Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cancer ; 128(13): 2441-2448, 2022 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35417564

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ruxolitinib is approved for patients with polycythemia vera (PV) who are resistant/intolerant to hydroxyurea, but its impact on preventing thrombosis or disease-progression is unknown. METHODS: A retrospective, real-world analysis was performed on the outcomes of 377 patients with resistance/intolerance to hydroxyurea from the Spanish Registry of Polycythemia Vera according to subsequent treatment with ruxolitinib (n = 105) or the best available therapy (BAT; n = 272). Survival probabilities and rates of thrombosis, hemorrhage, acute myeloid leukemia, myelofibrosis, and second primary cancers were calculated according to treatment. To minimize biases in treatment allocation, all results were adjusted by a propensity score for receiving ruxolitinib or BAT. RESULTS: Patients receiving ruxolitinib had a significantly lower rate of arterial thrombosis than those on BAT (0.4% vs 2.3% per year; P = .03), and this persisted as a trend after adjustment for the propensity to have received the drug (incidence rate ratio, 0.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-1.3; P = .09). There were no significant differences in the rates of venous thrombosis (0.8% and 1.1% for ruxolitinib and BAT, respectively; P = .7) and major bleeding (0.8% and 0.9%, respectively; P = .9). Ruxolitinib exposure was not associated with a higher rate of second primary cancers, including all types of neoplasia, noncutaneous cancers, and nonmelanoma skin cancers. After a median follow-up of 3.5 years, there were no differences in survival or progression to acute leukemia or myelofibrosis between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that ruxolitinib treatment for PV patients with resistance/intolerance to hydroxyurea may reduce the incidence of arterial thrombosis. LAY SUMMARY: Ruxolitinib is better than other available therapies in achieving hematocrit control and symptom relief in patients with polycythemia vera who are resistant/intolerant to hydroxyurea, but we still do not know whether ruxolitinib provides an additional benefit in preventing thrombosis or disease progression. We retrospectively studied the outcomes of 377 patients with resistance/intolerance to hydroxyurea from the Spanish Registry of Polycythemia Vera according to whether they subsequently received ruxolitinib (n = 105) or the best available therapy (n = 272). Our findings suggest that ruxolitinib could reduce the incidence of arterial thrombosis, but a disease-modifying effect could not be demonstrated for ruxolitinib in this patient population.


Asunto(s)
Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias , Policitemia Vera , Mielofibrosis Primaria , Trombosis , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Hidroxiurea/efectos adversos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Nitrilos , Policitemia Vera/tratamiento farmacológico , Mielofibrosis Primaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirazoles , Pirimidinas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trombosis/inducido químicamente , Trombosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Trombosis/prevención & control
2.
Ann Hematol ; 99(4): 791-798, 2020 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32086587

RESUMEN

Patients with polycythemia vera (PV) or essential thrombocythemia (ET) presenting with splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) might have a specific clinico-biological profile. To investigate this hypothesis, 3705 PV/ET patients from three national registers, 118 of them presenting with SVT, were reviewed. After correction for age and sex, PV/ET patients with SVT showed an increased risk of death (HR 2.47, 95% CI 1.5-4.01, p < 0.001), venous thrombosis (IRR 3.4, 95%CI 2.1-5.5, p < 0.001), major bleeding (IRR 3.6, 95%CI 2.3-5.5, p < 0.001), and second cancer (IRR 2.37, 95%CI 1.4-4.1, p = 0.002). No case of acute leukemia was documented among patients with PV/ET presenting with SVT and seven of them (6%) progressed to myelofibrosis. SVT was not associated with lower risk of MF after correction by age and sex. Patients with SVT more frequently died from complications related to hepatic disease, major bleeding, or second cancer, resulting in a 5-year reduction of age- and sex-adjusted median survival. In conclusion, PV and ET patients presenting with SVT have shorter survival than patients with PV and ET of the same age and sex. This excess mortality is related to liver disease, major bleeding, and second cancer rather than to the natural evolution of the MPN.


Asunto(s)
Policitemia Vera/complicaciones , Circulación Esplácnica , Trombocitemia Esencial/complicaciones , Trombosis de la Vena/etiología , Adulto , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Hepatopatías/epidemiología , Masculino , Venas Mesentéricas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/epidemiología , Vena Porta , Mielofibrosis Primaria/etiología , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Sistema de Registros , Riesgo , España/epidemiología , Vena Esplénica
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA