RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In clinical practice, the effect of durvalumab and radiation pneumonitis (RP) on survival after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is not fully understood. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate factors related to distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after IMRT for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). METHODS: All patients who were treated with conventional fractionated IMRT for LA-NSCLC between April 2016 and March 2021 were eligible. Time-to-event data were assessed by using the Kaplan-Meier estimator, and the Cox proportional hazards model was used for prognostic factor analyses. Factors that emerged after the start of IMRT, such as durvalumab administration or the development of RP, were analysed as time-dependent covariates. RESULTS: A total of 68 consecutive patients treated with conventional fractionated IMRT for LA-NSCLC were analysed. Sixty-six patients completed radiotherapy, 50 patients received concurrent chemotherapy, and 36 patients received adjuvant durvalumab. During the median follow-up period of 14.3 months, 23 patients died, and tumour progression occurred in 37 patients, including 28 patients with distant metastases. The 1-year DMFS rate, PFS rate and OS rate were 59.9%, 48.7% and 84.2%, respectively. Grade 2 RP occurred in 16 patients, grade 3 in 6 patients and grade 5 in 1 patient. The 1-year cumulative incidences of grade 2 or higher RP and grade 3 or higher RP were 33.8% and 10.3%, respectively. The results of multivariate analyses showed that durvalumab had a significantly lower hazard ratio (HR) for DMFS, PFS and OS (HR 0.31, p < 0.01; HR 0.33, p < 0.01 and HR 0.32, p = 0.02), respectively. Grade 2 or higher RP showed significance for DMFS and a nonsignificant trend for OS (HR 2.28, p = 0.04 and HR 2.12, p = 0.13), respectively, whereas a higher percentage of lung volume receiving 20 Gy or higher was significant for PFS (HR 2.25, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice, durvalumab administration following IMRT with concomitant chemotherapy showed a significant survival benefit. Reducing the risk of grade 2 or higher RP would also be beneficial.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/radioterapia , Quimioradioterapia/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th Edition Breast Cancer Staging System, biological information in addition to anatomical information was added as a basis for prognosis evaluation, but its prognostic impact in Japanese patients treated with postoperative radiotherapy has not been discussed. To determine the applicability of the updated prognostic staging system, we evaluated the prognostic value and confirmed the effectiveness of this system in patients in whom postoperative radiotherapy was performed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who were treated with postoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer in our institution between January 2011 and December 2015 were restaged by the AJCC 8th pathological prognosis staging system, and then overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) rates and hazard ratios (HR) were analyzed to compare the predictive fit of the two staging systems. RESULTS: Five hundred and seven patients who in whom postoperative radiotherapy was performed for breast cancer were enrolled in this study. 36.1% patients were downstaged and 5.3% patients were upstaged from the 7th to 8th editions staging system classification. Kaplan-Meier curves and HRs showed differences in OS and DFS rates between the 7th edition and 8th edition staging systems. The AJCC 8th edition prognostic stage system has a better prognostic prediction of OS and DFS than does the 7th edition anatomic stage system. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the 7th edition in breast cancer, AJCC 8th edition prognostic stage system has more precise stratification and superior prognostic value, providing a more accurate reference for the choice of radiotherapy for patients with breast cancer.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Japón , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuidados Posoperatorios , Pronóstico , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In Japan, positron emission tomography using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) has been covered by the national health insurance for esophageal cancer since 2006. FDG-PET is commonly performed in advanced esophageal cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of FDG-PET on survival in patients with locally advanced inoperable esophageal cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients with cT4 and without M1 esophageal cancer on CT in our institution between 2000 and 2014, and data for 78 patients who meet the eligibility criteria described below were used for analysis in this study. The eligibility criteria included (1) cT4 esophageal cancer without distant metastases or M1 lymph node metastasis (UICC 2002), (2) histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma, (3) 20-79 years of age, (4) having undergone at least 1 cycle of concomitant chemotherapy, (5) having been irradiated with 50 Gy or more, and (6) no other active malignant tumor during treatment. RESULTS: Two patients were excluded because abdominal lymph node metastases or neck lymph node metastases were detected by FDG-PET. In 78 eligible patients, FDG-PET was not performed before treatment in 41 of the 78 patients and was performed in the other patients. The median observation period was 68 months. The 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates in 78 patients were 36.9% and 30.8%, respectively. There was no significant difference in overall survival or progression-free survival between patients in whom FDG-PET was performed and those in whom FDG-PET was not performed (12.0 months vs. 11.0 months, p = 0.920 and 6.0 months vs. 6.0 months, p = 0.844, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with only CT, additional information from FDG-PET is not associated with improving survival in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. Our results suggest that FDG-PET might not have much meaning for survival in locally advanced esophageal cancer.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidad , Quimioradioterapia/mortalidad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/secundario , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Radiofármacos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate correlations between tumour response to definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and histogram-derived apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) parameters on diffusion-weighted MR images. METHODS: Forty patients with clinical T3-4 oesophageal SCC underwent concurrent CRT. MR examination at 3 T was performed 1-3 days prior to CRT. Readout-segmented echo-planar diffusion imaging was used to acquire ADC maps. Pre- and post-treatment CT examinations were performed. Histogram parameters (mean, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th percentiles, skewness and kurtosis) of the ADC values were compared with post-treatment disease status based on RECIST and the tumour regression ratio. RESULTS: None of the ADC parameters showed significant correlation with post-treatment status (range of Spearman's ρ values - 0.19 to 0.14, range of p values 0.22-0.47) or tumour regression ratio (range of Spearman's ρ values - 0.045 to 0.18, range of p values 0.26-0.96). Neither progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.17) nor overall survival (OS) (p = 0.15) was significantly different between the two groups corresponding to the lower (< median) and upper arms (≥ median) of the mean ADC values. CONCLUSIONS: Histogram-derived pretreatment ADC parameters were not predictive imaging biomarkers for tumour response to CRT in patients with oesophageal SCC. KEY POINTS: ⢠Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values are derived from diffusion-weighted MR imaging. ⢠High-resolution diffusion-weighted images are generated by readout-segmented echo-planar diffusion imaging. ⢠Readout-segmented echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging enabled evaluation of ADC parameters. ⢠Pretreatment ADC parameters do not predict chemoradiotherapy response in patients with oesophageal carcinoma.
Asunto(s)
Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Imagen de Difusión por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Imagen Eco-Planar , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Supervivencia sin ProgresiónRESUMEN
PURPOSE: A dose escalation study to determine the recommended dose with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for peripheral T2N0M0 non-small cell carcinomas (JCOG0702) was conducted. The purpose of this paper is to report the survival and the late toxicities of JCOG0702. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The continual reassessment method was used to determine the dose level that patients should be assigned to and to estimate the maximum tolerated dose. The starting dose was 40 Gy in four fractions at D95 of PTV. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were enrolled. Ten patients were treated with 40 Gy at D95 of PTV, four patients with 45 Gy, eight patients with 50 Gy, one patient with 55 Gy and five patients with 60 Gy. Ten patients were alive at the last follow-up. Overall survival (OS) for all patients was 67.9% (95% CI 47.3-81.8%) at 3 years and 40.8% (95% CI 22.4-58.5%) at 5 years. No Grade 3 or higher toxicity was observed after 181 days from the beginning of the SBRT. Compared to the toxicities up to 180 days, chest wall related toxicities were more frequent after 181 days. CONCLUSIONS: The 5-year OS of 40.8% indicates the possibility that SBRT for peripheral T2N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer is superior to conventional radiotherapy. The effect of the SBRT dose escalation on OS is unclear and further studies are warranted.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Radiocirugia/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/complicaciones , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/complicaciones , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Masculino , Análisis de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer treated by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), baseline malnutrition and its progression have been shown to be associated with a poor outcome. We conducted this study to determine the variation in four blood test parameters including serum albumin level (ALB), creatinine (Cre), hemoglobin (Hb) and platelet (Plt) during CCRT for stage III esophageal cancer patients and its effect on patients' outcome. METHODS: One hundred eighty-three patients diagnosed with stage III esophageal cancer were retrospectively investigated. In addition to known prognostic factors, baseline level of the four blood test parameters and their variation at day 105 (ΔALB, ΔCre, ΔHb and ΔPlt, respectively) were analyzed. RESULTS: The median observation period for patients who survived was 57.2 months, and the 5-year overall survival rate was 35.6% (95% CI 34.2-36.9%). In multivariate analyses, baseline ALB (≥ 3.6 g/dL), higher ΔALB (≥ + 0.3 g/dL) were independent predictors for overall survival (p = 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively), in addition to other clinical factors including T stage and overall treatment time (OTT). For disease-free survival, ΔALB was only a predictor in hematological parameters (p = 0.001) in addition to T stage and OTT. No hematological and clinical parameters had significant correlation with local control in multivariate analysis. Furthermore, ΔALB showed significant correlation with OS and DFS in log-rank test (p = 0.002 and 0.002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest improvement in ALB after treatment might be a favorable prognostic factor in esophageal cancer patients treated by CCRT.
Asunto(s)
Quimioradioterapia/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/sangre , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Albúmina Sérica/análisis , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/radioterapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Estado Nutricional , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Albúmina Sérica/efectos de los fármacos , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
This study aimed to develop and evaluate field shape optimization technique based on dose calculation using daily cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to compensate for interfractional anatomic changes in three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) for prostate cancer. For each of 10 patients, 9-10 CBCT images were obtained throughout the treatment course. The prostate, seminal vesicles, and rectum were manually contoured in all CBCT images. Subsequently, plan adaptation was performed with a program developed in-house. This program calculates dose distributions on CBCT images and optimizes field shape to minimize rectal dose while keeping the target at the optimal dose coverage (the planning target volume D95% receives 95% of the prescription dose). To evaluate the adaptive planning approach, we re-calculated dose distributions on CBCT images based on the conventional and adaptive plans. For the entire cohort, plan adaptation improved rectal V50 Gy, V60 Gy, V65 Gy, and V70 Gy by -7.71±8.43%, -8.30±8.90%, -7.91±8.51% and -7.03±7.70% on average (±SD), respectively. Our results demonstrate that adaptive planning approach is superior to the conventional planning approach for optimizing dose distribution, and this adaptive approach can optimize field shape in 3 min. The proposed approach can be an effective solution for the problem of interfractional anatomic changes in 3D-CRT for prostate cancer.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Dosificación RadioterapéuticaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purposes of the present study were to evaluate prognostic factors for patients with postoperative loco-regional recurrent esophageal cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy by multivariate analysis and to determine which irradiation is better, involved field irradiation or elective nodal irradiation, by matched-pair analysis. METHODS: We reviewed records for 80 patients with postoperative loco-regional recurrent esophageal cancer treated by chemoradiotherapy between 2000 and 2014. The median follow-up period was 62.0 months. Thirty-one cases were treated with elective nodal irradiation and were randomly matched by risk factors to 49 cases treated with involved field irradiation (1:1). RESULTS: Fifty-one patients had disease recurrence again, and irradiated-field failure was observed in 26 patients. The 5-year overall survival rate was 30.5% with a median survival period of 26.5 months. Grade 3 or higher late toxicity was observed in only one patient. In multivariate analysis, short disease-free interval and anastomotic recurrence were statistically significant unfavorable prognostic factors for overall survival (hazard ratios: 2.1 and 2.5, respectively). Matched-pair analysis including disease-free interval, pattern of recurrence and number of recurrent regions revealed that overall survival rate and irradiated-field control rate in patients treated with involved field irradiation were significantly better than those in patients treated with elective nodal irradiation (P = 0.016 and P = 0.014, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Short disease-free interval and anastomotic recurrence are unfavorable factors and elective nodal irradiation is not necessary in chemoradiotherapy for patients with postoperative loco-regional recurrent esophageal cancer.
Asunto(s)
Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/radioterapia , Irradiación Linfática/métodos , Anciano , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Periodo Posoperatorio , Pronóstico , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To review data for patients with stage T4 and/or M1 lymph node (lym) esophageal cancer who have been treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy since 2000 at a high-volume center in Japan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients with T4 and/or M1 lym esophageal cancer who were treated by definitive chemoradiotherapy between 2000 and 2010. The eligibility criteria included (1) histopathologically proven esophageal cancer, (2) T4 and/or M1 lym (UICC 2002), (3) 20-79 years of age, (4) having undergone at least 1 cycle of concomitant chemotherapy, (5) having been irradiated with ≥ 50 Gy, and (6) having no other active malignant tumor during treatment. Toxicity was graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v3.0). RESULTS: Data from 128 patients (70 with clinical stage III, 58 with clinical stage IV) were used for analysis in this study. The median observation period for survivors was 46.3 months. The 2- and 4-year overall survival rates were 32.8 and 24.4 %, respectively. The overall survival of patients without M1 lym was significantly better than that of patients with Ml lym (4-year, 32.6 vs 11.7 %, log-rank test; p = 0.04). Overall survival in more recent patients (2006-2010) did not show improvement when compared with past patients (2000-2005). Eight patients had late toxicities of grade ≥3. CONCLUSIONS: T4 patients without M1 lym showed a relatively good 4-year survival rate of approximately 33 %; however, the results did not show significant improvement after 2000.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/secundario , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Quimioradioterapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Anciano , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidad , Quimioradioterapia/efectos adversos , Quimioradioterapia/mortalidad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Femenino , Hospitales de Alto Volumen , Humanos , Japón , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the long-term results of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for stage II-III thoracic esophageal cancer mainly by comparing results of three protocols retrospectively. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2012, 298 patients with stage II-III thoracic esophageal cancer underwent CRT. Patients in Group A received two cycles of cisplatin (CDDP) at 70 mg/m(2) (day 1 and 29) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) at 700 mg/m(2)/24 h (day 1-4 and 29-32) with radiotherapy (RT) of 60 Gy without a break. Patients in Group B received two cycles of CDDP at 40 mg/m(2) (day 1, 8, 36 and 43) and 5-FU at 400 mg/m(2)/24 h (day 1-5, 8-12, 36-40 and 43-47) with RT of 60 Gy with a 2-week break. Patients in Group C received two cycles of nedaplatin at 70 mg/m(2) (day 1 and 29) and 5-FU at 500 mg/m(2)/24 h (day 1-4 and 29-32) with RT of 60-70 Gy without a break. Differences in prognostic factors between the groups were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival rates for patients in Group A, Group B and Group C were 52.4, 45.2 and 37.2%, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rates for patients in Stage II, Stage III (non-T4) and Stage III (T4) were 64.0, 40.1 and 22.5%, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rates for patients who received 1 cycle and 2 cycles of concomitant chemotherapy were 27.9 and 46.0%, respectively. In univariate analysis, stage, performance status and number of concomitant chemotherapy cycles were significant prognostic factors (p < 0.001, p = 0.008 and p < 0.001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, stage, protocol and number of concomitant chemotherapy cycles were significant factors (p < 0.001, p = 0.043 and p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The protocol used in Group A may be an effective protocol of CRT for esophageal cancer. It may be important to complete the scheduled concomitant chemotherapy with the appropriate intensity of CRT.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Quimioradioterapia/tendencias , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Anciano , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias/tendencias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Radiation therapy (RT) may be suitable for treating patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are difficult to treat with any other option. However, it remains unclear whether RT extends survival in these patients. Among the 957 HCC patients treated at Tohoku University Hospital from January 2007 to December 2013, only 49 patients received RT. We therefore retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of these patients; they were divided into three groups based on the reasons for choosing RT: 27 patients at Stage IV A (67.1 ± 1.6 years, 50.5 ± 2.1 Gy), 9 patients with alternative therapy (72.2 ± 2.4 years, 58.9 ± 1.1 Gy), and 13 patients who received RT after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) (75.6 ± 2.1 years, 56.5 ± 1.5 Gy). RT was employed to ensure the local control of the lesion. The patients at Stage IV A were treated with radical RT (n = 16) or with palliative RT (n = 11). In radical RT group, the response rate was 37.5% and the complete response rate was 25%. The survival rate was 12.5 ± 2.6 months after radical RT. This is considered relatively good for Stage IV A. The disease-free survival rate was 13.0 ± 2.8 months after RT. This excellent disease-free survival indicates that RT is an alternative to other treatments. In the TACE group, patients who received the RT had the significantly long disease-free survival rate than only-TACE (18.0 ± 3.8 months vs. 11.2 ± 0.58 months). We propose that RT is effective and safe for HCC.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/radioterapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/radioterapia , Anciano , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Quimioembolización Terapéutica , Terapia Combinada , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Cuidados Paliativos , Pronóstico , Radioterapia/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to determine the prognostic factors associated with an improved overall outcome after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for primary lung cancer and metastatic lung tumors. METHODS: A total of 229 lung tumors in 201 patients were included in the study. SBRT of 45 Gy in 3 fractions, 48 Gy in 4 fractions, 60 Gy in 8 fractions or 60 Gy in 15 fractions was typically used to treat 172 primary lungs cancer in 164 patients and 57 metastatic lung tumors in 37 patients between January 2001 and December 2011. Prognostic factors for local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The median biologically effective dose was 105.6 Gy based on alpha/beta = 10 (BED10). The median follow-up period was 41.9 months. The 3-year LC and OS rates were 72.5% and 60.9%, and the 5-year LC and OS rates were 67.8% and 38.1%, respectively. Radiation pneumonitis of grades 2, 3 and 5 occurred in 22 patients, 6 patients and 1 patient, respectively. Multivariate analyses revealed that tumor origin (primary lung cancer or metastatic lung tumor, p < 0.001), tumor diameter (p = 0.005), BED10 (p = 0.029) and date of treatment (p = 0.011) were significant independent predictors for LC and that gender (p = 0.012), tumor origin (p = 0.001) and tumor diameter (p < 0.001) were significant independent predictors for OS. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT resulted in good LC and tolerable treatment-related toxicities. Tumor origin and tumor diameter are significant independent predictors for both overall survival and local control.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía , Radiocirugia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to analyze changes over time in the characteristics, treatment, and outcome of patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). METHODS: Data on 315 patients with histologically proven PCNSL undergoing radiotherapy between 2005 and 2009 were collected from 20 Japanese institutions using a questionnaire. These data were then compared with data on 273 patients treated during the period 1995-2004 and those on 466 patients treated during the period 1985-1994. RESULTS: In terms of patient and tumor characteristics, we found a significant increase in mean patient age in the 2005-2009 period compared to the 1985-2004 period (63 vs. 58-59 years, respectively) and in the percentage of patients with better performance status (PS) during the 2005-2009 period compared with the 1995-2004 period (World Health Organization PS 0-2: 73 vs. 65 %, respectively). Regarding treatment, relative to the 1995-2004 period, significant changes in the 2005-2009 period were (1) decreased rate of attempting tumor resection (23 vs. 44 %); (2) increased use of chemotherapy (78 vs. 68 %), and (3) increased use of methotrexate (MTX)-containing regimens (84 vs. 53 %). The 5-year overall survival rates were 15.3, 30.1, and 36.5 % for patients seen during the 1985-1994, 1995-2004, and 2005-2009 periods, respectively, but relapse-free survival did not improve between the 1995-2004 and 2005-2009 periods (26.7 vs. 25.7 % at 5 years, respectively). Patients receiving MTX-containing chemotherapy had 5-year survival rates of 19, 50, and 44 % during these three periods, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although patient backgrounds differed among the study periods, recent trends were a high patient age, better PS, avoidance of extensive tumor resection, more frequent use of chemotherapy, and improved survival. The recent improvement in survival may be due to improvements in second-line treatment and supportive care.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Central/radioterapia , Sistema Nervioso Central/patología , Linfoma/radioterapia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Sistema Nervioso Central/efectos de la radiación , Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Central/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Central/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Japón , Linfoma/patología , Masculino , Metotrexato/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
The emergence of an aging society and technological advances have made radiotherapy, especially stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), a common alternative to surgery for elderly patients with early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) is also an attractive treatment option with potentially lower toxicity for elderly patients with comorbidities. We compared the clinical outcomes of the two modalities using Japanese multicenter data. SBRT (n = 420) and single-fraction CIRT (n = 70) data for patients with stage I NSCLC from 20 centers were retrospectively analyzed. Contiguous patients ≥ 80 years of age were enrolled, and overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), local control (LC), and adverse event rates were compared. The median age was 83 years in both groups and the median follow-up periods were 28.5 and 42.7 months for SBRT and CIRT, respectively. The 3-year OS, DSS, and LC rates were 76.0% vs. 72.3% (p = 0.21), 87.5% vs. 81.6% (p = 0.46), and 79.2% vs. 78.2% (p = 0.87), respectively, for the SBRT vs. CIRT groups. Regarding toxicity, 2.9% of the SBRT group developed grade ≥ 3 radiation pneumonitis, whereas none of the CIRT group developed grade ≥ 2 radiation pneumonitis. SBRT and CIRT in elderly patients showed similar survival and LC rates, although CIRT was associated with less severe radiation pneumonitis.
RESUMEN
Surgery is the standard treatment for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, no clear randomized trial demonstrates its superiority to stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) regarding survival. We aimed to retrospectively evaluate the treatment outcomes of SBRT in operable patients with stage I NSCLC using a large Japanese multi-institutional database to show real-world outcome. Exactly 399 patients (median age 75 years; 262 males and 137 females) with stage I (IA 292, IB 107) histologically proven NSCLC (adenocarcinoma 267, squamous cell carcinoma 96, others 36) treated at 20 institutions were reviewed. SBRT was prescribed at a total dose of 48-70 Gy in 4-10 fractions. The median follow-up period was 38 months. Local progression-free survival rates were 84.2% in all patients and 86.1% in the T1, 78.6% in T2, 89.2% in adenocarcinoma, and 70.5% in squamous cell subgroups. Overall 3-year survival rates were 77.0% in all patients: 90.7% in females, 69.6% in males, and 41.2% in patients with pulmonary interstitial changes. Fatal radiation pneumonitis was observed in two patients, all of whom had pulmonary interstitial changes. This real-world evidence will be useful in shared decision-making for optimal treatment, including SBRT for operable stage I NSCLC, particularly in older patients.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In 2006, we reported the effectiveness of chemoradiotherapy for postoperative recurrent esophageal cancer with a median observation period of 18 months. The purpose of the present study was to update the results of radiotherapy combined with nedaplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for postoperative loco-regional recurrent esophageal cancer. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2004, we performed a phase II study on treatment of postoperative loco-regional recurrent esophageal cancer with radiotherapy (60 Gy/30 fractions/6 weeks) combined with chemotherapy consisting of two cycles of nedaplatin (70 mg/m2/2 h) and 5-FU (500 mg/m2/24 h for 5 days).The primary endpoint was overall survival rate, and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival rate, irradiated-field control rate and chronic toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients were enrolled in this study. The regimen was completed in 76.7% of the patients. The median observation period for survivors was 72.0 months. The 5-year overall survival rate was 27.0% with a median survival period of 21.0 months. The 5-year progression-free survival rate and irradiated-field control rate were 25.1% and 71.5%, respectively. Grade 3 or higher late toxicity was observed in only one patient. Two long-term survivors had gastric tube cancer more than 5 years after chemoradiotherapy.Pretreatment performance status, pattern of recurrence (worse for patients with anastomotic recurrence) and number of recurrent lesions (worse for patients with multiple recurrent lesions) were statistically significant prognostic factors for overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Radiotherapy combined with nedaplatin and 5-FU is a safe and effective salvage treatment for postoperative loco-regional recurrent esophageal cancer. However, the prognosis of patients with multiple regional recurrence or anastomotic recurrence is very poor.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Quimioradioterapia/efectos adversos , Esquema de Medicación , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Fluorouracilo/efectos adversos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Compuestos Organoplatinos/administración & dosificación , Compuestos Organoplatinos/efectos adversos , Periodo Posoperatorio , Pronóstico , Neoplasias Gástricas/etiología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: A radiophotoluminescent glass rod dosimeter (RGD) has recently become commercially available. It is being increasingly used for dosimetry in radiotherapy to measure the absorbed dose including scattered low-energy photons on the body surface of a patient and for postal dosimetry audit. In this article, the dosimetric properties of the RGD, including energy dependence of the dose response, reproducibly, variation in data obtained by the RGD for each energy, and angular dependence in low-energy photons, are discussed. METHODS: An RGD (GD-301, Asahi Techno Glass Corporation, Shizuoka, Japan) was irradiated with monochromatic low-energy photon beams generated by synchrotron radiation at Photon Factory, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK). The size of GD-301 was 1.5 mm in diameter and 8.5 mm in length and the active dose readout volume being 1 mm diameter and 0.6 mm depth located 0.7 mm from the end of the detector. The energy dependence of the dose response and reproducibility and variation were investigated for RGDs irradiated with a plastic holder and those irradiated without the plastic holder. Response of the RGD was obtained by not only conventional single field irradiation but also bilateral irradiation. Angular dependence of the RGD was measured in the range of 0°-90° for 13, 17, 40, and 80 keV photon beams by conventional single field irradiation. RESULTS: The dose responses had a peak at around 40 keV. For the energy range of less than 25 keV, all dose response curves steeply decreased in comparison with the ratio of mass energy absorption coefficient of the RGD to that of air. As for the reproducibility and variation in data obtained by the RGD, the coefficient of variance increased with decrease in photon energy. Furthermore, the variation for bilateral irradiation was less than that for single field irradiation. Regarding angular dependence of the RGD, for energies of 13 and 17 keV, the response decreased with increase in the irradiation angle, and the minimum values were 93.5% and 86%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed the dosimetric properties of the RGD, including the energy dependence of the dose response, reproducibly, variation, and angular dependence in low-energy photons and suggest that the accuracy of the absorbed dose in low-energy photons is affected by the readout method and the distribution of radiophotoluminescence centers in the RGD.
Asunto(s)
Vidrio , Sustancias Luminiscentes , Fotones , Radiometría/métodos , Método de MontecarloRESUMEN
PURPOSE: A phase II study carried out to assess the efficacy of a risk-adapted strategy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for lung cancer. The primary endpoint was 3-year local recurrence, and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), rate of start of systemic therapy or best supportive care (SST-BSC), and toxicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible patients fulfilled the following criteria: performance status of 2 or less, forced expiratory volume in 1 s of 700 mL or more, and tumor not located in central or attached to the chest wall. Twenty-eight Gy was prescribed for primary lung cancers with diameters of 3 cm or less and 30 Gy was prescribed for primary lung cancers with diameters of 3.1-5.0 cm or solitary metastatic lung cancer diameters of 5 cm or less. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were analyzed. The patients included 7 patients with adenocarcinoma, 2 patients with squamous cell carcinoma, 1 patient with metastasis, and 11 patients with clinical diagnosis. The median tumor diameter was 1.9 cm. SRS was prescribed at 28 Gy for 18 tumors and 30 Gy for 3 tumors. During the median follow-up period of 38.9 months for survivors, 1 patient had local recurrence, 7 patients had regional or distant metastasis, and 5 patients died. The 3-year local recurrence, SST-BSC, DFS, and OS rates were 5.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.3-22.2%), 20.1% (95% CI: 6.0-40.2%), 59.2% (95% CI: 34.4-77.3%), and 78.2% (95% CI: 51.4-91.3%), respectively. The 95% CI upper value of local recurrence was lower than the null local recurrence probability. There was no severe toxicity, and grade 2 radiation pneumonitis occurred in 1 patient. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received SRS for lung cancer had a low rate of 3-year local recurrence and tolerable toxicity.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The number of elderly patients in Japan with breast cancer has been gradually increasing. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of radiotherapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for elderly patients with early breast cancer who were restaged according to the 8th Edition Breast Cancer Staging System. METHODS: We reviewed patients age ≥ 65 years who received BCS and adjuvant RT or BCS alone for breast cancer between 2010 and 2015 in our institution and restaged those patients using the AJCC 8th edition pathological prognostic staging system. We compared relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates in the RT group and no RT group. RESULTS: A total of 170 patients were eligible for analysis: 94 (55.3%) were treated with RT and 76 (44.7%) were treated without RT. Age (p < 0.01) was associated with the use of RT. Adjuvant RT significantly improved RFS (95.75% vs 84.21%, p = 0.02). There was no significant difference between the OS rates in the two groups. Univariate analysis showed that pathologic T stage and N stage were significantly associated with both RFS and OS and that histologic grade, chemotherapy, HER2, and RT were significantly associated with RFS, but not with OS. RT reduced the risk of recurrence (HR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.19-0.96, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: RT was associated with significantly improved RFS, but had no significant impact on OS in elderly patients with breast cancer after BCS. Adjuvant RT should be performed even for elderly patients with early breast cancer.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Mastectomía Segmentaria/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Radioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Re-irradiation is a treatment option for recurrent esophageal cancer patients with a history of radiotherapy, but there is a risk of severe late adverse effects. This study focused on the efficacy and safety of re-irradiation using hyperfractionated radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients who underwent re-irradiation by the hyperfraction technique using twice-daily irradiation of 1.2 Gy per fraction for recurrent esophageal cancer were retrospectively included in this study. The overall survival period after the start of secondary radiotherapy and the occurrence of late adverse effects were investigated. RESULTS: Of 26 patients, 21 (81%) received re-irradiation with definitive intention and 21 (81%) underwent concurrent chemotherapy. The median re-irradiation dose was 60 Gy in 50 fractions in 25 treatment days, and the median accumulated irradiation dose in equivalent dose in 2 Gy per fraction was 85.4 Gy with an α/ß value of 3. The median interval between two courses of radiotherapy was 21.0 months. The median overall survival period was 15.8 months and the 1-year and 3-year overall survival rates were 64.3% and 28.3%, respectively. Higher dose of re-irradiation and concurrent chemotherapy significantly improved survival (p < 0.001 and p = 0.019, respectively). Severe late adverse effects with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 or higher were observed in 5 (19.2%) patients, and 2 (7.7%) of them developed a grade 5 late adverse effect. CONCLUSION: High-dose re-irradiation using a hyperfractionated schedule with concurrent chemotherapy might be related to good prognosis, while the rate of late severe adverse effects is not high compared with the rates in past reports.