Performance evaluation of heparin-induced platelet aggregation vs serotonin release assay.

OBJECTIVES: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a rare but life-threatening condition that requires rapid diagnosis for proper management. Laboratory testing should only be performed on patients with intermediate- or high-risk pretest probability. The platelet factor 4 (PF4) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is the screening test that should be confirmed by higher specificity testing such as the heparin-induced platelet aggregation (HIPA) or the serotonin release assay (SRA). This study aims to evaluate the performance of the HIPA in comparison to the SRA, establish cutoffs of the PF4 ELISA to predict positivity for HIPA/SRA, and study the mortality rate between patients with suspected HIT confirmed as HIT positive vs negative. METHODS: All positive PF4 ELISA cases with confirmatory HIPA and SRA testing were included. As the SRA was considered the gold standard, the HIPA performance was evaluated in comparison to SRA before and after the implementation of a new standardized interpretation guide in 2022. The mortality of these cases was also documented by chart reviews. RESULTS: In total, 232 cases with positive or indeterminate anti-PF4 IgG ELISA had confirmatory testing with HIPA and SRA. The sensitivity of the HIPA improved from 55.4% in 2018 to 2021 to 73.8% in 2022. The specificity remained similarly high in 2018 to 2021 vs 2022 (94.9% vs 87.5%). The negative predictive value (NPV) improved in 2022. The PF4 optical density cutoff to predict the positivity of SRA was 0.85 vs 1.47 to predict the positivity of HIPA but decreased to 0.83 when combining HIPA and/or SRA. There was no significant difference in mortality between patients with suspected HIT confirmed positive vs negative. CONCLUSIONS: Although the HIPA has a lower sensitivity than the SRA, the new standardized interpretation guide improved its sensitivity and NPV in 2022. Future improvements are needed to use the HIPA as a stand-alone confirmatory test with the goal to shorten hospital length of stay and expedite proper anticoagulation management.

Cardiac Surgery Outcomes in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis Versus Peritoneal Dialysis.

Rationale & Objective: We sought to compare outcomes of patients receiving dialysis after cardiothoracic surgery on the basis of dialysis modality (intermittent hemodialysis [HD] vs peritoneal dialysis [PD]). Study Design: This was a retrospective analysis. Setting & Participants: In total, 590 patients with kidney failure receiving intermittent HD or PD undergoing coronary artery bypass graft and/or valvular cardiac surgery at Cleveland Clinic were included. Exposure: The patients received PD versus HD (intermittent or continuous). Outcomes: Our primary outcomes were in-hospital and 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were length of stay, days in the intensive care unit, the number of intraoperative blood transfusions, postsurgical pericardial effusion, and sternal wound infection, and a composite of the following 4 in-hospital events: death, cardiac arrest, effusion, and sternal wound infection. Analytical Approach: We used χ2, Fisher exact, Wilcoxon rank sum, and t tests, Kaplan-Meier survival, and plots for analysis. Results: Among the 590 patients undergoing cardiac surgery, 62 (11%) were receiving PD, and 528 (89%) were receiving intermittent HD. Notably, 30-day Kaplan-Meier survival was 95.7% (95% CI: 93.9-97.5) for HD and 98.2% (95% CI: 94.7-100) for PD (P = 0.30). In total, 75 patients receiving HD (14.2%) and 1 patient receiving PD (1.6%) had a composite of 4 in-hospital events (death, cardiac arrest, effusion, and sternal wound infection) (P = 0.005). Out of 62 patients receiving PD, 16 (26%) were converted to HD. Limitations: Retrospective analyses are prone to residual confounding. We lacked details about nutritional data. Intensive care unit length of stay was used as a surrogate for volume status control. Patients have been followed in a single health care system. The HD cohort outnumbered the PD cohort significantly. Conclusions: When compared with PD, HD does not appear to improve outcomes of patients with kidney failure undergoing cardiothoracic surgery. Patients receiving PD had a lower incidence of a composite outcome of 4 in-hospital events (death, cardiac arrest, pericardial effusion, and sternal wound infections).

Patients receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD) are frequently switched to hemodialysis (HD) around the time of an open-heart surgery. More times than not, this is driven by the preference of nonkidney doctors, because HD is perceived to control toxins and fluids better. PD is, however, more advantageous and can achieve similar results while being gentler. In an effort to keep patients on their home PD, we analyzed how they fared when compared with their HD counterparts. Patients maintained on PD did just as well if not better around and after their open-heart surgery. Given the expected increase in patients treated with PD, efforts should be made to maintain them on their home modality even around major surgeries.

