Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Can J Neurol Sci ; 48(2): 172-188, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32669144

RESUMEN

Interventional neuroradiology (INR) has evolved from a hybrid mixture of daring radiologists and iconoclastic neurosurgeons into a multidisciplinary specialty, which has become indispensable for cerebrovascular and neurological centers worldwide. This manuscript traces the origins of INR and describes its evolution to the present day. The focus will be on cerebrovascular disorders including aneurysms, stroke, brain arteriovenous malformations, dural arteriovenous fistulae, and atherosclerotic disease, both intra- and extracranial. Also discussed are cerebral vasospasm, venolymphatic malformations of the head and neck, tumor embolization, idiopathic intracranial hypertension, inferior petrosal venous sinus sampling for Cushing's disease, and spinal interventions. Pediatric INR has not been included and deserves a separate, dedicated review.


Asunto(s)
Malformaciones Vasculares del Sistema Nervioso Central , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares , Embolización Terapéutica , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas Intracraneales , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Vasoespasmo Intracraneal , Malformaciones Vasculares del Sistema Nervioso Central/diagnóstico por imagen , Malformaciones Vasculares del Sistema Nervioso Central/terapia , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/diagnóstico por imagen , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/terapia , Niño , Humanos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia
2.
Can Fam Physician ; 58(11): 1199-204, e620-5, 2012 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés, Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23152455

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To improve the ability of primary care physicians to recognize the mechanisms and common presentations of low-velocity Lisfranc injuries (LFIs) and to impart an improved understanding of the role of imaging and principles of primary care in low-velocity LFIs. SOURCES OF INFORMATION: A MEDLINE literature review was performed and the results were summarized, reviewing anatomy and mechanisms, clinical and imaging-based diagnoses, and management principles in the primary care setting. MAIN MESSAGE: Low-velocity LFIs result from various mechanisms and can have very subtle findings on clinical examination and imaging. A high degree of suspicion and caution are warranted when managing this type of injury. CONCLUSION: Although potentially devastating if missed, if a few treatment principles for low-velocity LFIs are applied from the initial presentation onward, outcomes from this injury can be optimized.


Asunto(s)
Errores Diagnósticos/prevención & control , Fracturas Óseas/diagnóstico , Luxaciones Articulares/diagnóstico , Ligamentos/lesiones , Huesos Metatarsianos/lesiones , Articulaciones Tarsianas/lesiones , Diagnóstico por Imagen , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Fracturas Óseas/terapia , Humanos , Luxaciones Articulares/terapia , Examen Físico , Férulas (Fijadores) , Soporte de Peso
3.
Neurol Clin Pract ; 11(2): e147-e151, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33842083

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the most critical public health challenge in recent history. In this report, we present a case of suspected acute hemorrhagic encephalitis with bilateral intracranial hemorrhages associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. RECENT FINDINGS: A 48-year-old female COVID-19-positive patient developed acute changes in her neurologic status. A head CT with CT angiography demonstrated extensive bilateral parietal and occipital intraparenchymal hemorrhage with intraventricular extension and acute hydrocephalus. The patient was treated with an external ventricular drain, and a CSF sample was tested for SARS-CoV-2 but was found to be negative. SUMMARY: The underlying mechanism for developing acute hemorrhagic encephalitis in viral illnesses may be autoimmune in nature and warrants further investigation. The initial neurologic presentation of COVID-19-related hemorrhagic encephalitis is altered level of consciousness, which may prompt further neurologic examination and imaging to exclude this feature.

4.
World Neurosurg ; 138: 52, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32142949

RESUMEN

Acute occlusion of a carotid stent is a rare complication that necessitates rapid diagnosis and treatment to prevent devastating neurologic injury. Management options may include thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy, or open surgical revascularization; however, the optimal treatment is unclear due to the low reported incidence of this complication. Video 1 illustrates the surgical technique for open revascularization with carotid stent removal, thrombectomy, and endarterectomy. We present the case of a 64-year-old woman who presented with expressive speech and right-sided motor deficits and was identified to have complete occlusion of the distal left M1 and proximal M2 branches, as well as near-occlusion of the left internal carotid artery. She underwent successful mechanical thrombectomy of the intracranial occlusion with complete reperfusion and also angioplasty and stenting of the carotid stenosis. She deteriorated overnight and was identified to have complete carotid stent occlusion but no large infarct, suggestive of collateral flow impairment. Cerebral reperfusion was established by emergent open stent removal and endarterectomy. An extended exposure of the carotid was required, as the stent extended beyond the typical sites of clamping both proximally and distally. Intraoperatively, the clot from the internal carotid artery was manually aspirated via a 5-French catheter. Postoperative imaging demonstrated appropriate vessel patency. In follow-up, the patient made a full neurologic recovery.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis Carotídea/cirugía , Endarterectomía Carotidea/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Stents/efectos adversos , Trombectomía/métodos , Arteria Carótida Interna/cirugía , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología
5.
Foot Ankle Int ; 34(11): 1508-15, 2013 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23836813

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Kellgren and Lawrence grading system (KLGS) has been used throughout the literature for the radiographic staging of osteoarthritis (OA) of the peritalar joints. Despite its widespread use, the KLGS has never been validated for use in this clinical circumstance. The purpose of this study was to determine the inter- and intrarater reliability of the KLGS in the assessment of radiographic progression of OA in the peritalar joints following total ankle replacement (TAR). METHODS: One hundred twenty pre- and minimum 5-year postoperative weight-bearing lateral radiographs following 60 consecutive cases of TAR were utilized. Each individual film was considered separately for the purposes of this study. Of those films, 93 and 98 were found to have adequate visualization of the subtalar (STJ) and talonavicular (TNJ) joints, respectively. Three qualified reviewers graded the films according to the KLGS on 2 separate occasions, with 1 month separating the 2 readings. The results were analyzed for intra- and interobserver reliability. The degree of agreement was analyzed using the weighted kappa (κ(w)) statistic, Fleiss's kappa (Fleiss's κ), and percentage agreement RESULTS: Interrater agreements were moderate (κ(w) = 0.37 ± 0.06; Fleiss's κ = 0.21 ± 0.03) for the STJ to fair (κ(w) = 0.43 ± 0.06; Fleiss's κ = 0.25 ± 0.03) for the TNJ. Intrarater agreements for the STJ were moderate (mean κ(w) = 0.43 ± 0.07) and moderate for the TNJ as well (mean κ(w) = 0.46 ± 0.07). The reliability of the KLGS, although not originally designed for use in the setting of inflammatory arthropathy, was not notably affected when being used to grade inflammatory versus noninflammatory arthropathy. CONCLUSIONS: The KLGS is likely not a reliable tool for grading the degree of OA present in the peritalar joints prior to treatment and following TAR for research purposes. Using the KLGS in the setting of inflammatory arthritis versus OA did not produce any notable differences in the observed reliability. It is important to remember this has not been assessed in the clinical environment. Further work is required to determine the optimal method for assessment of peritalar OA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective comparative study.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Tobillo , Osteoartritis/clasificación , Osteoartritis/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulaciones Tarsianas/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Estudios Prospectivos , Radiografía , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA