Most Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries in Professional Athletes Occur Without Contact to the Injured Knee: A Systematic Review of Video Analysis Studies.

PURPOSE: To systematically review studies using video analyses to evaluate anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury mechanisms in athletes during sport to better understand risk factors and the potential for injury prevention. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in accordance with the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines statement using SCOPUS, PubMed, Medline, and the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials from database inception through June 2023. Inclusion criteria included studies reporting on ACL injury mechanisms occurring in athletes based on video analysis. Athlete demographics, injury mechanisms, position of the lower extremity, and activity at the time of injury were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies, consisting of 542 athletes, met inclusion criteria. Most athletes competed at the professional level (91%, n = 495/542), with 79% (n = 422/536) of athletes being male. The most common sports were soccer (33%, n = 178/542) and American football (26%, n = 140/542). The most common injury mechanism was noncontact in 42.9% (n = 230/536) of athletes, followed by indirect contact (32.6%, n = 175/536) and direct contact (22.4%, n = 120/536). The most common position of injury was with a planted foot (91.7%, n = 110/120), full or near-full knee extension (84.4%, n = 49/58), and axial loading (81.3%, n = 87/107). Injuries commonly involved a deceleration/shift in momentum (50.4%, n = 123/244) or pivoting maneuver (36.1%, n = 77/213). At the time of injury, the knee commonly fell into valgus (76.8%, n = 225/293) with associated internal (53.5%, n = 46/86) or external tibiofemoral rotation (57.7%, n = 101/175). CONCLUSIONS: Most ACL injuries, when evaluated by video analysis, involve professional athletes participating in soccer and American football. The most common injury mechanism occurred without contact with the knee in extension during a deceleration or momentum shift, with resultant valgus and rotational force across the knee. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level IV studies.

Higher success rate observed in reconstruction techniques of acute posterolateral corner knee injuries as compared to repair: an updated systematic review.

PURPOSE: There remains controversy regarding the optimal surgical treatment for acute complete (grade III) posterolateral corner (PLC) injuries. The purpose of this article is to systematically review the contemporary literature regarding surgical options and subsequent outcomes of acute grade III PLC injuries. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using the following search terms: posterolateral corner knee, posterolateral knee, posterolateral instability, multi-ligament knee, and knee dislocation. Inclusion criteria consisted of studies with level I-IV evidence, reporting on human patients with acute grade III PLC injuries undergoing operative management within 4 weeks from injury, with subjective and/or objective outcomes (including varus stress examinations or varus stress radiographs) reported at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Two investigators independently performed the search by sequentially screening articles. Accepted definitions of varus stability on examination or stress radiographs and revision surgery were used to determine success and failure of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies, consisting of 288 patients were included. Ten studies reported primary repair, while reconstruction techniques were reported in seven studies. Overall, 43% (n = 125/288) of injuries involved the PLC, ACL and PCL. Staged reconstruction was reported in 25% (n = 3/12) of studies. The Lysholm score was the most commonly reported outcome measure. An overall failure rate of 12.4% (n = 35/282) was observed. Surgical failure was significantly higher in patients undergoing repair (21.9%; n = 21/96) compared to reconstruction (7.1%; n = 6/84) (p = 0.0058). Return to sport was greater in patients undergoing reconstruction (100%; n = 22/22) compared to repair (94%; n = 48/51) (n.s). The most common post-operative complication was arthrofibrosis requiring manipulation under anesthesia (8.7%; n = 25/288). A total of 3.8% (n = 11/288) of patients underwent revision PLC reconstruction. CONCLUSION: There remains substantial heterogeneity in the surgical techniques of acute, grade III PLC injuries with an overall failure rate of 12.4%. Failure rates were significantly lower, and return to sport rates higher in patients undergoing PLC reconstruction compared to repair. The most common postoperative complication was arthrofibrosis requiring manipulation under anesthesia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Intrarater and Interrater Reliability of Radiographic Characteristics in Skeletally Immature Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears: A PLUTO Study Group Reliability Study.

BACKGROUND: Radiographic measurements of limb alignment in skeletally immature patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are frequently used for surgical decision-making, preoperative planning, and postoperative monitoring of skeletal growth. However, the interrater and intrarater reliability of these radiographic characteristics in this patient population is not well documented. HYPOTHESIS: Excellent reliability across 4 raters will be demonstrated for all digital measures of length, coronal plane joint orientation angles, mechanical axis, and tibial slope in skeletally immature patients with ACL tears. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis). METHODS: Three fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons and 1 medical student performed 2 rounds of radiographic measurements on digital imaging (lateral knee radiographs and long-leg radiographs) of skeletally immature patients with ACL tears. Intrarater and interrater reliability for continuous radiographic measurements was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) across 4 raters with 95% CIs for affected and unaffected side measurements. Interrater reliability analysis used an ICC (2, 4) structure and intrarater reliability analysis used an ICC (2, 1) structure. A weighted kappa coefficient was calculated for ordinal variables along with 95% CIs for both interrater and intrarater reliability. Agreement statistic interpretations are based on scales described by Fleiss, and Cicchetti and Sparrow: <0.40, poor; 0.40 to 0.59, fair; 0.60 to 0.74, good; and >0.74, excellent. RESULTS: Radiographs from a convenience sample of 43 patients were included. Intrarater reliability was excellent for nearly all measurements and raters. Interrater reliability was also excellent for nearly all reads for all measurements. CONCLUSION: Radiographic reliability of long-leg radiographs and lateral knee x-rays in skeletally immature children with ACL tears is excellent across nearly all measures and raters and can be obtained and interpreted as reliable and reproducible means to measure limb length and alignment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Editorial Commentary: Knee Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Results in Significantly Improved Outcomes in the Majority Patients, but There Is Wide Variability in the Rate at Which Athletes Return to Sports.

Meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) is the reconstructive procedure of choice following a total or near-total meniscectomy for the symptomatic patient with a stable, well-aligned knee prior to the onset of degenerative arthritis. Historically, the goals were to eliminate symptoms with activities of daily living and improve longevity of the articular cartilage. However, athletically active individuals are rarely satisfied unless they return to their prior level of function, which is dependent on patient-specific, knee-specific, and sports-specific factors. Despite the fact that subjective patient-reported outcomes are significantly improved in the majority of MAT patients, there is wide variability in the rate at which athletic patients are able to return to sports, when they return, and their ultimate level of performance. We advise active individuals who undergo a MAT to pursue "low-impact" activities based on 10-year survivorship of 70% to 80%. Risk of a recurrent meniscal tear is the most common complication, and the ability of MAT to prevent osteoarthritis is unproven.

Return to Full Participation Following Concussion in the National Football League, 2015 Through 2020.

OBJECTIVE: Quantify days missed, games missed, injury burden, and time to return to full participation (RTFP) among National Football League (NFL) players who sustained a concussion. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: 2015 through 2020 NFL seasons. PARTICIPANTS: National Football League players diagnosed with a concussion from 2015 to 2020. INTERVENTIONS: National Football League-mandated graduated RTFP protocol. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Days missed, games missed, burden, and time to RTFP, overall and by position. RESULTS: An annual average of 3639 player-days of participation and 255 games were missed across NFL because of concussion. Concussed players missed a median of 9 days (mean = 15.0), a relatively stable metric over 6 years, with slight variation by position. Offensive linemen, tight ends, running backs, and linebackers missed the most days per concussion; defensive secondary, offensive linemen, and wide receivers sustained the highest injury burden. Postconcussion, 59% of players missed one or more scheduled games. Among players concussed in a Sunday game, 38% played in a Sunday game one week later. CONCLUSIONS: The 9-day median time missed post-concussion may be related to emphasis on graduated phase-based concussion management. No concussed player returned to competition on the day of injury, and less than 40% participated in games the following week. Further work is needed to better understand characteristics of concussions that take longer to return and movement through stages of return.

Return to play following nonsurgical management of superior labrum anterior-posterior tears: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Superior labrum anterior-posterior (SLAP) tears are common shoulder injuries, especially in overhead athletes. Often, initial management of these injuries is nonsurgical with focused rehabilitation. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the outcomes of nonsurgical management of SLAP tears in athletes. METHODS: A systematic review was performed for articles published before March 2021 using key search terms pertaining to clinical studies evaluating the nonsurgical treatment of SLAP tears in adult patients published in English-language literature. Abstracts and manuscripts were independently reviewed by 2 co-authors to determine eligibility. Return-to-play rate and return-to-prior-athletic-performance rate were determined by combining results across studies. RESULTS: Five articles met the inclusion criteria. There were 244 total athletes (162 elite or higher-level athletes). The mean ages ranged from 20.3 to 38.0 years. Type II SLAP tears were most common; baseball, softball, and weightlifting were the most common sports involved. The return-to-play rate was 53.7% in all athletes and 52.5% in elite or higher-level athletes. In athletes who were able to complete their nonoperative rehabilitation program, the return-to-play rate was 78% in all athletes and 76.6% in elite or higher-level athletes. The overall rate of return to prior performance was 42.6%, which increased to 72% for those athletes who were able to complete their rehabilitation. Patients who discontinued the rehabilitation protocol in favor of surgery had an average of 8 physical therapy sessions compared with 20 sessions for patients with successful nonoperative treatment. The timing of return to play was generally less than 6 months in studies that reported it. Patient-reported outcomes, including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and visual analog scale, all improved significantly after nonsurgical treatment. Factors associated with failure of nonsurgical management included older age, participation in overhead sports (especially baseball pitchers), traumatic injury, positive compression rotation test, concomitant rotator cuff injury, longer baseball career, longer symptomatic period, and the presence of a Bennett spur. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, nonoperative treatment of SLAP tears in athletes can be successful, especially in the subset of patients who are able to complete their rehabilitation program before attempting a return to play. Although nonoperative treatment should be considered the first line of treatment for most SLAP tears, there are some factors that may be associated with failure of conservative treatment; therefore, further high level, prospective studies would be beneficial to identify those athletes most likely to respond favorably to nonoperative treatment.

Editorial Commentary: Preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Scores Predict Which Patients Will Benefit From Arthroscopic Meniscectomy: To Scope or Not to Scope?

Despite its widespread use and low complication rates, arthroscopic meniscectomy has not been uniformly successful in all patients, especially in those with concurrent osteoarthritis. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is an initiative funded by the National Institutes of Health to develop and validate patient-reported outcomes for clinical research and practice. PROMIS has shown the ability to enhance and standardize measurement of a variety of health domains affecting musculoskeletal function and in discriminating between various orthopaedic procedures through the use of computer adaptive testing. Preoperative PROMIS scores are valid predictors of postoperative minimal clinically important difference in patients undergoing arthroscopic meniscectomy based on preoperative decreased physical function and increased pain interference. PROMIS score cutoffs may be used by arthroscopic surgeons to counsel patients considering arthroscopic meniscectomy.

Suture Tape Augmentation Improves the Biomechanical Performance of Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Grafts Used for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the time-zero biomechanical properties (stiffness, displacement, and load at failure) of bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) grafts used for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with and without suture tape augmentation as a means to determine the potential clinical benefit of this technique. METHODS: Eight juvenile porcine knees underwent ACL reconstruction with a human cadaveric BTB graft (control). These were compared to 8 juvenile porcine knees that underwent ACL reconstruction with a BTB graft augmented with suture tape. All knees underwent biomechanical testing utilizing a dynamic tensile testing machine. Cyclic loading between 50-250N was performed for 500 cycles at 1 Hz to simulate in vivo ACL loads during the early rehabilitation phase. The grafts were displaced during load-at-failure tensile testing at 20 mm/min. Differences in graft displacement, stiffness, and load at failure for the control and suture tape augmented groups were compared with the Student t-test with a significance level of P < .05. RESULTS: There was no difference in graft displacement between the 2 groups. A 104% higher postcyclic stiffness was noted in the augmented group compared to the controls (augmentation: 261 ± 76 N/mm versus control 128 ± 28 N/mm, P = .002). The mean ultimate load at failure was 57% higher in the augmented group compared to controls (744 ± 219 N vs postcyclic 473 ± 169 N, respectively [P = .015]). There was no difference in mode of failure between the control knees and those augmented with suture tape, with approximately half failing from pull off of the tendon from the bone plug and half with pull out of the bone plug from the tunnel. CONCLUSION: Independent suture tape augmentation of a BTB ACL reconstruction grafts was associated with a 104% increase in graft stiffness and a 57% increase in load at failure compared to nonaugmented BTB grafts. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In vivo suture tape augmentation of a BTB ACL reconstruction increases graft construct strength and stiffness, which may reduce graft failure in the clinical setting.

Editorial Commentary: Repair of Posterior-Medial Meniscal Root Tears: One More Potential Tool in Your Box.

No topic in meniscal surgery has generated as much interest over the past decade as meniscal root tears. These rather simple tears, if left untreated, act biomechanically equivalently to a complete meniscectomy. As a result, many investigators have championed the treatment of this injury through the innovation of various surgical techniques designed to restore the biomechanical function of the meniscus to prevent the long-term clinical effects of a complete meniscectomy. Most procedures to repair the posterior meniscal root to its tibial attachment can be broadly grouped into using either a suture anchor or a transtibial bone tunnel for tibial fixation. There are obvious pros and cons to both methods, and most surgeons become comfortable with one "go-to" technique depending on their level of experience with meniscal root repair and their comfort level with various arthroscopic techniques. Most surgeons prefer the transtibial technique in which the sutured meniscus is anchored to its anatomic tibial attachment via a tunnel through which the sutures pass before being secured with either a suture anchor or screw post to the anterior tibial cortex. This technique has considerable biomechanical and clinical evidence to support its use. Unfortunately, there are drawbacks to the transtibial method that must be considered, such as the technical difficulties of accurately and safely drilling the tibial tunnel, the risk of suture failure or attenuation through the tunnel, and the challenge associated with placement of the tunnel in the setting of a concurrent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Therefore, further advances in meniscal root repair are always welcomed by the arthroscopic community. However, as with any surgical innovation, 3 factors must be considered before a new repair procedure can be widely recommended: (1) it must be technically "doable" by most surgeons treating the clinical problem; (2) it must have biomechanical evidence to support its use; and (3) it must result in clinical outcomes that are at least as good as, and preferably better than, current techniques.

Decreased Postural Control in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Compared to Healthy Controls.

CONTEXT: Patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are likely to have deficient dynamic postural stability compared with healthy sex- and age-matched controls. OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that patients undergoing ACL reconstruction have decreased dynamic postural stability compared with matched healthy controls. DESIGN: Prospective case-control study. SETTING: Orthopedic sports medicine and physical therapy clinics. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged 20 years and younger with an ACL tear scheduled for reconstruction were enrolled prospectively. Controls were recruited from local high schools and colleges via flyers. INTERVENTIONS: Patients underwent double-stance dynamic postural stability testing prior to surgery, recording time to failure and dynamic motion analysis (DMA) scores. Patients were then matched with healthy controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographics, time to failure, and DMA scores were compared between groups. RESULTS: A total of 19 females and 12 males with ACL tears were matched with controls. Individuals with ACL tears were more active (Marx activity score: 15.7 [1.0] vs 10.8 [4.9], P < .001); had shorter times until test failure (84.4 [15.8] vs 99.5 [14.5] s, P < .001); and had higher (worse) DMA scores (627 [147] vs 481 [132], P < .001), indicating less dynamic postural stability. Six patients with ACL deficiency (1 male and 5 females) demonstrated lower (better) DMA scores than their controls, and another 7 (4 males and 3 females) were within 20% of controls. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing ACL reconstruction had worse global dynamic postural stability compared with well-matched controls. This may represent the effect of the ACL injury or preexisting deficits that contributed to the injury itself. These differences should be studied further to evaluate their relevance to ACL injury risk, rehabilitation, and return to play.

Clavicle Trauma: From Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries to Distal Clavicle Fractures and Midshaft Fractures in Contact Athletes.

Injuries to the clavicle and its articulations (the acromioclavicular and sternoclavicular joints) are becoming increasingly common. Conventional treatment has been dominated by nonsurgical techniques; however, the active patient was often left with substantial residual disability that was underreported. It is now recognized that surgical intervention may be advantageous in specific patients, especially athletes. Surgeons should consider pathophysiology, indications, and surgical techniques to best manage these injuries.

Editorial Commentary: National Football League Hopefuls Beware: Your Stock May Be Falling After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Making a National Football League (NFL) team is tough; making one after undergoing an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is tougher. NFL Combine participants who are post-ACL reconstruction, particularly with certain graft types such as allografts and to a lesser extent hamstring grafts, are frequently 'down-graded' despite the presence of a stable, well-placed graft without any associated meniscal or chondral damage. Whether NFL general managers are truly prescient in accurately predicting decreased performance by choosing a player later in the draft, or whether NFL coaching staffs knowingly or unknowingly restrict an athlete's playing time based on draft position or surgical history is unknown. Yet, any collegiate football player who is good enough to make it to the Combine possesses a rare combination of athleticism, strength, determination, and toughness. An ACL tear used to mark the beginning of the end of an athlete's playing career, but today's athletes are able to return at an elite level following ACL injury and surgery. Unfortunately, despite a successful surgery, prospective NFL players who undergo ACL reconstruction may still be at a disadvantage compared to their uninjured counterparts in terms of their ability to be drafted and play in the first two years of their careers.

Editorial Commentary: Want to Play in the National Football League? Not For Long If You Have an Untreated Cartilage Defect of the Knee.

Although the epidemiology and risk factors for chondral injuries of the knee among prospective National Football League athletes have been reported, the effect of previously untreated chondral injuries on players' early National Football League career performance has been unclear to this point. Despite not requiring surgical treatment, players with these untreated injuries were drafted later, played and started fewer games, and exhibited lower fantasy scores-a surrogate marker for performance. Untreated chondral injuries of the knee can have potentially deleterious effects on the playing careers (and financial prospects) of professional American football players.

Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Scores Are Responsive to Early Changes in Patient Outcomes Following Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computer-adaptive testing (CAT) physical function and pain interference scores can detect early variations in postoperative outcomes following arthroscopic partial meniscectomy and to determine whether age, sex, body mass index, mechanical symptoms, duration of symptoms, and the severity of chondrosis affect these scores. METHODS: Seventy-five patients who had undergone a partial meniscectomy between September 2015 and March 2016 and had both preoperative and postoperative PROMIS-CAT data for physical function, pain interference, and depression were included. Demographic, clinical, and surgical data including the presence of intraoperative chondral lesions were collected for statistical analysis to assess for factors that led to differences in PROMIS-CAT outcomes. RESULTS: Preoperatively, patients had decreased physical function and increased pain interference in excess of 1 standard deviation from the general population with mean PROMIS scores of 38.5 and 63.5, respectively. At the 6-week postoperative visit, patients had significant improvements in both physical function and pain interference with mean scores of 43.4 (P < .001, SE = 0.75) and 55.5 (P < .001, SE = 0.83). Female patients had less improvement in PROMIS physical function (P = .03) and depression (P = .02) scores postoperatively compared with male patients. Patients with high-grade articular cartilage lesions had less improvement in physical function (P = .014) and pain interference (P = .010) at 6 weeks postoperative compared with patients with low grade or no chondral lesion. CONCLUSIONS: PROMIS-CAT provides responsive outcome measures to early postoperative changes in physical function and pain following arthroscopic partial meniscectomy and has prognostic value in patient outcomes 6 weeks after procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV case series.

Injectable Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in Sport.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this article is to review the basic science of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), their clinical effects, indications, potential complications, and ethical issues associated with the use of injectable NSAIDs in the treatment of athletes. These objectives are presented taking into consideration the contemporaneous issues associated with the treatment of amateur and professional athletes. DATA SOURCES: A nonformal review of the published medical literature and lay media focusing on the use of injectable NSAIDs in athletes was used for this article. MAIN RESULTS: All NSAIDs work through the inhibition of the cyclooxygenase (COX) pathway (either one or both subtypes) to reduce inflammation and inhibit pain by reducing prostaglandin and thromboxane synthesis. Complications related to NSAID use involve primarily the gastrointestinal, renal, and cardiovascular systems through this COX pathway inhibition. Ketorolac is the only NSAID currently available in an injectable form. Despite its analgesic efficacy comparable with opioid medication, injectable ketorolac has the potential to cause bleeding in collision athletes resulting from impaired hemostasis. CONCLUSIONS: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug medications are currently used at every level of competition. Injectable ketorolac is an effective analgesic and anti-inflammatory drug. However, its potential effectiveness must be weighed against the risk of potential complications in all athletes, especially those who participate in contact/collision sports. The team physician must balance the goal of treating pain and inflammation with the ethical implications and medical considerations inherent in the administration of injectable medications solely to prevent pain and/or return the athlete to competition.

Surgery versus physical therapy for a meniscal tear and osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Whether arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for symptomatic patients with a meniscal tear and knee osteoarthritis results in better functional outcomes than nonoperative therapy is uncertain. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial involving symptomatic patients 45 years of age or older with a meniscal tear and evidence of mild-to-moderate osteoarthritis on imaging. We randomly assigned 351 patients to surgery and postoperative physical therapy or to a standardized physical-therapy regimen (with the option to cross over to surgery at the discretion of the patient and surgeon). The patients were evaluated at 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome was the difference between the groups with respect to the change in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) physical-function score (ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms) 6 months after randomization. RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat analysis, the mean improvement in the WOMAC score after 6 months was 20.9 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.9 to 23.9) in the surgical group and 18.5 (95% CI, 15.6 to 21.5) in the physical-therapy group (mean difference, 2.4 points; 95% CI, -1.8 to 6.5). At 6 months, 51 active participants in the study who were assigned to physical therapy alone (30%) had undergone surgery, and 9 patients assigned to surgery (6%) had not undergone surgery. The results at 12 months were similar to those at 6 months. The frequency of adverse events did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the intention-to-treat analysis, we did not find significant differences between the study groups in functional improvement 6 months after randomization; however, 30% of the patients who were assigned to physical therapy alone underwent surgery within 6 months. (Funded by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases; METEOR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00597012.).

Medial Meniscal Root Avulsion: A Biomechanical Comparison of 4 Different Repair Constructs.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the time-zero load-to-failure strength of 4 different constructs used to repair medial meniscal root avulsions. METHODS: Sixty fresh-frozen cadaveric knees with a mean age of 74 years were used for this study. Each knee was dissected to isolate the attachment of the posterior root of the medial meniscus to the tibial plateau. An Instron machine (Instron, Norwood, MA) with a custom-designed clamp was used to avulse the intact posterior meniscal root in 12 control specimens. An additional 48 specimens were tested after transection of the native meniscal root to evaluate the pullout strength of 4 different repair constructs using No. 0 FiberWire suture (Arthrex, Naples, FL): a single suture (n = 12), a double suture (n = 12), a loop stitch (n = 12), and a locking loop stitch (n = 12). Analysis of variance was used to compare load to failure and stiffness of all 4 groups; pair-wise, between-group differences were also assessed. RESULTS: Repair failure occurred most commonly by suture pullout in 94% of the specimens in the repair groups. For the controls, failure occurred most commonly at the meniscus-clamp interface. Failure load was highest for the control group (mean, 359.5 ± 168 N), followed in descending order by the locking loop stitch (191.4 ± 45.1 N), loop stitch (119.6 ± 55.0 N), double suture (96.2 ± 51.4 N), and single suture (58.2 ± 29.6 N). The control group was significantly stronger than 3 of the experimental groups (single suture [95% CI, 3.8 to 11.3], double suture [95% CI, 2.1 to 6.4], and loop stitch [95% CI, 2.0 to 4.5]; P < .0001) but not the locking loop stitch (P = .003; 95% CI, 1.2 to 3.2). The locking loop stitch was significantly stronger than the single suture (P < .0001; 95% CI, 2.0 to 5.4) and double suture (P = .003; 95% CI, 1.2 to 2.9). The locking loop stitch was significantly stiffer than the single suture (P < .0001; 95% CI, 3.8 to 20.3), double suture (P < .0001; 95% CI, 2.0 to 9.8), and loop stitch (P = .03; 95% CI, 1.1 to 5.5) but not significantly different from the control group (P = .93; 95% CI, 0.3 to 1.9). Age and gender had no effect on pullout strength. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that the locking loop stitch provided time-zero load-to-failure strength that most closely approximated the strength of the native meniscal root in addition to being significantly stronger and stiffer than 3 other commonly used repair methods. The true strength of the native meniscal root is unknown based on limitations with our testing methodology. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The locking loop stitch exhibited the highest load to failure and stiffness of the 4 fixation methods tested, despite the fact that none of the fixation methods replicated the strength of the intact meniscal root. It is currently unknown what strength of fixation is required for healing of meniscal root repairs.

Percutaneous discal cyst rupture in a professional football player using sublaminar epidural injection for thecal sac displacement.

A case of percutaneous discal cyst rupture in a 25-year-old professional American football player is reported. The patient presented with a 3-day history of severe left-sided back pain. Magnetic resonance imaging examination demonstrated a discal cyst effacing the left L4-L5 lateral recess, with interposed thecal sac. A sublaminar epidural injection was performed displacing the thecal sac, exposing the discal cyst, and allowing for percutaneous perforation. The patient had complete resolution of symptoms after discal cyst rupture and was able to compete in a professional football game 3 days later. Computed tomography-guided percutaneous rupture is a therapeutic modality that may be considered for treatment of a symptomatic discal cyst.

The Impact of the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Research on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Orthopaedic Practice.

With an estimated 200,000 anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions performed annually in the United States, there is an emphasis on determining patient-specific information to help educate patients on expected clinically relevant outcomes. The Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network consortium was created in 2002 to enroll and longitudinally follow a large population cohort of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. The study group has enrolled >4,400 anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions from seven institutions to establish the large level I prospective anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction outcomes cohort. The group has become more than a database with information regarding anterior cruciate ligament injuries; it has helped to establish a new benchmark for conducting multicenter, multisurgeon orthopaedic research. The changes in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practice resulting from the group include the use of autograft for high school, college, and competitive athletes in their primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Other modifications include treatment options for meniscus and cartilage injuries, as well as lifestyle choices made after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Understanding of Meniscus Injury and Expectations of Meniscus Surgery in Patients Presenting for Orthopaedic Care.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to assess orthopaedic patient knowledge and perceptions about the meniscus, meniscal injury, and treatment to identify gaps in orthopaedic patients' understanding and to assess the outcomes most important to these patients. METHODS: A 41-question survey was designed to measure knowledge and perception of meniscal tears regarding anatomy, function, surgical indications, operative techniques, risks, overall benefits of repair or removal, and recovery times. Study participants aged between 18 and 60 years were recruited from an academic orthopaedic sports medicine clinic regardless of their present complaint. Patients aged younger than 18 years were excluded. RESULTS: We surveyed 253 individuals (132 men and 121 women), with a mean age of 38 years. Most respondents (62%) rated their knowledge about the meniscus as little or no knowledge. Participants answered between 49% and 50% of questions regardless of how they self-rated their knowledge base. There was no correlation between perceived knowledge and percent answered correctly or between level of knee injury/surgery exposure and percent answered correctly. Only 28% of respondents knew that partial meniscectomy is the most common type of surgical treatment for meniscal tears. The risk of osteoarthritis developing and the risk of further surgery were the major concerns regarding meniscus surgery. Those who had undergone a previous meniscus surgery performed better on factual questions regarding meniscus structure (P = .0006), function (P = .0001), mechanism of injury (P = .0001), and the need for surgery (P = .0001) than those who had not undergone previous meniscus surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Patients having undergone prior meniscus surgery have better knowledge of meniscus injury and treatment than those who have not had previous meniscus injury. Meniscus repair is believed to be the most common treatment rather than meniscectomy. The risk of needing additional surgery and the risk of arthritis developing after meniscus surgery are the main concerns among respondents.