Facilitators for influenza vaccination uptake in nurses at the Shiraz University of Medical Sciences.

OBJECTIVE: Influenza is an important cause of morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to identify facilitators for vaccination in nursing staff at the Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHOD: A self-administered questionnaire was distributed among nurses between November 2005 and February 2006. RESULTS: The response rate was 100%. Sixty-one percent (89/145) of nurses reported that they had continued working while sick with an influenza-like illness, and 21% (35/166) of nurses had been vaccinated for the current season. The most common reasons given for uptake of the current influenza vaccine were the belief that they were at risk of influenza due to the nature of their work (80%, 28/35), and concern about transmitting influenza to their patients (31%, 11/35). Vaccinated nurses were 3.4 times more likely [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-11.7; P = 0.05] to have the intention to be vaccinated next season than unvaccinated nurses. Respondents who intended to be vaccinated next season were 10.3 times more likely (95% CI 4.4-23.2; P = 0.000) to recommend the vaccine to their family and coworkers, and 4.6 times more likely (95% CI 1.9-11.0; P = 0.001) to recommend vaccination to their patients. CONCLUSION: Free of charge and widely available vaccination programmes, and the belief that nurses are at risk of influenza due to the nature of their work improve vaccination uptake among nurses, and thereby reduce the risk of healthcare-associated infection in susceptible patient populations.

A survey of medical staff attitudes to an antibiotic approval and stewardship programme.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic stewardship programmes (ASPs) are advocated to ensure appropriate antimicrobial use; with short-term evidence they may improve outcomes, limit adverse effects, encourage cost-effectiveness and reduce antibiotic resistance. At Concord Hospital, a 450-bed acute care hospital, we have used a telephone-based ASP for 15 years. There may be differences in attitudes to the ASP by prescribers, which may influence its long-term efficacy. METHOD: A 40-item self-administered questionnaire was sent to 190 junior and 250 specialist medical staff. We aimed to elicit medical staff attitudes to the ASP's utility, educational value, effect on patient care and ease of use. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-four completed questionnaires were returned. Most (82%, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) 75-87%) clinicians had used the ASP, 98% of whom believed it to be a reasonable system. Most staff (85%, 95%CI 79-90%) believed that seeking approval made teams think carefully about antibiotic choice, agreed it provided helpful advice (91%, 95%CI 85-95%) and that the approval system provided useful advice and was educational (88%, 95%CI 81-92%). The ASP was felt time-consuming and detracting from clinical duties by 33% (95%CI 26-41%), while 10% (95%CI 5.8-15.7%) believed it undervalued intuition and experience. Few (19%, 95%CI 13-25%, P < 0.0001) clinicians believed it infringed their autonomy. The advice given through the ASP was believed by most (89%, 95%CI 81-92%) to improve patient outcomes. CONCLUSION: The ASP was surprisingly well supported by all levels of staff, and reinforced the benefits of maintaining an ASP policy.

Changing epidemiology of meticillin-resistant S. aureus in Queensland, Australia, 2000-2006: use of passive surveillance of susceptibility phenotypes.

The epidemiology of meticillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infection has changed remarkably in recent years with the appearance of new MRSA strains causing infections in the community. These strains have now begun to cause healthcare-associated infections. The ability to track such changes is necessary to guide clinical and public health action. Here we report passive surveillance of all public laboratory susceptibility data in Queensland to track changes in MRSA phenotypes corresponding to the major epidemic strains from 2000 to 2006. The inpatient rate of MRSA isolation from pus, tissue and fluid (PTF) and blood culture (BC) specimens declined by 26% and 35%, respectively. The rate of isolation of the AUS-2/3-like phenotype (corresponding to ST239-MRSA-III) decreased from 651 to 242 isolates per million accrued patient days in inpatient PTF and BC, whereas that for non-multiresistant MRSA (nmMRSA, corresponding to community MRSA strains) increased from 71 to 315. The overall outpatient rate of MRSA isolation from PTF and BC increased by 224% and 31%, respectively. The rate of AUS-2/3-like isolates in outpatient PTF decreased from 131 to 60 per million outpatient occasions of service while the nmMRSA rate increased from 52 to 490. Surveillance of phenotypes derived from routine susceptibility data is a useful tool for tracking changes in the epidemiology of MRSA over large geographical regions.

Post-discharge surgical site surveillance: does patient education improve reliability of diagnosis?

Post-discharge surgical infection surveillance by patients remains an integral part of many infection control programmes despite proven unreliability. We attempted to improve the validity of patient recognition of signs and symptoms of wound infection and post-discharge postal questionnaire responses through specific education prior to discharge. In total, 588 patients were studied after random assignment into two intervention groups, one of which received relevant education. Both groups were followed for four weeks post-operatively, with features of infection assessed weekly by experienced infection control nurses (ICNs) and by patient responses to routine postal questionnaires. Those patients who received education demonstrated a significantly poorer correlation with ICN diagnosis compared to the non-educated group (Kappa 0.69 and 0.81 respectively, P=0.05). Both patient groups achieved the same sensitivity for recall (83.3%), with high specificity demonstrated by both groups [educated (93.7%); non-educated (98.1%)]. The positive predictive value was 65.2% for the educated group and 83.3% for the non-educated patient group. When infected wounds identified by patients were examined for the proportion that were overdiagnosed, the excess of SSI identified by the educated patient group was 44.4% and by the non-educated group 16.7%. These results suggest that pre-discharge education causes patients to overdiagnose clinical features of wound infection and fails to improve the validity of diagnosis. This outcome further questions the value of post-discharge infection rates obtained by patient self-assessment as a measure of quality of performance.

Behavioural considerations for hand hygiene practices: the basic building blocks.

Hand hygiene is considered to be the most effective measure to prevent microbial pathogen cross-transmission and healthcare-associated infections. In October 2005, the World Health Organization (WHO) World Alliance for Patient Safety launched the first Global Patient Safety Challenge 2005-2006, 'Clean Care is Safer Care', to tackle healthcare-associated infection on a large scale. Within the Challenge framework, international infection control experts and consultative taskforces met to develop new WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Healthcare. The taskforce was asked to explore aspects underlying hand hygiene behaviour that may influence its promotion among healthcare workers. The dynamics of behavioural change are complex and multi-faceted, but are of vital importance when designing a strategy to improve hand hygiene compliance. A reflection on challenges to be met and areas for future research are also proposed.

A tsunami related tetanus epidemic in Aceh, Indonesia.

In January 2005, a tetanus epidemic was discovered amongst survivors of the Boxing Day Tsunami in Aceh, Indonesia. Our aim was to describe the extent of the tetanus outbreak in tsunami survivors admitted and describe the case outcomes from one hospital. All clinicians were instructed to report suspected cases to a centralised organisation using a standardised data collection tool. Active case finding was carried out by a trained team that visited hospital wards in Aceh. Of the 106 cases, 79% was above 25 years old (the median age was 40 years) and 62% was male. The mortality rate in Aceh was 19% and that of in follow up cases was 17%. Fifteen of the follow-up cases were admitted with severe tetanus associated with superficial wounds, three of whom had a history of immersion. Supplies to treat the tetanus cases in this epidemic were initially limited as disaster relief agencies were not prepared for the resultant tetanus epidemic. The mortality rate of 17%, was significantly less than was usual for tetanus in adults (>50%) and children (80%) in underdeveloped countries. To reduce mortality and morbidity, rapid disaster relief organisations should include supplies for vaccination and treatment of tetanus cases and consider early tracheotomy for severe cases.

Environmental challenges of identifying a patient zone and the healthcare zone in a crowded Vietnamese hospital.

BACKGROUND: The application of the World Health Organization (WHO) 'My five moments for hand hygiene' was designed for a healthcare environment with levels of bed spacing and occupancy normally present in developed countries. However, overcrowded healthcare facilities in Vietnam and other challenged settings require strategies to adapt 'My five moments for hand hygiene' in order to meet their situational needs. AIM: To identify the environmental challenges to compliance with the 'My five moments' indications. METHODS: Overt observation using the WHO hand hygiene audit tool was conducted in two clinical departments at a large teaching hospital in Vietnam. Clinical practice movements and the 'My five moments' indications were detailed diagrammatically. FINDINGS: Sharing a bed is widely practised outside the intensive care unit in this country, which makes visualizing a patient zone according to the WHO instructions difficult. In addition, decreased spacing between shared beds in overcrowded conditions results in the close proximity of patients to the shared healthcare zone. These two barriers prevent attempts to apply the 'My five moments' correctly. CONCLUSION: Undertaking hand hygiene and conducting audits in accordance with the 'My five moments for hand hygiene' assumes a separation of patients and individual healthcare zones. The barriers to applying 'My five moments' include the lack of distinct zones between patients and their shared healthcare zone, and amelioration requires resources beyond current chronic resource challenges. Until environmental resources can meet the western standards required for application of the 'Five moments' principle, healthcare workers urgently need detailed clarification of modifications that would empower them to comply.

The 'My five moments for hand hygiene' concept for the overcrowded setting in resource-limited healthcare systems.

Hand hygiene is a core activity of patient safety for the prevention of healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs). To standardize hand hygiene practices globally the World Health Organization (WHO) released Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care and introduced the 'My five moments for hand hygiene' concept to define indications for hand hygiene rooted in an evidence-based model for transmission of micro-organisms by healthcare workers' (HCWs) hands. Central to the concept is the division of the healthcare environment into two geographical care zones, the patient zone and the healthcare zone, that requires the HCW to comply with specific hand hygiene moments. In resource-limited, overcrowded healthcare settings inadequate or no spatial separation between beds occurs frequently. These conditions challenge the HCW's ability to visualize and delineate patient zones. The 'My five moments for hand hygiene' concept has been adapted for these conditions with the aim of assisting hand hygiene educators, auditors, and HCWs to minimize ambiguity regarding shared patient zones and achieve the ultimate goal set by the WHO Guidelines--the reduction of infectious risks.

Rate of seasonal spread of respiratory syncytial virus in a pediatric hospital.

The rate of nosocomial respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection was measured in a large pediatric hospital using an incidence density method. The at-risk days for nosocomial RSV were summed during a defined winter period in which there were 54 admissions with community-acquired RSV infection giving a rate of 2.9 cases per 1,000 at-risk days (95% confidence interval, 0.3-5.4 per 1,000).

Pilot testing standardized surveillance: Hospital Infection Standardised Surveillance (HISS). On behalf of the HISS Reference Group.

In Australia the time-consuming nature of double handling of surveillance data has meant that surveillance methodology rarely included prospective monitoring of patients at risk for the acquisition of a nosocomial infection. To streamline surveillance activities, infection control professionals favored the collection of case data either from the ward or pathology laboratories. By default, this method introduced a variety of definitions resulting in inconsistencies across health care facilities and artificial fluctuations in the magnitude of infection. In June 1998, the New South Wales Health Department funded its first attempt to develop and implement a standardized approach to collection of nosocomial infection data-Hospital Infection Standardized Surveillance (HISS). Six months later, in December 1998, 10 public acute care hospitals pilot tested the content and methodology of HISS. HISS members tested the application of the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance system definitions for infection, active and passive surveillance methodology, the handheld computer for data collection, and the Electronic Infection Control Automated Technology (eICAT) version for HISS software and analysis. HISS member hospitals selected from several sentinel monitoring programs such as intravascular device-related bacteremia and nonintravascular device-related bacteremia infections, surgical site infections, respiratory syncytial virus infections, and rotavirus infections. Hospitals continued to perform active surveillance in the first 12 months, collecting demographic variables, risk factors, and outcomes. The completeness of the data sets for the two most frequently monitored programs, surgical site infections and intravascular device-related bacteremia, was high, with 99.6% of the required 36, 372 surgical site infection data fields and 99.4% of the 572,717 intravascular device-related bacteremia data fields completed.

