Human Rights in Hospitals: an End to Routine Shackling.

Medical students (NSB, NM, JDW) spearheaded revision of the policy and clinical practice for shackling incarcerated patients at Boston Medical Center (BMC), the largest safety net hospital in New England. In American hospitals, routine shackling of incarcerated patients with metal restraints is widespread-except for perinatal patients-regardless of consciousness, mobility, illness severity, or age. The modified policy includes individualized assessments and allows incarcerated patients to be unshackled if they meet defined criteria. The students also formed the Stop Shackling Patients Coalition (SSP Coalition) of clinicians, public health practitioners, human rights advocates, and community members determined to humanize the inpatient treatment of incarcerated patients. Changes pioneered at BMC led the Mass General Brigham health system to follow suit. The Massachusetts Medical Society adopted a resolution authored by the SSP Coalition, which condemned universal shackling and advocated for use of the least restrictive alternative. This will be presented to the American Medical Association in June 2024. The Coalition led a similar effort to coauthor a policy statement on the issue, which was formally adopted by the American Public Health Association in November 2023. Most importantly, in an unprecedented human rights victory, a BMC patient who was incarcerated, sedated, and intubated was unshackled by correctional officers for the purpose of preserving human dignity.

Socioeconomic Impact on Swallow Therapy Attendance.

Dysphagia negatively impacts quality of life and increases health care costs. Swallow therapy is the primary and effective treatment for dysphagia of various etiologies, and attendance is critical to success. This study seeks to identify barriers to swallow therapy attendance at a tertiary care, safety-net hospital. A total of 309 patients were referred for swallow therapy from January 1, 2018, to April 30, 2019. Patients were divided into those who "Attended" at least one swallow therapy appointment and those who "Did not Attend" any swallow therapy appointment. Demographics, socioeconomic factors, and diagnosis prompting therapy referral were compared between the two groups. Socioeconomic status (SES) was based on insurance status and income. 177 patients (57%) attended at least one swallow therapy appointment and 132 (43%) did not attend any appointments. Overall, 240 (78%) patients had public insurance and 69 (22%) had private insurance. Analysis of SES status identified 106 (34%) patients as double-low SES, 157 (51%) as low SES, and 43 (14%) as high SES. Referral diagnoses were "Dysphagia-unspecified type" (n = 119, 38%), "Cancer" (n = 66, 21%), "Neurologic" (n = 46, 15%), "Globus" (n = 29, 9%), "Aspiration" (n = 17, 6%), "Reflux" (n = 17, 6%), and "Throat Pain" (n = 15, 5%). No patient demographic factors, SES factors, or referral diagnosis correlated significantly with swallow therapy attendance. Overall, swallow therapy attendance was poor. In this group, socioeconomic and demographic factors did not significantly impact swallow therapy attendance. Future research should focus on identifying barriers to swallow care and strategies to improve attendance.