Large Left Ventricular Pseudoaneurysm Presenting as an Embolic Stroke After a "Silent" Myocardial Infarction.

A 72-year-old woman with no history of coronary artery disease presented with an acute left middle cerebral artery stroke and was found to have a large left ventricular pseudoaneurysm measuring 8.7 × 7.6 cm and 2 large left ventricular thrombi, the source of her systemic embolization. Despite initial medical management, she developed refractory New York Heart Association functional class III heart failure, uncontrolled atrial fibrillation, and further enlargement of her pseudoaneurysm to 5.5 × 10.6 × 9.2 cm. She underwent urgent aneurysmectomy. Left ventricular pseudoaneurysms are rare and most commonly occur following an acute myocardial infarction when a ventricular free-wall rupture is contained by pericardium or thrombi. Historically, left ventricular angiography displaying a lack of an overlying coronary artery was the gold standard for diagnosis. Now, noninvasive imaging such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and echocardiogram with ultrasound-enhancing agent, are reliable diagnostic tools. They can distinguish a pseudoaneurysm from a true left ventricular aneurysm using characteristic findings such as a narrow aneurysm neck, bidirectional doppler flow between the pseudoaneurysm and the left ventricle, and abrupt changes in the cardiac wall structures. Progressive dilation, wall thinning, and dyskinesis can result in refractory heart failure, arrhythmias, and thrombi formation from venous stasis. Pseudoaneurysms have a 30% to 45% risk of rupture and can be treated with left ventricular aneurysmectomy.

Differences in patterns of progression of secondary mitral regurgitation.

AIMS: Little data exist about the natural history and disease progression of secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR). We sought to study the temporal progression of left-sided volumes and functions in patients who progress to develop severe SMR. METHODS AND RESULTS: We screened patients with chronic severe SMR who had at least one previous transthoracic echocardiography showing non-severe MR. Unsupervised phenotypic clustering based on baseline and rate of change in left ventricular (LV) and left atrial (LA) volumes, ejection fraction (EF), and MR severity progression identified two different phenotypes. We then compared them in terms of clinical characteristics, mechanistic and anatomical features, management, and outcomes. A total of 257 patients were included. Cluster 1 started with lower EF and LA strain and higher LV and LA volumes compared with Cluster 2, with a slower progression into severe SMR. At the onset of severe MR, Cluster 2 still had higher EF, lower LV volumes, but similar LA volumes and strain, and less proportionate SMR, compared with Cluster 1. They also had higher tenting height and more compensatory leaflet growth. On follow-up, Cluster 1 had more ventricular-directed therapies, whereas Cluster 2 received more mitral valve interventions. While the heart failure burden was higher in Cluster 1, there was no difference in mortality rates. CONCLUSION: Based on disease progression, two distinct progression patterns of SMR exist, having different anatomical and mechanistic features with variation in management and outcomes.

Antiplatelet Therapy, Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Progression, and Clinical Outcomes.

Importance: Preclinical studies suggest a potential role for aspirin in slowing abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) progression and preventing rupture. Evidence on the clinical benefit of aspirin in AAA from human studies is lacking. Objective: To investigate the association of aspirin use with aneurysm progression and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with AAA. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a retrospective, single-center cohort study. Adult patients with at least 2 available vascular ultrasounds at the Cleveland Clinic were included, and patients with history of aneurysm repair, dissection, or rupture were excluded. All patients were followed up for 10 years. Data were analyzed from May 2022 to July 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: Clinical outcomes were time-to-first occurrence of all-cause mortality, major bleeding, or composite of dissection, rupture, and repair. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional-hazard regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for all-cause mortality, and subhazard ratios competing-risk regression using Fine and Gray proportional subhazards regression was used for major bleeding and composite outcome. Aneurysm progression was assessed by comparing the mean annualized change of aneurysm diameter using multivariable-adjusted linear regression and comparing the odds of having rapid progression (annual diameter change >0.5 cm per year) using logistic regression. Results: A total of 3435 patients (mean [SD] age 73.7 [9.0] years; 2672 male patients [77.5%]; 120 Asian, Hispanic, American Indian, or Pacific Islander patients [3.4%]; 255 Black patients [7.4%]; 3060 White patients [89.0%]; and median [IQR] follow-up, 4.9 [2.5-7.5] years) were included in the final analyses, of which 2150 (63%) were verified to be taking aspirin by prescription. Patients taking aspirin had a slower mean (SD) annualized change in aneurysm diameter (2.8 [3.0] vs 3.8 [4.2] mm per year; P = .001) and lower odds of having rapid aneurysm progression compared with patients not taking aspirin (adjusted odds ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.49-0.89; P = .002). Aspirin use was not associated with risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted HR [aHR], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.79-1.07; P = .32), nor was aspirin use associated with major bleeding (aHR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.76-1.03; P = .12), or composite outcome (aHR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.93-1.45; P = .09) at 10 years. Conclusions: In this retrospective study of a clinical cohort of 3435 patients with objectively measured changes in aortic aneurysm growth, aspirin use was significantly associated with slower progression of AAA with a favorable safety profile.

Acute but not chronic heart failure is associated with higher mortality among patients hospitalized with pneumonia: An analysis of a nationwide database☆.

Background: Among patients admitted for pneumonia, heart failure (HF) is associated with worse outcomes. It is unclear whether this association is due to acute HF exacerbations, complex medical management, or chronic co-morbid conditions. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted between July 2010 and June 2015 at 651 US hospitals with a principal diagnosis of either pneumonia or secondary diagnosis of pneumonia with a primary diagnosis of respiratory failure or sepsis. Comorbidities were identified by ICD-9 codes and medical management by daily charge codes. Patients were categorized according to the presence and acuity of admission diagnosis of HF. In-hospital mortality was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, hospital cost, ICU admission, use of mechanical ventilation, vasopressors and inotropes. Logistic regression was used to study the association of outcomes with presence and acuity of HF. Results: Of 783,702 patients who met inclusion criteria, 212,203 (27%) had a diagnosis of HF. Of these, 56,306 (26.5%) had acute while 48,188 (22.7%) had chronic HF on admission; 51% had a diagnosis of unspecified HF. In multivariable-adjusted models, having any HF was associated with increased mortality (OR 1.35 [1.33 - 1.38]) compared to those without HF; increased mortality was associated with acute HF (OR 1.19 [1.15 - 1.22]) but not chronic HF (OR 0.92 [0.89 - 0.96]). Conclusion: The worse outcomes for pneumonia patients with HF appear due to acute HF exacerbations. Adjustment for HF without accounting for chronicity could lead to biased prognostic and billing estimates.

Clinical, functional and prognostic implications of severe atrial dilation in secondary mitral regurgitation.

OBJECTIVE: Atrial dilation is known to be a poor prognostic indicator. However, its clinical, functional and prognostic implications have not been thoroughly explored in secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR). We sought to describe the implications of severe atrial dilation (SAD) in SMR. METHODS: We included all adult patients with severe SMR due to left ventricle dysfunction (with no organic mitral valve disease) who underwent transthoracic echocardiography between January 2012 and March 2021 at our institution. The concomitant presence of severe left atrial (LA) dilation (>48 mL/m2) defined SADMR (SAD in SMR), and these patients were compared with those without SAD. RESULTS: A total of 2011 patients were included (mean age 70% and 41% females), with 71% having SADMR. MR severity and ejection fraction were similar between both groups. Patients with SADMR were older, less females and had more diabetes, but similar rates of atrial fibrillation. Mechanistically, they had lower A wave velocity (0.61 vs 0.72 cm/sec, p<0.001) and more impaired LA reservoir strain (9.7% vs 15.5%, p<0.001). Geometrically, SADMR had shallower leaflets' angulations, lower tenting height, larger annuli and smaller leaflet length/annular diameter ratios (all p<0.001). They underwent fewer MV interventions, although these were associated with better outcomes (log-rank p<0.001). Over the study period, SAD was an independent predictor of mortality (HR 1.26, p=0.04). CONCLUSION: SADMR is associated with specific mechanistic and functional alterations and confers a worse prognosis.

Stress testing and noninvasive coronary imaging: What's the best test for my patient?

Coronary artery disease (CAD) causes significant morbidity and mortality. Accurate noninvasive evaluation is important to facilitate appropriate diagnosis and treatment. The ubiquitous nature of CAD requires all practitioners, regardless of their specialty, to be familiar with noninvasive diagnostic modalities. This article reviews currently available tests, including specific features, diagnostic and prognostic value, strengths, and limitations.