Who coordinates infection control programs in Australia?

BACKGROUND: Australian infection control practitioners (ICPs) have not been previously profiled. Knowledge of their practice is limited, making support and evaluation of their programs difficult. To investigate the current role, function, and attributes of this group, we undertook a national survey of members of the Australian Infection Control Association. METHODS: In 1996 a questionnaire was sent to all 1078 nonmedical and nonindustry members of the Australian Infection Control Association. More than half (65%) of the membership responded to the questionnaire, which measured demographics, experience, infection control training and education, staffing levels, perceived deficits, and managerial support. RESULTS: Our results indicate that the typical Australian ICP works in a public acute-care facility with fewer than 251 beds, has 6 years experience in the field, and has completed hospital-based nursing training. Surveillance was the activity that consumed most of the ICPs' time. The majority of ICPs had responsibilities in addition to infection control, and although they considered management to be supportive, additional clerical support was identified as an area for program improvement. CONCLUSIONS: We have provided the first comprehensive profile of Australian ICPs and their practices. Our findings compel professional associations, such as the Australian Infection Control Association, to address the following: standardization in practice and surveillance, provision of appropriate training and ongoing education, and encouragement of research initiatives by infection control staff. These strategies are the key to future evidence-based infection control and will ensure survival of this specialty in Australia.

Methodologies used in surveillance of surgical wound infections and bacteremia in Australian hospitals.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of nosocomial infection in Australian hospitals is estimated to be between 5.5% and 6.3%. Since 1989, infection control professionals (ICPs) in hospitals accredited by the Australian Council on Health Care Standards (ACHS) have been encouraged to collect nosocomial infection data according to ACHS methodology. METHOD: In 1996, we surveyed members of the Australian Infection Control Association to examine the time spent on surveillance, the practice of surveillance of all hospital infections (hospital-wide surveillance), case-finding methods, case definitions, and reporting routinely used by ICPs in acute care hospitals. We also examined the ICPs' education and experience in infection control (IC). RESULTS: The survey was completed and returned by 65% (644 of 993) of Australian Infection Control Association members. Of the ICPs who completed the survey, 47.8% (308 of 644; 95% CI, 43.9%-51.7%) met the criteria for inclusion, because they coordinated an IC program in an acute care or surgical hospital and performed surveillance for either surgical wound infection, intravascular device-related bacteremia, or non-device-related bacteremia. Of the ICPs who reported their facility's accreditation status, 93.5% participated in ACHS system. Most (97.6%) ICPs had completed hospital-based general registered nurse training. Only 1.9% (6 of 308) of ICPs reported completion of continuing education relating to hospital epidemiology. The number of years of IC experience ranged from zero to 35 years, with a median of 4 years. ICPs spent a substantial proportion of their total weekly IC time on surveillance irrespective of ACHS accreditation; 19.5 hours in ACHS hospitals and 15.6 hours in non-ACHS hospitals (P =.33). More than three quarters (76.0%) of ICPs performed hospital-wide surveillance. The case-finding methods, definitions of infections, and reporting formats varied greatly. The definition most commonly applied by ICPs (6.8%; 95% CI, 4.1%-10.4%) to define surgical wound infection was infection within 30 days after the operative procedure, plus purulent drainage, plus isolation of organisms from a culture from the incision site, plus diagnosis by a medical officer. A 5-item definition of a patient being asymptomatic, plus afebrile on admission, plus infection occurring at least 48 hours after admission, plus the patient having a fever of >38 degrees C, plus a recognized culture from one or more bottles was used by 15.7% (95% CI, 11.3%-21.0%) of ICPs to define a case of bacteremia. CONCLUSION: Surveillance is the core business of Australian ICPs and consumes a substantial proportion of their time. The importance of surveillance, the epidemiologic limitations of the current ACHS system, and the nonstandard methods we report indicate that improved methodology is required for case finding and reporting of nosocomial infections. Australian ICPs should complete training in the principles of surveillance and epidemiology. With this training, ICPs can work collaboratively with other health care professionals to develop epidemiologically sound, local, nosocomial surveillance systems and lobby for a voluntary, national, standardized, risk-adjusted system of targeted nosocomial surveillance.

Variation in administrators' and clinicians' attitudes toward critical elements of an infection control program and the role of the infection control practitioner in New South Wales, Australia.

BACKGROUND: Debate remains over the core activities of infection control (IC) programs. Differences in stakeholder opinions must be considered if consensus panel guidelines and recommendations are to be broadly applied. This article describes a survey of administrators and clinicians employed in hospitals in New South Wales, Australia. Respondents self-reported their levels of agreement with affirmative statements regarding the role of the infection control practitioner (ICP) and the essential requirements and infrastructure of IC programs. METHOD: The study population included administrators and clinicians in each public, private, and freestanding day hospital in New South Wales. Respondents reported the intensity of their agreement with 16 affirmative statements relating to IC program infrastructure and resources and the ICP's role and responsibilities. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 62.1% (587/945). Clinicians (349/587) and administrators (238/587) accounted for 59.5% and 40.5% of the response rate, respectively. Overall, administrators and clinicians reported greatest levels of agreement for those elements not requiring additional resources. CONCLUSION: The extent of divergence between administrators and clinicians is not so great that it can not be resolved. Our findings demonstrate the degree of administrator support that clinicians can expect for each element. We advocate better communication between clinicians and administrators in conjunction with objective strategic planning. Our findings provide a guide for ICPs to either establish or negotiate the core components of their IC program.

Estimation of the risk of bloodborne pathogens to health care workers after a needlestick injury in Taiwan.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the number of health care workers (HCWs) in Taiwan at risk annually for contracting hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and HIV after a needlestick and sharps injury (NSI) with a used hollow-bore needle. METHODS: All patients hospitalized in 1 tertiary hospital between September 1997 and June 1998 had routine pathological work-ups. On the first day of the months of September 1997, December 1997, March 1998, and June 1998, 1805 samples of deidentified residual sera randomly sampled from 18,474 inpatients older than 6 years were serologically tested for antigens to HBV (HBsAg and HBeAg) and antibodies to HCV (anti-HCV) and HIV (anti-HIV) with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay reagents. The frequency of NSIs with contaminated devices in HCWs from 16 public teaching hospitals between July 1996 and June 1997 and the serologic results were used to extrapolate the estimated annual rate of seroconversion in HCWs after an NSI. RESULTS: Of the 1805 samples tested, 16.7% were seropositive for HBsAg (of which 1.7% were positive for HBeAg), 12.7% were positive for anti-HCV, and 0.8% were positive for anti-HIV. Of the 7550 NSIs reported by 8645 HCWs, 66.7% involved a contaminated hollow-bore needle. From these data, 308 to 924 HCWs were estimated to be at risk for contracting HBV; 334 to 836 were at risk for contracting HCV; and, at the most, 2 were at risk for contracting HIV. The estimated annual number of contaminated NSIs sustained by 4 categories of HCWs ranged from 0.3 to 0.7, resulting in 543 nurses, 113 technicians, 80 physicians, and 66 supporting staff to be at risk annually of acquiring HBV infection. The numbers of HCWs estimated to be at risk of acquiring HCV were 596 nurses, 90 physicians, 84 technicians, and 30 supporting staff. The risk of acquiring HIV was low, with 1 nurse and possibly 1 other staff potentially exposed annually. CONCLUSIONS: Our estimates of the risk for seroconversion after an NSI have demonstrated that an occult risk can be formulated into a quantifiable risk. The number of susceptible HCWs at risk for seroconversion is as many as 1762 annually. With the number of nurses employed and the frequency with which they use sharps and sustain an NSI, 64.7% of all possible seroconversions will be in the nursing staff. This is a salient reminder of the importance of the introduction of early training in safe-needle-handling techniques before nurses enter their internship in countries where safety equipment, safety instructions, and staff vaccination programs are absent.

