Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 295(5): 1061-1077, 2017 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28285426

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is a condition that affects 5-10% of pregnancies and is the second most common cause of perinatal mortality. This review presents the most recent knowledge on FGR and focuses on the etiology, classification, prediction, diagnosis, and management of the condition, as well as on its neurological complications. METHODS: The Pubmed, SCOPUS, and Embase databases were searched using the term "fetal growth restriction". RESULTS: Fetal growth restriction (FGR) may be classified as early or late depending on the time of diagnosis. Early FGR (<32 weeks) is associated with substantial alterations in placental implantation with elevated hypoxia, which requires cardiovascular adaptation. Perinatal morbidity and mortality rates are high. Late FGR (≥32 weeks) presents with slight deficiencies in placentation, which leads to mild hypoxia and requires little cardiovascular adaptation. Perinatal morbidity and mortality rates are lower. The diagnosis of FGR may be clinical; however, an arterial and venous Doppler ultrasound examination is essential for diagnosis and follow-up. There are currently no treatments to control FGR; the time at which pregnancy is interrupted is of vital importance for protecting both the mother and fetus. CONCLUSION: Early diagnosis of FGR is very important, because it enables the identification of the etiology of the condition and adequate monitoring of the fetal status, thereby minimizing risks of premature birth and intrauterine hypoxia.


Asunto(s)
Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal , Femenino , Desarrollo Fetal , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/diagnóstico , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/etiología , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/terapia , Hipoxia Fetal , Feto/inervación , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Mortalidad Perinatal , Placenta/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Placentaria , Placentación , Embarazo , Ultrasonografía Prenatal
2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39176208

RESUMEN

Objective: To evaluate the mode of delivery according to Robson classification (RC) and the perinatal outcomes in fetal growth restriction (FGR) and small for gestational age (SGA) fetuses. Methods: Retrospective cohort study by analyzing medical records of singleton pregnancies from two consecutive years (2018 and 2019). FGR was defined according to Delphi Consensus. The Robson groups were divided into two intervals (1-5.1 and 5.2-10). Results: Total of 852 cases were included: FGR (n = 85), SGA (n = 20) and control (n=747). FGR showed higher percentages of newborns < 1,500 grams (p<0.001) and higher overall cesarean section (CS) rates (p<0.001). FGR had the highest rates of neonatal resuscitation and neonatal intensive care unit admission (p<0.001). SGA and control presented higher percentage of patients classified in 1 - 5.1 RC groups, while FGR had higher percentage in 5.2 - 10 RC groups (p<0.001). FGR, SGA and control did not differ in the mode of delivery in the 1-5.1 RC groups as all groups showed a higher percentage of vaginal deliveries (p=0.476). Conclusion: Fetuses with FGR had higher CS rates and worse perinatal outcomes than SGA and control fetuses. Most FGR fetuses were delivered by cesarean section and were allocated in 5.2 to 10 RC groups, while most SGA and control fetuses were allocated in 1 to 5.1 RC groups. Vaginal delivery occurred in nearly 60% of FGR allocated in 1-5.1 RC groups without a significant increase in perinatal morbidity. Therefore, the vaginal route should be considered in FGR fetuses.

3.
Ultrasound Med Biol ; 48(1): 20-26, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34607759

RESUMEN

The present study aimed to evaluate the performance of QuantusFLM software, which performs quantitative analysis of lung tissue texture through ultrasound images, in predicting lung maturity in fetal growth restriction (FGR). We included patients with singleton gestations between 34 and 38 6/7 wk and divided them into two groups: FGR and control (appropriate for gestational age [AGA]). The images were captured by ultrasound according to a specific protocol up to 48 h before delivery and analyzed with QuantusFLM software. The main clinical outcome evaluated was lung maturity (i.e., the absence of neonatal respiratory morbidity). We included 111 patients; one was excluded because of low image quality, leaving 55 patients in each group. The FGR group had a lower birth weight (2207 g vs. 2891 g, p < 0.001) and a longer stay in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) (10 d vs. 5 d, p = 0.043). QuantusFLM software was able to predict lung maturity in FGR with accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of 94.5%, 96.2%, 50%, 98.1% and 33.3%, respectively. QuantusFLM had good accuracy in predicting lung maturity in FGR with reliability in identifying pulmonary maturity.


Asunto(s)
Feto , Ultrasonografía Prenatal , Femenino , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/diagnóstico por imagen , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Embarazo , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
4.
Rev. bras. ginecol. obstet ; 46: e, 2024. tab
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1569725

RESUMEN

Abstract Objective To evaluate the mode of delivery according to Robson classification (RC) and the perinatal outcomes in fetal growth restriction (FGR) and small for gestational age (SGA) fetuses. Methods Retrospective cohort study by analyzing medical records of singleton pregnancies from two consecutive years (2018 and 2019). FGR was defined according to Delphi Consensus. The Robson groups were divided into two intervals (1-5.1 and 5.2-10). Results Total of 852 cases were included: FGR (n = 85), SGA (n = 20) and control (n=747). FGR showed higher percentages of newborns < 1,500 grams (p<0.001) and higher overall cesarean section (CS) rates (p<0.001). FGR had the highest rates of neonatal resuscitation and neonatal intensive care unit admission (p<0.001). SGA and control presented higher percentage of patients classified in 1 - 5.1 RC groups, while FGR had higher percentage in 5.2 - 10 RC groups (p<0.001). FGR, SGA and control did not differ in the mode of delivery in the 1-5.1 RC groups as all groups showed a higher percentage of vaginal deliveries (p=0.476). Conclusion Fetuses with FGR had higher CS rates and worse perinatal outcomes than SGA and control fetuses. Most FGR fetuses were delivered by cesarean section and were allocated in 5.2 to 10 RC groups, while most SGA and control fetuses were allocated in 1 to 5.1 RC groups. Vaginal delivery occurred in nearly 60% of FGR allocated in 1-5.1 RC groups without a significant increase in perinatal morbidity. Therefore, the vaginal route should be considered in FGR fetuses.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA