A systematic review of assessment approaches to predict opioid misuse in people with cancer.

CONTEXT: Cancer prevalence is increasing, with many patients requiring opioid analgesia. Clinicians need to ensure patients receive adequate pain relief. However, opioid misuse is widespread, and cancer patients are at risk. OBJECTIVES: This study aims (1) to identify screening approaches that have been used to assess and monitor risk of opioid misuse in patients with cancer; (2) to compare the prevalence of risk estimated by each of these screening approaches; and (3) to compare risk factors among demographic and clinical variables associated with a positive screen on each of the approaches. METHODS: Medline, Cochrane Controlled Trial Register, PubMed, PsycINFO, and Embase databases were searched for articles reporting opioid misuse screening in cancer patients, along with handsearching the reference list of included articles. Bias was assessed using tools from the Joanna Briggs Suite. RESULTS: Eighteen studies met the eligibility criteria, evaluating seven approaches: Urine Drug Test (UDT) (n = 8); the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain (SOAPP) and two variants, Revised and Short Form (n = 6); the Cut-down, Annoyed, Guilty, Eye-opener (CAGE) tool and one variant, Adapted to Include Drugs (n = 6); the Opioid Risk Tool (ORT) (n = 4); Prescription Monitoring Program (PMP) (n = 3); the Screen for Opioid-Associated Aberrant Behavior Risk (SOABR) (n = 1); and structured/specialist interviews (n = 1). Eight studies compared two or more approaches. The rates of risk of opioid misuse in the studied populations ranged from 6 to 65%, acknowledging that estimates are likely to have varied partly because of how specific to opioids the screening approaches were and whether a single or multi-step approach was used. UDT prompted by an intervention or observation of aberrant opioid behaviors (AOB) were conclusive of actual opioid misuse found to be 6.5-24%. Younger age, found in 8/10 studies; personal or family history of anxiety or other mental ill health, found in 6/8 studies; and history of illicit drug use, found in 4/6 studies, showed an increased risk of misuse. CONCLUSIONS: Younger age, personal or familial mental health history, and history of illicit drug use consistently showed an increased risk of opioid misuse. Clinical suspicion of opioid misuse may be raised by data from PMP or any of the standardized list of AOBs. Clinicians may use SOAPP-R, CAGE-AID, or ORT to screen for increased risk and may use UDT to confirm suspicion of opioid misuse or monitor adherence. More research into this important area is required. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: This systematic review summarized the literature on the use of opioid misuse risk approaches in people with cancer. The rates of reported risk range from 6 to 65%; however, true rate may be closer to 6.5-24%. Younger age, personal or familial mental health history, and history of illicit drug use consistently showed an increased risk of opioid misuse. Clinicians may choose from several approaches. Limited data are available on feasibility and patient experience. PROSPERO registration number. CRD42020163385.

Drug metabolism in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A phenotyping cocktail study.

AIMS: To evaluate the effect of severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) on drug metabolism by comparing the pharmacokinetics of patients with severe COPD with healthy volunteers and using the modified Inje drug cocktail. METHODS: This was a single-centre pharmacokinetic study with 12 healthy participants and 7 participants with GOLD D COPD. Midazolam 1 mg, dextromethorphan 30 mg, losartan 25 mg, omeprazole 20 mg, caffeine 130 mg and paracetamol 1000 mg were simultaneously administered and intensive pharmacokinetic sampling was conducted over 8 hours. Drug metabolism by CYP3A4, CYP2D6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP1A2, UGT1A6 and UGT1A9 in participants with COPD were compared with phenotypes in healthy controls. RESULTS: The oral clearance (95% confidence interval) in participants with COPD relative to controls was: midazolam 63% (60-67%); dextromethorphan 72% (40-103%); losartan 53% (52-55%); omeprazole 35% (31-39%); caffeine 52% (50-53%); and paracetamol 73% (72-74%). There was a 5-fold increase in AUC for omeprazole and approximately 2-fold increases for caffeine, losartan, dextromethorphan, and midazolam. The AUC of paracetamol, which is mostly glucuronidated, was increased by about 60%. CONCLUSION: Severe COPD is associated with a clinically significant reduction in oral drug clearance. This may be greater for cytochrome P450 substrates than for glucuronidated drugs. This supports reduced starting doses when prescribing for patients with severe COPD.

Routine Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Dabigatran: Experience at a Tertiary Center.

BACKGROUND: A liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry assay to determine plasma dabigatran concentrations has been available for routine clinical use at our tertiary institutions since 2017. The aim of the study was to describe (1) the use of the assay over time; (2) the indications for testing; and (3) subsequent dabigatran prescribing decisions. METHODS: Patients for whom dabigatran concentrations were measured were identified using the laboratory database, and clinical data were extracted from the associated electronic health records. RESULTS: There were 233 samples in 24 months. The use of dabigatran increased over time, with a mean (95% confidence interval) increase of +0.5 (0.3-0.7) samples per month. Dabigatran concentrations ranged from <1 to 1060 mcg/L. The main reasons for testing were uncertainty about impact on renal function and drug interactions (39%), to inform prescribing decisions after thromboembolic or bleeding events (21%), and for investigation following dose-adjustment (16%). Dabigatran dose was changed after 30% (68/233) of assay results. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical use of the dabigatran assay has increased, with almost one-third of results associated with a subsequent change in dabigatran prescribing.

A randomised controlled trial of patient information leaflets as a medication counselling aid.

BACKGROUND: Medication counselling improves patient safety, adherence and satisfaction but is poorly done in clinical practice. Written aids further improve outcomes when used with verbal counselling. No studies have previously compared two types of written counselling aid. AIM: To compare the utility of a patient information leaflet (PIL) with a drug monograph as a medication counselling tool for patients starting a new medicine. METHODS: A single-blinded randomised controlled trial of medical students counselling simulated patients during a clinical examination. The PIL was compared with the drug monographs as counselling aids by assessing information transfer and aid usage. RESULTS: A total of 96 students was recruited. The PIL was superior to the drug monograph for counselling relating to missed doses (P = 0.02), and non-inferior for other domains of information transfer. The aid was used more frequently in the PIL arm (91% vs 77%, P = 0.09) and for longer (4.6 min vs 2.9 min, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The PIL was non-inferior to the drug monograph for overall information transfer, but superior for contingency planning. Aid usage was greater in the PIL arm, which may reflect greater student satisfaction with the tool.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for pain in hospice/palliative care: an international pharmacovigilance study.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the current, real-world use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for pain and the associated benefits and harms. METHODS: A prospective, multicentre, consecutive cohort pharmacovigilance study conducted at 14 sites across Australia, Aotearoa/New Zealand and the UK including hospital, hospice inpatient and outpatient services. Pain scores and harms were graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events at baseline, 2 days and 14 days. Ad-hoc safety reporting continued until day 28. RESULTS: Data were collected from 92 patients between March 2018 and October 2021. Most patients had cancer (91%) and were coprescribed opioids (90%). At 14 days, 83% of patients had benefit from non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and 22% had harm. The most common harms were nausea (8%), vomiting (3%), acute kidney injury (3%) and non-gastrointestinal bleeding (3%); only 2% were severe and no patients ceased their non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs due to toxicity. Overall, 65% had benefit without harm and 3% had harm without benefit. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients benefited from non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with only one in five patients experiencing tolerable harm. This suggests that short-term use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients receiving palliative care is safer than previously thought and may be underused.

Optimising interruptive clinical decision support alerts for antithrombotic duplicate prescribing in hospital.

INTRODUCTION: Duplicate prescribing clinical decision support alerts can prevent important prescribing errors but are frequently the cause of much alert fatigue. Stat dose prescriptions are a known reason for overriding these alerts. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of excluding stat dose prescriptions from duplicate prescribing alerts for antithrombotic medicines on alert burden, prescriber adherence, and prescribing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A before (January 1st, 2017 to August 31st, 2022) and after (October 5th, 2022 to September 30th, 2023) study was undertaken of antithrombotic duplicate prescribing alerts and prescribing following a change in alert settings. Alert and prescribing data for antithrombotic medicines were joined, processed, and analysed to compare alert rates, adherence, and prescribing. Alert burden was assessed as alerts per 100 prescriptions. Adherence was measured at the point of the alert as whether the prescriber accepted the alert and following the alert as whether a relevant prescription was ceased within an hour. Co-prescribing of antithrombotic stat dose prescriptions was assessed pre- and post-alert reconfiguration. RESULTS: Reconfiguration of the alerts reduced the alert rate by 29 % (p < 0.001). The proportion of alerts associated with cessation of antithrombotic duplication significantly increased (32.8 % to 44.5 %, p < 0.001). Adherence at the point of the alert increased 1.2 % (4.8 % to 6.0 %, p = 0.012) and 11.5 % (29.4 % to 40.9 %, p < 0.001) within one hour of the alert. When ceased after the alert over 80 % of duplicate prescriptions were ceased within 2 min of overriding. Antithrombotic stat dose co-prescribing was unchanged for 4 out of 5 antithrombotic duplication alert rules. CONCLUSION: By reconfiguring our antithrombotic duplicate prescribing alerts, we reduced alert burden and increased alert adherence. Many prescribers ceased duplicate prescribing within 2 min of alert override highlighting the importance of incorporating post-alert measures in accurately determining prescriber alert adherence.

Current pharmacological strategies for symptomatic reduction of persistent breathlessness - a literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Persistent breathlessness is a debilitating symptom that is prevalent in the community, particularly in people with chronic and life-limiting illnesses. Treatment includes different steps, including pharmacological treatment aiming to improve the symptom and optimize people's wellbeing. AREAS COVERED: PubMed and Google Scholar were screened using 'chronic breathlessness' OR 'persistent breathlessness,' AND 'pharmacological treatment,' OR 'opioids.' This review focuses on pharmacological treatments to reduce persistent breathlessness and discusses possible mechanisms involved in the process of breathlessness reduction through pharmacotherapy. Research gaps in the field of persistent breathlessness research are outlined, and future research directions are suggested. EXPERT OPINION: Regular, low-dose (≤30 mg/day), sustained-release morphine is recommended as the first-line pharmacological treatment for persistent breathlessness. Inter-individual variation in response needs to be investigated in future studies in order to optimize clinical outcomes. This includes 1) better understanding the centrally mediated mechanisms associated with persisting breathlessness and response to pharmacological therapies, 2) understanding benefit from the perspective of people experiencing persistent breathlessness, small and meaningful gains in physical activity.

Cyclizine pharmacovigilance in hospice/palliative care: net effects for nausea or vomiting.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the contemporary real-world use of cyclizine for nausea or vomiting, and the associated benefits and harms. METHODS: This was a prospective, consecutive case series of routine clinical use of cyclizine for nausea or vomiting in palliative care conducted across 19 sites in Australia, Aotearoa/New Zealand and the UK. Clinical outcomes were graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events at baseline and 72 hours after initiation of cyclizine. Ad hoc safety reporting continued for 2 weeks. RESULTS: Data were collected from 101 patients between May 2018 and December 2020. Cyclizine was mostly used in combination with another antiemetic. Overall, 79 patients benefited and 32 experienced harm (56 had benefit without harm; 9 had harm without benefit). The most common harms were constipation (13%), somnolence (9%) and confusion (7%), adding to the already high rates of these symptoms at baseline. For the four patients with serious harms (grade ≥3), these were exacerbations of existing symptoms. Nine patients stopped cyclizine at 72 hours and a further 20 patients within 2 weeks. The most common reasons for stopping were lack of benefit and symptom resolution; none stopped because of harms. CONCLUSIONS: When used as described in a palliative care setting, cyclizine benefits about three-quarters of patients, with about one-third experiencing tolerable harms.

Polypharmacy in Palliative Care: Two Deprescribing Tools Compared with a Clinical Review.

Background: Lack of guidance is highlighted as a barrier to deprescribing in palliative care. Two deprescribing tools exist, but with inclusion and exclusion criteria that limit utility. The tools have not previously been compared directly or used in an unselected palliative population. Objective: To compare the OncPal and STOPPFrail deprescribing tools to an expert review in an unselected palliative population. Secondary aims included a description of medicines incorrectly classified by both tools. Design: Fifty palliative inpatients were retrospectively reviewed by an expert panel, and both tools were independently applied to the patients. Positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were calculated per patient using the expert review as the gold standard. Results: The median number of medicines per patient was 11, with 19% of medicines deemed inappropriate. The PPV and NPV were 75% (interquartile range 50-100) and 91% (interquartile range 84-100), respectively, for OncPal, and 100% (interquartile range 50-100) and 90% (interquartile range 78-100), respectively, for STOPPFrail. There was no statistically significant difference between the tools (PPV p = 0.42 and NPV p = 0.07). The main medicines incorrectly ceased by OncPal were antianginals for stable coronary artery disease, and haloperidol for nausea by STOPPFrail. Conclusion: There was no significant difference between the tools. Both tools performed well in an unselected population. Some minor amendments could improve the PPV of both tools.

Cost-effectiveness of therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel disease.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is increasingly common, and results in significant morbidity. Traditional therapies include corticosteroids, aminosalicylates, thiopurines and methotrexate but in more recent years biologics have transformed the management of IBD. However, these agents come with a significant financial cost, making them unavailable for many patients worldwide. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is an important means to optimise clinical outcomes from pharmacotherapy. Recent studies have also focussed on the cost-effectiveness as an outcome of TDM. TDM of traditional therapies is principally mediated through improved disease control. Cost-savings from TDM of biologic therapies arises mainly from reduced pharmaceutical use with equitable clinical outcomes. This review considers the cost-effectiveness of TDM for IBD therapies, with a focus on recent research into biologic TDM.

Transitional cell carcinoma in the paediatric population: be aware of unusual aetiologies.

This is a case report of a 12 year old girl who presented with a rare condition in paediatrics, transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. It is important because it is readily treated by endoscopic means if diagnosed early. Potential aetiologies for this unusual condition are explored.