RESUMEN
Pusher behaviour (PB) reflects some misrepresentation of verticality. However, its neural mechanisms are still unclear. The aim of this pilot study is to assess the perception of the subjective visual vertical in patients with PB using an orientation discrimination task relying on a psychophysical forced-choice procedure. A sample of eight patients with post-stroke hemiplegia, three of whom with (PB+ group) and five without (PB- group) a clear PB, and 10 matched healthy subjects, was selected. All participants were assessed with an orientation discrimination task based on the objective Two-Alternatives Forced Choice (2AFC) procedure, in which observers are forced to report whether an oriented stimulus that was tilted off-vertical by a varying amount (but never vertical) was tilted clockwise or counterclockwise from vertical. Participants' ability in detecting the visual vertical was estimated by calculation of bias and threshold, which represent deviations of the subjective vertical from the physical vertical and the sensitivity to orientation offsets away from vertical, respectively. While there were no significant differences between groups in terms of bias, statistical analysis showed a significantly higher threshold in the PB+ group compared to both PB- and control groups. Results suggest that vertical misrepresentation might be due to the presence, in patients with PB, of a lower signal-to-noise ratio in coding systems. Implications for clinical practice are discussed.
Asunto(s)
Hemiplejía/psicología , Equilibrio Postural/fisiología , Trastornos de la Sensación/psicología , Percepción Visual/fisiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Conducta de Elección , Discriminación en Psicología , Femenino , Hemiplejía/complicaciones , Hemiplejía/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Estimulación Luminosa/métodos , Proyectos Piloto , Psicofísica/métodos , Trastornos de la Sensación/complicaciones , Trastornos de la Sensación/fisiopatología , SíndromeRESUMEN
The aim of this study is to assess the reported quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effectiveness of neglect rehabilitation using a standardized scale. A search of seven electronic databases was carried out. Selected articles were scored using the PEDro scale and classified as high or low quality study both with the original cut off of 6 and a modified cut off of 5. A linear regression analysis between year of publication and quality rate was used to test whether the quality of the studies improved with time. A total of 18 RCTs were selected. Six articles (33.3%) and 10 articles (55.56%) were classified as having high quality when the original cut off or the modified cut off of the PEDro scale were used, respectively. Analysis shows no time-related changes in PEDro scores. The results show that reported quality is moderate for RCTs in neglect rehabilitation.