Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of a Water-Free Cyclosporine 0.1% Ophthalmic Solution for Treatment of Dry Eye Disease: ESSENCE-2 OLE.

PURPOSE: The ESSENCE-2 Open-Label Extension study aimed to demonstrate long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of a novel water-free, nonpreserved topical cyclosporine 0.1% ophthalmic solution (US brand name VEVYE) for patients with dry eye disease (DED). METHODS: This was a Phase 3, prospective, multicenter, open-label, clinical study. All patients received cyclosporine 0.1% ophthalmic solution and dosed each eye twice a day for 52 weeks. Primary safety end points were ocular and nonocular adverse events (AEs). Secondary safety end points included visual acuity, biomicroscopy, intraocular pressure, and dilated fundoscopy. Efficacy end points, such as total corneal fluorescein staining (tCFS) score (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scale), ocular symptoms (visual analog scale [VAS]), and Schirmer tear test, were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 202 patients were enrolled from the ESSENCE-2 study. At week 52, 175 patients (86.6%) completed ESSENCE-2 open-label extension. A total of 55 patients (27.5%) reported 74 ocular treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). The most common ocular AE was instillation site pain (6.5%), which was of mild intensity in all cases. Patients showed statistically significant improvements in all prespecified efficacy end points compared with baseline at each visit. Corneal staining improvements were early and stabilized over time while tear production improved continuously. Symptomatology improvement followed these effects with scores reaching a minimum after 1 year of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The water-free cyclosporine 0.1% ophthalmic solution was safe and well tolerated during long-term use. The results demonstrated sustained 1-year efficacy, in both signs and symptoms of DED, and may help understand short and long-term healing dynamics in a predominant inflammatory DED population.

Efficacy and Safety of a Water-Free Topical Cyclosporine, 0.1%, Solution for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Dry Eye Disease: The ESSENCE-2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Dry eye disease (DED) is a common public health problem with significant impact on vision-related quality of life and well-being of patients. Medications with rapid onset of action and a good tolerability profile remain an unmet need. Objective: To assess efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a water-free cyclosporine ophthalmic solution, 0.1% (CyclASol [Novaliq GmbH]), applied twice daily in DED compared with vehicle. Design, Setting, and Participants: CyclASol for the Treatment of Signs and Symptoms of Dry Eye Disease (ESSENCE-2) was a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, vehicle-controlled clinical study conducted from December 5, 2020, to October 8, 2021. Following a 14-day run-in period with an artificial tear administered 2 times per day, eligible participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to the treatment groups. Patients with moderate to severe DED were included in the study. Interventions: Cyclosporine solution vs vehicle administered 2 times per day for 29 days. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end points were changes from baseline in total corneal fluorescein staining (tCFS; 0-15 National Eye Institute scale) and in dryness score (0-100 visual analog scale) at day 29. Conjunctival staining, central corneal fluorescein staining, and tCFS responders were also assessed. Results: A total of 834 study participants were randomly assigned to cyclosporine (423 [50.7%]) or vehicle (411 [49.3%]) groups at 27 sites. Participants had a mean (SD) age of 57.1 (15.8) years, and 609 (73.0%) were female individuals. The majority of participants self-identified in the following race categories: 79 Asian (9.5 %), 108 Black (12.9%), and 635 White (76.1%). Participants treated with cyclosporine solution had greater improvement in tCFS (-4.0 grades) than the vehicle group (-3.6 grades) at day 29 (change [∆] = -0.4; 95% CI, -0.8 to 0; P = .03). The dryness score showed treatment benefits from baseline in both groups: -12.2 points for cyclosporine and -13.6 points for vehicle (∆ = 1.4; 95% CI, -1.8 to 4.6; P = .38). In the cyclosporine group, 293 participants (71.6%) achieved clinically meaningful reductions of 3 grades or higher in tCFS vs 236 (59.7%) in the vehicle group (∆ = 12.6%; 95% CI, 6.0%-19.3%; P < .001). These responders showed greater improvement in symptoms at day 29 including dryness (∆ = -4.6; 95% CI, -8.0 to -1.2; P = .007) and blurred vision (Δ = -3.5; 95% CI, -6.6 to -4.0; P = .03) compared with nonresponders. Conclusions and Relevance: The ESSENCE-2 trial confirmed that treatment with a water-free cyclosporine solution, 0.1%, results in early therapeutic effects on the ocular surface compared with vehicle. The responder analyses suggest that the effect is clinically meaningful in 71.6% of participants in the cyclosporine group. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04523129.

A Water-free 0.1% Cyclosporine A Solution for Treatment of Dry Eye Disease: Results of the Randomized Phase 2B/3 ESSENCE Study.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a topical water-free cyclosporine A formulation (CyclASol 0.1% ophthalmic solution) in comparison with vehicle for the treatment of dry eye disease (DED). METHODS: Three hundred twenty-eight patients were enrolled in this prospective, 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, confirmatory, vehicle-controlled clinical study. After a 2-week run-in period, eligible DED patients were randomized 1:1 to either CyclASol 0.1% or vehicle twice daily. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline in total corneal fluorescein staining (National Eye Institute scale), and the second hierarchical primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline in the Ocular Surface Disease Index score, both at 4 weeks. Secondary efficacy and safety assessments included conjunctival lissamine green staining (Oxford scale), visual analog scales for dry eye symptoms, and adverse event. RESULTS: Treatment with CyclASol 0.1% was superior to vehicle in the primary endpoint: total corneal fluorescein staining at week 4 (Δ -0.8; 95% confidence interval, -1.3 to -0.4; P = 0.0002, analysis of covariance). This difference had already reached statistical significance after 2 weeks and was maintained throughout the study. The study did not statistically meet its second hierarchically tested primary endpoint: Ocular Surface Disease Index score (P = 0.2634). However, CyclASol 0.1% treatment showed statistically significant improvement compared with that of vehicle in the eye dryness score at week 4 (Δ -4.783; 95% confidence interval, -9.129 to -0.438; P = 0.0311). CONCLUSIONS: CyclASol 0.1% was effective in treating signs and symptoms of DED. It significantly reduced corneal and conjunctival staining and improved ocular dryness compared with vehicle. CyclASol 0.1% was safe and showed excellent tolerability.