Clinical features of atlantoaxial involvement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography with computed tomography.

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: Cervical spine involvement is one of the most serious complications in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The study aim was to assess the clinical significance of atlantoaxial (AA) joint involvement detected by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) with computed tomography (CT) in patients with RA. METHOD: A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate AA joint involvement detected by FDG-PET/CT in consecutive RA patients from December 2017 to February 2022. We investigated the relationship between AA joint involvement and clinical data, including disease activity and patients' cervical symptoms. RESULTS: Among 48 patients enrolled, abnormal FDG uptake at AA joint was detected in 13 (27%). Rheumatoid factor titre, initial disease activity score 28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate and total standardized uptake value were significantly higher in the 13 patients than in the others (P = 0.004, P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively). All patients with abnormal FDG uptake at AA joint had some cervical symptoms regardless of cervical spine X-ray abnormalities. Neck pain on movement and at rest were more frequent in the 13 patients than in the others (P = 0.001 and P = 0.004, respectively). The most sensitive symptom associated with AA joint involvement was neck pain on movement (sensitivity, 69%), and the most specific symptom was neck pain at rest (specificity, 100%). CONCLUSIONS: AA joint involvement was commonly observed by FDG-PET/CT in patients with active RA, independent of radiographic findings. Specific cervical symptoms can be important surrogate markers for detection of potential AA synovitis associated with active RA. Key Points • AA joint involvement was frequently seen in RA with high disease activity independent of radiographic findings. • Neck pain was a hallmark of AA joint involvement reflecting disease activity, and resting pain was highly specific.

Effect of drugs containing glucose on FDG-PET image quality.

OBJECTIVE: Patients often take prescription drugs for various diseases or complications that contain several grams of glucose. However, the effect of these glucose-containing medications on the image quality of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) has not been established. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of taking drugs containing glucose before an FDG-PET on the PET image quality. METHODS: In total, 736 continuously enrolled patients who underwent FDG-PET were retrospectively analysed. We investigated the total glucose content in the prescription drugs that each patient took during fasting before the FDG injection, and we divided the patients into three groups according to the amount of glucose in their drugs: group A did not take any drugs containing glucose, group B took sugar-coated tablets (containing trace amounts of glucose), and group C took prescription drugs with glucose an ingredient. Visual scores and quantitative variables with standard uptake value (SUV) for the brain, myocardium, blood, liver, and muscle in the FDG-PET images were analysed and statistically compared across the three groups. RESULTS: In group C, the amount of glucose was 0.63 ± 0.86 g (maximum 4.9 g). For the visual scores, there were no significant differences among the three groups. For the quantitative variables, significant differences were present in the brain SUVmax, muscle SUVmean, brain/blood ratio, brain/liver ratio, and brain/muscle ratio. However, a multivariate analysis showed that the group indicator was not significantly associated with any of the quantitative variables. On the other hand, blood glucose was significantly associated with the visual and quantitative variables. In group C, the correlation coefficient between the amount of glucose and the blood glucose level, the visual scores and the quantitative variables were in the range of - 0.121 to 0.100 and were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences between glucose-containing medications before FDG-PET and the visual scores and quantitative variables for FDG-PET image. Several grams of glucose in drugs before FDG-PET can be ignored.