Prevalence of nonreporting behavior of sharps injuries in Taiwanese health care workers.

BACKGROUND: Health care workers (HCWs) were surveyed to identify factors associated with nonreporting behavior of sharps injuries (SIs) in Taiwan. METHODS: We surveyed 10,469 full-time medical, nursing, technical, and supporting personnel employed at 16 randomly selected hospitals from 132 available accredited teaching hospitals in Taiwan. Information about the most recent injury and reporting behavior after an SI were collected from July 1996 to June 1997 by using a pretested structured questionnaire. Eleven categories, including an open-ended option, were provided for participants to explain their nonreporting behavior. RESULTS: Questionnaires were completed by 82.6% (8645) of our sample, of whom 87.3% reported to have experienced a recent SI. A used item was the most commonly (P <. 001) involved item in an SI, and SIs with a used item were significantly more likely (odds ratio 3.6; CI 95%, 3.03-4.26; P <. 001) to be reported compared with an SI that involved unused items. A total of 81.8% of injuries were not reported, with job category significantly affecting reporting behavior (P <.001). Medical staff had the highest nonreporting rate (85.2%). Although attendees of a prevention program were statistically more likely (P <.001) to report an injury compared with nonattendees, the level of reporting in both groups was not encouraging (21.3% and 17.2%, respectively). All reasons given for nonreporting were disconcerting, but none more so than the use of subjective assessment of risk by 21.7% of HCWs who did not report their injuries. Other reasons for not reporting SIs included that the item was unused (34%) and that the HCW was too busy to report the SI (14.9%), unaware of reporting requirements (14. 4%), or immune to hepatitis B virus (12.4%). CONCLUSIONS: With 82% of SIs in Taiwanese HCWs going unreported, the expected national incidence will be seriously underestimated and impact the appropriateness of prevention programs. The very low rate of reporting suggests that the current reporting system requires simplification. Because most injuries involved used items, the reporting systems also should include a more responsive management component. The results also suggest that the current prevention programs, currently provided by the general nursing department, require expert content knowledge in infection control if nonreporting and SIs are to be reduced.

Handwashing in healthcare workers: accessibility of sink location does not improve compliance.

In spite of its importance, handwashing frequency in healthcare workers is generally low. The rebuilding and relocation of an 800-bed tertiary referral hospital on the same campus allowed assessment of the impact of easy accessibility to sinks on handwashing compliance. The new hospital design ensured that no clinical activity could occur more than 5 m (usually much less) from a sink. In the old hospital, clinical staff were often up to 30 m from a sink. Covert observation of nursing staff was undertaken in intensive care, infectious diseases, internal medicine and urology wards, over a total of 24 h during three consecutive days, two months before and one and 10 months after relocation to the new hospital. In all areas, handwashing compliance was greater before than after-patient contact. Initial increases (9-24%) in after-patient contact handwashing frequency following patient contact were demonstrated in units of both high and low clinical care activity one month after relocation. However, no sustained clinically significant improvement could be demonstrated nine months later. Glove use was shown to diminish compliance with handwashing protocols by as much as 25%. Improved accessibility to sinks does not lead to an improvement in healthcare workers' handwashing compliance.

The Hospital Infection Standardised Surveillance (HISS) programme: analysis of a two-year pilot.

In 1998 the New South Wales (NSW) Health Department funded the development and implementation of the State's first standardized methodology for the surveillance of healthcare-associated infection for public hospitals. Fifteen pilot hospitals targeted inpatient groups considered to represent their core patient groups to act as sentinel measurements of patient safety. The aggregated rates of surgical site infection for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) (chest & leg) surgery was 1.7% (95%CI: 1.1-2.5), CABG (chest only) 2.1% (95%CI: 1.0-3.7), vascular 7.1% (95%CI: 4.6-10.3), hip prosthesis 1.3% (95%CI: 0.5-2.7), knee prosthesis 6.1% (95%CI: 2.8-11.2) and colorectal 12.5% (95%CI: 9.5-16.1). The development of a bloodstream infection (BSI) associated with a central venous catheter (CVC) was not significantly (P=0.6) different when examined by duration of exposure with 3.7 BSI per 1000 line-days for CVC in situ six or more days compared with 4.0 BSI per 1000 line-days for CVC in situ for five or less days. A significantly (P<0.0001) greater proportion of patients whose CVC was in situ six or more days (6.8 per 100 patients, 95%CI: 4.2-10.2) developed a BSI compared with the proportion of patients whose CVC was in situ for five or fewer days (0.6 per 100 patients, 95%CI: 0.3-1.3). Significantly (P<0.0001) different rates of patients acquiring a new methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection were found when hospital type was examined with rates ranging from 0.2 to 5.0 per 10000 occupied acute-care bed-days. The pilot highlighted that the collection of data for aggregation of some procedures and intravascular catheters may take many years before a reliable benchmark can be identified and many hospitals may not achieve reliable local rates annually. For surveillance to provide timely measures of patient safety we should consider surveillance methods for many small to medium sized hospitals that includes active surveillance only for infections with concurrent passive surveillance of the relevant denominators.

Sharps injuries among hospital support personnel.

Sharps injuries (SIs) among support personnel in hospitals have received little attention in the scientific literature. A cross-sectional study was undertaken to measure the incidence of SIs in Taiwanese support personnel. All support personnel, including laundry workers, cleaners, porters and central supply workers, from 16 hospitals were surveyed for SIs, sustained between June 1996 and July 1997. Either a questionnaire or face-to-face interviews, for those staff with a literacy problem, were used. Of the 862 persons eligible for study, 79.4% (684) were evaluable. Few staff (30.4%) had attended a prevention programme and 61% had suffered an SI in the past year. Few (25.4%) reported their injury. Hollow-bore needles, of which 72.2% had been used, were associated with 42.2% of injuries. Cleaners sustained the majority (65.7%) of injuries, and inappropriate disposal was associated with 54.7% of all injuries. For those staff employed for more than four years, the risk of sustaining an injury increased significantly with length of employment (P<0.001). Most of the injuries were sustained by cleaners handling sharps inappropriately disposed of by clinical staff. A safer environment for support staff could be achieved with the co-operation of clinical staff to correctly dispose of sharps to ensure single handling of sharps. A formal orientation of support staff in the reporting of SIs would enable clinical assessment and management of injuries, as well as an evaluation of needle and sharps safety in the healthcare setting.

Post-discharge surveillance: can patients reliably diagnose surgical wound infections?

Post-discharge surgical wound infection surveillance is an important part of many infection control programs. It is frequently undertaken by patient self-assessment, prompted either by a telephone or postal questionnaire. To assess the reliability of this method, 290 patients were followed for six weeks postoperatively. Their wounds were photographed and also covertly assessed for signs of infection by two experienced infection control nurses (ICNs). Patients also responded to a postal questionnaire seeking evidence of infection at both week four and week six post-surgery. Correlation between the patient's assessment of their wound and the ICNs diagnosis was poor (r = 0.37) with a low positive predictive value (28.7%), although negative predictive value was high (98.2%). Assessment of photos for signs of infection by two experienced clinicians also correlated poorly with the ICNs diagnosis of infection (r = 0.54). The patient's recall of prescription of an antibiotic by their general practitioner (GP) for wound infection during the postoperative period correlated best with the ICNs diagnosis (r = 0.76). This latter measure, particularly when confirmed by the GP in those patients reporting an infection, appears to provide the most valid and resource efficient marker of post-discharge surgical wound infection.