Detalles de la búsqueda
1.
Timely follow-up of positive cancer screening results: A systematic review and recommendations from the PROSPR Consortium.
CA Cancer J Clin
; 68(3): 199-216, 2018 05.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29603147
2.
A constrained maximum likelihood approach to developing well-calibrated models for predicting binary outcomes.
Lifetime Data Anal
; 2024 May 08.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38717617
3.
Changes in mammographic density and risk of breast cancer among a diverse cohort of women undergoing mammography screening.
Breast Cancer Res Treat
; 198(3): 535-544, 2023 Apr.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36800118
4.
Nationwide Trends and Determinants of Germline BRCA1/2 Testing in Patients With Breast and Ovarian Cancer.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw
; 21(4): 351-358.e4, 2023 04.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37015340
5.
Breast cancer polygenic risk scores are associated with short-term risk of poor prognosis breast cancer.
Breast Cancer Res Treat
; 196(2): 389-398, 2022 Nov.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36138293
6.
Risk factors for an advanced breast cancer diagnosis within 2 years of a negative mammogram.
Cancer
; 127(18): 3334-3342, 2021 09 15.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34061353
7.
Risk factors for breast cancer subtypes among Black women undergoing screening mammography.
Breast Cancer Res Treat
; 189(3): 827-835, 2021 Oct.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34342765
8.
Imaging Surveillance of Breast Cancer Survivors with Digital Mammography versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Radiology
; 298(2): 308-316, 2021 02.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33350890
9.
Clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with late stage cervical cancer diagnosis in Botswana.
BMC Womens Health
; 21(1): 267, 2021 07 06.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34229672
10.
Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Are Initial Benefits Sustained?
Radiology
; 295(3): 529-539, 2020 06.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32255414
11.
Different associations of tumor PIK3CA mutations and clinical outcomes according to aspirin use among women with metastatic hormone receptor positive breast cancer.
BMC Cancer
; 20(1): 347, 2020 Apr 23.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32326897
12.
Digital 2D versus Tomosynthesis Screening Mammography among Women Aged 65 and Older in the United States.
Radiology
; 291(3): 582-590, 2019 06.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30938625
13.
Effect of Mammographic Screening Modality on Breast Density Assessment: Digital Mammography versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Radiology
; 291(2): 320-327, 2019 05.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30888933
14.
Comparison of performance metrics with digital 2D versus tomosynthesis mammography in the diagnostic setting.
Eur Radiol
; 29(2): 477-484, 2019 Feb.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29967957
15.
Uptake of BRCA 1/2 and oncotype DX testing by medical and surgical oncologists.
Breast Cancer Res Treat
; 171(1): 173-180, 2018 Aug.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29737473
16.
Breast Cancer Characteristics Associated with 2D Digital Mammography versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Screening-detected and Interval Cancers.
Radiology
; 287(1): 49-57, 2018 Apr.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29272213
17.
Medical oncologists' willingness to participate in bundled payment programs.
BMC Health Serv Res
; 18(1): 391, 2018 05 31.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29855315
18.
BI-RADS Category 3 Comparison: Probably Benign Category after Recall from Screening before and after Implementation of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Radiology
; 285(3): 778-787, 2017 12.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28715278
19.
Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography compared to digital mammography alone: a cohort study within the PROSPR consortium.
Breast Cancer Res Treat
; 156(1): 109-16, 2016 Feb.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26931450
20.
Breast cancer screening initiation after turning 40 years of age within the PROSPR consortium.
Breast Cancer Res Treat
; 160(2): 323-331, 2016 11.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27665586