,639 (5.0%). A total of 4,653 specimens of triatomines were captured and the species recorded were Triatoma pseudomaculata (n = 1,775), Triatoma brasiliensis (n = 1,569), Rhodnius nasutus (n = 741) and Panstrongylus lutzi (n = 568), with an index of natural infection by T. cruzi of 2.2%. Only 53.1% of the infested HU were subjected to chemical control. Moreover, there was a decrease in the total number of HU surveyed over time associated with an increase in the index of intradomiciliary colonization (p = 0.004). These data demonstrated that entomological surveillance and control of vectors in the Agreste mesoregion of the state has been discontinued, emphasizing the need for more effective public policies to effectively control the vectors, in order to avoid the exposure of humans and domestic animals to the risk of T. cruzi infection.

Proton pump inhibitor and community pharmacies: Usage profile and factors associated with long-term use.

AIM: To characterize the usage profile and the factors associated with the prolonged use of proton pump inhibitor drugs in a community pharmacy. METHODOLOGY: This is a cross-sectional, prospective and observational study involving interviews with 410 patients who acquired PPI for their own use from community pharmacies. To characterize the factors associated with the prolonged use of PPI, a multivariate logistic regression model was used. RESULTS: Pantoprazole (42.7%) and omeprazole (31%) were the most acquired PPIs, prescribed mainly by gastroenterologists (49.5%). They are used in the morning, especially for gastrointestinal symptoms, however, they had been consumed for more than 5 years in 30% of cases. The factors associated with prolonged use are old age (OR 1.03 CI95% 1.01-1.05), body mass index (OR 1.07 CI95% 1.01-1.12), use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatories (OR 3.18 CI95% 1.20-8.43) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (OR 3.5 95% CI 1.39-8.88). CONCLUSION: PPIs are adequate in terms of indication and form of use, however, prolonged use associated with old age, being overweight and use of anti-inflammatories and antidepressants is frequent.

Drug-drug interactions in neonatal intensive care: A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: To characterize the prevalence and profile of drug-drug interactions (DDIs), the drugs most related to major DDIs and risk factors of their prescription in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). METHODS: Neonates admitted to a NICU who had at least one medication prescribed and a hospital stay >24 h were included in a prospective cohort study (August 2017 to July 2018). All medications prescribed during the hospitalization were collected from all neonates (n = 220), with the screening for DDIs. Prevalence and type of DDIs was identified. Network analysis was used to identify the drugs more implicated with DDIs. Logistic regression was used for the analysis of risk factors (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Over 70% of neonates were exposed to DDIs and 29% were exposed to major DDIs. The network analysis identified furosemide, fentanyl, aminophylline and fluconazole as most implicated with DDI, fentanyl was especially associated with major DDIs. The number of drugs (OR 1.60, p < 0.01), caesarean delivery (OR 2.68, p < 0.05), gestational age (OR 1.03, p < 0.01) and APGAR score (OR 0.78, p < 0.01) were identified as risk factors for exposure to DDI. CONCLUSION: Neonates in intensive care have a high exposure to DDIs and the occurrence of major DDIs is related specifically to the prescription of fentanyl. The number of prescribed drugs, gestational age, cesarean delivery and low APGAR score in the first minute were identified as risk factors for DDIs in NICU.

[Prescription of potentially inappropriate medications for the elderly: a study in Primary Health Care]. / Prescrição de medicamentos potencialmente inapropriados para idosos: um estudo na Atenção Primária à Saúde.

The elderly population is vulnerable to the risks of the use of medications, especially those considered potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), in which the risks outweigh the benefits. The study sought to evaluate the PIMs prescribed in Primary Health Care (PHC) and associated factors. A cross-sectional, analytical study was carried out from March to December 2019 in PHC in Campina Grande, Paraíba, through interviews with 458 elderly individuals. The independent variables included socioeconomic characteristics, health status and the use of medications, and the outcome was classified as PIM by the Brazilian Consensus on Potentially Inappropriate Medications. There was a prescription of at least one PIM for 44.8% of the elderly and the majority affecting the Central Nervous System (54.4%). In the adjusted model, depression (PR=2.01; 95%CI 1.59-2.55), using other medications in addition to those prescribed (PR=1.36; 95%CI 1.08-1.72) and polypharmacy (PR=1.80; 95%CI 1.40-2.33) remained an associated factor, and self-reporting systemic arterial hypertension became a protective factor (PR=0.65; 95%CI 0.49-0.87). This reveals the need for actions to monitor closely the use of PIMs by the elderly to ensure access in conjunction with safety.

