Comparison of comprehensive complication index and Clavien-Dindo classification in patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Our study aimed to compare the comprehensive complication index (CCI) to the conventional Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) in patients undergoing surgery for primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). METHODS: Data were collected for patients who underwent surgery from 2008 to 2019 at a tertiary institution. The length of hospital stay (LOS) was used as a surrogate marker for clinical outcomes, and associations with CDC and CCI were assessed. RESULTS: Data were available for 191 patients, with the highest CDC Grade of I, II, III, and IV in 18.3%, 41.9%, 17.8%, and 4.2%, respectively; the 30-day postoperative mortality (CDC Grade V) was 1.6% (N = 3). Whilst both classification systems were significantly correlated with LOS, this association was significantly stronger for CCI (Spearman's ρ: 0.768 vs. 0.648, p < 0.001). Increasing Charlson Comorbidity Index, tumor size, and organ weighted resection scores were independently associated with longer LOS. However, the association between LOS and both the CDC and CCI remained significant, even after adjusting for these factors (both p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The CCI is more strongly associated with LOS than the CDC, and represents a useful tool to quantify the total burden of postoperative complications after surgery for RPS.

Management controversies in Barrett's oesophagus.

The management of Barrett's oesophagus and associated neoplasia has evolved considerably in recent years. Modern endoscopic strategies including endoscopic resection and mucosal ablation can eradicate dysplastic Barrett's and prevent progression to invasive oesophageal cancer. However, several aspects of Barrett's management remain controversial including the stage in the disease process at which to intervene, and the choice of endoscopic or surgical therapy. A review of articles pertaining to the management of Barrett's oesophagus with or without associated neoplasia, was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched to identify literature relevant to eight pre-defined areas of clinical controversy. The following search terms were used: Barrett's oesophagus; dysplasia; intramucosal carcinoma; endotherapy; endoscopic resection; ablation; oesophagectomy. A significant body of evidence exists to support early endoscopic therapy for high-grade dysplasia (HGD). Although not supported by randomised controlled trial evidence, endoscopic therapy is now favoured ahead of oesophagectomy for most patients with HGD. Focal intramucosal (T1a) carcinomas can be managed effectively using endoscopic and surgical therapy, however surgery should be considered the first line therapy where there is submucosal invasion (T1b). Treatment of low grade dysplasia is not supported at present due to widespread over-reporting of the disease. The role of surveillance endoscopy in non-dysplastic Barrett's remains controversial.