Os idosos são vulneráveis aos riscos do uso de medicamentos, principalmente daqueles considerados potencialmente inapropriados (MPI) em que os riscos superam os benefícios. O estudo buscou avaliar os MPI prescritos na Atenção Primária à Saúde (APS) e seus fatores associados. Realizou-se um estudo transversal, analítico, de março a dezembro de 2019, na APS em Campina Grande, Paraíba, através de entrevistas com 458 idosos. As variáveis independentes abrangeram características socioeconômicas, condição de saúde e utilização de medicamentos e o desfecho foi medicamento classificado como MPI pelo Consenso Brasileiro de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropriados. Verificou-se a prescrição de pelo menos um MPI para 44,8% dos idosos e a maioria de atuação no Sistema Nervoso Central (54,4%). No modelo ajustado, depressão (RP=2,01; IC95% 1,59-2,55), utilizar outros medicamentos além dos prescritos (RP=1,36; IC95% 1,08-1,72) e polifarmácia (RP=1,80; IC95% 1,40-2,33) permaneceram como fator associado e autorreferir ser portador de hipertensão arterial sistêmica tornou-se fator de proteção (RP=0,65; IC95% 0,49-0,87). Evidencia-se necessidade de ações que qualifiquem o uso de medicamentos por idosos, de modo a garantir acesso aliado à segurança.

Effectiveness and safety of ivermectin in the treatment of COVID-19: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Ivermectin is a drug with antiviral properties and has been proposed as an alternative treatment for patients with COVID-19, in some countries; however, there is limited evidence to support its clinical use. Accordingly, the aim of this review and meta-analysis is to obtain superior evidence on the effectiveness and safety of ivermectin in treatment of COVID-19. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search in the medical databases and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform databases for randomised clinical trials and quasi-randomised trials published from December 2019. The criteria for inclusion are that infection needs to be confirmed by a real-time PCR or serology test, and the effect of ivermectin has been compared with placebo, symptomatic treatment or no treatment. We will exclude observational studies and clinical trials that involved patients with symptoms suggestive of COVID-19, but without a laboratorial diagnosis. Outcomes of interest include mortality, time to symptom resolution, time of hospitalisation, frequency of invasive mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, incidence of severe acute respiratory syndrome, admission to intensive care unit, viral load, PCR-negative status, percentage of infection after prophylactic use, and total incidence of adverse and side effects. Study selection will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Two reviewers will independently select the studies and assess their eligibility. Two other reviewers will independently extract data from each study. Meta-analysis will then be carried out using fixed-effects or random-effects model, using the mean difference for continuous outcomes and the relative risk for dichotomous outcomes. Bias risk will be assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The quality of evidence for each outcome will be assessed using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology. Review Manager V.5.3.5 will be used for synthesis and subgroup analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Owing to the nature of the review, ethical approval is not required. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020197395.

[Comparative assessment of off-label and unlicensed drug prescription in neonatal intensive care: FDA versus Brazilian guidelines]. / Evaluación comparativa de la prescripción off-label y unlicensed de fármacos en cuidados intensivos neonatales: Guías de la FDA versus guías brasileñas.

INTRODUCTION: Regulatory agencies are responsible for defining the use of off-label (OL) and unlicensed (UL) drug prescription in neonatal intensive care. However, these regulatory criteria may differ between agencies in different countries. The aim of this study was to establish the frequency of OL and UL drug prescription in a sample of patients in a neonatal intensive care unit applying the criteria of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of the United States and the Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA) of Brazil, analysing the differences observed in the results based on the applied criteria. METHODS: Prospective cohort study in neonates admitted for more than 24hours to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of a teaching maternity hospital between August 2017 and July 2018. We obtained information concerning the drugs included in the analysis of OL and UL prescriptions from the DrugDex-Micromedex® and official information on pharmaceutical products in Brazil. We used the kappa correlation coefficient to assess the agreement between the FDA and ANVISA criteria. We defined disagreement as a kappa value of less than 0.200. RESULTS: We evaluated 220 neonates admitted to the NICU and 17,421 items prescribed during the study period. We did not find a difference in the proportion of neonates in which at least 1 drug was prescribed under OL conditions applying the FDA versus the ANVISA criteria (96.4% vs. 98.6%). We found differences between the FDA and ANVISA in the OL classification based on the authorised age of use and indications for prescription, mainly in systemic antimicrobials and cardiovascular drugs. When we compared the prescribing information provided by the FDA and the ANVISA, we found that the criteria of the ANVISA were less specific. CONCLUSIONS: OL and UL drug prescription are frequent in neonatal intensive care applying the criteria of either agency, although the FDA has established more detailed criteria in terms of the ages and indications for which prescription is authorised.